Mere rosii (1975) User Reviews

Interesting experiment

[bosu_rares · 7/10 · 9 November 2007]

I've seen this film a few times, and I was pleasantly surprised each time by Mircea Diaconu's acting. He plays a young urologist who is assigned to a town hospital with no urology ward, and who keeps bumping into his superiors because of both ethical and medical problems. For those who know the medical system in Romania, it's an acid pamphlet against destruction of young talents as well as a stand against the never-ending corruption plaguing the noblest of professions. It must have been a brave thing to film, not to mention show such a film during the early '80s. The only problem with it is that the story line is not always firm and straight (probably because of concessions the director had to make) - for example, the half-romance between the doctor and the young psychologist. All in all I advise you not to change the channel when it's shown on TV.

courageous

[Vincentiu · 31 August 2014]

courageous, honest, good acting, clever solutions against political command, direct irony against the social sins . and one of beautiful roles of Mircea Diaconu, a lovely performance by Carmen Galin. more than story, clear definition of Alexandru Tatos credo. a film about the duty and the moral victory, about the sacrifice and life as more than convention chain or show. the sensitivity, the touching pieces who defines the lead character are the pillars of it. and the delicate air of freedom. a courageous film for Romania of yesterday and tomorrow. because it remember, in a Balcanica society who believes all has its price than the real values are, always, the axis for define you and the other.

Alexandru Tatos

[Kirpianuscus · 20 June 2016]

a film who reflects his need to escape from the rules web of political command. a surprising film in the context of period. a splendid role by Mircea Diaconu. and a courageous pledge for the honesty and passion as the best manner to define yourself and to change the reality. a pamphlet, it is precise analysis of the social sins. the arguments of young doctor. the cold suspicion, selfish protective circles of the hospital director. the love stories. and the atmosphere who impress for a film from "70's. because it is more than social criticism. it represents a precise portrait of a sick system, not very different by the Romanian medical system from 2016. the importance of film - expose the credo of the director. in direct manner. reflecting the crisis of a cruel perception about the weakness who defines a community.