La rivincita dei nerds III
Titolo originale: Revenge of the Nerds III: The Next Generation
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,9/10
5299
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
I nerd hanno conquistato il collegio, ma alcuni atleti non lo permetteranno più.I nerd hanno conquistato il collegio, ma alcuni atleti non lo permetteranno più.I nerd hanno conquistato il collegio, ma alcuni atleti non lo permetteranno più.
James Cromwell
- Mr. Skolnick
- (as Jamie Cromwell)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe only Nerds film in which Booger doesn't belch.
- BlooperWhen the members of Lambda Lambda Lambda are watching Harold Skolnick remotely controlling the robot to mess with the Alpha Beta's pimple cream, Harold Skolnick narrates "We're here at the world renowned Tri-Lamb fraternity bathroom where we've secretly replaced their Pimple Clear with pimple inducing ingredients". He should have said they were at the Alpha Beta fraternity's bathroom. It was mentioned earlier in the film that the Tri-Lamb house and everything in it had been given to the Alpha Betas, however, so Alpha Betas using the Tri-Lamb bathroom is not an error.
- Citazioni
[seeing Lewis get chummy with Stan Gable]
Dudley 'Booger' Dawson, Esq.: You've become the worst kind of nerd. A self-hating one. I remember when you were the George Washington of nerds. Now, you're more like the Benedict Arnold!
- ConnessioniFeatures Studs (1991)
Recensione in evidenza
Extremely Bad On All Levels
Revenge of the Nerds III (1992)
1/2 (out of 4)
Made-for-TV sequel is pretty horrid and a real insult the even the second film in the series, which was pretty bad on its own. This time out we have a fresh group of nerds showing up at Atoms College, which has pretty much been nerd friendly for the past decade. Soon Stanley Gable (Ted McGinley) is hired as Dean and he plans on making the college more jocks but the gang from the original movie has other plans. You can file this one under the "what the heck where they thinking" section because if someone wanted to kick start the franchise why on earth make it a pathetic made-for-TV movie? Okay, movies for television can be pretty good but the production values here are so cheap and the story so bad you're really going to feel like you're watching an episode of Saved by the Bell: The College Years. I'm really not sure where to start but I guess we'll begin with the two new leads who are downright annoying, pathetic and just unlikeable. The key behind the first film is that we liked the characters but that's not the case here as all of the newbies are just annoying and you can't help but want to pick on them as well. Another major problem are the characters from the first movie as they too are underwritten and come off looking like cheap, fake copies of the originals. Curtis Armstrong, McGinley, Julie Montgomery and Robert Carradine are just a few of the folks brought back here and more get dragged into the film at the very end for brief cameos. I really like the idea of bringing back the original group but if they were going to go through all the trouble of getting everyone signed it looks like they would have spent some extra time on an actual story. What we have here is just one bad sequence after another and we know where it's all going to go as we get the typical tired story of the nerds having to fight yet again. This here is a real mess of a movie and a major insult to the original film. The only reason this thing avoids a BOMB rating is due to McGinley and Carradine sharing a few nice moments when they first meet up after all these years.
1/2 (out of 4)
Made-for-TV sequel is pretty horrid and a real insult the even the second film in the series, which was pretty bad on its own. This time out we have a fresh group of nerds showing up at Atoms College, which has pretty much been nerd friendly for the past decade. Soon Stanley Gable (Ted McGinley) is hired as Dean and he plans on making the college more jocks but the gang from the original movie has other plans. You can file this one under the "what the heck where they thinking" section because if someone wanted to kick start the franchise why on earth make it a pathetic made-for-TV movie? Okay, movies for television can be pretty good but the production values here are so cheap and the story so bad you're really going to feel like you're watching an episode of Saved by the Bell: The College Years. I'm really not sure where to start but I guess we'll begin with the two new leads who are downright annoying, pathetic and just unlikeable. The key behind the first film is that we liked the characters but that's not the case here as all of the newbies are just annoying and you can't help but want to pick on them as well. Another major problem are the characters from the first movie as they too are underwritten and come off looking like cheap, fake copies of the originals. Curtis Armstrong, McGinley, Julie Montgomery and Robert Carradine are just a few of the folks brought back here and more get dragged into the film at the very end for brief cameos. I really like the idea of bringing back the original group but if they were going to go through all the trouble of getting everyone signed it looks like they would have spent some extra time on an actual story. What we have here is just one bad sequence after another and we know where it's all going to go as we get the typical tired story of the nerds having to fight yet again. This here is a real mess of a movie and a major insult to the original film. The only reason this thing avoids a BOMB rating is due to McGinley and Carradine sharing a few nice moments when they first meet up after all these years.
D’aiuto•13
- Michael_Elliott
- 9 apr 2010
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare una lista video per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Revenge of the Nerds III: The Next Generation
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was La rivincita dei nerds III (1992) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi