Occident (2002) Poster

(2002)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Mind boggling!
DanDV29 August 2003
I never expected a Romanian film to be so "occidental"!

Yes, I'm a young movie fan, but Romanian films (or at least those that I've seen) just have that characteristic awkwardness which make them look like second-class movies.

Well, Occident is different. It's radically different. It's different even from those American movies which had set the standards, but up to par with any of them.

Occident is strongly non-linear, and you wonder whether the familiar scene you're seeing is a similar one or a remembrance. Occident is fascinating, intriguing, even mind-boggling, and it doesn't make use of any Romania-specific jokes. So, if you're not Romanian, it's no problem. Occident is universal. And, quite a rare thing, Occident is worth seeing again. And again. And again.
24 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
better than '4-3-2'?
dromasca25 May 2008
My friends in Bucharest recommended this film: 'you must see it, it's better than 4-3-2'. 4-3-2 is the short for '4 months, 3 weeks and 2 days', the film that made director Cristian Mungiu known in the West and brought him a 'Palme d'Or' in Cannes exactly one year ago. I tend to agree, but I would add 'yes, better, but mostly for Romanian viewers'.

'Occident' deals with what has been in Communist Romania a national obsession and what became today a national and social phenomenon - the aspiration of the young generation to run away from a country where they cannot build a decent life and the mirage of the Occident. The story happens in the year 2000 and is told three times, from three different angles belonging each to a pair of characters, each time changing the perspective and revealing new angles of the story, changing its sense and even its ending. It is a smart story, in a style much more nervous than '4-3-2' which had a linear story telling, with long scenes giving the actors better opportunities for deeper performances.

And yet 'Occident' tells a lot of harsh truths about the Romanian society, about its corruption, emptiness, lack of education. All these will be much better understood by Romanian viewers however. It is also a different time, the characters in 'Occident' may be desperate to run away, but the difference is that they can do it, while '4-3-2' characters have no place to run. This may be one of the reasons that '4-3-2' impressed more viewers out of Romania. What happened in the last years of the dictatorship of Nicolae Ceausescu was criminal and may be shocking for less initiated viewers, but is by no means news for most of the Romanians, excepting the very young ones. Ceausescu still sells better even after his death.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A bittersweet tale on chance and yearning
eLSydeoN15 January 2013
Lucian is a 29 year old botanist whose financial security is threatened after his job gets cut. After finding himself evicted from his old apartment, his practical girlfriend is unwilling to accept his proposition to move in with his elderly aunt and himself and starts seeking solace in the company of an older foreigner about to return to France. Mihaela is a 24 year old romantic idealist and aspiring poetess who after being stood up at the altar has to reluctantly accept her willful mother's attempts at finding her a well-off foreigner suitor. "The colonel", a retiring police officer and Mihaela's father is approached by a Romanian expat to assist with breaking the news of the death of one of his friends, all the while trying to avert his daughter's ill-suited wooer.

The three stories in the film, although clearly delineated, are closely intertwined and interdependent, and its strings often blend seamlessly and fluently into one another. Showing signs of Kieslowski (imagery), Tarr (multi-perspective narrative structure) and Wong (theme of failed connections and longing), "Occident" holds a strong grip and deliberate pace on its three plots, gradually revealing more layers of each of its three protagonists, and often amending previously shown events through its crafty fragmented narrative.

Cristian Mungiu's first feature directorial effort paints a bittersweet picture on the transitional period of Romania a decade after the fall of the communist regime, most acutely marked by the large-scale brain-drain occurring after the late 90s recession. Frequently underscored by a popular local hit from the 70s, "Noi in anul 2000" ("We, in the year 2000"), whose youthful, innocently hopeful lyrics create a feeling of melancholy and forlornness when contrasted with the bleakness and ennui of contemporary adulthood in Romania, the film approaches themes of chance, displacement and longing. Allured by the mirage of an idealized West full of opportunity for a better life, the characters in the film are in pursuit of an ever elusive happiness, narrowly missing their chance and failing to reach a meaningful connection.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A realistic, bitter sweet rendition of what life in Romania is for young people without money and/or connections.
bikerc6 October 2003
A beautiful story about time, coincidences and happenstance. Three stories intertwine and characters influence one another's life without ever knowing it. Excellent and convincing performances from both veteran actors and newcomers. Even though it made me laugh a lot, after I finished watching it didn't taste like a comedy, but more like a sad love story. And even though love doesn't conquer all (love between man and woman, love between friends, love for one's country), the story doesn't feel hopeless and bleak, not even once. A must-see for anyone interested in Eastern European productions.

PS: The version I saw had English subtitles, but they were sometimes incomplete and a couple of times rather badly translated. I felt they didn't do their best to do justice to the lines.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Splendid
tributarystu15 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I've started widening my perspective on the world, on people and, ultimately, concerning the movies. I used to think, as too many kids my age still do, that Romanian movies can't be good. It's something "our" generation thinks of because we are all thinking of moving abroad, of getting away from this, in the end, beautiful country. The country itself is beautiful, it's our actions that destroy it and make our lives miserable. This movie is a so called comedy. It's a comedy exactly in the style of Filantropica, a comedy that makes you feel a very deep sorrow, especially if you are Romanian and understand everything as it is. It's a superbly done movie and I dare to say it's better than Filantropica. Quite a lot better. The story in itself is deeper than the one in Filantropica and, what is very important, Cristian Mungiu has an incredibly geniuine way of bringing his ideas to the screen.

SPOILERS

The story has a main plot which is composed of three secondary plots. Each part brings important new elements and it would be impossible to watch only one and know how the movie will end. So the three stories each focus on two characters, but in the end they all focus on the leading actor, Alexandru Papodopol, whose character's name is Luci. He comes out as the biggest loser out of the whole story. Not only does he waste his relationship with his almost to-be-wife, but he also ignores the affections of young "co-worker" Mihaela.

The first thing that I noticed in the movie is the ironic touch of the director. For example, the number of the car which Gica(the role of the typical friend) is B 63 PCR. PCR,in Romanian, has two meanings. One regards the old communist party, and the other sounds something like "Bribes, Corruption and Relations". At the moment, this is one of the biggest problems there are around here, and it is also something which we can observe during the movie. For example the way Luci got his job from his employer, who knew the director of a kindergarten, the one at which Luci's wife worked for some time. I personally believe, after seeing the whole movie ,that the relations between the employer and the teacher were something more than "friendly", if you understand what I want to say.

Then again, the "Corruption" idea is present as the colonel offers some money to one of the police officers who were present at his house and saw the Italian who was black(something totally unexpected). "Relations" are also present: the way the colonel is found by Nae and the way he gets Nae to take his girl with him to Germany.

This idea being settled I want to mention a few more things I noticed during the film. An important scene is the one where Nae wants to take a grape, or some fruit, and finds out it's only decorative. It shows something about the society of our days, a society often criticized by great Romanian writers like the brilliant Caragiale or by the critic and novel writer(well, not only...) G. Calinescu. It's the fact that the whole society is very superficial and much too often priorities get all mixed up, which sometimes leads to disasters. Money is often too important and there is always a lust for more. The situation presented in Occident just made me think of a recent book I read by Calinescu, about these superficial people who do not care about feelings but only about all the material, and actually not lasting, things.

An important theme which the movie wants to point at is the mentality which rules among the young generations, the idea of moving abroad as soon as possible, because Romania has nothing to offer. This is, of course, not true, maybe partly, but certainly not totally. It will take time until people will learn to keep in mind where they grew up and remember to come back. At this time, it happens much to rare.

The characters are partly interesting. As I said, Luci is the loser. He is a little shy, but he does stand up for himself and knows right from wrong.

On the other hand, Sorina, his "girlfriend", is a person obsessed by the thought of getting out of Romania. Unfortunately I didn't really like the actress who performed her role. It seemed just too distant...even more distant than it should've... Mihaela is another desperate person, who suffers especially because of...love. It's something we all suffer of from time to time, but her situation is a little more desperate. After being dumped, in a way, at her wedding she is, of course, very depressed. By meeting Luci she starts hoping that there might be a chance, but Luci doesn't cease the moment and so Mihaela is forced to...act. She is also a poem writer...which is something we all are. I guess everyone has a period when they write poems, and some dream of winning something from it, others just want it to be there. It does show about her character, how much she lives for a dream. "The cop" is something like the immoral man who doesn't care about the time any more. He betrays his wife, and, sincerely speaking, I can't blame him, but one has to accept some moral duties. His police forces is absolutely pathetic and this is another touch of the director, who wishes to make fun of the cops, who are often considered stupid. I personally can't say if it's true or not, but it seems that many people agree to this theory...sooo... As a kind of sub-character is the landlord at the tenement where Luci was living, that is before he got kicked out. The typical "smart guy", who knows everything but always needs to big monkeys around him to be able to say anything.

Each time a story ends you expect to know what happens, but as the next one develops you can understand the under-layers of the whole plot and things come smoothly together. It's always a cliff-hanger somewhere and the plot does have some 180 degree turns. If there's something which bothered me, it's the two kids spitting at each other. It's not the fact in itself, but it is the idea that one of them looks so much like a gipsy, and I consider that a small discrimination. Yes, you might say "Hey, it's only a comedy" but, let's be sincere: would you call this movie a comedy just because it brings a few laughs and it is ironic and shows some beautiful satire of Romanian life?

There was some handy camerawork too, but it wasn't as if I hadn't seen it anywhere before. "Occident" is a movie which looks like a western made movie, if we consider the scenario and the way the action is presented. One might compare it to Pulp Fiction, because of the way the story is shown, but I think there is a certain difference between the two. It is a beautiful piece of art and it shows that there are Romanian directors and actors who can do a great job as well as all the American actors and directors. Of course, I won't start comparing with "classics", but I'm referring to some certain well known persons. Doesn't matter really who.

Also...this is a movie about the ironies of life. Just in case you didn't notice. The sometimes cruel ironies of life: the way the lives of the characters cross. By the way, I remember the beautiful beginning with the train rails, which crossed each other. Great "touch".

Compared to Filantropica...yes, it's certainly better. It's more real than Filantropica, it's easier to imagine it's...just as it should be.

About the mark...yes, I thought quite some time about it. It's a certain 8.5 I'd say now. I can't really say that it is more towards 8...but still, it remains to your choice. Just try and get this movie. It's worth it! "Free your mind"
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Greatest black comedy I have ever seen, besides American Beauty
anandamoyi-130 September 2002
The movie achieved great success in Cannes festival. The greatest thing about it is the natural way of showing different stories around the same characters. Everyone could identify with one character in the movie. It is sad, showing that Romania is a country everyone wants to leave, seeking for a better life in Occident. Yet, the main character does not leave, not because he does not want to, but because he has nothing to do abroad. The movie shows different experiences from the point of view of each character. The end is unexpected, the further life of characters is unknown, you may imagine they succeeded abroad or not. Occident is not a social movie but a comedy, even if a black one, about people's goals, hopes, dreams. It does not want to emphasize the poverty in Romania, because it shows only the life of a certain group of people, which do not represent the entire Romanian nation. The team that made this movie is great, the director, the actors, the script, everything is great about this movie. This movie will change you, will make you wonder about things you never thought before.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A funny and sad story from Romania.
Sampparound4 February 2003
This is worth seeing for being from Romania alone, but also it´s a good movie. It takes place in present day Romania and over a few days you follow Nae and Sorina around in everyday events. In a "Short cuts" kind of way you first meet a this couple, and people they encounter and interact with are the people we follow around in the next part. In all you get to see the same events from three different angles which makes an interesting whole. Like in everyday day life, there are both sad and happy occurrences, that shows us that life is not black nor white. It´s partly based on the true stories that the director collected while working as a journalist, and partly based on his own and his friends experiences, which makes this movie very believable.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
romanian style pulp fiction
alexbrie27 January 2003
I really liked this movie, I laughed most part of it, although it isn't a real comedy, but rather a drama. Yet, Ioan Gyuri Pascu makes a really funny role as the typical friend, neighbour and jack of all trades. All in all, the movie's charm is based on the way we get various pieces of information during each of its episodes, and we make up a story of our own, only to discover in the next episode of the film that it wasn't entirely true; most like in "Memento", or "Pulp Fiction", but in a stronger way, as we have here more different stories to follow, mix and clue together (similar to "E pericoloso sporgersi). Each episode shows us the same line of action, but with other details each time. The various pieces of information link one with the other only to show us that we are much too used to drawing conclusions of our own, without waiting to hear the narrator's. If you have the opportunity, go watch the movie. Although it is funnier for romanian people, the more likely to get the jokes and irony regarding everyday's life, it is entertaining as well for foreigners, due to the simple and amusing stories. "Occident" is riding the same wave as "Filantropica"; we hope to see some more good romanian cinema in the future as witty, ironic, sparkling and amusing as those ones.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Visan is like the wine in this movie again
liancu27 September 2005
I like this movie, I like its construction, a blurred image that becomes clearer. Visan is like the wine in this movie, it has something inside him magic, a another dimension. More it gets older better he is. Hope so see more other movies of this quality. Congratulations for the "mise en scene". The rest of the actors are good enough as well. The context, if you are not Romanian, harder to be understood and felt like a Romanian could feel. I've spend a nice evening watching this, it is something different from the Hollywood dozen movies that are winning Oscars. It is real art and real art should stay in time, I hope that one day those movies would be easier to be found and seen on numeric format. It deserves an A++ for sure.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
For Romanians only?
Tarsitius3 May 2010
If you are Romanian, Ex-Romanian, if you live or have lived in Eastern Europe behind the Iron Curtain, if you want to emigrate to the West, then you might suck up every detail of the film and find it good.

If not, like me, you could fall into sleep already within the 15 first minutes already, wake up later on and try desperately to find a clue. Occasionally you have to smile a bit, because the film is not that bad. It will however be funnier for you to compare Romanian with Italian or Latin expressions: 'Politia' is written on the police car, for instance.

This film consists mainly of views towards faces of speaking persons. The most sensational scene is the arrest of a thief by a police squadron. A dinner at McDonald's is also a special event. A ride and a discussion in the BMW of a temporary repatriate is another highlight.

The cinema director informed the spare audience that it was hard to get a preview and a copy. Not on DVD and to be ordered directly from the film director in Bucharest. So why has this film found no distributor abroad? Because no one would go to watch it there.
1 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
cinnamon taste
Vincentiu28 November 2012
like many films of new Romanian wave, it is a picture. picture of a country.reflections of a people existence. a film about price of basic things and nuances of feelings. about meetings, expectations, hope and values. so, a kind of window. nothing more. it is difficult to write a review about this part of a not small chain. because it is not beautiful or impressive or sad. it is not a subject of meditation or basket with nice images. it is only little piece from a broken reality. gray, cruel, without profound sense, passive, prey of a form of Bovarism. nothing more. a game with nuances in which words are bones of silence. a testimony. like many others Romanian films. and search of beginning. or only drawing of them.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Romania
Kirpianuscus31 December 2018
A chain of stories. Impecable portrait of characters. Bitter humor. Ways of survive. And the choices defining different situations. A honest, realistic portrait of Romanian realities. Seductive for inspired performances, for the exploration of cliches and for the science to propose only events , determining the viewer to build his conclusion. Young people. Solutions . Their parents. And small circles of survive , fake succes or appearences as refuges.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed