Madness and Genius (2003) User Reviews

great film great future

[coalandswitches · 8/10 · 28 March 2005]

Ryan is a great young filmmaker. I have seen hundreds of professional reels and shorts and while there are lots of talented filmmakers out there; Eslinger is the real deal.

It's rare that a young person can take such a small amount of money and make a successful film, so many things can go badly wrong. Madness and Genius is a good movie that stays with you. Tom Noonan is great and while I don't disagree about the poor supporting cast the technical aspects of the film are top notch.

Another thing to note: Ryan must be a focused young man because this movie is 'tight'. It feels like a testament to someone who spent their money carefully and put a LOT of time into this project. See it if you can (not sure how) and let people know it's a great movie.

wait for (one hopes) the big budget remake

[ThurstonHunger · 4/10 · 8 March 2004]

After scanning all of the promotional write-ups of films at Cinequest 2004, this was the one to which I gave the highest hopeful rating. In fact, I even talked two friends into joining me in seeing "Madness and Genius."

The good news is that they both enjoyed it. I however, did not have my expectations met. I'd say wait till the director gets some more funding, more secondary ideas and more experience to remake this film later.

To be sure, Tom Noonan delivered big time. He was a big part of my anticipation of this film. His portrayal of a scientist/professor was always captivating. From the physical (how he clutched after a pen that was rolling off a desk, and even how he lurched around town) to the more complex (he's very believable as someone who seems to be socially cut-off from his surroundings, but from time to time drops in a comment of crystal clarity).

The other actors (with the exception of the department chair) just were not up to the task. Too often a scene had *one* thing going on, visually or in the dialog. More distractions on the sides will make for a more believable film, as well as help smooth over the scientific underpinnings. And more two-shots too!

It was shot in black and white high definition video, and the director in a very short post-film discussion (it was late for many, just after 11 pm) mentioned that he just could not afford the color stock. This was news to me, I had no idea there was a cost differential (nor did my two friends, one who has made some amateur films himself). Still for $20K, this was a pretty solid first effort.

This film toys with many interesting ideas, indeed it is the finest anti-recruitment film for college I've seen yet. In some ways, college and its place in our lives really needs to be examined more. Several times actors in this ask, "Why are you here," to our young villain.

I only hope that when, not if, this gets remade by a larger production company, they will make sure Noonan gets to reprise his role as Professor Donovan.

4/10

One last weird note, I was going to try and check a hunch whether writer/director Ryan Eslinger dropped out of college, and I came across another young man of the same name, with his own bout with "Madness."

http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Jul/07172003/Utah/76039.asp

Glad that filmmaker Ryan was able to take his bleak views and create art out of them.

Eslinger's a good guy

[FilmSchoolLegend · 14 August 2004]

I have not seen the movie, but to answer the question of the previous reviewer. I knew Eslinger since our freshman year at NYU. He graduated college in only 3 years. This film was shot in only a couple of weeks during the summer of 2002 (between his sophomore and junior years), as Noonan's schedule and Eslinger's bank account permitted. The film was financed out of Eslinger's own pocket and he did all of the editing himself.

Eslinger was nominated for a grant from the Independent Spirit awards as a "Filmmaker to Look Out For." I hope to see Eslinger making more good films, because I have seen his previous work as a student and he obviously show some sort of promise with this first feature effort.