Inainda Kaigal (1990) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
One hero is a Muscle man, but the other is not.
chinth18 September 2007
I watched the Tamil film "Ineinda Kigali (Fixed hands)" at the theater. When I got to watch "Aakhri sangran"(final battle) {the name should be corrected), I realized that this is the Hindi dubbed version of the above Tamil film. Same actors, same scenes, different language and different character names (Sathish in Tamil: Prathab in Hindi). Absolutely this is an action packed adventure. But in two hero movie the director must avoid the exhibition of one actor's weakness over other. Leading hero Ramki, as many other Tamil actors, is not a man with perfect muscle built body. The supporting hero Arun Pandian, is a strong tough guy with muscle filled physique. There are very little number of strong men in Tamil films such as Arjun, Sarath Kumar, etc. In the scenes with bare arms, we see the difference of these two men. in the scene that two men catch their hands with friendship in the train, Arun's jerkin sleeve is stretched as his muscles stretch. Nothing happens to Ramki's sleeve. Director should avoid such incidents when south Asian fans are appreciating well built strong heroes. (such as Hindi and Hollywood films) Acting is well done. Ramki's actions when he steals the statue is super. The story is nicely managed. The villain amputates his own leg to save the life. In the combat scenes, it is again shown that Arun is a good fighter with martial art skills than Ramki. In the scene of cliff climb, Arun takes the lead. It is reasonable up to some extent because Arun (David) is a well trained army major while Ramki (Prathab) is a bandit. This is a very good film. If this weakness was not there, it would be better.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed