Caution - May contain Spoilers
This film (somewhat ineptly) deals with a self-destructive trend among a certain segment of the gay population. Known as Bug-Chasers and Gift-Givers these are the men that knowingly attempt to spread the HIV virus. As warped as this may seem this is a real situation that needs to be acknowledged and addressed.
One bug chaser interviewed in the movie was a young man living in L.A. (identified as Kenboy) who had a sense of doom about getting the HIV virus. His logic (which I could not follow) was that if only he could get the virus, he could stop worrying about becoming infected. By the end of the film he has thrown a "conversion party" and achieved his objective. Now that he's tested positive he's not following any drug therapies and is still having unprotected sex with all comers. (I kept asking myself, why was he so scared of testing positive if he was going to do nothing differently afterwards? It's like a man being so afraid of the water that he's compelled to drown himself.)
Another young man interviewed describes how he made "the worst decision of my life" and decided to have unprotected sex with a man he knew to be positive so that he could stop worrying about using condoms and start having carefree sex. He describes how once he made his decision, how popular he became, how nice it was fit in for a time, and how worried he now is about the realities of the situation.
The film also interviews men who throw "bare backing" parties for sero-positive (HIV infected) men and describes their attitude. Most of these men discount the theories that there are actually different strains of the virus and one HIV positive man may well give his virus to another HIV positive man only to hasten (or cause) the man's death because his partner is more vulnerable to the new strain he receives.
There is also a group of older gay men who are all HIV positive, and who have formed a support group to discuss the many unhealthy side affects (particularly serious heart problems) that taking the current anti-HIV medications entail.
This group criticizes the advertisements for these medications and the current forms of safe sex ads as promoting the idea that HIV is not as serious as it truly is. They assert that the gay community, in an attempt to be "politically correct" and not offend those that are HIV positive, underplays the truly catastrophic seriousness of becoming HIV positive. They suggest that many young men who are practicing unsafe sex today are doing so because we have somehow put out the message that it's no big deal becoming positive.
Overall I found this film to be very important but I wish it could have been better crafted. It seemed very preachy and over-long and I heard several folks in the lobby discounting its all too important message on the pretext that it was a propaganda movie.
This film (somewhat ineptly) deals with a self-destructive trend among a certain segment of the gay population. Known as Bug-Chasers and Gift-Givers these are the men that knowingly attempt to spread the HIV virus. As warped as this may seem this is a real situation that needs to be acknowledged and addressed.
One bug chaser interviewed in the movie was a young man living in L.A. (identified as Kenboy) who had a sense of doom about getting the HIV virus. His logic (which I could not follow) was that if only he could get the virus, he could stop worrying about becoming infected. By the end of the film he has thrown a "conversion party" and achieved his objective. Now that he's tested positive he's not following any drug therapies and is still having unprotected sex with all comers. (I kept asking myself, why was he so scared of testing positive if he was going to do nothing differently afterwards? It's like a man being so afraid of the water that he's compelled to drown himself.)
Another young man interviewed describes how he made "the worst decision of my life" and decided to have unprotected sex with a man he knew to be positive so that he could stop worrying about using condoms and start having carefree sex. He describes how once he made his decision, how popular he became, how nice it was fit in for a time, and how worried he now is about the realities of the situation.
The film also interviews men who throw "bare backing" parties for sero-positive (HIV infected) men and describes their attitude. Most of these men discount the theories that there are actually different strains of the virus and one HIV positive man may well give his virus to another HIV positive man only to hasten (or cause) the man's death because his partner is more vulnerable to the new strain he receives.
There is also a group of older gay men who are all HIV positive, and who have formed a support group to discuss the many unhealthy side affects (particularly serious heart problems) that taking the current anti-HIV medications entail.
This group criticizes the advertisements for these medications and the current forms of safe sex ads as promoting the idea that HIV is not as serious as it truly is. They assert that the gay community, in an attempt to be "politically correct" and not offend those that are HIV positive, underplays the truly catastrophic seriousness of becoming HIV positive. They suggest that many young men who are practicing unsafe sex today are doing so because we have somehow put out the message that it's no big deal becoming positive.
Overall I found this film to be very important but I wish it could have been better crafted. It seemed very preachy and over-long and I heard several folks in the lobby discounting its all too important message on the pretext that it was a propaganda movie.