"American Experience" The Johnstown Flood (TV Episode 1991) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Day The Dam Broke.
rmax3048239 December 2015
The version shown on American Experience is an expanded version of the original. It's not narrated by Richard Dreyfus.

This is an expansion of an award-winning documentary made for the Flood Museum at Johnstown, Pennsylvania, a small town devastated when a dam above the community failed and a sixty-foot wall of water and debris demolished Johnstown. The narrator, David McCoullough grew up in the area and heard stories of the disaster when he was a child. And so did my immigrant grandmother, who occasionally brought the subject up, although as a child I had no idea of what she was talking about.

The disaster was not a force majeur, like a tornado. The cause of the failure was the neglect of the dam itself, which had created a lake for local sportsmen, The South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club. Nobody seemed to care much about public safety then and we seem at the moment sometimes to be edging our way into that same Lotus Eater's paradise.

By 1889 Johnstown was a smoky industrial city of 30,000 people, mostly recent Welsh and German immigrants. The employed worked ten and twelve hour days, six days a week and sometimes seven, at the Cambria Steel Plant, producing rails, plowshares, and barbed wire. It was crowded, smoky, and poor. That was the norm at the time, and people were glad to have jobs. And things in Johnstown were improving: seventy-two telephones, electricity, a hospital, a newspaper, an opera house.

Everyday life was different at the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club, fourteen miles up the river, whose members include people with names like Frick, Mellon, and Carnegie. The three-story, fifty-room mansions were their "cottages," used as retreats from the streets of Pittsburgh on weekends and summers, only two hours away from the city by rail. On summer afternoons there might be several dozen sails on the lake. Servants were hired from the town five hundred feet below and fourteen miles away. The dam was part of the club's property. It had passed through the hands of several owners who had done nothing to maintain it and who had, in fact, removed some discharge pipes and sold them for scrap, meaning the lake could never be drained.. Subsequently, the club itself had shave three feet from the top of the dam to allow the passage of horse and carriage. There were spillways at both sides of the dam, so that if the water should rise high enough, it wouldn't put too much pressure on the dam itself, but the spillways had been neglected and were clogged with boulders and fallen timber. Lovers considered it a romantic place to meet. For the most part, no one in the Club thought about the dam.

In Johnstown, the owner of the largest steel mill in town, the Cambria Iron Works, was concerned and sent some of his team to inspect the dam. The team's geologist, Fulton, returned thinking that "the dam was an accident waiting to happen." The Iron Works sent a letter to the Club proposing repairs to the dam and offering to share the expenses. The Club's manager dismissed the suggestion as mistaken and coming from "you and your people." On May 31st of 1889, a torrent of rain fell. Johnstown's streets became rivers, sweeping away cows. Streams appeared where no streams had been before. Eight inches of rain fell. Nobody had seen anything like it. And the lake was rising two inches each hour, despite efforts of the club's superintendent to raise the dam's height and clear its spillways of debris. At three in the afternoon the dam broke. It caused no damage to South Fork, which was on the side of a hill. It took ten minutes to sweep away the center of Johnstown. Two thousand, two hundred and twenty two men, women, and children were dead. One third of the bodies had been battered beyond recognition. What had destroyed the town was not just a wall of water but a huge wave mixed with bits and pieces of iron, wood, barbed ware, and other debris it had picked up in its fourteen miles journey.

Some residents left but most remained to rebuild the town. Indeed there was help sent from around the nation. Seven thousand pairs of shoes, for instance. Clara Barton stayed for five months, building a Red Cross hospital and doing other public services. The South Fork Hunting and Fishing Club was sued but no damages were ever awarded.

This program is a pretty good summary. It's in black and white and skillfully blends period photographs with black and white reenactments. For those more interested in the details there are several popular books available.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A good documentary but not angry enough
Katz512 December 2005
The story of the horrible 1889 Johnstown flood is even more timely now, coming in the wake of what happened in New Orleans and the gulf states in 2005. There have been many books about the Johnstown floods (and there have been more than one---the 1889 was the worst one in terms of damage and casualties, however. The town was basically wiped out). These books discuss in great detail the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club up the river, whose members were Carnegie and Mellon and other millionaires. The members of the South Fork Fishing and Hunting club were told for years that without an adequate spillway (and this documentary discusses this, to a point), the lake could reach dangerous levels. These warnings, made by engineers, were written off. Folks in Johnstown heard for years that the dam would break, and the idea took on mythical proportions....people who claimed that were "crying wolf," so to speak. The dam did give way, causing a wrath of destruction and creating a true hell on Earth at the Stone Bridge in Johnstown, when debris caught fire. These events are depicted in this documentary and will cause your jaw to drop....how can something like that happen in "a civilized world?" This documentary never discusses the outcome of the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club members---just a comment about how no lawsuits were brought forth. The newspapers, many of which had shares owned by the members, were relatively easy on the members. That's not to say they were completely at fault. The citizens should have heeded the warnings. But this, like the Titanic tragedy, is a classic case of rich vs. the poor or less fortunate (and not every resident of Johnstown was poor--but compared to the Pittsburgh wealthy who were members of the club, they were). I'm surprised that Hollywood has not created a 'Titanic'-like film based on this horrible event.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Depressing but very well made.
planktonrules24 September 2011
It's rather surprising that most people today have never heard about the Johnstown Flood--even though it was a huge disaster that killed several thousand unsuspecting people. It seems that the rich folks living in the region wanted a resort lake for fishing, so they created a huge earthwork dam and for some time no one thought much about this new lake. However, after a particularly hard rain, the earthworks began to crumble and soon the entire lake--located high in the mountains--came tumbling down onto the villages below.

Like so many of the PBS documentaries, this one consists of a narrator (Richard Dreyfuss), photos, engravings and actors recreating people who went through this horrible ordeal. Because it occurred about a decade before movies were created, no stock footage was available--though vintage footage of other floods was used here and there to supplement the available material. It's actually interesting, because there really WASN'T that much available material and so this new footage and the recreations really helped to tell the story.

I loved this very depressing documentary. I noticed another reviewer also liked it but was upset that the film spent little time talking about the culpability of the industrialists in the accident and their escaping responsibility for the disaster. I would have to agree, as the film did seem to gloss over this. Still, it was very well made and compelling. It's hard to imagine watching this and not being affected. Well done.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An Adequate Introduction
Lechuguilla18 June 2005
In this 64 minute documentary, still photos, drawings, illustrations, and dramatic reenactments constitute the visuals, while a voice-over (VO) describes and explains the particulars of the disaster, which occurred in 1889. Knowing next to nothing about this event, I found the film to be a fairly good introduction.

When watching any documentary I prefer as many facts as possible. "Johnstown Flood" provides enough factual information to make the film worthwhile. I especially liked the liberal use of maps, because they help to orient the viewer, and provide a sense of direction.

But, I could have done without the reenactments, which consisted of actors, dressed in period costumes, engaged in brief dramatic scenes. I found this element to be unnecessary, somewhat hokey, and devoid of useful facts. Further, the VO script becomes terribly melodramatic, at times. For example, with violins playing funereal background music, the narrator tells us: "From the banks many charred remains of victims were plainly visible to the naked eye as the retreating waters reluctantly gave up their dead. Beneath almost every log or blackened beam a glistening skull or the scorched remnants of ribs or limbs marked all that remained of life's hopes and dreams."

The reenactments and the melodramatic script aside, "Johnstown Flood" is an adequate overview of this long ago tragedy. If the viewer wants to research the event in more detail, there are plenty of sources available, including books, videos, and the historical society in the city of Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Powerful but one Constructive Critique
tmtndu21 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
My wife, Lisa, and I viewed this film on May 20, 2021 at the Flood Memorial. The re-enactment of the flood waters conveys perfectly the sudden catastrophe; however, the Narrator's dialogue is totally misplaced as he "tours" the cemetery, etc. It detracted from an otherwise solemn subject. More could have been said @ whether South Fork Club members were culpable.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Two different documentaries!
diane-thill10 January 2021
There is some confusion on this page, which promotes this documentary, narrated by Richard Dreyfus, and the award winning 1988/89 film directed by Charles Guggenheim. They are two completely different films! And should not be confused. The American Experience episode about the Johnstown Flood was an expanded version of the Guggenheim film, hosted by David McCullough, and narrated, not by Richard Dreyfus, but actor Len Cariou. This expanded version includes vintage photographs of the cottages, clubhouse, and the lake itself taken by the son of one of its prominent members - Lewis Clarke, a gifted amateur photographer.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Power is the Story, Not This Film
Michael_Elliott7 February 2012
The American Experience: Johnstown Flood (1993)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Richard Dreyfuss narrates this documentary covering the tragic day of May 31, 1889 when the town of Johnstown, Pennsylvania was crippled by a massive flood when the South Fork Dam burst and the end result had towns completely destroyed and a death toll of 2,200 or more. Considering how tragic this event was it's really a wonder why more people haven't heard of it. I'm not sure if it was just so tragic that time has tried to forget it but considering the damage and the number of deaths it seems like the event would be better remembered today. Considering how horrifying and harrowing the events are, it doesn't really take much for you to get caught up in the story and the sadness and Dreyfuss does a very good job with his part as narrator. The main problem I had with the movie was the way it was shot with some extremely silly actors playing people and telling "their" stories. I found these sequences to be poorly shot and it really took away from the actual story. Nothing we're told from these people really adds up or hits you with too much simply because of how poorly stages the scenes are and some of the performances are rather silly. It's really too bad these scenes take away from the overall story so with that in mind there's no question that you need another documentary. Throughout the horror and shock of the actual event, it was refreshing seeing how the entire country came together to raise money, food and make sure that those who needed help got it. We have seen this several time in America's history.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed