Lady in the Dark (TV Movie 1954) Poster

(1954 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
My ship has come in now that I've made up my mind!
mark.waltz31 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
While the 1944 movie is colorful and features some great moments, it is a bit of a disappointment in retrospective. Some shows seem to be too ahead of their time, and even with serious subjects dealt with in a handful of shows, psychological turmoil was not one of those that held a lot of interest during the dark days of World War II. It had all the factors that looked like a surefire hit, but something was missing. Certainly, that wasn't the fault of its cast, especially Ginger Rogers. But a TV version a decade later got it together, creating a perfect example of how TV musicals could work better than those on the big screen.

Ginger Rogers could have easily repeated her movie role and scored a success, but the role of the troubled magazine editor Liza Elliott went instead to Ann Sothern, as far from Maisie or her private secretary as an actress can get. Like Rogers, she's not the best singer (neither was Gertrude Lawrence who originated the part on stage), but like Ginger was an excellent dancer. She was also an even better dramatic actress and chews up the part as each of her emotional turmoils is explored. Also scoring highly is Carleton Carpenter whose obviously gay character makes his attraction to a male model extremely obvious. Luella Gear gets some great lines and delivers them with delicious venom.

As for the various men in her life, they are remarkably all dull. Still, this is a lavish and an important chapter in not only the development of the Broadway musical but a decade later, an advancement in the way TV could tell stories, educate and entertain. The Kurt Weill and Ira Gershwin score is sweet, profound and thought provoking. "My Ship" is my own particular favorite. The production number of "Jenny" is performed here rather subtly, certainly not like the campy overstuffed spectacle of Julie Andrews' version in "Star!" TV had something for every type of audience during the 1950's, and this appealed to the intellectuals who clamored for something real that they could ponder over rather than wait for a commercial break to grab a soda.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A groundbreaking, one-of-a kind work! The grandaddy of American musical drama!
caribeno31 March 2002
"Lady in the Dark" is an absorbing, audacious, one-of-a kind journey into musical theater. The use of dream sequences and music in an otherwise serious drama about the self-sabotage of an emotionally-scarred woman is a wonder to behold, conveying more clearly the connections between the mind and a person's actions than more straightforward serious dramas. The music by Kurt Weill and Ira Gershwin beautifully integrate and propel Liza Elliott's (the main character) inner life to her outer life, showing the different facets of Liza Elliott's character that she is too afraid to show outwardly. The range of musical genres (jazz, ballads, Broadway showstoppers, semi-classical) are arrestingly illustrated in such songs as "This is New", "Beautiful Girl", "My Ship", and the incomparable "Saga of Jenny". Ann Sothern plays Liza Elliott brilliantly. This may well be her finest dramatic performance. Certainly, she conveys the quick wit, savoir faire, glamour,emotional brittleness, vulnerability, and emotional pain that inform the character of Liza Elliott. Hers is an emotionally wrenching and arresting performance. The rest of the cast is uniformly good. James Daly reveals complexity in what could have been a stereotypical role of a womanizer. Sheppard Strudwick conveys gravity and creepiness in his role as Liza Elliott's psychologist. The dances choreographed by Rod Alexander are beautiful to see, though not always well-integrated into the plot. A brilliant gem of American theater and American television! "Lady in the Dark" deserves to occupy a far more visible, important place in the history of American entertainment. It's content and performances were far ahead of their time. It's theme is just as relevant now as it was in the 1940's (when it was on Broadway) and in 1954 (when this television version was broadcast. A must see!
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed