The Last Dinosaur (1977) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
it can easily be enjoyed, if one judges it for what it is: a low-budget flick
TheUnknown837-13 November 2007
"The Last Dinosaur", the title for a particular late-70s science-fiction flick which was apparently (I'm guessing by a few details in the credits and in the film) a cooperation of American and Japanese film companies. This film was obviously made on an incredibly low budget, which you can judge by many aspects of it shown on the screen. "The Last Dinosaur" is preposterous, has campy effects, redone sound effects that still retain aspects of their original versions, and with the exception of Richard Boone, completely wooden acting. It is a mindless film, and yet, somehow, there is something classic and enjoyable about it. It's a film that cannot be forgotten by those who have seen it. And whether they loved it or hated it, they remember it for being so cheap. Why is it enjoyable, then? I myself don't really know the answer. There's just some things about some films like this that somehow in some way work out.

The title of the film isn't completely accurate, according to the storyline. The so called "last dinosaur" of the film is a humanoid tyrannosaurus rex who sounds uncannily like Godzilla, and is portrayed by a man in a rubber suit. But we see lots of other creatures on screen. We see pterosaurs (which technically aren't dinosaurs, but are still prehistoric creatures), a giant reptilian mistaken to be a ceratopsian. And then we see an actual ceratopsian, a triceratops. So evidently, this T-rex is not alone in his prehistoric world.

The special effects on the film are simply laughable. We are humored by the dinosaurs more than we are frightened by them. There are several instances when the rubber heads of the creature get pushed in and then bounce back out into perfect form again, totally impossible in real life, considering that heads are made of skulls. There is a point in the film when a triceratops falls over onto its side and although we were more than obvious to the fact that it was made by two men in a heavy suit, standing one behind the other, it becomes more obvious in the mentioned scene. First, the guy in the front falls, yet the second guy apparently wasn't timing himself, for the back legs were still standing for a while before they finally realized they had to fall over too.

Casting and acting was wooden, not counting Richard Boone, who was popular as a cinema villain. Here, he is kind of an anti-hero. A womanizer, hunter, tough guy. Yet, even Boone doesn't really save the cast. It's not his acting that was the problem, it was the lines he was given to say. "That's not an alligator, it's a crocodile, and yet I shot it too.", "You ding-dong!", "a great scientific mind was killed by a beast with a brain the size of a dried pea!", and so on and so forth. The other actors were simply horrible at their jobs, maybe excepting the dark-skinned actor who didn't have any dialogue to say. But those people dressed up as a cavemen were perhaps the most hilarious part of the film. Not only being totally unnecessary, but not unexpected plot points, they made me laugh as I watched them walk slowly, swaying their arms from side to side with their mouths hanging open. A lot of characters were also totally unintelligent. Such as a press conference scene, where reporters did not ask enough questions. No logical questions. They didn't even ridicule the idea of a live dinosaur, as they do in most sci-fi flicks.

While "The Last Dinosaur" is totally ludicrous and lacking in intelligence, it is somehow entertaining. Once again, I'll state that I don't know why I enjoyed it. Maybe I just like old cheap monster movies. This is cheaper than any of the old late-60s and 70s Godzilla films in all regards. But whatever, the case, "The Last Dinosaur" was an okay 70s monster movie. It will meet people halfway in terms of their outlooks upon the film. But everybody will describe it as cheap.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not Bad Dinosaur Film.
AaronCapenBanner23 September 2013
Richard Boone plays billionaire Masten Thrust, an oil tycoon and big game hunter who leads a scientific expedition to explore a lost land in a dormant volcano under the polar ice cap. Joining him are scientists played by Joan Van Ark and Steven Keats, as well as a renowned Japanese scientist who doesn't last very long...seems that a T-Rex is out to get them, and it will prove to be the biggest challenge of Thrust's career.

Reasonably entertaining yarn is fun for kids, but also has themes of obsession and tragedy that will appeal to adults. Sure, compared to the "Jurassic Park" films the F/X here are primitive, but at the time, were impressive, and hold up OK. Not especially original, but does have a fitting end. On DVD from Warner Archive collection.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Jurrasic Park Meets Land Of The Lost
happipuppi1326 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I was ecstatic when I found an actual copy of this a few years back.

With good reason, I hadn't seen this film since 1981. During a rainy Saturday afternoon on local TV . (Yes, it went from Network TV to syndicated local TV "that" fast.)

I was 12 or 13 back then and (of course) long before CGI would make effects eye popping ,I can honestly say for myself, I was actually amazed as a kid by the effects here. Yes... young, innocent and naive' .

I proudly admit it.

....but that's what made watching this film fun and even exciting then. I really believed all I saw and felt the characters truly were in danger and the creatures seemed real as well.

In a new perspective, yes, Jurrasic Park had taken the effects of films like this and made them instantly 'old school' and (to some) laughable.

I'll admit, it made me laugh to see that Pterodactyl right off the bat, when the ship emerged to the new world, from the water. And, how Masten,Chuck & Bunta were able to create & build crossbows & arrows to brand new factory like perfection.

Still, like many say here ,the fun is in watching the actors try and make this a believable story. They came kind of close.

Boone was over the top but still pretty good as a man who has seen may great adventures but is now seeing that his best years and times are behind him. (Hence the name of the movie & not just for the T-Rax itself.) Big laugh from him calling chuck a "ding-dong" , a nice safe PG rated insult.

He knows this is his last expedition & last chance to do something great and feel great about himself, After retirement, according to him ,there's nothing to expect.

In second place is Joan Van Ark (less than a year away from debuting her now iconic character "Valerie" on Dallas.) At first it looks like her character would be a really strong female who'd take Masten to task and put him in his place.

In the first 1/2, I have to say it, she smiles and laughs way too much. Maybe that's her character's persona but even after she gets leeches on her, instead of getting really upset, she just (again half smiling) says "leeches...yuk!"

It's not until things get really bad for her & the crew that her performance really gets interesting. From being hounded by the big bad dinosaur, to irate cave people and then realizing that she & the crew may be trapped in the past forever.

Dr. Kawamoto (Tetsu Nakamura) says little and big shock ,becomes the first victim of the dinosaur. In a scene eerily similar to the now classic Jurrasic Park "bathroom" moment ....the poor man sees the monster tower over him ...and stomp him like an insect.

The rest of the cast (like Bunta played by Luther Rackley & not counting the cave people), may as well have not have been given any lines at all. Anything they were given to day is pretty boring or predictable and not that interesting.

In the end ,the message is clear that Masten is seeking that final glory to the point of an obsession with the dinosaur. He only wants to kill it so he can brag about something for maybe the last time and hunting & killing is what he's truly best at.

Despite the things that make us laugh here (unitended or not), the final sequence and ending is actually very poignant and has a fair level of meaning.

So, in all ,I rate this film 6 stars.

A star each for Boone & Van Ark. One star for the fun and the final star for the somewhat deeper meaning to it all. (END)
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stumbles around on Steggy feet...
gazzo-22 December 2000
Well, I haven't seen this since it was originally aired in '77...so my comments are based on something I saw 23 years ago. But I remember, and my brothers remember, it was pretty good. And the rock-bouncing-off-T-Rex's-head thing that is mentioned-that was Cool! We liked that! Ditto the being drug down the hill by the boulder scene. This was fast paced, tongue in cheek, exciting-we enjoyed it.

What can I say? Maybe its terrible, maybe it's bad Godzilla/Gammera level-I donno. But at the time, we had a blast.

So-a 1977 rec. here....

**1/2 outta ****
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Welcome to the Jurassic valley of the rubber lizards.
mark.waltz23 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I'll give this campy TV movie credit for one thing. It's one that I'll never forget. Of course, I don't mean that in a good way, but I had fun laughing at it from the ridiculous characterizations played by Richard Boone and Joan Van Ark to the two men struggling to make the Triceratops move as if it is real. One of the men was one way while the other one in the back moves the other way, and no creature in history has ever looked so disjointed. You've also got a giant turtle, pterodactyls and a Tyrannosaurus Rex that looks fairly realistic but nothing like what Spielberg would create two decades later.

An incredible puzzle piece box cover represents the valley in the middle of nowhere that time has stood still for these prehistoric creatures, and boom goes on an expedition there with the hopes of adding the T-Rex to his collection of stuffed animals. His seemingly cheery character is completely dislike Cabool, seen at the beginning of the film taking a woman he's just met on a private plane and then turning around and buy her a return ticket home the minute they get there, giving her a gold bullet as a gift. "What am I supposed to do with this?" she asks, and all his ego can only think of is to basically never forget him.

Then there's Joan Van Ark as a world-famous journalist photographer, whose pictures are apparently worth thousands of dollars. Her character is annoying from the moment she began stalking Boone so she can travel with him, and she's not the kind of person that you want on any kind of a journey where there might be danger. Her eternal cheeriness begins to get on the nerves right away, and when she begins weeping when the t-rex destroys their camp and the only way out, you long for her to be abandoned by the survivors. As for Boone, he deserves here to become a dino toothpick.

I must say that the best performances come from the grinding cave people who also become a threat. Their little attempts at speech are far more intelligent than the physical script which the trained actors must recite. This has the impact of one of those B Universal Maria Montez films but none of the panache. At least the characters in those films were likeable. Here, I had no interest in seeing how they got rescued.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worst dinosaur movie I've ever seen. Recommended
knsevy3 December 2003
Stupidly beautiful. This movie epitomizes the 'so bad it's good' genre of films.

The only two talents in it are Richard Boone and Joan van Ark, and only Boone is any good. It's kind of sad that the man who rose to fame as Paladin should wind up in this ugly pile of celluloid. While he turns in a fantastic performance, I couldn't help but feel that he so outclassed all his fellow actors in this piece that he shouldn't even have been there.

The effects in this film are laughable, but fun. The idea of a dinosaur being buried in the wall of a cave and suddenly coming to life is B-movie gold. When the 'triceratops' gets killed, watch how it falls. It's clear that the stunt performer in the FRONT of the costume knows the timing best. He falls to the ground, well before the back half of the dinosaur follows suit.

Speaking of 'suits', there is nothing good to say about the purple tyrannosaur, in this flick. It seems to have some kind of stealth technology, since Bunta (reputed to be the best tracker in the world) twice fails to notice it until it's within biting range of him. I don't know how all the prints are, but in the version I own, the Tyranno's roar contains Godzilla's trademark bellow.

This is loads of fun, to watch, if you like bad movies. I love them, and especially bad monster movies, so I consider this the gem of my collection. If bad movies are your thing, definitely get this one.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stupid, but not boring (except for the bit where they are literally boring).
BA_Harrison19 September 2021
The same year that George Lucas and his team developed groundbreaking special effects to bring audiences bizarre alien creatures and dramatic space battles in Star Wars, this US/Japanese co-production settled for far less advanced techniques to bring its dinosaurs to life, making it an embarrassingly clunky, yet still rather charming addition to the Lost World genre. Rivalling The Land That Time Forgot (1974) for worst movie dinosaurs of the decade, The Last Dinosaur features Tokusatsu-style men-in-rubber-suit monsters that are wholly unconvincing, but which will undoubtedly hold much appeal for fans of all things kaiju (the film's T-Rex even sounds like Godzilla).

Richard Boone stars as Masten Thrust, the wealthiest man in the world (but still unable to hire a decent graphic designer to make his company a decent logo), who leads an expedition to a lost world in the polar region, where he hopes to find a living Tyrannosaurus Rex. Joining him on the journey into the unknown are geologist Chuck Wade (Steven Keats), scientist Dr. Kawamoto (Tetsu Nakamura), photographer Francesca Banks (Joan Van Ark) and brave Masai tracker Bunta (Luther Rackley). After navigating their way to the prehistoric land in a laser borer craft, the team are attacked by a tribe of savage cavemen and face danger from a T-Rex that steals their transport and stomps their camp.

Entertaining for its sheer silliness, The Last Dinosaur features unrealistic miniatures, a laughably bad Pteranodon that endlessly circles the sky, and a triceratops that somehow conceals itself in a rock face to launch a surprise attack on the T-Rex. Other dumb moments include Francesca unknowingly standing on the back of a giant turtle, the T-rex stealthily sneaking up on its victims unheard, Masten ordering Bunta to find 200 yards of tough vine (that's 600ft, or 182 metres, but the ever resourceful Bunta comes through), the T-Rex being yanked off its feet by a tumbling boulder (attached to the dinosaur by that tough vine!), the speedy construction of a massive medieval-style catapult (I'm still not sure where that axe came from), and Chuck and Francesca miraculously transporting the steel (so presumably extremely heavy) borer over land to re-launch it in a lake.

5/10 - it's silly, it's stupid, it's technically inept, but it's also quite fun as a result.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
classic 70s
gharf-120 August 2007
i was 9 when i first saw this on TV. on a Friday night. i remember the full page ad in the TV guide with the picture of the Rex. amazing how some things stick in your mind after 30 years. Anyway if your a kid who likes monster movies this one is entertaining enough especially with boone and Keats raging at each other. Special effects are no harryhausen but its worth the hour and a half if you find it somewhere on late night TV. Haven't seen it in a few years for some reason these classics fade from cable TV. If you do catch it on late night don't be too critical just grab some snacks and enjoy it. it might be cheesy but i thought it was a lot better than the kong remake that came out in the theaters a year before.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It wasn't a classic, but was worth while.
NerdBat1 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As a Paleontologist, I have to say terrible! But as a science fiction enthusiast, I have to say it was a good one. Maybe not a classic, but that's to be debated. The ended sorta left us hanging though, what happens to the big game hunter? Did he accomplish the task he was so determined to do? What of the people who did leave? Was their story believed? I also had to poke fun a bit at the tribe that inhabited the land. Obviously hostile towards the protagonist group, they reminded me of Eskimo tribes in their *apparent* Ethnicity. Not sure though, but that's just me. In any case, I probably won't watch this movie again. To be honest, I rarely watch films more than once, but this is worth anyone's time who loves science fiction and B movies as much as I do.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
American-Japanese joint venture at Cinema Fantastique!!!
elo-equipamentos19 June 2019
Another piece of the Cinema Fantastique, the American-Japanese joint venture in this bold production, starting for the casting, the already older Richard Boone lent his large background as a great Tycoon and tough guy, Joan Van Ark a dared and beauty journalist didn't convincing at all, Steven Keats has an average performance only, the monsters coming from Japanese's school, something alike Godzilla standards, so fake as three-dollars bill, stunts covered by a rubber costumers, when the T-Rex was hit by the catapult's stone is easy perceives that T-Rex's head was made by rubber and a overlong tail, anyway a careless production, the fight between Triceratops and Tyrannosaurus Rex is enough acceptable, at last, the props as the Polar Borer's miniature is quite different from large one, also how two tired persons rolling it from a remote cave to the river is too much laughable, the music score is misplaced, soft songs mixing with something weird, a trash picture which pleased me, is enough funny a fine entertainment, however a low profile production!!

Resume:

First watch: 2015 / How many: 2 / Source: DVD-R / Rating: 6.5
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The second most interesting man in the world ...................
merklekranz28 June 2011
Now I'm here to tell you that "The Last Dinosaur" is the "cream of the crap" when it comes to hilarious, cheap, ridiculous, monster movies. Not even the reigning champ, "Mighty Peking Man" can compare to this wonder of wondrous trash. A certain beer commercial has the "most interesting man in the world", however this film has Richard Boone, playing Masten Thrust, who's dinosaur hunting exploits certainly qualify him as at least the second most interesting man in the world. Throw in a rubber suited T-Rex , beer can polar borers, Japanese cave men, a basketball player for a tracker, and it goes on and on. This should be banned at "bad movie festivals" as unfair competition. - MERK
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fun...they don't make 'em like this anymore....
zillabob19 August 2007
The Last Dinosaur was one of those "out of nowhere" movie-of-the-week films in the 1970's that was pretty exciting for the time especially to fans of Japanese Tokusatsu films. Originally slated for a theatrical release (around when the Dino King Kong was out in the previous December) it was suddenly pulled and made into a Friday Night ABC Movie of The Week. Rankin Bass-who were no strangers to Japanese co-productions were the guns behind this production, co-produced with Tsuburaya Productions of Japan-the people who brought us Ultraman in various forms. Starring mostly an American cast including the late Richard Boone, Joan Van Ark and the late Steven Keats, it told the tale of a prehistoric pocket of time in what was a superheated volcanic caldera somewhere at the frozen arctic circle, containing dinosaurs. It plays a lot like the films The Land Unknown(1956) and The Land That Time Forgot(1975) in feel and pace. Sure the dinosaurs were guys in suits(A Triceratops with front knees!) but they were filmed in such a way, the music and score was so well done, and the cast did a fine job that this didn't matter much to many of us brought up on Godzilla. The film has a lot of class to it, from the opening score by Nancy Wilson "The Last Dinosaur" to the overall "big" feeling of the film-the locations at hot springs in Northern Japan were excellent and lush- and the undeniable feeling of Kaiju Eiga to it. There are some amazing set pieces-the T-Rex's "bone yard" and a tracking shot that takes us deep into the jungle to see the T-Rex eat a giant fish from a stream. Tsuburaya's FX people did their job in style here and aside from a few dodgy matte shots, they do their job well. This film is considered the best 1970's "kaiju" film from Japan, even over the five Godzilla films made during that decade. Rankin Bass did several other co-productions with Tsuburaya providing the creatures or miniatures- The Bermuda Depths(1978) and The Ivory Ape(1980)-but neither measured up to the epic look of this film.
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Japanese monster mash meets the lost world
Chase_Witherspoon22 December 2023
When Richard Boone's egotistical great white hunter (aptly named Maston Thrust) is introduced to Nancy Wilson's soulful opening theme song, I initially thought the film's title was a dramatic metaphor for Boone's character, an anachronism in an environmentally conscious world seeking to protect the majestic beasts he so callously discards. And whilst the double meaning persists throughout the picture, patience pays off, and after a somewhat vague start, Boone and his intrepid crew venture off to a subterranean eco-system where living dinosaurs and neanderthal man have been mysteriously preserved deep underground.

Van Ark plays the feisty Pulitzer prize winning photo journalist who tags along to document the much anticipated discovery, Keats is the uptight shuttle captain, and former NBA player Rackley (who narrowly missed out on a championship ring with the Knicks before being traded early in the '72/'73 season) plays 'Bunta' the mute harpooner/servant complete with native garb who Boone describes as being highly articulate and also a rampant polygamist possessing 100 wives no less.

The special effects consist of the usual men-in-monster suits fighting one another a-la 'Ultraman' or 'Godzilla', close-ups of elaborate miniatures and sets, and dual screen projection juxtaposing the actors in front of the giant marauding dinosaurs. The array of specimens created might appear amateurish by today's standards, but was quite entertaining contemporaneously.

Mild sexual tension emerges amid the crew's desperate attempts to survive, leading to some cracker dialogue between Keats and Van Ark after the latter takes umbrage at being forced to become a domestic housekeeper as the men hunt for food ('why don't you just shut-up!' yells Keats as if to a nagging wife to which Van Ark responds defiantly 'why don't you just make me!'). What follows is touching - literally - and an emasculated Richard Boone discovers his tail-chasing salad days are coming to an ignominious end.

Well-paced, nicely photographed and scored (although the brass cues are somewhat overused) with some genuinely moving moments, there's a lot for an adolescent audience to enjoy (including a mud-covered Joan Van Ark) in this neo-classical adventure which effectively brings the Japanese monster genre into Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's lost world.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The stupidest and yet possibly the most brilliant bad movie ever
slackline703 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
How can a movie - make that an incontrovertibly bad movie - be both inconceivably stupid and brilliant at the same time?

If you have trouble answering that - dig up The Last Dinosaur on YouTube or somewhere else; it will either be free or very, very cheap.

And whether you love it or hate it - you will almost be certainly transfixed from beginning to end. Why? Because you're going to keep asking yourself - is its ridiculousness due to the most incompetent filmmakers in history - or the most brilliant? Is this a movie that just doesn't know how bad it is - or absolutely knows how bad it is and goes for broke by striving to be the most memorably bad movie ever made?

Pay attention to the three most ridiculous scenes of the whole movie - and ask yourself if they are the worst scenes in the entire movie - or the best.

In the classic (and perhaps intentional) tradition of a three-part story - the first scene is the second most ridiculous - and also the second-most memorable. The titular dinosaur - a T-Rex that looks something like a cross between Godzilla and the Grimace from the old McDonald's commercials - is minding his own business burying a rocket that travels through the ground instead of the air (don't ask); when he's attacked by a triceratops that explodes out of the side of a mountain. Yes - you heard that right. No setup, no explanation - just your average triceratops buried into the side of a mountain who decides to burst free and go after a passing T-Rex. What is so wonderfully perplexing is - unlike the God-awful special effects and shoddy editing - this scene really, really tries to be... something. Not sure what - but good Lord, it's trying.

The second scene is least ridiculous of of the Ridiculous Scene Triad - but it is nonetheless still epic in its ridiculousness. Again the titular T-Rex is minding its own business - save for chasing Joan Van Ark into a cave after she runs between its legs (don't ask) when Joan's posse sneaks up behind it, ties a vine/rope/not really sure to its tail and the other end to a boulder, and the T-Rex gets whisked off its feet and onto its arse when the boys call out the T-Rex and the boulder rolls past him and down a hill. While this isn't quite as ridiculous as the first in that it is kinda, sorta theoretically possible - but it nonetheless provides one of the most hilarious sight gags in history when we see the 20 ton dinosaur soaring through the air onto its caboose. Can such a scene be possible without the writer, director, and producer trying to give us the most hysterically funny scene in any movie anywhere - or is it just bad movie-making? You will ask yourself that question again and again, and you will never, ever forget that wonderfully ridiculous scene.

Finishing in the classic (and again possibly intentional?) presentation of a three-part story - they save the most hilariously awful, hilariously wonderful scene in all of monster cinema (and that includes the roaring shark at the end of Jaws: The Revenge) for the end. Once again the T-Rex is minding its own business - save for sneaking up on The World's Greatest Tracker and, I don't know... maybe eating, maybe stepping on, maybe simply stealing his beaded necklace...? when our heroes take him on with a three-story catapult they somehow built with stone-age tools in a few days (don't ask). The boulder hits the T-Rex perfectly in the noggin - and its noggin gets crushed like an egg-shell and then snaps back into place for the dinosaur to recover completely. Once again, the wonderfulness of this scene is in the question - was the dented head intentional or not? Were the filmmakers too stupid to just put some cheap plywood inside the dinosaur's noggin and re-film - or too smart to realize leaving it in would create one of the most ridiculously memorable scenes in B-movie history?

Whether you guys did all this on purpose or not - I salute you. You made one hell of a really memorable, really bad movie.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
the last what?
ionamay4817 January 2004
Ok, this is low budget stuff. yes the t-rex is ludicrous. But I still like this movie. Luckily it does seem to get better as it goes along. I love boone anyway, and he is at his screaming, impatient best here. It is still an entertaining flick ,and special effects not withstanding, it is still a pretty engaging movie. if you want a good laugh and some decent Boone to kill 90 minutes with, this is acceptable. Van Ark's luscious figure doesn't hurt the eyes either.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Enjoyable TV movie dinos
BandSAboutMovies29 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Also known as Polar Probe Ship: Polar Borer, this film was a co-production of Rankin/Bass and Tsuburaya Productions. It was directed by Tsununobu "Tom" Kotani and Alex Grasshoff, who also made The Wave, a TV movie we watched repeatedly in high school classes.

This movie was intended for theatrical release, but failed to find a distributor. That meant it ended up on ABC, with a 92-minute edit airing on February 11, 1977. In other countries, it played as a 106-minute film (it was a double feature with Sorcerer in the UK!).

Oil company owner and big-game hunter Maston Thrust (Richard Boone) - what a combination for a heel, right? - is using a laser drill to find oil under the polar ice caps when a T. Rex is discovered living in a valley that is heated by a volcano. The first crew that explores the area dies, other than geologist Chuck Wade (Steven Keats, who also appears in another Rankin/Bass and Tsuburaya film, The Ivory Ape), so a new crew is sent in.

Thrust himself leads it, along with Maasai tracker Bunta (NBA and ABA player Luther Rackley), Dr. Kawamoto (Tetsu Nakamura in his last role), Chuck and Frankie Banks (Joan Van Ark), a Pulitzer Prize-winning photographer who gets on the trip by sleeping with Thrust. Yes, that really happens. Also, it was 1977.

The laser borer gets destroyed fairly early and all modern conveniences fail in the face of multiple dinosaurs, all portrayed with man-in-a-suit techniques, which I absolutely loved. The entire crew is nearly killed by numerous kaiju attacks. Also, there are cave people and one of them, named Hazel, ends up washing Joan Van Ark's hair.

If you love the T. Rex costume here, well you'll be excited to know that it was reused as Dinosaur Satan Gottes for the simply baffling Japanese anime/live action mashup Dinosaur War Izenborg, which you can find in the U. S. as Attack of the Super Monsters.

Perhaps the best thing about this movie is its theme song, "He's The Last Dinosaur." It's worth getting through the whole film just to hear it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
So-so Dinosaur Flick
aesgaard411 March 2001
Warning: Spoilers
You really have to love dinosaurs to appreciate this cheap and ludicrous film. The best dinosaur flicks are the ones where the dinosaur isn't the star, but the purpose of the plot (as in Jurassic Park, which is more of a cerebral survival flick). This movie appears created by the same people who created the vastly more superior "Bemuda Depths" movie with Connie Selleca. The plot takes an idea from the Doug McClure movie, "The Land That Time Forgot," that dinosaurs still exist in a jungle under the polar icecap; how this is all possible, I don't know, I think Jules Verne wrote the novel. Interested in the oil reserves down there, an oil company sends Thrust, a big game hunter played by Richard Boone, in one of his last roles I think, to kill the last living tyrannosaurus Rex guarding it. Two archaeologists, Steven Keats and Joan Van Ark (the inspiration for Spielberg's archaeologists in "Jurassic Park ?") go along to study the thing before he can kill it, but Boone gets all "Ahab after the whale" on them. Neither Keats or Van Ark have much chemistry with each other as Thrust tales a Three Stooges approach to killing/capturing the thing, failing each time and getting even more irrational as the movie goes. One of the craziest scenes is when the T-Rex steals the Arctic borer like a big dumb dog stealing a bone. The special effects are cheap, man in a T-Rex outfit filmed at extreme angles, ala the old "Godzilla" movies, which looks ridiculous and takes away from the obvious anatomical form of the T-Rex and the credibility of the picture. A triceratops with styracosaurus features is uncovered buried in the countryside (how it would survive buried alive is a mystery) which is played by two men in a suit, again off disproportionately in size, anatomy and scale to the T-Rex, and duels off in an even more ridiculous travesty. Even more ridiculous is the T-Rex never eats anyone. He's this large apex predator who stomps one guy and stands in place as a big rock literally rolls across his head, making a shape in the top of the costume! He's nothing more than a lumbering, stocky, hump-backed dumb animal, and the few pterosaurs you see glide so slow, you have to wonder just how they're staying aloft! The man-apes in this picture are also a rip-off from "Land of the Lost." With all this going against it, you can't call this a great picture, but if you want to see a dinosaur movie, the high camp won't bother you.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A tonal mess
lfdewolfe26 August 2020
The only good thing about this movie is Richard Boone as Maston Thrust. Yes, that's his name. Everything else sucks, while I like rubber suit monsters as much as the next guy but the dinosaurs in this look really bad. The same guys that did this made Godzilla, what happened? But by far the biggest problem is the tone, the movie is too silly to be taken seriously because of dinosaurs, but it tries to have a message behind it so you can't really call it THAT silly. Also, the acting (with the exception of Richard Boone) are really bad. Don't watch this, please.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Oy vey! *facepalm*
sc_mackinnon19 February 2023
What can I say that hasn't already been said?? Lowbudget, silly, cheesy, ridiculous special effects, wooden acting - I could go on.

But I will just say these 3 things:

1) this film would make Ed Wood proud.

2) Proof that Hollywood hasn't had an original idea in decades. The Lost Worod did it better.

3) This film is proof-positive that drug use among Hollywood writers, producers, etc. In the 1970's was rampant.

4) Either Richard Boone was desperate for work, or he was blackmailed into doing this.

Don't waste your time with this. I'm thoroughly convinced that this kind of rubbish will lower your IQ. Watcher beware.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Kind of Good movie
acevang40us3 August 2005
This movie is kind of good. It seem that they used the Tyrannosaurus Rex like a blown up balloon, just like Godzilla, just maybe back in those 60-70's days, scientist haven't got enough info. on all sorts of dinosaurs. Back in those time scientist still making dinosaur, so I guess this movie was base on a Tyrannosaurus Rex movements back in the 60-70's. There even a part where a giant rock, fired by someone at the Tyrannosaurus Rex, it damage the Tyrannosaurus Rex and it was knock out for a little while. At the end, the Tyrannosaurus Rex went back to search for food. There is something wrong in the movie as well, like a rifle, how can one rifle kill a Tyrannosaurus Rex, when it could be 1,000-5,000 stronger than we are. If this film going to make a remake, I suggest make it more good and excited, because watching a old movie seems like to have a remake of it, if lucky.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Hopeful laughs turn to plastic dinosaur dung
davetree18 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I'm about half way through this. Thought it would be a campy laugh.

It's tougher than I thought to watch--a script, reject from a highschool contest is funny--but after all the "oh no's..." it's like a toy dead rat. That's it's big turn-off among all the rest-- sub 50's 'Godzilla' art just gets hammered by dialogue and music--and acting from the same highschool (the rejected first tryouts). Was this a late 70's spoof on a 50's film? No, and the laughs turn to groans.

Wait, duh duh duhnnn...I'll play the rest.

Sorry, I can't watch any more--the fake crossbows (from tent pegs) to shoot the fake neanderthals--gotta have the bad guys--is the last stop. Bawanna with the menacing natives. Ugh. I thought another drink would help, but no.

Good luck on your view; my internal laugh machine got clogged.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Difficult To Rate This Film
ray5916 December 2000
This one is just impossible to rate. I liked it; but I don't know why.

The dinosaur effects work is mostly terrible, and Tsuburaya should be ashamed of that T-Rex; although the man-in-a-suit Triceratops is ambitious and interesting, and the charge of the primitive mammal is beautifully done.

So why did they put those big, puppy-dog eyes on that T-Rex?

The overall story is above average for a 70s made-for-TV. I really liked Richard Boone as the world's wealthiest man. He was playing a kind of cross between Hugh Heffner (in later years) and Teddy Roosevelt! The writing actually manages a rather poignant touch at the film's close. It was an unexpected ending.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
If you could just take it as a parody
jmngrdnr29 January 2024
I'd like to unsee this movie. I'm a fan of Have Gun Will Travel, excellent TV Western. But Boone was a product of his generation and this seventies sci Fi film is an example of why heroes die when you finally meet them. He is the same character as he was in the 50 s, but this translates awfully. He's incredibly sexist in a modern society/culture, and even racist in a patronizing way that would have even pissed off Paladin back then! The dinos are rubber suits and the dialogue is entertainingly bad. I would advise not watching this if you have a soft heart for Paladin - the Have Gun / Will Travel days. Joan Van Ark does the best with the crappy dialogue and action.. All the other actors just seem kind of freaked out! Terrible, but possibly entertaining for some.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
B- Movie Treasure
douglasljung3 August 2004
Prepare to meet your Messiah - they call him Masten Thrust. Male role models have become increasingly difficult to find in today's overexposed society. Every other day an apparent role model is forced to tearfully apologize for a youthful indiscretion or he innocently gets a few youngsters drunk on his ranch. The Last Dinosaur is the story of the last great hunt of Masten Thrust, an old, grizzled, big game hunter who serves as role model supreme. Despite his haggard features and bulbous nose, the females, including Joan Van Ark, are attracted to him like Meatloaf is to cheesy lyrics. Thrust is openly sexist and makes no apologies for his elaborate lifestyle, which includes a red kerchief and a private jet with a working fireplace.

Thrust embarks on a mission to find and hunt the last dinosaur on earth when ironically, after a rich full life, he is truly the last dinosaur. Despite his propensity for yelling at everyone in his presence, his employees and lady friends are unwaveringly loyal to him. He may act as though he's perpetually drunk, but make no mistake, if he calls you a 'Ding Dong' you are a 'Ding Dong'.

Not to be denied his own ballad, Thrust's song shamelessly praises him and his manliness. A sampling of lyrics includes: "Few men have ever done, what he has done, or even dreamed, what he has dreamed/Few men have even tried, what he has tried, most men have failed, where he's prevailed/The world holds nothing new in store for him, and things that startle you and me, are just a bore to him/Few men have ever lived, as he has lived, or even walked, where he has walked'. Even BMTG banned artist Clay Aiken could belt out those lyrics and become an rump-kicking machine.

Thrust and his crew of scientists strap themselves into the 'Polar Borer' wearing mini bike helmets, though Thrust affords himself the luxury of the red kerchief around his neck. The giant human filled drill bit digs through the earth and ice to come popping out into a lagoon. Dinosaurs from the air and land soon descend upon the scientists forcing Thrust and crew to run for their lives. After narrowly escaping a charging dino, Masten lays back and blasts out a hearty laugh, not so much to celebrate life but to acknowledge 'the game is afoot'.

Soon after, it is little surprise that we see a few slightly hunched over cavemen sneaking peeks at their visitors. Thrust, not content with simply killing a dinosaur, decides then to make it his mission to bag a cave broad. Throughout the movie, the lone T-Rex contradicts the belief that dinosaurs have a brain the size of a peanut. Despite its enormous size, the local T-Rex is able to sidle up next to its victims virtually unnoticed. With the element of surprise, T-Rex simply crushes a scientist or two and loots the campsite. Every so often the bloated and cagily faced Thrust is seen yelling at someone, shooting at something or flirting with a primitive J-Lo in manly fashion.

Thrust is like James Tiberius Kirk, not only in his addiction to love, but also when is comes to making complicated weapons using limited natural resources in a short period of time. Thrust and the remaining crew members construct a highly accurate catapult that flings a large boulder into the skull of the cunning T-Rex. Upon realizing that even he, Masten Thrust, cannot top this addition to his trophy case, Thrust decides to stay in his prehistoric surroundings. The ever-dwindling crew then leaves Thrust to live out his days with his lovely, although a bit gamely, cavewoman and introduce her to his personal collection of STDs. This is only a brief synopsis of a movie so complicated and rich in BMTG tradition that it takes several viewings to absorb its message and realize that Masten Thrust is the answer. The press conference, complete with a yelling Thrust, mumbling reporters, and the introduction of the great Bunta, is a classic moment. Also look for a body, resembling a dead Ricky Schroeder, lying on some logs, and the most powerful use of someone being called a 'Ding-Dong' in cinematic history.
24 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I liked it
spec-411 April 2003
I'm not sure if these other people saw the movie - some apparently couldn't follow the "complicated plot". He's a billionaire who owns an oil company who ALSO happens to big game hunt - wow - that's really far fetched. Any way - his new "drilling machine" happens to break through a glacier and on the other side is a world seperated from our own time where dinosaurs and cavemen wander around. Nothing ground breaking about this but it certainly isn't ludicrous. Anyway the rest of the movie is about this T-Rex they find (which the billionaire, Boone, claimed was there) hunting them and them hunting it. Look - it's an old made for TV movie - of course the special effects look cheesy - they didn't have CG - they did the best they could and for a MFTVM they did a hell of a job for the time. This movie should be remade for the big screen - I'd love it and I'd be the first one in line. Seeing that Dinosaur with modern day special effects stalking those guys would be great!
16 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed