Wrong Way (1972) Poster

(1972)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
One of the most amazingly inept and sleazy films you'll ever see
noahbbrown22 December 2006
The original pre-cert videotape of this changes hands for crazy money these days, it's very very rare. I was 'fortunate' enough to get hold of a DVD-R of this, as it sounded right up my street...

And the verdict?.....Jeeez! As noted previously, this is definitely "inspired" by 'Last House On The Left" but the tone is totally different. It's proper early-70s rough-ass grindhouse business, sexist as hell, dumb, with sub-porno standard acting. It's not disturbing in the slightest however, and whilst the subject matter (rape rape and more rape) is nasty, the way it's done is just funny. The soundtrack is absolutely wild - incoherent hippy wailing over acoustic guitar meandering, you couldn't make it up, honestly. Has to be heard to be believed.

This is a great period piece...the work of anonymous drunken old hacks exploiting the hippy counterculture. God knows who any of the people involved in this are, but hell, I'd be fascinated to know how and why a movie like this came about. Worth seeing to sate your curiosity...this film is one of a kind. It is DEFINITELY bad though.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Crappy Rape-Themed Exploit Film...
EVOL66621 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
How can a film that contains so much rape and sleaze be so damn boring??? That is the question I asked myself numerous times while watching this mess of an exploit film. I typically love sleazy/trashy films, and budget-constraints don't usually bother me - but WRONG WAY really had about nothing going for it. Nothing new was brought to the table and is nothing that the serious exploit fan hasn't seen before - but WAY better done...

The story concerns two girls whose car breaks down in the middle of nowhere. Two scumbags come along playing the "heroes" - but they take the girls back to their camp where they, and two of their other buddies rape the girls for what seems like an hour. They eventually let the girls go, who then stumble upon a group of killer hippies who rape them some more. Then, for some unknown reason - a completely unrelated plot is introduced totally out of left field about two drug-runner/slave-traders on their way to Mexico who stop off in an abandoned shack to bone their newest "acquisition". Eventually the cops catch on and justice is served...

Now, from the above description - this probably sounds like an exploit-lover's dream-cum-true, right? WRONG!!!! Almost EVERYTHING about this film is garbage. The rape scenes are protracted and boring, and show more pasty white man-asses and dongs than any female flesh - and this gets old REAL fast. The women in the film are attractive enough - too bad you don't see more of THEM. The production is horrible and reminded me of the 70's XXX-roughie films, minus any of the hard-core content. The only person in the whole film who could act even a shred, is the hippie-cult leader - but he's only in the film for about 5 minutes. Honestly - WRONG WAY is low-budget exploit film-making at it's worst. The only credit I can give it is for it's sleazy and relatively "graphic" exploration of rough subject matter for the timeframe. I guess it would be worth a look to the exploit completist, as it's a pretty rare film to get ahold of - but everyone else, and even semi-serious exploit fans should probably not bother with this one...3/10
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Super-sleaze of the rancid 70's
Coventry6 July 2006
This is the type of movie you get when giving a camera to a bunch of drunken fat guys that watched way too much porno in their lives. They presumably intended to make their very own imitation of Wes Craven's "Last House on the Left" with aggressive sex scenes and violent revenge-action, only they only got around filming the sex footage and completely forgot about the action. Two young girls, surprisingly cute-looking and sympathetic, are picked up by bored rednecks and brought to a remote place where they get raped and beaten for hours! It's unbelievable how LONG these rape sequences last! Viagra must have been popular in the early 70's already. When the dirty beer-drinking & pot-smoking farmers have finally satisfied their lusts, the girls try to get back to civilization on foot but – sadly for them – they get captured by a pathetic hippie-cult, led by what unquestionably must be THE most annoying guy I've ever seen. The agony of this film ends with two totally unrelated characters having sex with a prostitute in a sleazy motel room. Who the hell are those people??? Just in case you still have doubts, "Wrong Way" should NOT be watched by anyone who still has some good taste left in him/her. The absolute low point was when the camera zoomed in on the girls as they were washing their vagina after being raped several times. At that point, I was really wondering why I was still watching this crap. The editing is lousy and the choice of music couldn't be more wrong. None of the cast members starred in another movie ever again and that's probably for the best. Rating 2 out of 10; a point for the girls each because I honestly felt sorry for them.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Sexploitation at its sleaziest!
Wetbones15 October 2003
This is a very rare film that you're not likely to ever get your hands onto. It was released about 20 years ago on VHS in England. Those were the days before the BBFC so it was not censored in any way.

The film is about two girls who are on their way home but after taking a shortcut their car brakes down. They end up asking a bunch of dope-smoking hippies for help but end up getting raped in every sexual position imaginable for nearly 20 minutes of the running time! After the all the hippies have had their way they leave them to themselves. So they decide to wander off and look for help. However they stumble upon a crazy cult of yet more evil people who want to "reduce them to sexual beasts" before killing them. All this time a police investigation is on its way, triggered by the anxious father of one of the girls. And there is even a completely unnecessary and unrelated side-story about two villains who want to smuggle a drugged girl across the Mexican border to sell her to a brothel - but not before raping her themselves ...

As you can probably tell from this summary, this is sexploitation at its best (or worst, depending on your point of view). There is no hardcore sex in this film but almost 50 per cent of the running time has various girls getting raped over and over again. I wasn't able to take any of it seriously so I wasn't offended in the least but consider yourself warned. More than once this all but lost film reminded me of Meir Zarchi's I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE. Only that I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE had more plot and less sex.

With so much nudity on display, maybe I should talk about how the actors look? Well, I thought the girls were all quite beautiful in a very 70ies way, meaning no implants and no plastic surgery. But the men ... Now, I can enjoy a naked guy as much as a naked girl but when they are all about 50 years old, obese, beer-bellied and sporting greasy hair and silly mustaches I get turned off. I guess that was the point as it further accentuates the violation of these girls and I should probably be glad that I wasn't aroused by overlong scenes of rape but sometimes it was just painful.

The acting is amateurish and the same goes for the directing and editing. And the music is just weird ... it is mostly made up of dreamy folk-pop songs! It's crazy and often extremely out of place. I'd say it is not such a bad thing that this film has faded into obscurity right after its release. In fact the sole reason that I enjoyed it a little bit was that I had to hunt it down and search for it. I get a kick out of watching films almost nobody else has ever seen. In the end you've to decide for yourself it is worth the effort.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sleazy as hell.
HumanoidOfFlesh1 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
"Wrong Way" has to be one of the sleaziest exploitation films I have ever seen.Two girls are kidnapped and viciously raped by a gang of sleazeballs.After the rape,the girls stumble off through the woods and encounter Ron Darby and his psycho hippie cult who decides to kill them.This virtually unknown and rarely seen film contains tons of sleaze and full-frontal nudity.The rape scenes are very long and surprisingly nasty.The acting is horrible and the soundtrack is completely annoying.Unfortunately "Wrong Way" isn't as disturbing as "Last House on the Left" or "I Spit on Your Grave",but you'll need to take a shower afterwards. However if you like dirty exploitation cinema you can't miss it.7 out of 10.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Revenge? Who needs revenge?
BA_Harrison5 June 2021
As far as I am aware, I Spit On Your Grave holds the ignominious record for the longest rape scene ever committed to celluloid, but Wrong Way doesn't exactly hold back either: the film's two young victims, Nancy and Cathy, are passed between several lank-haired, drug-crazed drop-outs for so long that I was amazed they were able to walk away afterwards. It's such a ridiculously drawn-out scene that it ultimately loses the power to shock.

Left in the middle of nowhere, their clothes tattered and torn, Cathy and Nancy proceed to wander aimlessly through the countryside, eventually seeking help from a group of hippies, unaware that these potential saviours are in fact a murderous Manson-like cult who are in the process of burying a body. The hippies take the girls hostage and abuse them further. Meanwhile, the local police comb the area for the missing teenagers.

The film then abruptly turns its attention to a totally unconnected pair of villains holed up in a cabin who have a hostage of their own, a pretty woman who they've got drugged up on heroin. After forcing her to have sex, they bind and gag her and shove her in the trunk of their car. Before they can drive away, the police arrive on the scene and a shootout occurs. The film then wraps things up in a matter of seconds by showing the killer hippies being arrested/shot and Cathy and Nancy being freed.

Needless to say, Wrong Way is pure exploitation: the film's tasteless content, grainy photography, reprehensible villains, and no-frills direction positively screams grindhouse, while it's gritty low budget aesthetic and unflinching scenes of degradation have seen it compared to Last House On The Left. But whereas I Spit On Your Grave and Last House justified the graphic depiction of sexual violence with a healthy dose of brutal revenge, Wrong Way does nothing of the sort, making it seem even more exploitative as a result. This is z-grade trash that simply revels in abuse; it has all the technical competence of a roughie, but with none of the hard-core content (there is, however, full frontal nudity from both sexes, and lots of shots of male butts, one of which is a worrying shade of green!).

5/10. Utterly deplorable and completely amateurish misogynistic nonsense, so inept and outrageous that fans of all things exploitation will simply have to see it to believe it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Thoroughly stinky rapesploitation bummer
Bloodwank9 July 2011
On paper Wrong Way should be a winner. Two girls have a car breakdown and get repeatedly raped, anti-climax, the end. Nothing but pure unadulterated exploitation in a brisk 77 odd minutes with a significant portion taken up by ultra sleazy soft-core rape, its a real shame that it ends up so darned boring. Ineptly shot and edited with dire acting but the worst thing of all is that the assorted butt ugly males have more nudity than the lovely girls. That's like, the biggest mistake a film like this can possibly make, its a total, profoundly asinine misjudgement of the target audience that could always seem like intentional subversion were it not for the fact that nothing here really feels intentional at all. On the other hand, one of the guys asses has a weird grayish green look to it like he's turning into a zombie from the buttcrack up, which kinda made me chuckle. Also, one of them is called Crabs because he apparently got them when he let one of his buddies give him head, and another likes to eat raw eggs to somehow improve his sexual prowess. So there's a bit of off key weirdness floating through this one to ease the disinterest and it has some effect, but not generally enough. I actually pretty much zoned out for a good deal of the viewing, spent more time pondering it's makers and their purpose, the moods of the actors and the unfinished seeming plot construction. Given that this came out in the same year as Last House on the Left its possible that it was cynically rushed out as a quickie rip off, making it something of a suitably ignoble godfather to the works of The Asylum. But maybe it was made independently, which could almost make it a pre hardcore precursor to the many great roughies of the decade, except that hardcore flicks had already turned legal so there was absolutely no reason not to go down that route. Almost certainly some combination of booze and hate was behind this, and I would wonder cocaine as well were the budget not so low. And did any of the actors care, even a little about proceedings? I've an inkling they were probably jobbing porno performers, but then the rapes are so lifeless and poorly handled it would seem they had not even a smidgen of professional pride. Meh, I still feel kinda sorry for them, I actually love seeing degradation on camera but this whole film was just lame, so lame in fact that just writing about it makes me dislike it even more than I did when I watched it just a couple of days ago. The only conceivably reason to watch this is if you happen to be some kind of rapesploitation cinema historian, everyone else should steer far clear.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Went the Wrong Way on ripping off The Last House on the Left
The_Void9 November 2006
Usually, I love this sort of film...but Wrong Way just doesn't cut it. The influence from Wes Craven's classic The Last House on the Left is clear and obvious throughout, but the film doesn't do anything new with it and overall is really rather boring. The Last House on the Left inspired a number of rape and revenge films; the majority of which hailed from Italy and are rather good if you're into this sort of stuff. That's what makes Wrong Way all the more disappointing; it's not a bad thing to rip off Craven's film, but when all you've got is a series of sex scenes, you know that it hasn't been done well. The plot is virtually non-existent, and simply focuses on a couple of girls that end up being raped and abused by a few bored hippies. The film is notorious for its rape scenes that go on seemingly forever, but it gets old fast. I have no problem with sex in movies, and in fact actively seek out this sort of dirty, grisly film...but there really is no reason to bother seeking out Wrong Way. It's currently unavailable in Britain, and that certainly isn't a bad thing.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
sleaze galore in a boring flick
trashgang18 December 2012
Hard to get sleazefest that was only available on VHS in the UK before their was any censorship. And it shows because it had a lot of nudity, male and female. But don't think it's attractive because the rape scene's are a bore.

It involved all one-time actors and one-time director and it's easy to spot because the acting is really wooden and some scene's do take to long. Bad editing and strange score give it an exploitation feeling. Not only that, it looks like it was somehow based on Last House On The Left (1972) another rape/revenge flick.

As I said it do involve a lot of nudity but nothing is attractive. It's full bush era back then and you know how they looked, with their white asses and tits. The males also walk around full frontal and it's quit a shock because they are all fat or have bellies.

Two girls are being kidnapped and abused. The father of one of the girls is afraid something happened and the police starts an investigation. Once the rape is done, this flick really becomes slow and boring. You wander how it got made. Even the rape scene's must have been a one taker. They looked like they had a drink or so because some of the boys are laughing all the time. Guess they had fun rubbing their cocks against the girls. And the girl towards the end giving head and being taken from behind at the same time is almost laughable. And didn't they forgot to add the revenge?

But again, it's sought after because it's some kind of sleaze classic although I have seen better. Unavailable and a rare catch.

Gore 0/5 Nudity 2,5/5 Effects 0/5 Story 1/5 Comedy 0/5
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrible
BandSAboutMovies19 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Made under the title Bad Scene, the British cuts to this movie took out fifteen minutes of footage, taking the film's total down to under an hour. I can completely imagine what they cut, as this movie has multiple assault scenes that last so long that they become an actual assault on the viewer.

Two girls named Nancy and Kathy (Laurel Canyon and Candy Sweet) are on their way home when their car breaks down, which leads to them getting attacked by drug-addled hippies, soon followed by a Satanic cult who also abuses them and then plans on killing them. That's it, that's the movie. Some movies push past the actual act of sexual violence and concentrate on the revenge or the escape, but this one and done by director Ray Williams.

So once the cult kidnaps them, you'd think that the cops would find them or get invovled, right? No because now we move to another story where a female heroin addict is kidnapped, assaulted and sent to Mexico before the cops forget Nancy and Kathy and rescue her.

There's a biker named Crabs because he has crabs. This is utter garbage and not in the right way. I have no idea who thought they could release this movie in the UK in the early 80s and it kind of makes every other movie in the section 3 video nasty category look positively classy and well-made by comparison. Horrible.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the sleaziest and most inept exploitation thrillers ever shot
Leofwine_draca5 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
WRONG WAY is a super-sleazy exploitation flick from the early '70s with absolutely no redeeming values whatsoever. This plot less drivel involves a couple of attractive girls who, just like in LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT, find themselves subjected to a gang of delinquents who decide to mercilessly rape them for most of the film's running time. They manage to escape, but are captured by members of a murderous hippy commune who also decide to rape them. Meanwhile, cops search for the missing girls and a couple of guys try to smuggle a kidnapped lady south of the border...it's as boring and uninteresting as it sounds, with story that makes little sense and the most diabolical acting you'll ever witness from a cast of nobodies and porn actors.

The production values are nil, the whole production is amateurish in the extreme and I'm surprised that copies of the film still float around today. Almost the entire running time is taken up with sex scenes involving ugly male actors having ridiculous simulated sex with attractive and naked girls. There are probably more naked guys in this flick than girls and the result makes for distinctly unappetising viewing. It's all done in the worst possible taste and yet the ineptness of it all means that it never feels disturbing like the Wes Craven flick. Instead it's a boring waste of time and one of the worst ever movies I've had the misfortune to sit through – this is one of those times that the fast forward button really does come in handy.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Totally bad, can't take your eyes off it
stevenfallonnyc31 December 2007
It is really astonishing when one thinks that, unlike today, there actually was a movie-making climate which allowed for films like Wrong Way to be made and put in real movie theaters. This is an astonishingly bad film but it is a fascinating example of early 70's sleaze no doubt.

Two very pretty girls take the "wrong way" which is a short cut, their car breaks down, two hippies come along in their truck to give them a ride to help, but take them to their other hippie friends instead. They rape the girls repeatedly in the middle of nowhere until finally letting them go, where the girls then meet other crazies who rape them too. Stick in a very mild police investigation and, for the hell of it out of nowhere, toss in some drug runners who have sex with another pretty girl and there's the movie.

The group of hippies that rape the girls first are an amazingly sleazy bunch. Beer bellies, greasy hair, all unattractive, a total nightmare for any woman. They also are real "backwoods" and that's scary in itself. For instance, one (named "Crabs" I think) keeps scratching his groin, then complains to another that he got that itch after he let the other guy "suck" him. Ouch! The "acting" (especially by the two girls, who give it their best) is hilarious, but the rape scenes are truly wonders to behold. When the hippies rape the girls, you see much more of the men's ugly bodies than the girls. One guy's butt is even green! The rape lasts a very long time, with cheesy folk guitar music playing in the background. Before the rape, we even see another group of hippies hanging around who are against raping the girls, but a shotgun held by the leader chases them away.

Then later on for seemingly no reason, two ugly drug runners have sex with a very pretty drugged out girl, in another overlong scene. It all ends soon after in a quick "resolution" to the "plot."

Of course Wrong Way is a horrible movie. It's not even that much fun to watch. But you can't take your eyes off it.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
However
shandycr23 January 2024
This is utter rubbish, but... it does have a certain fascination. I can't begin to comprehend what was going through the cast and crew's minds when they set out to so-called 'film' this desert rape-a-thon with hilariously dubbed-in post-production dialogue.

It is so incompetent on every technical level that it makes 'Love Camp 7' look like a basically acceptable cinematic effort. And that takes a lot.

However, there is something I have to mention. Lots of other reviewers have referenced here about the amount of male nudity, and yes there is tons of it. But, whereas they usually describe grotesque pot-bellied men, a couple of the male cast members do actually have quite reasonable physiques, including nice butts which you get to see a lot of. Hence the two stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure, unadulterated exploitation
lazarillo1 May 2011
This early 70's movie is sometimes compared to "Last House on the Left" (made the same year) because it is also about two young girls who run afoul of a group of vicious hippie criminals after their truck breaks down on a rural country road. One of the girls has concerned parents as in "Last House", and the local police mount a slow and generally ineffective search for them (although in "Last House" the police are SUPPOSED to be inept,comic buffoons--I'm not so sure here). But "Last House on the Left", as low-budget as it was, has things like character development and an actual plot, including a revenge sequence at the end modeled on Ingemar Bergman's "The Virgin Spring". I doubt the people who made this thing had ever even HEARD of Ingemar Bergman.

It would be easy to brand this movie as misogynist since it has several LONG--and, in one case, completely gratuitous--rape scenes where the women are stripped bare and forced to service multiple male partners. But it might be giving this movie too much credit to assume it has any kind of anti-feminist or anti-female agenda. The only agenda here is obviously to turn on viewers who are into rough, "non-consensual" sex. That would certainly include actual rapists, but it would also include people who might be into rough play-acting and even some women who might indulge in rape fantasies now and then. Because where "Last House" is a realistically violent film and is often genuinely disturbing, this film is just ridiculous and completely impossible to take seriously on any level.

There are a couple points of interest though. One of the actresses playing the two protagonists MIGHT be the later 70's porn star Rene Bond. She looks a little different with long blonde hair instead of short brown hair and--if it IS her--she still has her original breasts. (But whether she is Rene Bond or not, her name is probably not "Laurel Canyon" or "Candy Sweet" as the two actresses are listed in the credits). There's also an interesting sequence when the girls are let go by their first group of attackers and they stumble across a Manson Family-like group who are burying a dead body while an actual toddler wanders around! The leader of the group stands out as a hammy dinner-theater actor in an entire cast of complete NON-actors. He alternately threatens to make the girls serve as babysitters and sex slaves, but then before anything happens, the movie cuts away to a completely irrelevant scene with some peripheral characters quasi-raping another drugged out girl in a motel room. The denouement with the original protagonists is delivered after that, entirely in a voice-over by the police as the filmmakers either ran out of money or were simply not interested in any aspects of the "plot" that DIDN'T involve some kind of sexual violation. This movie is obviously nothing but pure, unadulterated exploitation.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a seventys drive in classic
paul-81729 October 2003
this is a very rare film released twice in the uk on video before the bbfc known as wrong way on the interocean video label and the hitch hiker on the rarer tiger video label its a lost drive in classic the rape scenes of the two woman must rate as the longest in any film i have seen theres even a strange cult sect included catchy hippy music this is up there with texas chain saw massacre and last house on the left as my favourite seventys drive in classics cannot see this ever getting another release over here now with the bbfc.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
tigon's dirty pick-up
gavcrimson30 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
"Do I have a very bad video copy here or does one of the actors in this film appear to have a green ass" is the infrequently asked question you may find yourself puzzling over during Ray Williams' 1972 American exploiter Wrong Way, worryingly the answer is actually the latter. I'm far from the first person to note similarities between Williams' film and The Last House on the Left, which extends to beyond the casual. Not only do the two films centre around two teenage girls failing into the hands of a gang of sex criminals, but both serve up comic relief filler in the form of two knuckleheaded cops, both score graphic sexual assault scenes to downer folk music, and both cut between one of the girls' parents expressing growing concern about her safety and the grim abuse being dished out to their offspring. It all feels more than just mere coincidence, but exactly who saw each other's film first remains a question mark, keeping in mind both films were made in 1972. Wrong Way does however increase your respect for the upsetting power of Last House on the Left, when you see the basically same material that in Wes Craven's hands made for a thought provoking film with considerable shock value, here serve as fodder for a sweaty, droning softcore quickie.

Sleazy Rider–another film that is in a similar mode to this-had a notably anti-establishment, cop hating rhetoric to it, but Wrong Way's mindset is in comparison muddled and reactionary. Plenty of good old boy humour is in evidence, jokes about getting crabs n' drinking beer are calculated to get the fellas cracking up at the local drive-ins. Hippie put downs are present and correct with longhairs portrayed as itinerant rapists and drug dealers, even a lame Manson-esque figure turns up towards the end of the film. "The good news is our men had to shoot one of the hippie rats…he got it right in the balls" enthuses the

cops. Sentiments suggesting a greater allegiance to the forces of law and order here,and a film that spits a giant ball of mucus in the direction of hippies. Despite that Wrong Way gawps long, if not exactly hard, at the hippies foul sexual deeds. Gang rape scenes go on and on in this, but badly mimed rape scenes and limp tally-whackers from all concerned constantly give the game away that no real humping was going on here. Just to get back to the topic of he of the green ass for a moment, it does occur to me that as the main gang rape scene takes place on and up against a green van, its possible that performing outdoor, simulated rape under the Californian sun might have caused some of the van's paintwork to come off on our man's ass. A likely reason for this unfortunate on screen ailment, the mark of Wrong Way, betya he had a hard time explaining that to his old lady when he got home.

Wrong Way never shies away from the fact that the verbal and physical abuse of women is meant as a constant source of amusement and arousal here. The occasionally inspired ugliness of the screenplay is best illustrated in a subplot that sees two white slave traders shooting up a woman with heroin and taking advantage of the merchandise before they sell her to a brothel. "You mean you'd destroy a human being for a few lousy dollars" she protests, to which her captor cackles back "absolutely not, we're nice guys, we're gonna trade you for H", and his equally mangy partner in crime contributes to the conversation "you're a nympho, and you know it". The subsequent threesome between these three lovebirds finds the woman –the person people had paid to see go nude- obscured under all the hairy, potbellied, male goose-flesh of her two co-stars, a reoccurring problem in Wrong Way's gross sex scenes.

Although it has all the hallmarks of the kind of third rate, obscurity that never saw the light of day till video came along, Wrong Way did surprisingly have a British theatrical release as part of a porno triple bill package put together by Tigon in 1981. Eric Godwin, a kindly, well liked elderly gentleman had the job of buying the majority of Tigon's American acquisitions at the time. Godwin was prone to voicing despair over the growing explicitness of the American product he was being offered during film buying trips to Los Angeles, not on account of any prudishness, but because of the inevitable problems it would give him with the British censor. Unlike many of Tigon's porno acquisitions of the early 1980s, Wrong Way hadn't started life as hardcore, but still proved Godwin's worst fears correct when it came to the British censor who cut around 20 minutes out of it for the British theatrical release. Sure the later, uncut video release is the way any exploitation aficionado would therefore want to see this thing, but even with heavy cuts the sleaze impact of Wrong Way on the big screen must have made for a tremendous culture shock. Imagine Wrong Way blown up to the size of a bungalow, encountered in the intimidating atmosphere of a porno cinema, and at a time before video had yet to fully expose British audiences to the sub-amateur side of American exploitation cinema.

Video, bootleg DVDr, maybe laptops, are of course the only way we'll get to see films like Wrong Way these days, but like the down and dirtiest examples of American sexploitation- Sleazy Rider, Sinner's Blood, The Bad, Bad Gang, Golden Gate Pay-Off, et al- the deeply un-erotic nature of the sex, the overwhelming hatred of women and the equally overwhelming sense that those behind the camera barely knew what they were doing, all succeed in holding the attention, overriding any impulse to turn away from the abyss.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed