AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
4,7/10
6,8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA Little League player is sent back into medieval times where he is given the task of saving Camelot.A Little League player is sent back into medieval times where he is given the task of saving Camelot.A Little League player is sent back into medieval times where he is given the task of saving Camelot.
- Prêmios
- 2 indicações
Michael Mehlmann
- Shop Owner
- (as Michael Mehlnan)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesKate Winslet was reportedly told to lose weight for her role, and became sick as a result.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe "Big Macs" Calvin makes for the princess include tomatoes; an ingredient native to the New World and unavailable in Medieval England until the the discovery of the Americas in the 15th century.
- Citações
King Arthur: Camelot rots, and I play at being king. I want her great again.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe film's title is shown near the end of the closing credits.
- ConexõesFeatured in The Nostalgia Critic: A Kid in King Arthur's Court (2009)
- Trilhas sonorasTHIRD EYE
Performed by Feel
Courtesy of Red Engine Music (ASCAP)
Copyright (c) 1994
Avaliação em destaque
One of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995
Dreadful film.
Everything about 'A Kid in King Arthur's Court' is just so poor, the whole feel of the film is extremely low-budget and limp. The writing is substandard, while the dialogue is actually terrible; it forces the 'present day vs. old days' theme way too much, it needed more to it.
The casting can make such a difference in how your film comes out, you can have a load of crap but if you get a strong cast you can still produce something good. This simply doesn't do that, though there is an interesting caveat - as both Kate Winslet and Daniel Craig incredibly appear, in just their third and second films respectively - huge credit to the Hubbards & Co., the UK casting directors.
The premise is just so dumb and uninteresting. Disney already adapted the Mark Twain novel in 1979 with 'Unidentified Flying Oddball', which I didn't love, so it's bizarre they chose to go back to it. As noted earlier, they try to make it noteworthy by colliding the two differing eras but it just comes across as lazy.
There's one, very minor, part I did like and that was King Arthur's little story with the Excalibur sword. It's nothing amazing, but I could appreciate what they were trying to do with that at the very least.
Entirely forgettable, one of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995; from the ones I've seen to date, which is the majority, it's in my bottom six in fact.
Everything about 'A Kid in King Arthur's Court' is just so poor, the whole feel of the film is extremely low-budget and limp. The writing is substandard, while the dialogue is actually terrible; it forces the 'present day vs. old days' theme way too much, it needed more to it.
The casting can make such a difference in how your film comes out, you can have a load of crap but if you get a strong cast you can still produce something good. This simply doesn't do that, though there is an interesting caveat - as both Kate Winslet and Daniel Craig incredibly appear, in just their third and second films respectively - huge credit to the Hubbards & Co., the UK casting directors.
The premise is just so dumb and uninteresting. Disney already adapted the Mark Twain novel in 1979 with 'Unidentified Flying Oddball', which I didn't love, so it's bizarre they chose to go back to it. As noted earlier, they try to make it noteworthy by colliding the two differing eras but it just comes across as lazy.
There's one, very minor, part I did like and that was King Arthur's little story with the Excalibur sword. It's nothing amazing, but I could appreciate what they were trying to do with that at the very least.
Entirely forgettable, one of Disney's worst live-action offerings up until 1995; from the ones I've seen to date, which is the majority, it's in my bottom six in fact.
útil•11
- r96sk
- 5 de out. de 2020
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is A Kid in King Arthur's Court?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- A Kid in King Arthur's Court
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 15.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 13.406.717
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 4.315.310
- 13 de ago. de 1995
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 13.406.717
- Tempo de duração1 hora 29 minutos
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Um Garoto na Corte do Rei Arthur (1995) officially released in India in English?
Responda