Fire Sale (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
37 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Mixed Feelings about this Movie
Sturgeon544 August 2005
This is probably the most difficult movie for me to critique. The cast includes several of the greatest comedic talent of the twentieth century, and the material is to die for. In addition, I find the Jewish humor of both Arkins, both Reiners, Sid Caesar, Woody Allen, etc. to be some of the best available in cinema. I soooo wanted to love this movie!! Unfortunately, I cannot wholeheartedly recommend it, and beyond saying simply that it isn't as funny as it could have been, I would have some trouble explaining why. Leonard Maltin gave this a 1-star review, calling it "truly unbearable." And yet Keith Bailey, one of my personal favorite reviewers, stated on his website www.badmovieplanet.com that he absolutely laughed himself silly with this movie, calling it a "comic masterpiece." Other reviewers on this website are similarly at polar opposite opinions, and this made me insanely interested in seeing it for myself. Though it has mysteriously never been available on video or DVD, I did find a quality bootleg copy on ebay. As far as I'm concerned, neither of the two reviewers is correct - my appraisal is more of a middle ground between the two.

It seems to me that Robert Klane had a fantastic script, which pulled out all the stops, balancing almost six wacky subplots surrounding a dysfunctional Jewish family. The multiple-subplot structure of "Seinfeld" episodes most certainly takes its inspiration from this movie. Several individual lines are magnificent, the ideas are completely original, but the execution was inefficient. For one, the cinematography is some of the worst I have ever seen - the whole movie is too dark due to insufficient lighting. Second, the timing of most of the jokes is way off. The best example is a scene involving the simultaneous asthmatic attack of both Rob Reiner's character and his father. On paper, this could have been a wonderful bit of dual comic overacting, but the actors underplay it, as if they are embarrassed by the whole thing. And director Arkin makes the unwise decision to prolong the scene for what seems an eternity.

Similar sloppiness pervades the movie, and as such, I found the IDEAS of the movie downright hilarious, but I just couldn't laugh while I was watching it. This is one of those movies that seem a lot more entertaining in hindsight than while you were actually viewing it. That might be the reason why so many reviewers here have fond recollections after so many years. Mind you, I'm not saying it is a bad movie, and that you should steer clear of it as Maltin suggests. But what I am saying is that it has been overrated for two reasons: 1) It has basically disappeared from the public for 28 years, giving it a cult movie mystique, and 2) People have overly nostalgic memories after not having seen it for many years.

Because I love the type of comedy this movie aspired to be, I would like to make a recommendation. Instead of seeing this movie, I suggest Larry Cohen's 1981 horror spoof "Full Moon High," also starring Arking and his son Adam. That movie had similarly anarchic Jewish humor, but the difference is that that movie pulled everything off magnificently, and additionally its is much easier and cheaper to find on video. That film was, indeed, a comic masterpiece.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Slap Shot comedy!
fostrmom18 February 2007
Now I have to tell you that I thought that this movie was just a figment of my imagination, as no one I know except my date for the evening in 1977 has ever even heard of this movie. I was a 17 year old on a date with my soon to be (1 ½ later) husband. I found it funny. Hilarious in fact. I would love to buy the movie and see it again as a mature adult, to see if it is as funny now. But alas, I've never found this movie for sale. The movie itself starts with a strange scene with a noise in the dark. When the lights come up and you figure out what is going on, I remember laughing so hard. For me, that's the way the entire movie was. Slap shot comedy perhaps.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Laughed till I cried!!
fostrmom24 June 1999
From the second the movie starts in the dark w/ the (noise) of a blowdryer, warming up the cold toilet seat, till the very end I loved this movie. I'm sorry that I've never seen it on TV or in the video stores. The comedy just kept on coming and coming. Here it is 1999 and I seen it in 1977, it's my favorite comedy of all times. I only wish that I could share it with my family now.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
IS this Bvrooklyn alvready?
wombat_115 May 2003
Like many of the previous reviewers, I only ever saw this movie once, and that was a long, long time ago (again like them). But even though I was only a teenager, where for me the world of the US East Coast Jews may as well have been on another planet, what gags I did understand (and I realized that there were many, many gags that I didn't!) were exceptionally funny. Leonard_M - loosen up a little. The movie IS funny.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Samuel H. Franklin is Incorrect: Movie Has a Laugh
doctorbiobrain200530 March 2006
I'm sorry, but I must respectfully disagree with Mr. Sam H. Franklin's review of this movie. There is, in fact, one laugh in the entire movie. It's the scene where Al (played by the always great Alex Rocco) is telling the wimpy Russel (Rob Reiner) how all the merchandise in the store is outdated. And he throws the clothes off the mannequins, and the last mannequin turns out to be an old lady. That was the one funny scene in the movie. The old lady ended up partially naked later on in the movie, but it wasn't nearly as funny. Oh, and Sid Caesar did a couple of things which may be construed as humor, though that is certainly a subjective construct. Other than that, this is a truly horrid movie. I thought it would at least have kitschy value, which it almost does; but it's not worth it anyway. Rob Reiner should have directed.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The heat is off.
mark.waltz14 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This dark comedy is not going to be for every taste for several reasons, mainly because of its excessive Jewish humor that not every audience will appreciate. It's about a family of nuts led by Vincent Gardenia and Kay Medford, also including sons Alan Arkin and Rob Reiner. Gardenia and Medford are off to visit gardenias brother, Sid caesar, leaving Reiner in charge of the department store that Gardenia owns and seems to be on the verge of going out of business.

A mix-up has Gardenia believed to have died, Caesar escapes from the mental hospital where he's been convalescing, and Arkin spends the time training his newly adopted son, a 7' black orphan who is a great basketball player but petrified of playing in front of an audience. Anjanette Comer looks hysterical as Arkin's wife with this big kid sitting on her lap being comforted like the baby they've never had.

While some of the humor is questionable, there are a lot of funny moments although for half of the film poor Medford is forced to act like her character is senile. For a good portion of the film, gardenia plays if he is dead, sort of a precursor to the later comedy "What about Bob?". This is a strange family for sure, and not all of their storylines seem to really connect them. At times, this doesn't work but certain individual moments are ones you'll never forget. It's interesting to note that the music in the opening sounds like the opening theme of "Murder By Death".
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Few movies go to show jut how subjective comedy is
MissSimonetta9 June 2023
FIRE SALE has a toxic reputation. Its lukewarm box office and bad reception killed off Alan Arkin's brief directing career, and it's certainly a disappointing follow-up to the brilliance of his debut, LITTLE MURDERS. However, it's not nearly as bad as people say. It's uneven and messy. And the loud, often un-PC humor will not be to all tastes. That being said, I was amused more often than not, maybe because my own family is decidedly insane and this is just relatable.

Another element I appreciate is the lack of sentimentality. Arkin never tries to make us feel sorry for anyone in the Finkus clan. They're all pretty horrible and I have to appreciate that.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite possibly the worst I've ever seen.
pcalvin11 March 2001
Though it's now been 24 years since I saw it, I still remember thinking that I should have walked out of the theater.. No one in the audience laughed even once. The only one laughing was the person who took our money for the tickets.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Better than 99% of what passes for "comedy" these days
Mikelito21 March 2008
Four stars? - give me a break!

I was thrilled and amused when I saw this as a kid - so many unconventional scenes, so many people who don't behave ...

Alright this is not that entertaining for people of today who have lost any attention span. And it's not as brilliantly made as "Where's Poppa?", also written by Robert Klane, but it does have its moments, i.e. most scenes that Arkin and Gardenia are in. Reiner is pretty inept here as usual, though. Kay Medford is very good as a Mother out of touch with reality. A good cast in general.

Some scenes lack a better execution but on the whole this is an original idea that has several subplots which are nicely tied up. Greed, ineptness, dysfunctional families, madness and irritation manifest themselves in many different ways.

Most locations are pretty "awful" by today's viewing habits but that is the exact charm of this movie as opposed to all the slick and sterile over-produced forgettable comedies of today. The settings make this movie look "real" and might tend to make people uneasy about the story because it seems people don't really get their way - no matter how they try. That makes for good comedy because this is how life is when you constantly overreach: You make a fool of yourself.

The main problem with this seems to be that the ideas are funny but better production and direction would not have hurt. This could very well be remade but I doubt people today want to see anyone on the screen who is over 40 years old... And that is pathetic.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Modern-day ills and ethnic slapstick...in one word: Loud
moonspinner551 April 2011
Alan Arkin directed and stars in this inept comedy about a losing high school basketball coach who needs to borrow $3,000 from his estranged father, who hasn't spoken to his son since Arkin left the family business (Fikus and Sons clothing store, with the second 's' in Sons crossed out!). Rob Reiner plays Arkin's hapless brother, who needs $13,000 to keep the store going while pop Vincent Gardenia recuperates from a heart attack. 'Outrageous' Jewish humor may be intended as satire by screenwriter Robert Klane, working from his own novel, but the punchlines (both visual and verbal) continually fall flat. Arkin and Reiner might have made the perfect comic foils, but Arkin as a filmmaker never sees the possibilities in this development--only the opportunities where he can clobber the audience over the head with high-decibel insults. * from ****
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not bad at all.
iloveperth1 December 2005
After reading the positive comments here and seeing the 1 star rating on my digital cable guide, I decided to give it a chance (plus, I'm a big Alan Arkin fan after seeing him in 'Catch-22', 'Glengarry Glen Ross', and 'Little Murders'). And I have to say that it's not as bad as it's made out to be. It's actually really really funny--if you have a certain sense of humor. I was dying with laughter during the scene where Arkin and Rob Reiner started fighting on the father's bed--on top of the father! There were other good scenes: the kids throwing the rocks through the windows, Arkin approaching the basketball player on the court, the crazy Jewish mother throughout the whole movie, "Keep Out Putz!" written on the office door and the scene with the comatose dad and the insurance guys. I could go on because I really liked this movie. The only thing that kinda bugged was Rob Reiner's attacks, but eh. What are you gonna do?

I think that you have to enjoy a certain type of humor to find this movie funny. During the whole thing I found myself drawing parallels to my favorite sitcom, Arrested Development. Crazy dysfunctional family? Check. Adopting a kid of a completely different race for personal gain? Check. Buring down a business for money? Check. (Episode 2 of Season 1--Top Banana!) Multiple story lines that culminate into one big finale? Yup. And there was even a big wacky ending involving all the family members. Both are very slapstick-y comedies with both dry and over the top jokes. If you love that kind of humor, then you'll really like Fire Sale. If you're more into standard comedies, then you'll probably become very easily annoyed and change the channel.

I'd love to see a cheap DVD of this movie out in a letterbox format. I remember Fox Movie Channel used to run some kind of promo trailer/short documentary before showing it, so I'd love to see that as well. Plus, some of the scenes are very dark. I'm not sure if this is the print of the movie or Arkin's intention, but it would be nice to see this movie remastered and released in the future, but that probably won't happen. A girl can dream though!
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stale
JasparLamarCrabb28 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
A train wreck. An astoundingly bad "comedy" about a family of loud mouthed lunatics. Patriach Vincent Gardenia wants to burn down the family store for the insurance money. His sons (conniving high school basketball coach Alan Arkin & asthmatic nebbish Rob Reiner) have other plans. Directed by Arkin, the film has nothing of interest save for the fact that there's so much talent wasted. It's a Mel Brooks movie without laughs OR Mel Brooks. Every single repellent character, of which there are many, shrieks each line of dialog. Arkin (usually one of the funniest movie actors) looks foolish, running around like a goon and Reiner is just plain annoying. And what is Anjanette Comer doing in this? Also wasting the time of Sid Caesar, Kay Medford, Alex Rocco and the great Richard Libertini. It's easy to believe that this junk derailed Arkin's directing career as well as Reiner's future as an actor.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a freak show!
mmwood197826 July 2003
This movie was definitely overlooked as a classic. Strange, yes; bizzare, oh yes! but funny if you have a strange sense of humor. Monty Python and Benny Hill fans may like the strange and off-beat humor of this movie, other humor fans may be wondering what this is about. The secret is that what you see is what you get: what you see on the screen is what this movie is about. This is a disfunctional family before the term became fashionable. I loved the characters' goofiness, and the way that the actors portrayed them. Alan Arkin, Vincent Gardenia, and Rob Reiner were the "stars" of this movie, but they wouldn't have gone anywhere without the supporting cast of characters. Uncle Sherman, Marian, Ruthie,and of course, Captain F#@k, rounded out the chaacters. Not getting into the plot of the movie (which there was none, really) : there was no stoy plot or character arc - it was just fun and goofy comedy. I just wish it was offered on VHS or DVD!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What a dud for such a cast
SimonJack10 June 2021
With a very good cast of comedians of the day, "Fire Sale" could be expected to be very funny and very good. Unfortunately, it is not. And that's mostly because of the screenplay and the characters of the cast. This is a film based entirely on ethnic humor with some otherwise funny antics. The plot is a good idea and it could have been a smashing comedy. It just needed to shed the ethnic stereotyping and put some wit and humor into the dialog.

Ethnic humor is usually oriented toward people of whatever group it happens to be about. It's comedy that they would understand, recognize and enjoy. It's the type of stories one tells within one's group. But when it is designed for larger audiences - especially people outside the group, it has to be done more carefully. First, so that a broader audience will recognize humor associated with the ethnic group that may not be in other groups. Second, so that it's genuinely funny to others as well. And, third, that it doesn't go overboard to the extent of stereotyping people.

I can recognize the ethnic comedy in this film, but it's no funnier that a smile or two. After that, it gets a little into stereotyping. But the biggest fault of the film is that it just lacks comedy. It isn't very funny. Where are the laughs in the script? The antics are the only thing this film has going, but they aren't very good. Rob Reiner's Russel Fikus isn't even funny with his first asthma attack brought on by fear of his dad. After that, his prolonged gasping and noise-making is tedious and boring.

I hadn't seen this film in the theater, and just watched it on DVD. After watching it, I reflected on how audiences expect movies with comedians in the lead roles to be very funny. But, so often, such films are little better than average, and sometimes they are terrible. Of course, there are some smashingly good comedies made by performers who are known mostly as comic actors. But some of the greatest comedies of all time have been with all--around actors who play drama, adventure, mystery, and other genres as well as comedy. My three stars for this film are for the antics of Sid Caeser - the only little bit of humor in it.

The critics of 1977 almost unanimously panned "Fire Sale," and audiences avoided it more than they went for it. The cast must have worked for peanuts, because the budget was a mere $1.5 million for such a cast of known names. It made a small profit in theaters with total ticket sales of $10 million. But that was a year when the first Star Wars film broke all records with a $1.6 billion box office. And, when two others films topped half a billion bucks and 34 films had box office receipts exceeding $100 million. Against this film's paltry box office, many other real comedies had good draws. The biggest of the year were "The Goodbye Girl" with a box office over $370 million, "Semi-Tough" at over $250 million, "Annie Hall" at just over $200 million, and "Airport" at more than $165 million.

Here's the only funny exchange of dialog in this film. Virginia, "Why are you so afraid of your father? He's a old man with a lousy business." Russell Fikus, "He's old, but he's a killer."
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Funniest movie in history -- to about 1% of the population
Dr_Know26 March 2005
Alan Arkin, Rob Reiner, Vincent Gardenia, Alex Rocco, Kay Medford, Sid Caeser and a 7 foot tall black teenager named Captain F*@% in the most Jewish movie ever made. As I watched this on Fox Movie Channel earlier tonight I wasn't laughing -- because my mouth was hanging open too wide. Where to begin? Where?!? This movie has the highest per capita amount of asthma jokes I've ever seen. Just when you think there are no more laughs to get out of an asthma joke -- there's another! And all Ruthie wants is to visit her sister in Florida (pronounced Flaaaaahrida.) Need I mention that the patriarch of the family is in the garment business? And he has a sign on his door for his son to read which says "Keep Out Putz?" Need I mention that everyone talks down to the Spanish speaking men painting the house? Need I mention that Ruthie won't allow her husband to attend such an occasion in a sports jacket and slacks? Need I mention that Alan Arkin refers to the refrigerator as "the icebox?" Oh. . .oh, I'm starting to palpitate. This film is unavailable on DVD or VHS, but Fox Movie Network is pretty good about rerunning things. If they show it again, I am taping it.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I love this film!
stattad22 January 2002
I'm another one who is waiting for the day this movie comes out on video. I also laughed from start to finish, especially when Alan Arkin discovers the basketball phenom. This movie was wayyyy ahead of its time, and those that didn't laugh just don't get the jokes!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Diamond in the rough
tvman-313 July 2005
The movie is a bit sloppy from a technical standpoint, but it remains the only movie to make me literally laugh myself sick. The Farrelly brothers owe a huge debt to Robert Klane's mining of the twisted humor genre. For years, this was my video holy grail. Finally, it occurred to me that it probably showed up from time to time on the Fox Movie Channel; so, not having it on my cable system, I started buying the monthly satellite programming guides, and when it came up in the rotation on FMC, I had a friend tape it for me. A simple DVD release will not be adequate. This needs the full Special Edition treatment. And oh, how I hope there are outtakes.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Broad comedy like "The Producers" and "Where's Papa?" Vincent Gardenia at his Peak! Arkin, Reiner Ceasar, Medford... the cast alone demands a viewing.
gromek464 October 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This film is about 30 years old. I know of no conversions to tape or DVD. It had a theatrical run of about two weeks partially due to a bad review but nobody I ever met who saw it disliked the picture. The reviewer either never actually saw the entire film or had an agenda to sink it. When I first saw it my girlfriend (who isn't Jewish) and I and the vast majority of the audience, were roaring with laughter. We returned a number of times with friends and family and everyone loved it.

13 years later I had the privilege of having Sid Ceasar in my car (I was hired to take him to his hotel) and I asked him about the film. He said that he had a lot of fun making the movie, but the studio provided very limited money to advertise and promote the product. No press, no promotion. Studio politics.

Gardenia (overbearing father) and Medford (sweet, but loopy wife and mother) are the parents of Arkin, the older son who lives outside the family home and Reiner (intimidated, milquetoast) who lives in. The family owns a failing, indebted department store. Arkin is married to Anjanette Comer, who desperately wants a child. Arkin claims he is impotent because of the tyranny of his father and the fact that he is the hated high school basketball coach whose team can't even win one game. Ceasar plays a wacky WWII patient at the the VA hospital who still believes that the war is still ongoing.

On a road trip to Florida, Gardenia secretly sets into motion a scheme to burn his Dept. store down and collect the Fire Insurance. Arkin and Reiner think that his parents' absence presents the perfect opportunity to prove their father wrong and refurbish and restock the store and make a success of it. They don't know of the plot and go to work. Ceasar as Gardenia's unwitting foil is priceless. The pace of the film accelerates and is replete with a few clever twists. This effort is worth a sincere second look and a re-release.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
mixed nuts
ptb-85 August 2004
Unreleased at first in the cinema in Australia, this absolutley demented farce sat on the shelf until after Arkin's original THE IN LAWS came out and was a hit here. Then Fox decided to give it a run and it was lukewarm. Pity, as a raucous Jewish comedy is is a pretty good one and anyone into anarchy as comedy (Big Store, Duck Soup, Where's Poppa, etc) will enjoy the screaming antics of a very fractured extended family. I think it ended up on a double bill with maybe Mel Brooks' THE PRODUCERS or something like that which matched the mugging and screaming. At my holiday resort cinema in that period we would show it on student nights and get a good reaction. Kids and old Jews loved it though.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
funniest movie i have ever seen.
haladams28 August 1999
this movie must be re-released. a whole generation of comedy fans is missing out on one of the classic comedies of all time. if you have never seen this movie please contact your congressman and your clergyman and demand that they contact whoever it is that they serve and bring this movie to the publics attention.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Really funny movie
sloscan11 January 2003
I saw this movie as a motel movie shortly after vcr's became affordable/popular.

I thought it was very funny and would love to see it again on DVD or tape.

The rather subtle, dry humor mixed with slapstick comedy was very well done. I would certainly buy it if it were available.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Too Funny Not To Be Released
flopsjr7 April 2004
Everyone to his own taste. Leonard Maltin is a wonderful critic, but this time I disagree with him. A friend of mine showed me a tape he made of this movie in 1979. I could not stop laughing. Sometimes a movie doesn't have to have a message when it's being funny (Ace Ventura, as a case in point). The stars of this movie are comedy giants, but the supporting cast is just as funny. Richard Libertini steals the movie as a house painter cum psychiatrist. Alex Rocco as a clothing salesman is hilarious. I have an old VHS tape of this movie that I made off HBO. I would love to see this movie released on DVD. If there is any good reason why this movie is not being released I'd like to hear it. I've showed the tape to my kids, and they went crazy for it. I think the time has come to let the world enjoy this laugh riot. I'm surprised that cable hasn't shown it either instead of the same tired retreads over and over. Let's hear it for comedy that isn't pretty.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
How Can This Be Viewed in 1999
Search-415 July 1999
The movie was incredible, ever since I saw it in 1977 I told my wife she had to see it, it was really funny. Right up there with the "In-Laws." As soon as it came out on video we would watch it. Well, 20 years later, and every time I ask in a video store they give me a funny look. Does anyone have any clue how this classic can be viewed??? "PLEASE HELP"
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very funny movie..
ppeters22 September 1999
I saw this a couple of times in the late seventies. My parents had just subscribed to this new service called Cable TV, and low and behold we had a movie channel called Showtime. I watched it every day it was on. It gives new meaning to the word "Putz". I really wish it would be released on video/DVD. I don't understand why it hasn't been. It is sad that another generation hasn't had the opportunity to share the laughs.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Funniest Movie Never To Be on TV
Scooby-4311 August 1999
I remember the preview of "Fire Sale", it had Don DeLouise starting to announce this film as being something you surely shouldn't miss, when a couple of painters carrying a ladder walk in front of him which makes him stop and he silently cusses them out. He was right, if you missed Fire Sale in the theatres you missed it and it has vanished like something into the twilight zone. In the early '80s I knew a guy who had seen the movie but since then nobody but me has ever mentioned it. I just ran down a movie from 1968 called "Project X" and it took me a year and a half to get a copy of it, it cost me a thousand dollars, and I had to convince the studio to give it to me, and they gave it to me for free when I finally convinced them the movie was long lost, I don't think they knew it was. It may be a similar situation with "Fire Sale", I think that I'm going to make my next project to get "Fire Sale".

Leonard Maltin's review of this movie was horrible. Calling it a black comedy is ridiculous! Nobody is killed, nothing gruesome happens, maybe no bad language, (I forget). It's a very main stream comedy, with big name stars, of the same type as "It's A Mad, Mad World". The scene with the brothers trying to insure their Comatose dad would be a classic if they would'nt hide this film away like some kind of lost treasure.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed