Double Take (1997) User Reviews

Yet another bad ending

[Tito-8 · 4/10 · 12 February 1999]

This routine thriller actually manages to be decent most of the way, but unfortunately, it has a bad and predictable ending that ruins the honest effort that was made to make this film seem clever. As a result, the competence of the first seventy minutes or so really doesn't amount to much, since it was wasted by the lackluster conclusion.

I did not care for the ending

[jordondave-28085 · 4/10 · 5 April 2023]

(1997) Double Take ACTION THRILLER

Connor McEwen (Craig Sheffer) is a known novelist and by coincidence, he also happens to be a witness to a possible murder involving a robbery at an antique shop. When Connor identifies the perpetrator(Costas Mandylor) at a trial and he gets sent to prison, on another coincidence Connor runs into another look-a-like who looks exactly like the suspect he had sent to prison.

Spoil As it turns out the so -called girlfriend, Nikki Capelli (Brigitte Bako) was always in cahoots with the perpetrator all along as well as the person who was arrested, who we find out later is actually a twin- both in the same extremist group. That is was nothing more but a ploy or scheme to extort 250,000 from him for the purpose of funding their extremist cause. And upon attempting to escape. The leader gets killed by means of subway running over him while the star lets Nikki escape allowing her to keep the money even though he has intentions to return that money. He writes a brand new successful book entitled "Double Take" and meets with Nikki again but in somewhat in disguise, and they walk off together.

wasted potential

[mattkratz · 25 April 2001]

A writer witnesses a murder and helps put away the culprit. Days later, he bumps into the man's exact double, and starts to think he made a mistake. Before too long, he finds himself tangled up in a complicated conspiracy where nothing is as it seems.

This had the potential to be a good movie, but it deteriorates into predictability and too much confusion. Better acting could have helped, too.

** out of ****

Thinly Disguised Toronto

[mrs ras · 1 May 1999]

I first came upon this movie on HBO, late at night, and although I missed the beginning, I was hooked into watching it because it looked like Toronto and I like watching movies to guess where they are supposed to take place and where they were really shot. Where it was shot was easy, but where was supposed to be was a mystery. I found that the movie itself paled next to the game. I don't think I would have continued watching the whole thing, but for my curiosity.

I was astounded to find out that it took place in New York, especially when the Library at 41st Street and 5th Avenue was mentioned and it was the University of Toronto that was seen. There was no attempt to make this movie look like it was in New York, except for the "TTC" being covered over on the "Toronto Transit Commission" logo on the subway.

A few days later, I watched the opening of the film, expecting to see stock footage of the New York skyline, to define the setting, but the skyline shown looked to me to be San Francisco.

I found this film too much of a knock-off of many others and combined with the lack of disguise of setting it made it seem like an inexpensive, student project. There is one thing I did like about it. I like Toronto and I like seeing videos of it.