American Boyfriends (1989) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
American Boyfriends
goblingal17 June 2005
Now whoever wrote the other comment on IMDb about this movie doesn't know anything about this movie. first all Lizzie is Sandy's childhood friend along with Thelma. The new girl Sandy meets at Simon Fraser is Julie Labelle played by Toronto's own Liisa Repo-Martell.

This movie is a good movie with a good storyline but it could have been done better pepping it up could have helped some and maybe making Thelma less aggravating.

if you like Liisa Repo-Martell movies catch Nights below station street, story of a girl with a huge problem one that she eventually couldn't keep hiding.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What went wrong with Sandy Wilson?
Spuzzlightyear14 August 2005
Poor Sandy Wilson, critically acclaimed for her first feature film, The American Cousin, then having the ENORMOUS pressure of following up with her follow-up, American Boyfriends, and bombing with that, then bombing one more time with Harmony Cats before dropping out of sight.

Having never seen American Cousin (well, maybe I have, I just can't remember now), I went into this film having some sort of background about what the film was (a sequel) and the history of it (eg it tanked).

The semi-autobiographical film takes place in the 1960's, where Sandy (played by Margaret Langrick) her two friends, and her roommate go down to the US to see her American cousin get married. During the wedding reception, Sandy and her roommate make a snap decision to travel further to California, where they meet some sort of drifter draft danger dodgers, which further complicates matters. Sandy has some hard decisions to make about her future, but before she does that, it all comes crashing down by one phone call.

I think the main problem with this, in my opinion, is that Wilson is quite comfortable with the characters she's familiar with from the original movie, that would be Sandy and her two friends and John Wildman, The new roommate and the people in California I found, I wasn't rooting for as much, if at all. All the while when the two were in California, I kept wondering what happened to her friends that she left behind. Like I said, I haven't seen the original movie, and the fact that I can pick out and root for all her home-grown characters and not the newer ones, just shows to you what mistakes Wilson made on this.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ho-hum... a decent effort
pinstripe31 July 2003
American Boyfriends is a film that is easily forgotten, which is a sad but true aspect of a lot of films that viewers entail. The problem here is that there is just nothing to keep the viewer into the film, and make them stay completely raptured.

The story consists of a young Canadian girl named Sandy (Margaret Langrick) from Penticton who moves to the Coast to pursue her studies at Simon Fraser University. She soon meets her new "best friend" Lizzie (Delia Breit), and the two hit it off quite quickly. Soon enough, Sandy's friends from home come to visit, also making stops to search for wedding dresses for one of the girls. Before you know it, all four of the girls are off to Portland to visit Sandy's cousin Butch's wedding. The rest is just pure spontaneity, and seems a bit far fetched of what two fresh university students would do, but the preposterousness was probably intended by the director.

Don't get me wrong: American Boyfriends is not a bad film, it's just not great. The acting is decent, the storyline is a bit lacking, but in general, it's just one of those films you probably won't remember you watched until you begin to watch it again.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If this is romance, than my vote is that it has died.
film-critic20 November 2007
Films need to stand alone. No sequel should work where one needs to see the first to understand the second; the work of the director is to allow first time viewers to understand their goals, missions, and tones of the film without forcing more money out of their hard earned pockets. Not the case here. From the beginning we are pushed into the lives of these four, sometimes three, mostly two, teenagers that love nothing more in life than to talk about sex, getting married, past boyfriends, and historical moments in the past. The problem with this film, where it faults immediately, is that there is no future. Nobody cares about consequences or decisions, and there is no authority there to stop them. Sure, this was 1965, the times had fewer boundaries, but Wilson doesn't give us this. She allows her girls to have free reign and control, and thus the story becomes disastrous. To begin, we have no characters. There were no developed characters at all in this film. Through monotone voices, staged lines, and unrehearsed moments, we follow these girls as they leave college, head to Oregon, and suddenly into California. No parent worries, money doesn't seem to be an issue, reality happens to float right out the window. One would think witty dialogue would follow, but it doesn't. Nothing of value occurs with out characters, because they give us nothing to care about. A review quotes Margaret Langrick's performances as "Sandy Wilcox" as charming, but to me, she was utterly dull. None of these characters has any emotion when they spoke, they were all dried up, and nobody (the actors nor the director) seemed to care. It was the 1960s, I guess anything was possible.

Moving past the characters, one would hope that the story would venture at least a spark of interest, but not with "American Boyfriends". Having nearly found myself ill with the characters, the story had me running to the bathroom. Nothing was cohesive. I have used the word "nothing" quite a bit, but it is because all other words escape me. Nothing of value happened in this film. In one scene we were driving to a wedding, no money, no cares, and the open road ahead of us. Then, we are getting gas, eating dinner, getting our hair done, and living the pampered life. Then we are at the wedding, cousins flirt, the driest best man (another sore moment for the film) attempts to talk, couples unite, others break apart, and free cars are given out to those that whine the most. Then we are in California, looking for surfers, finding freeloaders, drinking, listening to music, crying about the war, and talking to a guy named "Glider" who apparently loves hotdogs. Tragedy happens; we are back to Canada, and rushing the boarders. All in a days work -- but not for me. Nothing of value happened outside of what I just mentioned. There are no characters, no stories -- not one reason for this film to even exist. My toes wouldn't even tap at the music because it seemed cliché and overused. It didn't reflect the situations that our pseudo-characters were going through. It felt as if Wilson wanted to make a film, throw in several of her own favorite songs, and keep her friends from films past – not actually make a strong, memorable body of work. Most of the time I can find at least one positive comment to make about a body of work that a team spent blood and tears on, but with "American Boyfriends" nothing comes to mind. It was a stale piece of bread hoping to find out that lighting does strike twice, but alas, the weatherman called for clear skies.

Overall, I cannot suggest this little film to anyone. There is a reason why it hasn't seen the DVD light yet, and it would be a waste of disc space if it miraculously did. The characters were unmotivated, boring, staged, random, and sprinkled with a bit of amateur night on top. They were not professionals and only added to the diminished quality of the film. The story was non-existent. There was nothing, outside of what I could summarize in two minutes that made this film stand out in my mind. It was as if Sandy Wilson didn't know how to make a movie, or that there wasn't any script, just money and a map. Focus on the direction and characters, no matter the power of the story, and still something will stick to the audience. There was nothing of value at all. The music, of which this film prided itself on (i.e. see the sticker on the box) was horrendous. It completely missed the direction of the story. It felt like I was watching "Good Morning Vietnam" set to opera music – it just didn't work. There is nothing positive to say about this film. It is a blemish on both the Hollywood name as well as the word "sequel". I cannot suggest this film to friends or family, nor even to Sandy Wilson. It was rushed, trite, and completely incomplete. Whomever thought these girls could act, were horribly mistaken. Skip this one please, for the sake of your family – you will live a happier life.

Grade: * out of *****
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ew!
Yew1 June 1999
This movie stunk. For those of you Nicholas Lea fans out there who are trying to get ahold of this movie because it's listed on his credits and you can't find any information about it anywhere...look no further. Nick has about 15 seconds TOTAL screen time and about one barely audible line. This movie is not worth sitting through...even for Nick. The characters seem contrived, the story is rushed, and it becomes increasingly hard to sit through it as time passes. Honestly...pass it over on the shelf, and get something better.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Flop
reesiji4 January 2021
Compared to her first film, My American Cousin, this really stank. The lead, John Wildman, must have taken acting classes between the two films, because in this one he's all "actorish" and self conscious, really ruining the film. In the first film he was natural and boyish. In this one he's a parody.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Because of the return engagement of writer-director Sandy Wilson and stars Margaret Langrick and John Wildman, American Boyfriends is a worthy sequel to My American Cousin
tavm27 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Several years ago, I watched something called My American Cousin, a partly autobiographical film written and directed by Sandy Wilson and she cast a young teen girl named Margaret Langrick as her when she was 12 growing up in Canada. The title character was played by John Wildman who was also Canadian but convincingly played the rebellious cousin from down below showing his relative a lifestyle she was fascinated by. So now Sandy Wilcox (Langrick's character) is in university with a new friend but when calling one of her old friends finds out Butch (Wildman's character) is getting married so she, her roommate, and two of her old friends crash at his nuptials. I'll stop there and say the best scenes are when Sandy and Butch are reunited especially their final scene. The rest after that meanders quite a bit though when Butch's fate is later revealed, some more touching moments occur that make this quite worth seeing as a sequel to one of the most critically-acclaimed films to come from up north. So on that note, I highly recommend American Boyfriends.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Low-budget, mildly entertaining
Leafan23 May 1999
I brought this film to see my favorite actor, Nicholas Lea, but was left disappointed because he was only in two scenes. other than that the only reason I can see to watch this sequel to the smash hit Canadian film My American Cousin is if you have nothing better to do, it's not that bad but lacks any real plotline other than a few girls going on a car drive around California. Oh well, Maybe the sequel - My American Step-Mother will make a bigger impact - Ha Ha Ha!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed