2 reviews
I bought the SILO KILLER dvd for a buck. Thank god I didn't pay more for it. The "film" was unsuccessful but my expectations were so low and the film was so obviously played for fun that it seems pointless to critique it with a massive review. Suffice it to say, everything about it was way below average, certainly the "acting" which was at times painfully bad to watch (the guy in the suit was the worst of the entire non-acting bunch). But the camerawok was sometimes interesting and there were some good locations here and there. It's a shame they didn't even try to make something worthwhile with the resources they had instead of creating what basically amounts to a big (unfunny) joke they created on a weekend with a couple of video cameras. It's hard to believe it was even released to an unsuspecting public. Is there a market for home-made movies on dvd these days?
- Maciste_Brother
- Jul 21, 2003
- Permalink
This is the time when I'd like to see IMDb have a 0 rating system. I can understand the producers (if you can call them that) making something due to a low budget, but this must have been a no budget. It's neither funny or scary, just cheap and gross with the worst of the worst cast. I understand that it wasn't intended to be or look like a movie with an actual budget but I see absolutely nothing worth watching about this film. I've seen better videos on YouTube that was shot with a cell phone or webcams of animals. The worst part is that they "try" to be funny and no one is the least bit. There are a lot of watchable and slightly entertaining comedy-horror movies but this is plain stupid, kiddish and boring. I'd be embarrassed to put my name or even my dog's name on this junk pile much less my real name. It's just horribly unwatchable because you won't laugh, you won't jump but you might get a headache from rolling your eyes and being annoyed. If Elvis were alive he wouldn't just shoot out the TV, he'd burn down Graceland or pull the trigger on himself.