"The Wednesday Play" The Big Flame (TV Episode 1969) Poster

(TV Series)

(1969)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Tested by time ...
taiaha22 June 2012
This piece of work, originally made for TV as a BBC "Play for Today", was considered by many as being quite reactionary for its time. It still is, and given the climate of today's commercial world, remains just as relevant. In many ways, perhaps even more relevant...

Filmed in a semi-documentary style, it preempts the hand held style by some decades. Many of the cast were not professional actors, but actual dockers, which enhances the authenticity and feel of the whole film.

The workers vs management industrial battle depicted is not new, and although the insidious involvement of the government and overt use of the military in the dispute is disturbing, it is surprising how open it all is. One can't help but think that in a 'modern' democracy such tactics would be far more covert.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An fascinating slice of once-controversial drama from Ken Loach and Jim Allen
dr_clarke_24 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
'The Big Flame' is a 1969 episode of The Wednesday Play written by socialist playwright Jim Allen and directed by left-wing director Ken Loach, who have had several fruitful collaborations throughout their careers. It was actually Loach's final episode for The Wednesday Play (which ended the following year), but not his last work for the BBC, and clearly had quite an impact at the time, appalling Mary Whitehouse (who thought it Communist and demanded a review of the BBC charter) and later lending its name to revolutionary socialist feminist organisation Big Flame. It is, put simply, exactly what anyone familiar with Loach, Allen or both would expect from them in a play about unofficial strikes and work-ins.

Indeed, the plot, which concerns a group of striking dockers deciding to take over the docks and run them themselves, taps into the then-topical issue of unofficial strikes, which had just been banned by the government. The industrial relations theme isn't new and is still relevant, and Allen and Loach natural side firmly with the workers. At the same time, it presents a typically (for both) one-sided argument, with workers under threat from greedy managers, but then it fully intends to. And it is to the credit of both writer and director that it doesn't demonise individual managers, with Michael Forrest's Garfield portrayed as being reasonable and willing to listen. The Unions don't escape blame either (no for the first or last time in an Allen script), with criticism that they have made promises to the workers without sharing all available information with them. The decisive nature of strikes is also examined - not all workers want to go on strike, and some simply can't afford to.

The workers soon start to suspect a conspiracy against them by the Government, as ship-owners order their captains not to allow the cargoes to be unload, power to the dock equipment gets cut off, and the army gets deployed in response to the take-over. And indeed, it isn't long before the police and army are ordered to move in because the Government wants an end to the work-in. In keeping with much of Allen's work, anyone who is in anyway presented as the enemy of the working man is written in a very one-dimensional way; notably, the judge presiding over Regan and Fowler's trial makes it clear that he is putting the practical exercise of Marxism on trial and using the defendants as scapegoats.

It is understandably difficult to divorce Loach's politics from his technical skills as a filmmaker, which has historically prejudiced anyone who doesn't share the former against appreciating the latter. But Loach's reputation as one of England's greatest directors has been well-earned over his lengthy (and at the time of writing, continuing) career. 'The Big Flame' is shot on location, with much use of handheld cameras and a cast fleshed out by non-professional actors who actually worked on the docks and thus captures the feeling of dockers' life very realistically. The opening scene is very long and dialogue-heavy, but Loach's use of close-ups and rapid cuts draws the viewer into the debate. The play is of the docu-drama type that the BBC would later move away from in response to criticism from certain quarters, and at times voiceovers in the form of in-character interviews play over scenes, with various workers talking about what striking means to them. Loach also handles the action-packed scenes of the army and police moving in - a sequence that involves dozens of cast members and extras - very convincingly. Once again, the use of hand-held cameras and close-ups pulls the audience into the thick of it. The final scene, of a news reporter being heard announcing the sentence and a sympathy strike held the next day, makes it feel as though the story is closely based on real-life events, adding to the realism - as Loach fully intended.

The cast is excellent and fans of British archive television will recognise Norman Rossington as Danny Fowler and Godfrey Quigley as Jack Regan, amongst others. Quigley gives a standout performance as Jack Regan, especially during his impassioned speech at the trial. Fowler wants to defend workers' jobs, whilst self-proclaimed Marxist Regan wants something more revolutionary and changes the course of the strike to turn it into a "work-in". Overall, 'The Big Flame' - like all of Loach's work - will not be to everybody's taste. But anyone with an interest in British television history should watch it, as a fascinating and well-made historical artefact if nothing else.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
In many ways 50 years before it's time
karlericsson29 December 2011
An attempt to show how a revolution could begin (if it caught on). In the sixties, when this was done, the Soviet Union was still in full bloom and the Americans profited from the "evil in the east" by looking nice in comparison. Today we have seen another side of the American system, the true side, and a film like this could easily be shown on the Internet. In the sixties, this film was very bold indeed and there are still dialogs in it that are surprising even today. I had the privilege to be able to talk to Jim Allen when he visited Locarno with the film Land and Freedom. He told me that he had read everything by Jack London, when I asked him if he had read The Iron Heel. Jim Allen was solid working class and a working class hero as far as I could see. Judging from his appearance nobody would expect that this man was capable to write as fantastic scripts as this one, for instance. He almost looked like a bum, who just had turned up from the gutter. He was so far removed from any shred of vanity that it almost made him disappear. I knew too little of him then to be deeply impressed but I sure am now. This film, looking like a documentary, is truly a remarkable. There are not many films like it.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed