Sexual Chemistry (1999) User Reviews

Would have been better X-rated

[Phil_H · 4/10 · 19 October 2000]

I hate wannabe, pseudo-porn. It's a waste of talent, film, and time. This one, although, is much better than many, but still fails to be anything more than a pathetic almost porn movie. There was some glimpses of fun and value here, but not enough to sustain the momentum. In the end, it's a "4"...if you're really bored and don't mind seeing half naked, good looking, women, then give this a shot. But don't expect anything better than late-night cable fare.

Excellent B-Softcore movie!

[Shink · 5/10 · 27 November 1999]

Call me a weirdo, but I am a big fan of this movie. Very funny and very sexy women. The plot is just cheesy enough to be hilarious. The acting is as bad as can be expected, but the total package of the movie makes it decent. It's not for everybody, but if you're not offended by R-rated porn, then you could be surprised!

Inorganic Chemistry

[HRoss007 · 5/10 · 18 November 2006]

The plot is an interesting concept but poorly developed. The scenes and settings do not support a premise that any "Chemistry" is being developed. But then again, it's really a spoofy take on some Mad Scientist chemistry using the "Scientist" as his/her own Test Subject. And Maybe some subtle implications on the chemistry between the characters. There may be enough voyeuristic watching the Lab thru a window to imply some kinky experimentation. I lost count of how many scenes included full frontal nudity - some worth more than others, but most of the Make-out scenes were a little too gymnastic and lacked credible passion. The actors have very few credits to their name. I would take time to see a bit more of Jeff Xander and Raisa Ivanic. For low-budget light entertainment - I'd still bet this movie was a lot more fun to make than it was to watch!

Good idea, with or without the sex.

[otakuman64 · 5/10 · 28 October 2006]

I liked the movie - the plot premise, while probably a bit overdone (How many male-to-female/Jekyll-and-Hyde movies are there, anyway?) is a good one, and, while the sex scenes were a bit overdone, they weren't TOO gratuitous...

Though, personally, I think the movie would have made just as much sense with a few minutes of sex clipped out - obviously, some nudity would need to stay for artistic and plot purposes, but about half the sex could be edited out without too much problem if done properly.

Overall, though there's a bit too much cheap fan-service for some tastes, it's a enjoyable movie.

Interesting Movie

[jazzjunkie · 7/10 · 19 April 2003]

I think this was an interesting concept about testing for new drugs to enhance sexuality. But you did have to go with the flow it did go a bit overboard in the premise of the movie but I did not rent it for the great plot and great directing. it was a good movie for the kind it is and will look for other movies by stephanee LaFleur.

It was funny.

[wickedb1ch · 6/10 · 10 March 2000]

I seen this movie and I thought is was funny. It was campy but it was funny. I thought that it really didn't need as much sex in the movie. It would have been fine without the sex. I like Stephanee LaFleur. I have seen her movies and I like her. I also thought that the guy that played Robert was good too.

Overall I give this movie a 6.

Helen Haxton's GONE WITH THE WIND

[charlytully · 6/10 · 18 November 2008]

Just finished reading MARGARET EXPOSED: TARA ABANDONED FOR T & A, by Eudora Weasley. This National Book Award winner details the long-sought secret behind GWTW being the only book Margaret Mitchell ever got published (i.e., it WASN'T, as MM left historical romance for the then-more lucrative field of porno, churning out such titles as DELTA OF DAWN, LITTLE SAPSUCKERS, A HORSEFLY IN THE HOUSE OF LOVE, etc).

After watching SEXUAL CHEMISTRY, I realized I had just witnessed a role reversal of the opposite sort: porn to serious drama. I haven't seen any of the other produced scripts SC writer Helen Haxton has penned (e.g.--LAP DANCING, MARRIED PEOPLE SINGLE SEX, NIGHT FIRE, etc.), but the mere titles reek of cheap sexploitation. SC, on the other hand, deals with the heartbreak of frigidity and the search for a female Viagra. Perhaps budget limitations (this movie's cost was a small fraction of GWTW's) kept SC from becoming a bigger success, but it still can serve as a valuable wake-up call to the pharmaceutical R&D community.