The Erotic Mirror (Video 2002) Poster

(2002 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Great for Laurie Wallace fans.
Li-11 January 2005
Rating as a soft-core film: B

The Erotic Mirror has much the same problem as most Surrender Cinema productions, it's poorly filmed, poorly lit, badly acted, and the sound is barely audible. But this is a soft-core film, where the only thing that matters is whether or not the sex is titillating and the women are pleasing to look at. The sex is mostly exciting and if some of the women aren't all that good-looking, Laurie Wallace picks up the slack and then some.

The movie stars the gorgeous Laurie Wallace as a young woman who buys a mirror at an antique shop. The catch is that this mirror sends off erotic vibes, making every woman in its vicinity positively desperate for sex (though it only seems to make them attracted to other women).

As mean as it may be to say, most of Surrender's women are rather homely, whether it's because they've got tattoos, piercings, enhancements, or are just plain unattractive. The one woman to that exception is the truly beautiful and incredibly hot Laurie Wallace, who has to carry the whole movie on her shoulders. She does it well, spending literally half the screen time in some state of undress (usually totally naked).

The movie's single best scene occurs near the twenty-minute mark, when Laurie finds herself sexually affected by the mirror late one night. This leads to Laurie masturbating in front of the mirror in one of the hottest scenes I've seen in softcore cinema. The other scenes consist of lesbian couplings, and they're most pretty hot.

The second most attractive woman in this flick is Darian Caine, but she's quite a distant second to Wallace. Anyway, it's entirely worth watching for Laurie Wallace fans. This isn't the hottest softcore out there, but the prospect of seeing Laurie nude for nearly an entire hour's worth of screen time (of the movie's somewhat overlong two hours) is too good a prospect to pass up.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This has got to be the worst soft core ever.....
thepavl8 July 2004
This has got to be the worst soft core ever.....

Laurie Wallace is beautiful, Misty is nice but all the others in the movie should be buried in a landfill along with the "acting" (if you can call it that) "sex scenes" (if you can call them that) and the "story"(i don't think people would see this for the story).

A young couple takes a vacation on Laurie's home town and discovers a mirror in an antique shop. Laurie then proceeds to have sex in front of the mirror with a)herself b)one girl(!) c)two girls(!!) d)three girls(!!!) e)five girls (? where is four?) in order to release the woman trapped in the mirror who has a big treasure blah blah!!

Don't see this movie. Please don't see this movie. Everything in it is laughable! Only it is so bad you cannot laugh.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What were they thinking?
dbrown-07020415 July 2004
Warning: Spoilers
This review contains spoilers.

The basic plot of this Seduction Cinema lesbian fest is this. Amy (Laurie Wallace) buys a mirror at an antique store. When she stands in front of the mirror she gets really horny. She shows the mirror to other women and they get horny too. It's sufficient to string together a bunch of softcore female masturbation and lesbian scenes.

There are five sex scenes in the movie: Laurie solo. Laurie with her doctor friend (A.J. Kahn). Laurie with her two former high school friends (Misty Mundea and Esmerelda DellaRocco). Laurie, the high school friends, and some other woman. And finally a six girl orgy. Oh, and in all of those scenes, the woman in the mirror (Darian Cane) makes some appearances. With one exception that I'll get to later, the women are all attractive to varying degrees. Laurie is a knockout. Esmerelda was decent and everyone else fell somewhere in between.

This could have been really good, but it doesn't get above okay for three reasons. First, it's slow. This thing runs for two hours, and you're twenty-five minutes in before you even get to see any female nudity. Second, the sex scenes weren't always filmed well. There's some good stuff, but a lot of the time, they drag. And third, there was Mistress Rhiannon. She is this super-deformed, huge breasted (I'm talking 60 or 70 inches here) freak with huge fish lips to boot. Let me make myself clear. She is gross!!! Fortunately she is only in one scene and doesn't have sex with anyone.

It's a shame. With the exception of mutant girl, this had a good looking cast. If the sex scenes had been filmed better, and about thirty minutes of the boring stuff was cut, this would have been a classic. As it is now, I'd only recommend this to die-hard fans of Laurie Wallace.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed