Who Killed Baby Azaria? (TV Movie 1983) Poster

(1983 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Absolutely abysmal acting, writing and directing.
marnifrances10 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
After watching "A Cry in the Dark" and "Through My Eyes", this made for television movie left me disgusted. The writing, acting and directing are all abysmal to put it nicely.

It is clear that Frank Moorhouse (writer and narrator) researched little more than court documents to put together this awful documentary style tele-drama.

Moorhouse's narration is strained and told from the prosecution's point of view and there is little point of view from the Chamberlain family. The acting is horrible to say the least and it's no wonder Lindy Chamberlain was so disappointed in this obviously rushed and biased film.

The so-called "scientific evidence" (that was eventually quashed when the Chamberlains were exonerated) is presented in a rushed and careless manner . No scientific evidence or research conducted and collected by the defense team was presented at all.

This tele-drama serves one purpose: for you to be left thinking that Lindy Chamberlain murdered her child.

However, this movie was made in 1983, while Lindy Chamberlain was still in jail. It is a very early take on the events and it is dangerous to rely on this movie alone for the facts of the case.

I encourage you to watch this out of interest rather than to gain knowledge or draw an opinion from. There are 2 far better movies to see on this case and they are : "A Cry In The Dark" and "Through My Eyes". Both these far better!
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Trash
CalamityDrain23 August 2007
The evidence that the prosecution bungled so horribly? The only 'evidence' that favored the prosecution, were scraps they created themselves, popular opinion which they fostered by 'leaking' to the media, and erroneous forensic tests on stuff that wasn't even blood done by attention seeking idiots. There was no evidence that the woman killed her child. Look up the real facts of the case, instead of believing this pile of trash.

The real life family went through enough. This movie just adds insult to injury.

This movie should be classified as fictitious, just like the prosecution's case. Any money made by this horrendous film should be given, with an apology, to The Chamberlain family.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The best telling of the true story
Movie Hound Video3 April 2001
This documentary style TV movie puts " A CRY IN THE DARK" to shame. That movie was obviously Meryl Streep's way of saying she believed the woman. This movie takes scientific evidence and actually court documents and shows the real story on what happened in Australia that night in 1980. Dingo dog or murdering mother? Watch the evidence and make your judgment!
1 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed