The main actress is no Aileen Quinn, but she gets the job done in an average sort of way. It's not a musical, but there is a reprise of "Tomorrow" though I don't think it's sung by the actors themselves. I'd say the actress who played Molly and Joan Collins were the best actors in the entire thing. The story is a basic kid adventure story with surprisingly little predictability. The good news is that it's hardly ever slow so almost anyone can sit through it. If you're a die-hard original Annie fan, however, you'll probably be disappointed with the entire thing. It doesn't feel "Annie. An example of the movie: "He showed me how to change an unimportant element so that the substance can no longer be used for evil purposes."
21 Reviews
Mixed Feelings
TheLittleSongbird30 April 2009
The Aileen Quinn version was one of my favourite movies when I was 10, and still is to some extent. The remake with Kathy Bates was very good, but just lacked the charm of the original. Now this TV movie, is good, but it isn't great. In fact, I have mixed feelings for this-I liked some bits, and disliked others. The acting was a mixed bag. Ashley Johnson gives a spirited performance as Annie, however if you compare her to Aileen Quinn and Alicia Morton she may be too old, and I think because of that, she lacked the innocence that both girls gave to their performances. I liked the actresses of Hannah and Molly(Camilla Belle is adorable), but not Carol Cleveland as Miss Hannigan. You don't see her very much, and compared to Carol Burnett and Kathy Bates, she isn't the Miss Hannigan we grow to love, with the love of gin, and control, and I felt both were absent here. George Hearn doesn't do too bad a job as Daddy Warbucks, and Joan Collins, looking as fabulous as she did in the 50s-60s, has a ball playing an otherwise pantomime character. I didn't care very much of the supporting characters though. The main flaw with the film was the plot. It was fast moving but it was also predictable and a little too silly at times, especially the scenes with Murphy and Rupert. I wasn't crazy about the music either. And the script is weak a vast majority of the time. In conclusion, an acceptable movie. Is it the worst movie ever? No far from it! That dishonour goes to Home Alone 4, which made me vomit when I saw what they did to two comedic near-masterpieces, and an adequate second sequel. 5/10, but that doesn't mean I hate it at all. I've just seen better. Bethany Cox
OK Annie sequel
taylor-qtpie9 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
OK So I Love the 1982 version of Annie.I watched day and night.So when I got Annie 2:a royal adventure Iwas very excited.Ashley Johnson did an OK job as Annie.Camilla Belle was adorable as Molly.AndEily Ann Lyod did good as HannahThe movie was kinda predictable and dumb.But it had it's funny moments.Still I think the whole plot with the fortune teller was stupid.And you could just tell Lady Hogbottom was evil.It just irked me.I like unpredictable movies and this sequel was predictable.Oh and 1 more thing,Why sing ''Tomorrow'' when Daddy Warbucks gets knighted?It's all about looking at the bright side of things and it was a happy moment.I just didn't get it.It would've probably fit when they were in the dungeon.I mean,really? Well,all in all i liked Annie:A royal adventure.
A disappointing "sequel" to the original
Mike-DD25 August 2000
This version is a sad and disappointing return of Annie the orphan-no-more. Silly plot and sub-plots, combined with an under-par acting by most of the actors, and woeful characterization makes this Annie film a real let-down. The antics that Annie get into are downright silly at times, and comic timing is absent at times. The bad guys in this case are so inept that they might as well turn themselves in instead of trying to escape. At least the crooks in the original Annie had much more brains and intellect than most common criminals.
Wait till it comes to free-to-air unless you are really an Annie-fan.
Wait till it comes to free-to-air unless you are really an Annie-fan.
This has been my least favorite movie for years.
jjvwcyxhr6 April 2022
This is not canon. I refuse to believe this is canon to the original 1982 Annie movie. I have never been more let down by a sequel in my life. What's so bad about it you ask?
Excellent question.
Atrocious writing, some of the laziest writing I've ever seen and doesn't even make sense as a sequel to Annie. The characters are nothing like the originals at all, they didn't even try to make them look or act similar at all.
Horrible directing, like if you think the Star Wars prequels have bad dialogue, wait til you watch this one. Also garbage cinematography, not even visually appealing in the slightest.
An absurd amount of cliches, mainly in the plot. If you want a movie where you can predict literally everything and also by the way Annie is a literal CRIME FIGHTER now, yeah I guess if that's your thing, watch it.
I could go further. It's not good. Not good by any sense of the word. I regret the day I laid eyes upon the thumbnail on Netflix and clicked "watch". The movie is so bad that it actually hurt my mental health. All I could think about for several days was the awful experience that was watching "Annie: A Royal Adventure". It haunted my thoughts day and night, I became an insomniac and had to start taking up to 10 mg of melatonin every night. I'm restless, tired, and depressed. I started seeing a therapist recently, he told me that I need to stop thinking about it so much and to not focus all my rage on it all the time, but I can't. No matter how hard I try, no matter how much melatonin I take, no matter how much media I consume at once to block out all possible thoughts of this movie, it still haunts my mind, constantly, like it's my own shadow. I don't know what to do anymore. I keep seeing visions of the bad guys popping roofies into my milk (which is an actual scene in the movie I'm not kidding) and the so called "Annie" singing tomorrow at the end of the film completely unprompted. Seriously, it was the most jarring, out of place musical number I've ever seen. I would rather watch the Human Centipede 1, 2, and 3 than watch even just that musical number again. There is nothing I can do to stop the visions, they have infiltrated even my sleep. It's all I see, and I don't know what to do.
If you are listening, I beg you, please do not watch it, do not put yourself though what I have experienced for the last 5 years. I wouldn't wish it upon anyone. If you do watch it, which I highly advise you don't, I pray that you are spared by God from the evil that will inevitably befall you. Stay away from "Annie: A Royal Adventure" at all costs.
Excellent question.
Atrocious writing, some of the laziest writing I've ever seen and doesn't even make sense as a sequel to Annie. The characters are nothing like the originals at all, they didn't even try to make them look or act similar at all.
Horrible directing, like if you think the Star Wars prequels have bad dialogue, wait til you watch this one. Also garbage cinematography, not even visually appealing in the slightest.
An absurd amount of cliches, mainly in the plot. If you want a movie where you can predict literally everything and also by the way Annie is a literal CRIME FIGHTER now, yeah I guess if that's your thing, watch it.
I could go further. It's not good. Not good by any sense of the word. I regret the day I laid eyes upon the thumbnail on Netflix and clicked "watch". The movie is so bad that it actually hurt my mental health. All I could think about for several days was the awful experience that was watching "Annie: A Royal Adventure". It haunted my thoughts day and night, I became an insomniac and had to start taking up to 10 mg of melatonin every night. I'm restless, tired, and depressed. I started seeing a therapist recently, he told me that I need to stop thinking about it so much and to not focus all my rage on it all the time, but I can't. No matter how hard I try, no matter how much melatonin I take, no matter how much media I consume at once to block out all possible thoughts of this movie, it still haunts my mind, constantly, like it's my own shadow. I don't know what to do anymore. I keep seeing visions of the bad guys popping roofies into my milk (which is an actual scene in the movie I'm not kidding) and the so called "Annie" singing tomorrow at the end of the film completely unprompted. Seriously, it was the most jarring, out of place musical number I've ever seen. I would rather watch the Human Centipede 1, 2, and 3 than watch even just that musical number again. There is nothing I can do to stop the visions, they have infiltrated even my sleep. It's all I see, and I don't know what to do.
If you are listening, I beg you, please do not watch it, do not put yourself though what I have experienced for the last 5 years. I wouldn't wish it upon anyone. If you do watch it, which I highly advise you don't, I pray that you are spared by God from the evil that will inevitably befall you. Stay away from "Annie: A Royal Adventure" at all costs.
One of the worst movies ever
erlaneyva3 May 2020
Silly, kitschy, kid-friendly, but pretty enjoyable!
I_Ailurophile9 August 2022
It hardly needs to be said, but mark this as the type of sequel/TV movie that is whipped up to revive a beloved character or franchise, but which very pointedly sticks them in odd circumstances, just for fun. After all, why not? It's safe to say that the very premise of 'Annie: A royal adventure' is rather far-fetched, but by the same token, the only intent here is family-friendly entertainment. None of the cast from this picture's 1982 predecessor have returned, nor is this a musical - but as there's no pressure to remain especially faithful to a preexisting story, everyone involved here is allowed to just have a good time. To that end, the writing is definitely simplified such that young children could enjoy it, but there's still sufficient cleverness here to make it reasonably appealing to older viewers, too. 'A royal adventure' isn't wholly essential, perhaps, but it's pretty decent!
Outlandish as the story is, Trish Soodik's screenplay is rather solid. Though geared for kids, the scene writing and dialogue is penned with wit and good humor that earns some smiles and laughs. (Even if the title character's catchphrase - "leaping lizards!" - is repeated a hair too often.) The narrative is complete and cohesive, and suitably smart that one can recognize some nice little touches to keep one engaged. Compared to what we would want of more adult-oriented fare the characters are perhaps underwritten in general, and largely reduced to a single personality trait, but it's fine for a feature of this nature. Annie alone feels duly well-rounded, buzzing with precocious energy and determination; good thing she's the protagonist!
Gratifyingly, whatever strength there is in 'A royal adventure,' the cast do a terrific job of drawing it out, guided by capable direction from Ian Toynton. Even those portraying secondary supporting characters, like Jayne Ashbourne, Perry Benson, and Camilla Belle impress with what material they're given. Joan Collins is clearly eating up the opportunity to play such a deliciously dramatic dame as Lady Hogbottom, and it's an unexpected pleasure to watch her - and Crispin Bonham-Carter, too, as he revels in chewing scenery as Rupert Hogbottom. Established stage actors as they are, it's a joy to see George Hearn and even more so Ian McDiarmid turning their skills toward realizing roles that are much sillier than their norm. Above all, it's an outright delight to see Ashley Johnson, then only 12 years old, take on the part of Annie. She has very well demonstrated her abilities in a number of capacities throughout her career, and even as a child actor she showed adept range, nuance, and poise to take on a lead role. To revisit her work at such a tender age, knowing well some of what she has done since, is just a blast.
Top it all off with excellent costume design, hair and makeup work, and filming locations, and to be honest this is really quite fun overall. The chief fault of the 1982 film was that when someone wasn't singing or dancing the title kind of dragged, and on a lesser note, the more nonsensical inclusions contrasted poorly with the intended sincerity. As this TV movie takes on these characters without any major care for heartfelt genuineness, and dispensing (almost) entirely with musical inclinations, balance never enters into the equation - so it can be what it wants without any fetters. By all means, the wildly fanciful tenor of 'A royal adventure' may be a bit much for some viewers; there's no disputing that the kitsch and boiled-down simplicity of the family-friendly writing rides a fine line. Yet that writing is stronger than I'd have given it credit for, sights unseen, and the cast go a long way in making up the difference. Most recommendable for fans of those involved, this is hardly going to appeal to all comers, but if you're open to the type of picture 'Annie: A royal adventure' represents, this is a surprisingly worthwhile movie!
Outlandish as the story is, Trish Soodik's screenplay is rather solid. Though geared for kids, the scene writing and dialogue is penned with wit and good humor that earns some smiles and laughs. (Even if the title character's catchphrase - "leaping lizards!" - is repeated a hair too often.) The narrative is complete and cohesive, and suitably smart that one can recognize some nice little touches to keep one engaged. Compared to what we would want of more adult-oriented fare the characters are perhaps underwritten in general, and largely reduced to a single personality trait, but it's fine for a feature of this nature. Annie alone feels duly well-rounded, buzzing with precocious energy and determination; good thing she's the protagonist!
Gratifyingly, whatever strength there is in 'A royal adventure,' the cast do a terrific job of drawing it out, guided by capable direction from Ian Toynton. Even those portraying secondary supporting characters, like Jayne Ashbourne, Perry Benson, and Camilla Belle impress with what material they're given. Joan Collins is clearly eating up the opportunity to play such a deliciously dramatic dame as Lady Hogbottom, and it's an unexpected pleasure to watch her - and Crispin Bonham-Carter, too, as he revels in chewing scenery as Rupert Hogbottom. Established stage actors as they are, it's a joy to see George Hearn and even more so Ian McDiarmid turning their skills toward realizing roles that are much sillier than their norm. Above all, it's an outright delight to see Ashley Johnson, then only 12 years old, take on the part of Annie. She has very well demonstrated her abilities in a number of capacities throughout her career, and even as a child actor she showed adept range, nuance, and poise to take on a lead role. To revisit her work at such a tender age, knowing well some of what she has done since, is just a blast.
Top it all off with excellent costume design, hair and makeup work, and filming locations, and to be honest this is really quite fun overall. The chief fault of the 1982 film was that when someone wasn't singing or dancing the title kind of dragged, and on a lesser note, the more nonsensical inclusions contrasted poorly with the intended sincerity. As this TV movie takes on these characters without any major care for heartfelt genuineness, and dispensing (almost) entirely with musical inclinations, balance never enters into the equation - so it can be what it wants without any fetters. By all means, the wildly fanciful tenor of 'A royal adventure' may be a bit much for some viewers; there's no disputing that the kitsch and boiled-down simplicity of the family-friendly writing rides a fine line. Yet that writing is stronger than I'd have given it credit for, sights unseen, and the cast go a long way in making up the difference. Most recommendable for fans of those involved, this is hardly going to appeal to all comers, but if you're open to the type of picture 'Annie: A royal adventure' represents, this is a surprisingly worthwhile movie!
Are You Kidding?
dramaqueen0046912 June 2007
Unfortunately there was not a 0 for a rating or else I would've chosen it. This movie lacks the star power that the original movie had in such abundance. Carol Burnett, Albert Finney, Tim Curry, Bernadette Peters, Edward Hermann, the innocence of newcomer Aileen Quinn, and expert directing from seasoned pro John Huston (father of actress Angelica Huston)is what made this film so charming. Even the 1999 remake with Kathy Bates, Victor Garber, Alan Cumming, and Kristin Chenoweth had more to offer than this sorry excuse for a sequel. Before she did this movie all Ashley Johnson was known for was her role as little Chrissie Seaver on the prime time show Growing Pains. She had a few bit parts in movies but I don't know who thought she had talent enough to carry a movie on her own. And adding Joan Collins as Lady Edwina Hogbottom, ridiculous! They couldn't get good enough actors to play the major roles like Daddy Warbucks, Miss Hannigan, and Annie but they will sign Joan Collins to play some British lady? It doesn't surprise me that this movie was as bad as it was. The critics were right to have not agreed with this movie, even if it was only made for TV, it was a poor sequel to an otherwise lovable movie.
More like the original comics, rather than the musical, and I'm glad.
landofoz-0009330 November 2023
With all the different screen versions of Annie the musical, it's nice that there is a film that feels like the forgotten comic series that started it all. There were two Little Orphan Annie films in the 40s that I have been dying to see since I was 9. I'm 18, as of this review. Other than those lost films, the other Annie films have been remakes of the tired musical version. I love the 1982 version for various sentimental reasons, and even the Kathy Bates one, but this one is really something new, and unlike the others. I first saw this when I was 7, back in 2012, in a double pack with the 1982 Annie, and I have many fond memories of watching it quite a bit as a kid. For one, the beautiful, amazing Joan Collins is in here, and she is clearly having fun as the villain, and just as glamorous as ever. Also, I think the actress playing Annie is really spunky and likable. I won't go into the plot other than Annie takes a trip to the U. K. and helps solve a crime. That plot sounds exactly like one of the comics, right? I used to collect Little Orphan Annie things when I was 9-12, so I read a lot of the original comics, and listened to some of the radio plays. I'm sure most people nowadays have never heard of the original Little Orphan Annie stories, and they only know of Annie the musical, so that is why they are put off by this film, seeing as there is only one musical number, but watching this will give you an idea of what Annie was like in the beginning, mixed with just a little bit of the musical.
Annie goes to England.
JMSchmidtty28 June 2011
this movie does not compare to the original, and it is one of the worst movies ever made, but i give it a 3 because of how unintentionally funny it is, for instance, when Annie says "it sure is big" and Michael says, enthusiastically, "it appears to be a stoner missile, used to wipe out entire villages!". Annie's hair looks really fake and Sandy doesn't even look like Sandy from the original movie. Ian McDiarmid (the emperor from star wars) must not have been getting any acting jobs back then. If any you tube poop makers are viewing this page, i greatly recommend using it for your you tube poops. Unfortunately it's hard to find on DVD but you can probably get it on amazon.
The best
izzybizzylikespigs13 December 2019
This movie is wonderful! I don't know where I got it, but I've had the dvd since I was young. It's cheesy, but it's also so much more! Annie 2 has a great plot, while it may be confusing at times, you'll understand on maybe the third watch. I really recommend it!!
Annie 2: A Royal CRINGE
kelylanne199810 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I remember watching this movie when I was young, and 7 years later I question why. In all honesty, I have never come across a sequel so bad. The storyline was terrible, and the cast were too cringing to listen to after a while. My favourite character was Sandy, that was how challenging I found it to watch the movie. Yes, the cast members were talented actors, but they just weren't right for this movie. The first Annie movie was extraordinary, incredible, and breath-taking. But 'Annie 2: A Royal Adventure'? I have no words. I appreciate the effort everyone must have gone through to make his movie, but It all seemed too predictable, and the actors were so patronising and enthusiastic that it was cringing to watch. Throughout the movie things didn't seem to make any sense. At an instant you were curious why Annie got a job doing paper-rounds yet she was adopted by the 'Richest man in the World'. In summary, don't watch this movie unless you want to waste 90 minutes of your life. Although, it would have been hard to make a sequel of one the best musicals of all time, but I just couldn't bear to watch any more.
This is actually a Famous Five adventure.
morrison-dylan-fan26 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I read IMDb comments before I saw the movie,and was rather put off it by them. I have to agree that Annie herself looks like a refugee from 'Whatever Happened to Baby Jane',but wonder if many viewers are missing the point about what this film really is? Consider: from 1942 on,British author Enid Blyton released a set of children's novels about 'The Famous Five'.In them,four children-the fifth member of the team is a dog-do things such as preventing Uncle Quentin's professor guest from being kidnapped along with his formula.Uncle Quentin is a sort of father figure,and looks after a girl 'George',actually Georgina,who's a tomboy.George and her friends live in a 1940s-50s world,even in most recent adaptations,and are constantly being menaced by heavies a escaping via secret passages in ruined castles.What is this,if not the basis of 'Annie: a Right Royal Adventure'? Viewed as such,it's a lot of fun.though I can see how it would disappoint 'Annie' fans. For more info on the Famous Five TV series,films,and musical check out IMDb.The musical is an adaptation of Mystery Moor',the thirteenth book of the series.
Awful
TeganRhan11 February 2013
Why is it when a American film company gets to make a "part 2" they always go "I know lets base it is London!".....or Paris. Asides from that cliché this film is awful because if you have seen the original or even the 1999 remake of Annie, you can forget there endings. Remember Mrs Hanigan? Carted away to the nut house in 1999 remake and taken away with her family by the cops in the original?Basically caught out as a horrible woman who would never be in charge of minors again? Well she is back owning the orphanage. Remember the president saying "I promise you girls we will find you all new and loving family's"? Seems he lied,as Molly is still in the Orphanage. The "plot" and the rest is not even worth mentioning, but the above really bugged me.
If I could give it -10 I would.
If I could give it -10 I would.
Very Disappointed
charlotte-pethers17 September 2009
Well where do i start? i think it's very insulting to the original Annie with Aileen Quimnn. I love the film Annie, and i was expecting this to be a brilliant film, but i was so disappointed! the acting is awful, the original Annie came out a few years before i was born, I'm now 25 and Annie is still one of my favourite films, So i was really excited to see Annie 2. The acting was awful in the film, were any of the characters original? very badly written, directed and acted. This is not a film i wish to see again, and any Annie lover i recommend that you don't watch this film because it will only leave you very disappointed. The young girls singing isn't bad but still doesn't compare to the original
One of the funniest disgraces to humanity I've seen . . .
orphic_okapi6 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This film is absolutely awful, but nevertheless, it can be hilarious at times, although this humor is entirely unintentional.
The plot was beyond ridiculous. I don't even think a 2 year-old would be convinced by the ludicrous idiocy that the film-makers tried to slap together into a story. However, on the positive side, some of the horrifically inane plot twists provide a great deal of humor. For example, "Wow, Lady Hogbottom has a giant missile hidden in her back yard!" It gets worse (and even funnier), but I'll spare you.
The acting is generally laughable. Most of the kids' roles are sort of cute, but not very believable. On the other hand, Annie is pretty awful all-around. The adults don't take their roles seriously at all, but this is largely a good thing. If they'd tried to be believable, the film would've been even worse. Which is difficult to imagine.
Once you get past the overall crappiness of the movie, there are actually a few standout moments of almost-not-crappiness. The scene where Lady Hogbottom's son runs away with the maid is surprisingly hilarious, though it's an annoying letdown when they get caught by the police. The butler character, while very minor, is a ray of sunlight that almost, but never quite pierces through the gloom.
Watching this movie actually caused me physical pain. Nevertheless, there were a few redeeming parts that made it almost watchable without beginning to hemorrhage internally. Judged on its good parts alone, the movie would be about a 5; unfortunately, the rest of the movie hardly deserves a 1. Thus, I give it a 3.
That's being pretty generous, I'd say.
The plot was beyond ridiculous. I don't even think a 2 year-old would be convinced by the ludicrous idiocy that the film-makers tried to slap together into a story. However, on the positive side, some of the horrifically inane plot twists provide a great deal of humor. For example, "Wow, Lady Hogbottom has a giant missile hidden in her back yard!" It gets worse (and even funnier), but I'll spare you.
The acting is generally laughable. Most of the kids' roles are sort of cute, but not very believable. On the other hand, Annie is pretty awful all-around. The adults don't take their roles seriously at all, but this is largely a good thing. If they'd tried to be believable, the film would've been even worse. Which is difficult to imagine.
Once you get past the overall crappiness of the movie, there are actually a few standout moments of almost-not-crappiness. The scene where Lady Hogbottom's son runs away with the maid is surprisingly hilarious, though it's an annoying letdown when they get caught by the police. The butler character, while very minor, is a ray of sunlight that almost, but never quite pierces through the gloom.
Watching this movie actually caused me physical pain. Nevertheless, there were a few redeeming parts that made it almost watchable without beginning to hemorrhage internally. Judged on its good parts alone, the movie would be about a 5; unfortunately, the rest of the movie hardly deserves a 1. Thus, I give it a 3.
That's being pretty generous, I'd say.
Shocking!
orangeprincess_em29 December 2006
Not even worth watching this tacky spoiler ruins everything about 'Annie'. The characters seem almost cheapened by the poorly written storyline and they low quality feeling to the production. It was very clearly made for TV, yet if I found it on my television, I would flick it straight over. The children in the film do an alright job, yet the adults acting is unbelievable and so the movie fails to really draw you in. This film lacked the music/dance numbers thats made the original brilliant and truly does take the shine of the Annie we all love. Johnson, as Annie is at times annoying and over acted..you cannot convince yourself that she truly is Annie. The differences in character appearance continued to irritate me throughout the duration of the film. Sad to say this sequel was a total flop.
Annie is two thumbs down
audrey29200323 August 2005
Annie's wig does not look good. she is not cute and pretty enough to play Annie. Annie sticks out in the movie, as her outfits look like Halloween costumes. terrible acting and terrible plots. This movie is such a change from the 1982 version. I think that a younger and smaller girl should have had the lead role. Ashley Johnson portrays a very boyish Annie. Not appealing at all. At least the casting director got it right with Daddy Warbucks. Ms. Hannigan was also miscast. Camilla Belle played Molly alright. "Warning" this movie might insult your IQ so you might just want to only show it to very young children. 8 and younger. Some of the plots are too fictional and could hardly take place in the real world.
Where is the "0" rating?
ascheidler2 January 2012
My daughter picked this out from the video rental place, and it is absolutely dreadful. Irritating characters, annoyingly awful "plot" (note the quotes), shameful "acting" (quotes again!)... this movie is totally devoid of redeeming qualities.
Do what you can to fool your kids into picking ANYTHING else. My daughter also picked out an American Girl movie that same day (the one about Kitt during the depression), and contrary to my expectations it was very good. A decent story that weaves in a historical lesson as well as a good example of being honest and kind.
The two movies couldn't have been more different...
Do what you can to fool your kids into picking ANYTHING else. My daughter also picked out an American Girl movie that same day (the one about Kitt during the depression), and contrary to my expectations it was very good. A decent story that weaves in a historical lesson as well as a good example of being honest and kind.
The two movies couldn't have been more different...
The filmic equivalent of Ready Salted flavoured crisps.
sarcasm_for_free14 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Let's see... in this sequel we have Annie going to London with two gal pals and her dog Sandy, to see her adopted father Daddy Warbucks being knighted by Prince Philip (Can he do that? I thought that duty was the sole preserve of the Queen).
Naturally, she gets up to all kinds of unrestrained hi-jinx along the way, mostly involving a couple of dumb Home Alone-style goons employed by a villainous Joan Collins in typically flirtatious form. She plans to blow up Buckingham Palace to become the new monarch you see, and to do that she plans to kidnap a scientist friend of Annie's to launch a missile...
Yes, I'm afraid it IS as stupid as it sounds. It's like the producers and TV schedulers (this was not a theatrical release, Que Surprise) desperately needed an Annie sequel to fill a Holiday timeslot. Instead of making a marvellous musical masterpiece to compliment the original though, they took a random harebrained screenplay off the shelf that could literally be about any group of spunky kids and dumb adults and said "this'll do".
Oh, I almost forgot... the cast DO sing a few lines from Tomorrow just before the ending credits roll. The strange thing is though, all the people joining in (apart from the actors playing Annie and Warbucks) seem to do so almost reluctantly, with little emotion or passion behind their crooning and nary a smile in sight.
Sort of how the movie was greenlit, I'd wager. 4/10.
Naturally, she gets up to all kinds of unrestrained hi-jinx along the way, mostly involving a couple of dumb Home Alone-style goons employed by a villainous Joan Collins in typically flirtatious form. She plans to blow up Buckingham Palace to become the new monarch you see, and to do that she plans to kidnap a scientist friend of Annie's to launch a missile...
Yes, I'm afraid it IS as stupid as it sounds. It's like the producers and TV schedulers (this was not a theatrical release, Que Surprise) desperately needed an Annie sequel to fill a Holiday timeslot. Instead of making a marvellous musical masterpiece to compliment the original though, they took a random harebrained screenplay off the shelf that could literally be about any group of spunky kids and dumb adults and said "this'll do".
Oh, I almost forgot... the cast DO sing a few lines from Tomorrow just before the ending credits roll. The strange thing is though, all the people joining in (apart from the actors playing Annie and Warbucks) seem to do so almost reluctantly, with little emotion or passion behind their crooning and nary a smile in sight.
Sort of how the movie was greenlit, I'd wager. 4/10.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
