Dead Students Society (Video 1998) Poster

(1998 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Decent
berniefan5114 February 2007
The film is alright. The plot isn't the best, but you get what you pay for here. At least you get some erotic poetry and satisfactory boobage. Save for a rainy day, and probably rent before buying. Also, this film is probably better watched with a large group of your peers.

The actors and actresses are all pretty bad. None of them seem to be trained thespians at all. Donnie Suave, who plays "Jerome," steals the show with his excellent dialogue and muscular physique.

The soundtrack is exemplary. The musical stylings of composer Michel Quimpel more than make up for the lack of special effects both visually and audibly.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't waste your time - pathetic and inept on every level
Groverdox9 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I watched "Dead Students Society" for one reason: to see Misty Mundae. I didn't realise she doesn't appear until one hour in, but that wouldn't have deterred me: sometimes these softcore b-flicks can be enjoyable in their own right.

Well, this one truly isn't. The plot, the acting, the dialogue, the direction, is all abysmal. Even the idea for the movie is unquestionably bad: a generic softcore starlet plays a professor of literature - seriously - and hosts a "Dead Poets' Society" style get together with her horny students in a cave. They come and she kills them in the lamest death scenes I have ever seen. At one point, she strangles a guy to death with a phone cord (remember those) and no attempt is even made to have the cord look taut. Perhaps that's just as well, though, as that would only make the viewer more aware of the fact that this woman is nowhere near capable of strangling this strapping young man to death, all on her own.

What was the point of referencing "Dead Poets' Society" anyway? Who the hell watched that movie and thought, I wonder what it would be like if Robin Williams was played by a softcore starlet, the boys were played by 30-something year old ex-athletes, and the whole "society" thing was a ruse to lure them to their deaths?

I can only assume that the producers were completely out of ideas for another Z-grade softcore flick, turned on the TV, and caught the Peter Weir movie being repeated and thought, yeah, I don't think Wynorski's ripped this one off yet.

There are also deaths by knife in which the slashing blade leaves barely visible red imprints on the victim's flesh, and yet apparently damages it enough to kill him. A papercut would do more visible damage. That same blade is run across a guy's throat, having him immediately disgorge blood, that couldn't possibly have gathered in his throat so quickly. It looks less like a throat cutting than a case of tuberculosis he didn't know he had.

Most of the deaths are by strangulation, though, and not only does the generic softcore broad not look anything like a professor anywhere on planet Earth, she also doesn't look even halfway strong enough to strangle anything other than a puppy to death.

In case we're not getting the point that the filmmakers don't know how to film strangulation realistically, the softcore broad has a male accomplice who strangles two boys at once, and both start gushing blood from their mouths. I've never seen someone react to strangulation that way. At least a cut throat sort of makes sense that it would lead to bleeding from the mouth.

These things are not exactly uncommon failings in b-pictures. Hell, sometimes they're kind of endearing. But it helps if the movie they're in is somewhat entertaining. This one is just so dingy, low-budget and crappy that it's not entertaining in the least.

Aside from Mundae, the movie has one other natural babe in the cast (the softcore professor has breasts so fake that when she's topless it looks like she's still wearing layers of rubber and fake tan). When the natural babe finally gets her clothes off, the filmmakers don't even know enough to give us a good look.

If David DeCoteau is reading this (a long shot, I know) this movie approaches your levels of ineptitude, tediousness, and homoeroticism - but not at a level to make it interesting or worth watching. What really made me think of your movies was a scene where guys strip to their underwear and fight, in a case of boxers vs briefs. They're not white briefs though, so I guess your interest in this movie will probably end there.

Yes, I started writing this review before the movie was over, and yes, I wrote the above paragraph to distract myself from the movie's ending, which isn't just lame and pathetic, it's also incomprehensible.

I just didn't want to waste any more of my time on this garbage. You can go one better, and not waste any time at all.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Avoid it Like The Plague
kyleMetal13 March 2003
this is one of the most awful low budget films i've ever seen, i think the point was to exploit some college girls here. If they wanted to make a softcore porno, why not go all the way and make it X-Rated? it's a complete waste of time, hardly anything is shown as far as skin is concern so don't even bother.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Amateur hour
patconolly18 March 2008
Poor story, really bad script, really bad acting. If a random group of young people with no particular talent are asked to make an erotic, "female serial killer" movie, this is about what they could come up with. The attractive nudes, including one of Misty Mundae's earliest roles, brings it up a notch to a 3. But then the gratuitous extra bad acting by Ed Wood veteran Conrad Brooks takes it back down to a 2. If it included actual porno footage (of the real cast) I might have rated it a 4.

The DVD gets extra credit for misstating the plot on the DVD cover (guess the writer didn't have the patience to watch the whole thing), saying that Nora (a grimacing Roxanne Michaels) tempts the young female students into ... whatever... Nope, psycho Nora's only interested in the men.

My "favorite" part, about 30 seconds after brother Nikko has already been "taking care of the other one", Nora shouts out "Take care of the other one"! I also mildly enjoyed listening to the college student, who signed up for a poetry class, reading aloud at a 2nd grade level.

The DVD cover prominently features Misty Mundae. She's cute, looks about 15, but is only in for a few minutes after the halfway point.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Movie...Ever!
Dr. Atomic28 February 2003
Warning: Spoilers
*Minor Spoilers*

I had to see the premier of this move back in 1999 at William Patterson University in New Jersey. The entire film was done on the campus and I went to see it because I knew a person in it. Unfortunately, he is strangled to death in one of the opening scenes leaving me to sit through this nonsensical and seemingly endless film. Poetic Seduction (as it was called when I saw it) is an near constant stream of stranglings and awkward attempts at sex sequences. I had the interesting experience of sitting near the woman at the premere. It is odd when the character having incestuous sex on screen is sitting next to you and laughing at the mistakes in filming. The scary part is, when I mentioned that this was the worst movie I had ever seen, the person I knew simply laughed and said "I hope so!" Overall, Poetic Seduction is a horribly acted, nonsensical, stupid movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed