The Palace of Arabian Knights (1905) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A stately pageant, Méliès style
wmorrow592 February 2002
Georges Méliès' Palace of the Arabian Nights is one of the large scale fantasies produced by this pioneering filmmaker once he'd moved past his early, simple trick films. The great popularity of his Voyage Dans la Lune ("A Trip To The Moon") prompted the director to emphasize spectacle, with troops of actors in exotic costumes, painted scenery flying in and out, camera trickery, contortionists in animal suits, etc., and all of those elements are on display here. There's plenty to see, but I must admit I sometimes prefer those earlier films, even the ones where Méliès himself is simply standing on a stage performing his magic tricks for an unseen audience. Those first films are so engaging and fun, and convey a fresh excitement about the possibilities of the new medium which still comes across a century later. Audiences today certainly enjoy Voyage Dans la Lune, with its charming sets and dreamlike atmosphere, but even there one can see that handling actors was not the director's strong suit. We are carried along by the sheer novelty of the thing and the narrative momentum, not by the performers, who barely register as people.

Arabians Nights is enjoyable, but even Méliès' fans will concede that it has some drawbacks, deficiencies which suggest some of the reasons behind the director's eventual decline and fall from public favor in later years. From the beginning, the pace is slow and stately, and for long stretches we feel as if we're watching a stage pageant deprived of sound rather than a silent movie. Solemn actors march past while the static camera sits somewhere in the middle of the auditorium. It took me a while to figure out which actor is the protagonist (Hint: he's wearing a striped robe and has a big mustache), and there are no title cards to explain the action. I gather that when these films were first shown narration was delivered to help clarify the story, but that doesn't help us as we watch today. The story concerns a virtuous young nobleman who must endure various hardships in order to win the hand of the Princess he loves. Does this sound familiar? Well yes, but the action is so vague in the opening scenes that it takes a while for viewers to get their bearings, even alert and sympathetic viewers.

Nevertheless, Palace of the Arabian Nights has its moments, especially in the second half. There's an encounter with a fire-breathing dragon, a fight with skeletons which prefigures Harryhausen's Jason and the Argonauts, and transformations and other mystical effects along those lines. Méliès also liked to arrange dancing girls from the Folies-Bergère into picturesque configurations, like a Gallic Busby Berkeley, and several of these tableaux are presented here. This film is a pleasant diversion over all, but when we consider that Méliès' Star Film company continued to produce these pageant-like films year after year, recycling the same elements without developing or updating their cinematic technique any further, we start to understand why the company was out of business by 1914.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not one of Georges' best
JoeytheBrit6 September 2009
While this fairy tale adaptation by Georges Melies is visually arresting, the storyline is so impossible to follow as to render the film unintelligible, which serves to undermine all the effort Melies, his crew and cast have obviously put into the production. The film is painstakingly hand-coloured, but the print I saw on the internet was badly blurred which meant the colours bled into one another quite badly.

Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the film today is the set design - even though by modern standards it is a little too busy with a bit too much detail. Overall, the film is visually impressive, but it falls far short of Melies' best.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Lots of Color/Bewilderment
Hitchcoc16 November 2017
This is a bunch of spectacle with so much going on that it's hard to figure out who is doing what. As far as the Arabian Nights, what happened to Scheherazade and her staying alive by not finishing a story. Melies throws in everything but that kitchen sink (it may have been there; I couldn't see through all the stuff on stage). There are so many stories from the Arabian Nights from Ali Baba to Sindbad. Why not give some of those to us in a clearer, more understandable way.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Typical Fairytale Adventure from Méliès
Cineanalyst2 February 2008
This is a rather typical fairytale adventure from Georges Méliès, but not a very good one. Two of his better ones that I've seen are "Bluebeard" (Barbe-bleue) (1901) and "Kingdom of the Fairies" (Le Royaume des fées) (1903). The overriding problem with "The Palace of Arabian Nights" is its dawdling pace, which makes Méliès's typical tableau, theatrical style most cumbersome. It seems that Méliès became too caught up in portraying supposed Arabian and Indian designs and magic, but also he relies more here upon theatrical effects rather than on narrative and his usual exuberance and wit. Additionally, the dissolves, which John Frazer ("Artificially Arranged Scenes") suggests were being done now with a printer instead of the old way of in the camera, are longer, and they are, unfortunately, the transition between every scene.

On the other hand, the stage designs are quite good for the time. The Ice Palace is a standout, as is the separation of layers of the jungle to reach the Ice Palace. The poor, fuzzy quality of the Grapevine video I saw, however, didn't allow me to fully appreciate this aspect. I hope that in Flicker Alley's upcoming release they will have a clear and colorized print (one does exist) of the film with narration (which would clear up some ambiguous story details and which Méliès provided scripts for when his films were originally exhibited, although I don't know whether Méliès's original script for this one is still known to exist). Additionally, this time the fairy godmother (the usually designated character who guides the heroes and manipulates the narrative in Méliès's fairytale films) is a female portrayal of the Hindu god Shiva, who at first provides the suitor, or Aladdin (played by Méliès), with a genie dwarf and, later, leads several fairies in presenting Aladdin with the treasure.

EDIT: The Flicker Alley set does, indeed, feature a hand-colored print with narration.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An Early Color Spectacular
frankebe17 March 2012
I actually have no problem at all with the slow tempo of this movie. But given all the black-and-white sections needed to complete a print of this film, you do have to use a little imagination to realize what this looked like when it was first released, and how early-cinema audiences must have reacted to it.

The purpose of a lot of Mèliés movies is using the medium of film to show off spectacle. And this film is truly visually spectacular. Even in the 21st century I find myself awed by the fantastic coloring on this film. If you've never seen any of it in the kaleidoscopic colors it was painted, you really need to get the Flicker Alley 5-dvd set of Mèliés films and see this. I was flabbergasted to see the minute detail of sumptuous coloring in the crowd scene at the beginning. One-by-one various incredibly-costumed performers march onto the stage until it is absolutely filled with characters, costumes and color. Unfortunately, only a black and white print today exists of the very first minute or two of this film, after which the color explodes. Some day someone will restore the black-and-white sections and the poor-color sections of this film well enough to justify re-coloring it so we can have a complete print looking the way Mèliés intended.

You will have to use your mind's eye, then, to imagine this movie in pristine form. The multiple fantastic characters (even though they don't do much), the sets and the costumes, the pyrotechnics, the treasures and the overall pageantry give much to look at, and I can easily see how this would have been an audience pleaser back in 1905.

The story mixes together all sorts of Middle Eastern and Eastern, and even European story conventions, into a very amusing hodgepodge (the main character, not Mèliés by the way, is even named "Prince Charming" instead of Aladdin). Mèliés' narration makes complete sense out of the action, so you really need to either read his text first, or see the movie with the narration in the soundtrack (see Flicker Alley).

I admit that this is not the very best Mèliés film (like the action-filled "Trip to the Moon" or "The Impossible Voyage"), but there is always so much to see, so much beautiful hand-made stylized decoration, and so much going on with so many characters in every shot, that I never find myself bored watching a Mèliés spectacular like "The Palace of the Arabian Nights". Robert Israel's excellent music in the Flicker Alley release completes the enjoyment of this movie.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Melies' magic version of '1001 Nights'
binapiraeus15 August 2014
And here's another one of George Melies' truly MAGICAL contributions to early cinema: an exotic tale of '1001 Nights', with miraculously moving set pieces, fireworks, monsters and skeletons (which even remind us of the "Pirates of the Caribbean" movies, which were produced exactly 100 years later, and of course with the help of ALL kinds of computer effects...), through which the fearless hero has got to fight his way in order to gain the beautiful Arabian Princess... And all the time, the pictures are accompanied by a most beautiful, exotic music score, which virtually LURES us into the world of '1001 Nights'!

There's no doubt that this WONDERFUL work had inspired Douglas Fairbanks while making his GRAND fairy tale movie "Thief of Bagdad" - which, in turn, inspires directors and scriptwriters unto this day... So, once again we get the proof while admiring this fantastic piece from the very early days of cinema: it ALL seems to go back to... Georges Melies!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Visually Impressive, Otherwise A Bit Below Méliès's Best
Snow Leopard1 November 2005
This Georges Méliès fantasy feature is impressive visually, with all kinds of interesting detail in the settings, costumes, and the like, plus plenty of Méliès's renowned camera tricks. The story is interesting but often vague, and many of the details are now difficult or impossible to decipher. When Méliès made involved features like this, he used to write a verbal narrative designed to be read at the screening, to explain the action on the screen. Unfortunately, once that gets lost, it becomes very hard for future audiences to appreciate the movie as much as its original audiences did.

The story is the familiar one of a princess who is in love with a young man whom her father does not accept. So the young man has to go through all kinds of ordeals and trials in the hope of winning her hand after all. Many of the sequences are quite involved, and it is worth watching over again to piece together as much of the action as possible. Even then, it is probably not possible to catch all of the detail.

Yet regardless of the missing story details, like almost all of Méliès's movies it is worth seeing for the visual effects. His distinctive backgrounds are often stylized even for their time, but they are always interesting, and often quite elaborate. He throws in a generous supply of stop-action trick shots, pyrotechnics, offbeat choreography, and the like, all of which are good for their time.

This would not by any measure be among Méliès's best features, but then that is a very high standard. Those unfamiliar with his work would find many other Méliès movies more enjoyable than this, but like all of his movies, it still has enough to be worth watching.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Palace of the Arabian Nights (Melies)
Michael_Elliott20 March 2010
Palace Of The Arabian Nights, The (1905)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

aka Le Palais des mille et une nuits

A 20-minute epic from Melies tells the typical story of a princess who wants to marry the young man she loves but her father refuses. The boy is visited by some sort of spirit who sends him on a quest and if he can overcome everything that will be thrown at him then the boy will receive riches. This isn't your typical Melies film from this period as this here runs ten-times longer than the normal films he was producing. With that said, even though a narration track was added for this film, I still found it rather confusing and in the end it might look good but it's not nearly entertaining enough. I think everyone knows the story here but there's way too much time spent on scenes that amount to nothing including one with some dancing girls. There's some minimum action including a nice sequence where the man must battle some skeletons followed by a fire breathing dragon. This stuff here was quite good and the film needed more stuff like this but we're often left with scenes of the boy just wondering around. The film was in black and white but many of the scenes were hand-tinted and for the most part it looked excellent.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed