"Columbo" Last Salute to the Commodore (TV Episode 1976) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
95 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
An off-beat episode that nearly makes you switch off!
The Welsh Raging Bull29 November 2004
This 1976 episode ignorantly dispenses with the basic Columbo formula in it's thought, style and execution. with a distinct aura of parody smothering it's dialogue and characterisation.

Whether it was felt by the regular members of the Columbo crew that it was time to try something different, or whether things were ad-libbed around a basic storyline I don't know. Suffice to say, that after an interestingly constructed opening with an off-screen murder, the remaining part of the first half of this episode rambles desperately, with characters seemingly unable to keep a straight face, yawn-inducing discussions on boats and parts of boats, and some irritating repetition of secondary characters introducing themselves to each other etc.

It's almost like somebody decided to tighten things up in the second half, with a wonderfully inserted twist relating to the prime murder suspect and a script, which becomes increasingly rich in interesting clues, that facilitate an decent Agatha Christie-like resolution. Despite this significant improvement, the sealing clue is woefully inadequate and thus the glaring mediocrity that haunts so much of the early part of this episode returns at a very crucial time.

Slipshod in overall execution, the script could have been significantly tightened and sharpened to render a Columbo episode that, whilst deviating from the typical approach, would have proved to be a relatively entertaining story.

From a historical point of view, it seems that Peter Falk had intended, prior to the production of this episode, to make this his final outing as Columbo. If this is true, he appears to have changed his mind by the story's finale: his remarks to his colleague about "not quitting" - which in the context of the story, refer to Columbo's smoking habit - may have been a subtle reference to his desire to carry on a little longer.

Sadly, this episode does mark Falk's departure from the portrayal of some of his character's appealingly deceptive traits - the seeming absent-mindedness and dim-wittedness of the Columbo character has been replaced with an unsatisfying and pronounced arrogance. Unfortunately, this would take the gloss of the remaining episodes in the original series, some of which are very good.

Painfully uncertainly paced and padded in places, significant tolerance will need to be shown by most viewers to get them safely through to the second half. Ironically, this addition to the series could provoke more discussion than any other, in light of its very curious approach.
135 out of 155 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
You win some and you lose some
Crimpo213 February 2006
I'm a big fan of Peter Falk and his Columbo series - any showing is a must-see for me even where I have already viewed them a dozen times before since they aren't who-dunnits and Falk always gives a performance worth watching. Sad to say I think this is one of the two or three very disappointing episodes. Falk plays Columbo at half-speed, his two side-kicks are one (most would say two) too many, Vaughan has nothing to do and so ends up doing nothing, but most of all the pace of the first hour of the movie is far too slow.

So what went wrong. I suspect here we have a director trying for a twist on the Columbo formula - which is OK, it made sense to throw an off-speed delivery occasionally - and also experimenting with 'improvisation' by the actors. As we all know that sometimes comes off and sometimes crashes and burns horribly. In this case sadly the latter. The little quirky scenes in Columbo movies are a delight - but here almost the whole movie is made up of such scenes and so the plot gets horribly lost.

It should come as no surprise to fans of the Columbo genre that the director was Patrick McGoohan. A brave experimental director and actor - and here in 1976 given the opportunity to try something out. Sadly it doesn't work. However, given his fine performances in 4 other Columbo movies - and his fine direction in four other than this -I'm still a fan!
67 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Peter Falk Drunk?
user-3558326 March 2020
This episode was weird. If you've watched any other episodes you can see that Peter Falk is clearly drunk, stoned and sleep deprived in several scenes. This episode stars Robert Vaughn and is directed by Patrick McGoohan, both British drinkers of renown. I can only assume there was a lot of fun on the set and they decided to run some scenes inebriated.
25 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Columbo" departs from its usual formula—and fails in the attempt
J. Spurlin10 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I won't post any spoilers for this film; but if you're going to watch this unpopular "Columbo" entry anyway, I recommend you don't read this, or any other review, until afterward.

Charlie Clay (Robert Vaughn) runs a ship building business owned by his father-in-law, Commodore Otis Swanson (John Dehner), who is not happy with the wastrel's shady dealings. Nor is he pleased with any of the people closest to him, including his alcoholic daughter Joanna Clay (Diane Baker), his elderly nephew Swanny Swanson (Fred Draper) or his lawyer Kittering (Wilfred Hyde-White). Soon the Commodore is murdered; and Charlie Clay covers it up by impersonating the Commodore, taking the corpse out on the man's yawl at night and throwing the body overboard. Lt. Columbo (Peter Falk) investigates this case with the help of a veteran sergeant (Bruce Kirby) and a 29-year-old novice (Dennis Dugan). Our rumpled, redoubtable detective knows Clay covered up the crime. But his assumption that Clay committed the crime may prove premature.

The reason you shouldn't read any reviews is because they invariably call this is a whodunit. That makes it a departure from the usual "Columbo" formula, in which we always see the murder take place. But the word "whodunit" gives away the surprise an hour into the film—in which we learn, along with Columbo, that who we thought had done it, hadn't done it.

Actually, it's not that much of a surprise. "Columbo" fans will know something is up right away, since we see the cover-up but not the murder itself. We always get to see the murder, we lucky brutes. This unusual episode has two precedents. "Double Shock" also withholds important information during the murder scene—in order to surprise us later. "A Friend in Deed" also has one person covering up the murder for someone else.

"Columbo" is one of those rare series that succeeds because of a strict formula, not in spite of it. Even many mystery series leave us craving more variety. The only parallel I can make is an odd one: Chuck Jones's "Road Runner" series also works because of its formula. The closer it hues to it, the funnier it is. This film should join the post-Jones "Road Runner" shorts in one grave marked, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

Everything is wrong with this entry, directed by Patrick McGoohan from a script by Jackson Gillis. The pacing is jerky and awkward. The performances are bad: Diane Baker, a good actress, overplays her role as a drunk; Peter Falk is weirdly aggressive and self-satisfied as Columbo. The characters seem manipulated into acting the way they do, instead of behaving like real people. Lt. Columbo has all the suspects gather into one room for a classic Agatha Christie-style ending; but the solution to the mystery is a complete bore.

Here's a question for those who have already seen this (not a spoiler): Why wouldn't the Commodore have reused the "S" stencil rather than asking for two?
71 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Weirdest Episode yet
tinealexander26 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This episode was so weird I couldn't believe it. I was sure it was some new director, and as it turns out it's that weirdo Patrick McGoohan!

I agree with almost everyone's reviews here, but just wanted to add: WHY/HOW was Columbo suddenly not seasick?

Why would he end the episode on a row boat? (Don't tell me it's because he discovered Dramamine on the last episode on a ship - starring Robert Vaughn as well!)

Anyway, it was an oddly paced episode. Too arty for a detective show. Peter Falk very nearly destroyed the character Columbo. We're in love with the way Columbo is disarming. It was not fun to see him acting cocky or like he'd been on the job too long. And there were definitely way too many sidekicks on the force this episode. Columbo makes more sense as a long wolf, less sense as the team player.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Commodores Watch
DKosty12319 February 2011
Warning: Spoilers
The script here gets very circumstantial, but then the directing of Patrick McGoohan often does. The plot is a different sort of twist as it makes everything appear Robert Vaughn (Charlie Clay)is the murderer. So much so in fact that even Columbo has him guilty until Clay turns up dead himself late in the episode. This makes it appear all of Columbo's work has been fruitless.

It seems the Commodore (John Dehner) is murdered and being one of the richest men around makes for a lot of suspects. The cast even includes Wilfred Hyde-White and is one of the strongest talent guest casts of the season. Still the episode plods until late into it.

The getting together of every suspect at the end is cliché like in many Murder She Wrotes, but with Columbo (Faulk) holding this court, it is more exciting than Ms. Fletcher. This sequence where the real murderer is sorted out is the best part of the show. The trouble is having the patience to get here. Still, this sequence and the loaded guest cast make it all a worthwhile wrap up to season 5.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not the best Columbo episode
MrSirViking26 April 2020
I am a huge fan of the Columbo series. He is one of my favourite detectives and Peter Falk is a fantastic actor. And the original formula of Columbo works great and is both funny and interesting at the same time. They tried something different in this episode. And it really did not work out. The usual one more question is missing and the ending and how they figure out who murdered who was really just one big confusing and strange thing. There is still part of this that is good. The whole meditation thing i thought was very Columbo. So this episode has got some good things. But mostly its just one big mess. And it falls way out of what you would normally think of a Columbo episode. So this mighy be one of the few Columbo episodes to avoid.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A contender for my least favourite Columbo episode
TheLittleSongbird25 February 2011
I do say this with a heavy heart, because I have been a fan of Columbo for a long time. Last Salute to the Commodore had the ingredients for a good episode, starting with the fact that Patrick McGoohan who is a fine actor and capable director directed it.

Last Salute to the Commodore does have its good points. The photography, costumes and locations are striking, Columbo humming the unofficial theme song was a treat and Diane Baker while slightly overdoing it at times is at least enjoyable. And McGoohan's direction at least gives the episode some style.

However, as others have said, Last Salute to the Commodore departs from the usual formula, the audience here don't know who the murderer is until the last fifteen minutes or so and the prime suspect bites the dust. Initially I had no problem with that, though that decision kind of subtracted from the fun due to the lack of any memorable scenes and dialogue from Columbo and the culprit. That said, apart from me being okay with the change initially and the change with the prime suspect is interesting and does work, the change concerning the murderer not being revealed until the last fifteen or so minutes is a change that doesn't work. There are far too many drawn out scenes, the whole story takes far too long to get going while the final solution was both disappointing and uninteresting.

The idea of the story was good, it's just that on screen the whole plot is uninteresting and lacking any spark on the whole, and it's not just the drawn out scenes and the disappointing conclusion. The pace really spoils it, I usually don't mind slow-paced films and TV episodes but when the plot and writing are not that good I found it a chore to watch to be honest. The writing was poor mostly, it lacked the wit and sparkle a Columbo episode usually does, it lacked intelligence and some of it felt as though the actors felt uncomfortable delivering it. Mind you, it did have some moments of infectious humour, the sailing jokes were quite fun, but it wasn't enough. Also maybe I am not right, but did anyone else feel the episode was too long, an hour-and-three-quarters instead of about eighty minutes?

Baker aside, the acting is not so good. There have been a few disappointing Columbo entries(Dead Weight, Murder with Too Many Notes, one with William Shatner) but they do have some decent scenes or a good cast to elevate. Here, Peter Falk isn't bad as such, but the way Columbo is written shocked me in a bad way. Here Columbo seems to be going to caricature and the constant sending-up of himself got tired fast unfortunately. The usually good Robert Vaughn seems bored and disconnected too, while Joshua Bryant overdoes it dreadfully. Even the music was a disappointment, here it is often obtrusive and took me out of the setting.

Overall, I love Columbo but this didn't work. 4/10 Bethany Cox
86 out of 101 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A most unique episode of Columbo
tfmiltz22 November 2013
There are some very fishy things with this episode.

For one ? Notice Falk can't stop laughing.

Notice the blank stares.

Notice how he just loses it- as if in a foggy daze.

I am quite convinced the entire set did LSD for this episode.

I've never quite seen anything like this one.

I've been watching all 12 seasons - back to back and then ? This one.

Someone above mentioned Agatha Christie - It is clearly a new direction for the series. While this episode has many 'loose ends' ? They do get tied up. I'll still hold with my LSD suspicions. Somethings just are so far out there in this episode ? I don't know what else could be the answer.
51 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't believe all the bad reviews
Dar Star4 August 2020
There is a peculiar need by Columbo "fans" to dump on this episode to show their bonafides. But the criticisms are over the top. Yes this episode is different and Peter Falk plays it kind of wacky, but it is not at all as terrible as people make it out. It is actually middle of the pack by Columbo standards. You want lousy? See Dagger of the Mind or the Conspirators.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible pacing made me lose interest in this mystery
aromatic-223 June 2001
The Columbo formula was thrown out the window here. Unfortunately, so was the pacing. The result is one of the most boring entries of the series -- complete with a Columbo who seems to be making fun of himself half of the time. At the end, since Columbo didn't seem to care that much about catching the killer, I lost interest too.
84 out of 100 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A surreal,off-beat and experimental Columbo.
Thebobo.13 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
First off I would like to state for the record that I am a Columbo fan. Even as a kid I loved the show because Peter Falk made his character nonthreatening,friendly,silly and simplistic. Very rarely did he raise his voice or show his gun. The best season for Coulumbo would be the first. Great direction,dialog and acting. Subsequent seasons would see Falk polish his character to the extent we know it today.

Most episodes followed a formula. The murderer and the motive for committing his/her crime was revealed during the prologue. Our hero would not arrive until 10-15 minutes into the story allowing for plot and character development of the guest stars. However one episode in episode 5 would buck this trend and bring the show into an almost avant-garde style.

"Columbo: Last Salute to the Commodore (#5.6)" (1976) was directed by Patrick McGoohan (of The Prisoner fame). A good friend of Peter Falk and frequent guest star of the show (there was always great chemistry between the two). The episode followed formula for its prologue. When Colombo enters the scene the show goes off into the Twilight Zone. Falk appears lethargic(as does the pacing of the story). It is clear that he is improvising. While no stranger to this method of acting (after all his best friend was John Cassevettes) many fans would be put off by this severe departure. I wasn't. While not the best episode it was nice to see something different in a time when such experimentation was rarely allowed in television. I am surprised NBC allowed it. The lovely Diane Baker plays it straight in this show when everyone else seems to be having a field day doing their own thing. It was fun to watch Robert Vaughn keep a straight face when Falk was obviously trying to trip him up. Another unique feature of this episode was it departed from the norm and went with a "whodunit". Soon we learn our antagonist (Vaughn) is murdered and must guess who the culprit is. The climax is both odd and amusing as Falk goes over the top to solve his crime.

I can understand how Colombo fans may hate this episode.In some ways Falk seems to be mocking his very character (I was always under the impression Falk had some contempt for Columbo because it overshadowed all the other great things he did prior and after the series). What is surprising is that this episode didn't raise to a cult status because it bucked the trends of television of its time. This to me is an unheard of classic and sincerely hope that it's recognized someday in the annals of TV history.
44 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
SURPRISE!
Mort-316 February 2001
About thirty minutes into the film, I thought this was one of the weakest "Columbo"s ever because it had the usual beginning (a murder happening, then Columbo coming, inspecting everything and interrogating the main suspect) squared! It was boring because I thought I knew everything already.

But then there was a surprising twist that turned this episode into a most exciting one. Suddenly, many characters were involved, I started to guess with Columbo and the ending was just like Agatha Christie's Poirot endings are.

The film is full of irony, and looking back, I must admit that the whole episode is great work of the writers because the ordinary first part is a mere tool for creating this irony, creating a huge fool-the-audience-scenario. Don't turn your television off before the end!
13 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Worst Columbo I've Seen
dgcrow19 November 2008
I love the Columbo series, have seen at least 80 percent of the show's episodes, and hope to eventually see them all. So far, this one is by far the worst. What makes it so disappointing is that it has a wonderful supporting cast: John Dehner, Diane Baker, Robert Vaughn, Wilfrid Hyde-White, and Dennis Dugan, among others. But what a waste of talent. And what terrible pacing and staging. Patrick McGoohan is a fine actor, and his performances as the murderer in this series are outstanding. But his directing in this episode is simply awful. If you're a Columbo fan, skip this one. If you're not a Columbo fan, all the more reason to skip it as well!
72 out of 92 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Columbo original
scarlett-3024 November 2000
An offbeat (literally) episode from the original run, in which Falk and director Patrick McGoohan tried a different angle on the familiar formula. The result is a rather fey, whimsical Lieutenant - all smirks and knowing winks - on a case that twists alarmingly before he can nail the suspect. Guaranteed to either enchant...or send viewers screaming from the room.
40 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Atypical Columbo
MillieTheRedhead26 January 2024
About 20 years ago a study came out suggesting that patients about to have surgery should be warned that they would be experiencing pain afterwards. This led to better pain management than when patients were reassured that the pain wasn't going to be that bad. I don't know if those results were ever replicated, but I think the findings of this study are relevant more broadly. For instance, I have been warned by numerous reviews on imdb and elsewhere, that "Last Salute to the Commodore" is one of the worst, possibly the worst episode of Colombo ever. So I went into watching it with extremely low expectations and therefore ended up mildly enjoying it. I agree it's weird, and some of the scenes are just plain annoying, such as the one in the boat yard when Colombo starts screaming and everybody's screaming to be heard over the industrial noises in the background. That seemed gratuitously irritating, but other odd scenes were amusingly absurd. It almost seemed like Robert Vaughn's character had been written for Patrick McGoohan. Was the original plan to have McGoohan both act and direct? For instance Robert Vaughn said something like "I like my findings preliminary," and when asked "Smoke?" answered, "Erratically." That sort of quirkiness seemed out of character for a character played by Robert Vaughn.

I enjoyed having young Mac on board and getting to see Bruce Kirby's character play a bigger role than usual. This episode broke from the formula in that we didn't see the murder committed, so we got a little bit of a plot twist. I found the educational bits about sailing mildly interesting. I like that Colombo typically teaches you something about some kind of subculture or area of endeavor in each episode. I thought the absurd and goofy tone was okay for one episode and it seemed that this might have been a significant episode in some way. I wonder if there had been a plan to end the series with this one. I think I read somewhere that McGoohan had been asked to take over for Peter Falk in the season following this one and refused. If there was some dissatisfaction among the creatives involved, could the bizarreness of the episode have been a little bit of "up yours" to the powers that be? The final scene with Colombo rowing the boat into the horizon with a melancholy rendition of "This old man" playing made me think it was perhaps a last salute to Colombo... but fortunately no.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Edward Albee anyone?
fxkmefford21 August 2022
Never elsewhere has Columbo battling wits with so many mind-game playing adversaries, but only one is the killer.

Not only is he not playing dumb anymore, but one strange scene has our hero perpetrating the only cruel thing he ever did to a perfectly innocent character that I can recall: He fools the daughter of the deceased Captain to believe the latter has returned, alive and well, from the sea. 'Daddy!' she exclaims in short lived relief and joy.

In fact it's a ruse to prove she could have mistaken another person for her father on the night of the murder... This is downright sadistic!

This episode has other flaws, like the bad guy coming from left field and the weak 'proof' moment that does him in.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unusual Columbo TV Thriller
ShootingShark8 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
When the wealthy owner of a shipyard drowns at sea, suspicion falls on his ambitious son-in-law and Columbo is called in to investigate. The case looks simple until the son-in-law also turns up dead ...

This is a very atypical Columbo story, but one of the best. It breaks most of the traditions of the series - we never see the murder, the chief suspect ends up dead, there are a gallery of suspects and Columbo even has an assistant (very nicely played by Dugan). The reason it's so good is partly down to a great script by Jackson Gillis, but mostly because Falk and McGoohan (old cronies from several previous Columbos together) milk every scene for all the oddball comic potential they can - four men squashed in a car built for two, lots of sailing gags ("So this is the mizzen boom ?"), an interview with so much background noise you can't hear any of the dialogue, Columbo attempting transcendental meditation, a running gag about giving up smoking, and so on. The cast are variable - Vaughn is a fine straight-man to the buffoonery, but Baker as his lush of a wife is a chore to watch. The humour is sly and infectious, the story is gripping, McGoohan's direction is excellent, the Los Angeles marina locations are beautiful and Falk is just sensational in his greatest role. Classic TV murder-mystery fare.
6 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Bizarre Disjointed Episode
abbamanic-195-19813225 December 2014
As an utter Columbo devotee I was almost shocked to watch this episode.

It revolves around the murder of an elderly ship-yard owner who has plans to sell-out to a conglomerate, to the horror of various family and friend leeches who see their meal ticket flying out the window.

Even the first cut scene to the murder location has you wondering if a chunk of tape hasn't ended up on the floor without the editors noticing.

A stellar cast including Vaughan (who starred in a previous cruise-ship murder Columbo episode) utterly fails to make this work, and Vaughan himself looks extremely uncomfortable in this outing.

The scenes are awkward, apparently ad-libbed, Falk open with a knowing self-satisfied stare when stood at the door of the Commodore's (ship-yard owner's) home as though by divine inspiration he thinks he knows who's guilty even before the killer has made his/her trademark slip-up.

Stilted dialogue, long, long awkward silences, uncomfortable character dynamics (Columbo keeps draping an arm around Vaughan in most scenes in a bizarre fashion), oddly timed cut-scenes, absence of incidental music and worst of all absence of endearing Columbo characteristics made this a cringe-worthy outing. I felt uncomfortable several times watching it.

Some reviewers will rate this quirky episode simply by virtue of it trying to be different-what that ignores is that the very appeal of Columbo, especially the 1970s outings, is its formulaic presentation. Falk is smarmy, condescending to his young detective trainee, all-knowing well before any clues have been presented...all in all it presents like a drama-class ad-libbed thrown together session. A very bad episode, possibly because it suggests the end of the Columbo series, with Columbo rowing off at the end whistling that annoying Nik-Nak Paddywhack tune (despite having a cigar clenched between his teeth!). Going by the 1980s/1990s episodes maybe it should have been the end.

When you compare this episode to the gems starring Robert Culp and Jack Cassidy, it almost poisons the entire series, and definitely feels non-canon. Fans avoid, this was bad, very very bad.
46 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why does nobody see the sheer joy they had when they made it?
jéwé6 February 2009
"Last Salute" is an episode directed by Falk's friend McGoohan and from start to finish the viewer can enjoy what is almost a pastiche of a crime mystery. Columbo lingers in the harbor, in no hurry at all, works together with Mac (because his boss insists), makes him drive his car, gets entangled with Robert Vaughn in the car, with the telephone, tries TM on the deck of the boat. He seems in a jolly mood all the time. Note how he touches and lays his arms around everyone in this episode. It is an episode as calming as the waterfront itself. And it probably isn't up to what most viewers expect. But that always is a problem. We need to accept it as a creative thing too. And Columbo always had it's own patterns and in-jokes, but because of many different directors as well as guest stars and considering the fact that the show ran for 35 years, there is no such thing as the one formula it sticks to. So it is really quite sad that there are always these remarks 'the last of the real Columbo's', 'the final good episode', 'here's where episodes became to long', 'here's where Falk was too old', etc, etc. Enjoy every episode for its own merits. "Last Salute" is in no way possible to be compared with outings like "Double Exposure" of "A Stitch in Crime". So don't. Just sit, relax and watch this episode. And there is no episode like it, it is beyond comparison.
42 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Touching Ending
darrendouglasbenson31 May 2014
It is a strange episode. I didn't watch it but it was on in the room and I kept looking up when people started getting loud. That silly scene with the drunk wife limping through the restaurant was absolutely goofy. BUT for my money, it has the best ending of all Columbos. An ending like that shows a deep understanding of Falk's character. For all his charm and genius the fact is that his job is hard. On this particular job he had the opportunity to learn a little bit about boats and when he had finished his work and could go home he did what I like to think he was wanting to do the whole time, maybe his whole life. Be alone in the pure sea, away from murder. Still with his cigar and coat, for that is who he is. Just for a moment to be in a silent new world on his way to the one he loves the most. It really is hard not to cry for a sec watching it. Worth the wait.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
All at Sea.
rmax30482330 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The milieu here is the family and friends of the Commodore (John Dehner), very rich folks. The Commodore is murdered and just as we think Columbo has the killer (Robert Vaughan) cornered, he's murdered too. Columbo assembles all the possible suspects in a room at the end and goes through a Charlie Chan or Hercule Poirot routine to expose the real killer, whose motive turns out to be greed.

This is thin stuff although the director (Patrick McGoohan, a talented actor) tries to lay it on with a trowel. I would guess the script started off as an hour-long show for "Mannix" or "Dan August" or something. There are many attempts to pad it out with humor and none of them are funny. (See Lieutenant Columbo try to wrestle himself into a FULL LOTUS POSITION! That'll be ten cents.) Characters get rather elaborate introductions and then play no more than the usual minor roles. Worse, this is a somewhat different Columbo than the character his fans have come to know. He's bumbling, of course, and has to cope with the difference between a mainmast and a mizzenmast, but on top of that he's CUTE. He winks. He smiles. His comments are coy. And what does it all boil down to? A two-minute experiment at the end in which the killer reveals his guilt. The rest were all red herrings.

There would be worse episodes after the series was revived and wrung out, but this is certainly one of the weakest of the original series, despite the talent in front of, and behind, the camera.
46 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Dry Humor!
cbwebsites24 July 2018
One of my very favorite Columbo episodes. The physical humor & interactions between Peter Falk & Robert Vaughan are priceless. Vaughan's body language says it all. It's wonderful to see where the actors are actually "cracking up" with laughter or are trying to disguise it & hold it back at times . The scene where four of them are in Columbo's Peugeot with the top down is hysterically funny. This is a very uniquely entertaining Columbo episode IMHO.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fred!
vonnoosh16 April 2022
This is an end of season episode which usually means (at least on American television) that it is going to be the weakest episode of the year. Short Fuse from the first season was at the end of the season and Falk called it the worst of the year. This end of season episode comes after nearly completing 5 seasons of Columbo, and I imagine all involved were getting a little worn out (perhaps bored) with the show like McGoohan was getting with Secret Agent/Danger Man before quitting it. The result here is an original Columbo if only because it is so bizarre.

I am a bigger fan of The Prisoner and Secret Agent than I am a Columbo fan so i rate this episode higher than most because it has a strange flare like some episodes of The Prisoner. There aren't any nods to that series like in Identity Crisis but McGoohan does have a certain style that is evident. Offbeat. The very first shot has a close up of a boat named "Titanic" and we see how tiny it is as the camera pulls away to tue sound of some sea shanty being awkwardly sung.

Peter Falk loved working with McGoohan and I think they together came up with some improvised scenes. The reason for this may have been a script that was on the short side and they needed to fill time. I think that is more likely the reason some strangely comic scenes go on a little long like Columbo trying to meditate or the yelling scene with Fred.

This scores points for originality and for having the distinction of not revealing so much early on for a uniquely different payoff in the end. This also has less unbelievableplotholes leading up to the conclusion than other episodes. Some universally loved episodes have plotholes like having details that a detective as sharp as Columbo would never miss but he somehow does for the sake of maintaining the narrative like not checking phone records to prove where a call the killer claims took place actually did take place.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Weird episode where there's a lot of physical contact and getting into people's personal space. Whodunnit second half, but not compelling and frankly cringeworthy.
reb-warrior24 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
What happened here? Why did they have Columbo doing so much physical contact and getting right up into people's personal space? Made him seem like a creep. I actually didn't mind the car squeeze-in scene. It was near the beginning and funny, tho it didn't seem necessary. But then they kept doing weird physical contact stuff, and in-your-space scenes.

The mystery wasn't compelling. Tho at first it's interesting as you think, oh this time they're not showing the murder as something different. Well, it is different, but not in a good way. In the end, we are left with a Poirot-like scene where all the usual suspects are present, and Columbo does his big presentation, and aha, moment as to who the killer is. Only with Poirot, it is always good. Here not so much. Mainly because at this point I just didn't care, the guest characters were annoying af, and the entire scene is drawn out and cringeworthy. To top it off, the killer is caught because of some stupid scene where Columbo gets everyone's reaction to a watch sound. I mean that wouldn't even hold up in court. A lawyer would just say the sound, sounded different, and that is why he said "no it isn't." That isn't even the main problem. There was no way Columbo could know what the killer would say. I mean he could have just said, "so what?" too. Then what?

Is it me or did Peter Falk over-act here? Gasp, say it isn't so. Love the guy, both the actor and the character, but sorry, he was over-the-top here, in his body movements, facial expressions, and, delivery of lines. I don't know why all of this happened. The script wasn't that great I'd say, and not very good direction. 3/10.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed