Survivors (TV Series 1975–1977) Poster

(1975–1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Superb series
pjuk-110 March 2015
The iconic opening sequence of this wonderful show was something I have never forgotten and, unlike many other series from this period, I actually have the three season box set on DVD and have watched it recently and - barring a few obvious age related issues - can confirm it is as good as it initially seemed back in 1975.

The post-apocalyptic mood is brilliantly captured and although the plot and stories do dip after Terry Nation gave up full control of the project, the sense of loss and foreboding is superbly carried forward.

The absence of one of Series 1 leading characters in series 2 and 3 is managed to reasonable effect although it is obvious the writers would have preferred to have carried on from where Season 1 left off. The attempts to shoehorn the missing person's back into the show from time to time is an obvious issue. Also, there are some plot lines that don't entirely work but 'Survivors' is really about characterisation and how you relate to these people in this world. Barely an episode goes by when the viewer doesn't wonder what they would do if it were them in the situation and this adds to the feeling of belonging and care for the survivors - it also adds to the sense of fear and desperation for the viewer.

As you'd expect, the age of the show does leave some reservations and some of the stories would never make the cut now - undoubtedly it is dated, of course - but it also has to be said that the slow pace and different requirements of mid-70's TV actually enhance some aspects with regard to tension and plot building. When they tried to recreate and update the show later, the increased pace and need to make sure something was happening all the time detracted from the atmosphere and understanding of the characters. In the original, you care about the people and what happens to them. There is never any point you don't believe in this post-apocalyptic world and this is the show's strength.

Some detractors have mentioned specific story lines where people don't behave as we'd expect them to do with second decade 21st Century glasses on. This is difficult to argue but, like listening to an old record from the same time, it is a pointless exercise to bemoan the different production values or to miss a modern trope. This is of its time, of course, but it shouldn't detract from the project. Don't forget, when they tried to remake it and modernise it, it was truly awful.

For anyone with an appreciation of classic TV and good story-telling this is highly recommended.
19 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great classic post doomsday drama
Thorsten-Krings23 March 2010
Survivors is the first post doomsday drama on British television, echoing the pessimistic world view of 70s science fiction feature films such as The Andromeda Strain, The Omega Man or Planet of the Apes. Of course Survivors obviously also owes a lot to the grandmaster of British Science Fiction, John Wyndham with some dialogues almost verbatim taken from the day of the Triffids. But that does not have an impact on the quality of the programme. Like in Romero's Crazies the bureaucracy just fails terribly and the world becomes overrun by a deadly virus. Helpless attempts at stopping it are made but it all ends with a whimper. So a group of survivors from all different walks of life meet and group together. The disaster brings out the best and the worst in people: the hamprered housewife turns into a leader, the leader into a fascist and a rich woman into the bitch from hell. So a lot of the drama comes from the dynamics between the people and all the dilemmas you face in this situation. For viewers of todaya it takes a while getting used to the much slower pace of narration of the 70s. Long scenes, no hand camera and sparingly used music. That makes it look dated but once you accept it, it really makes very good viewing because the pace matches the helplesness of the people. Theonly drawback for me is that as with a lot of 70s and especially 80s British TV the outdoor scenes and the studio scenes were shot on different material so that as a viewer you experience really harsh differences in term of the picture.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Chilling
mhorg201820 June 2018
While apocalyptic tv shows like The Walking Dead and Z Nation are the vogue today, this show (remade in the 2000's) is absolutely terrifying because this could really happen. When a virus is accidentally released, it spreads world wide quickly and 90 percent of humanity is killed off. The survivors take one a few different ideas; banding together and attempting to recreate a civilization, becoming raiders on others, or simply dying off. A really brilliant and terrifying show.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Intelligent, frightening and wholly relevant.
filmbforever17 June 2004
When an enigmatic unnamed scientist accidentally infects himself with a lethal engineered virus he unwittingly spreads it world wide via air travel. Focusing on London, England we see the effects of the virus as millions succumb and civilization collapses accordingly. The story hones in on a handful of emotionally scarred survivors who come together and attempt the difficult and painful reconstruction of a new society no longer able to depend on supplied science and technology. In one episode entitled "Law and order" the survivor's group are faced with a rape and murder of one of their number following a raucous celebration. An intellectually disabled member is falsely accused and sentenced to death with the killer himself voting for the man's execution. After one of the group leaders carries out the killing, he learns the identity of the real killer and is forced to allow him to stay in the group and withhold the information as the news of the tragic error would permanently splinter and destroy what they fought, against enormous odds, to create. Survivors is gripping stuff; well acted, cleverly written and creatively directed - if you like character driven Sci - Fi drama then this is for you.
29 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Timeless!
hm13136 April 2020
Saw it about 10 years ago (2011), and was impressed. Seems very appropriate in the age of COVID-19.This series was made in BBC's "golden era" of TV production. All the best Dr. Who episodes were simultaneously filling the airwaves. Anyway, if you're in COVID-19 lockdown, stream this series. Be warned .... it can be graphic and disturbing.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"God...Please don't let me be the only one!"
ShadeGrenade10 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
With cinemas of the early to mid 70's being full of films predicting grim futures for Mankind - such as 'Zardoz' and 'Soylent Green' - it was predictable that television would get in on the act eventually. Terry Nation's 'Survivors' begins with one of the most memorably scary title sequences ever filmed; to the accompaniment of Anthony Issac's powerful theme, a Chinese scientist accidentally smashes a flask. Some time later, he collapses at an airport and dies. Within hours, the terrible plague he has inadvertently unleashed spreads across the world. Millions perish. Only a handful survive - and they band together in an attempt to rebuild civilisation...

At the time of its original screening, I remember thinking: "What if this came true? Could I live in a world without electricity and all the other comforts we take for granted?". The main characters were 'Abby Grant' ( Carolyn Seymour ), a strong-willed middle-class housewife, 'Jenny Richards' ( Lucy Fleming ), secretary, and Greg Preston ( Ian McCulloch ), engineer. All were excellent. Other memorable characters to cross their paths included 'Tom Price' ( Talfryn Thomas ), a work-shy tramp, 'Ruth' ( Celia Gregory ), and 'Jimmy Garland' ( Richard Heffer ). Initially, the story lines combined action and adventure with thought-provoking drama. In the best episode of the series, 'Law & Order', a retarded man is put on trial for the murder of a young woman. His fate is to put to the vote. He is found guilty, and executed. Then its discovered that he was innocent. It remains the finest indictment of capital punishment I have come across. Another good episode was 'Something Of Value' in which a petrol tanker becomes the centre of an ownership dispute.

After an excellent first series, the show went slightly downhill in the second, as Carolyn Seymour was fired by the producer. Terence Dudley was notorious for rubbing people up the wrong way - Kit Pedler and Gerry Davis took their names off his previous B.B.C. sci-fi series 'Doomwatch'. Her departure was a huge blow for the show. Denis Lill's 'Charles Vaughan' was brought in as a regular. Then Ian McCulloch left in the third, and when power was restored in the very last episode, the series ended on an upbeat note. U.K. Gold repeated it in the '90's, and in 2003, D.D. Video put it out on D.V.D. In 2008, the B.B.C. attempted a remake with Julie Graham as 'Abby' and Paterson Joseph as 'Greg', but it was an unmitigated disaster, and was dropped after only two seasons. The producers failed to grasp that 'Survivors' was about people having to get by without technology, and had characters accessing the Internet. Furthermore, the women often looked as if they had stepped straight from 'Sex & The City'. Terry Nation would have hated it.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It Started Off Well
Theo Robertson10 February 2003
This speculative drama starts each episode with one of the greatest title sequence ever devised for television : A Chinese scientist accidentally drops a glass tube . Cut to the scientist collapse at an airport where planes are arriving then taking off again then the camera focuses on passports of Moscow , Madrid , Madrid , Paris and London being stamped as the picture dissolves . It doesn`t sound very exciting and it`s probably not but it is very very effective because it`s so simple . The whole premise of the series and its consequences of a lab borne virus escaping and being carried around the world sums up what has happened to humanity - the survivors - in the opening credits . Not a lot of programmes do that . And credit too for Anthony Isaacs title music which is understated , bleak and haunting

Written by Terry Nation the first couple of episodes introduce us to the main characters of Abby Grant , Jenny Richards and Greg Preston , three people who have survived a superflu like virus that has wiped out 99 % of the world`s population . The trio meet more characters on their travels , not all of them good . One thing season one was good at was showing us that a worldwide calamity will not bring out the best in people and in some episodes like " Garland`s war " and " Something of value " that people may have to turn to violence if they want to survive at all . One outstanding episode " Law and order " centres around the premise of how will people deal with someone within in the group who harms another person in the sanctum

Unfortunately as soon as Nation left to create BLAKES 7 at the end of the first season he took many of his Wyndham / Christopher inspired ideas with him . Seasons two and three are far less interesting than the first . Charles Vaughn who wouldn`t be out of place on a hippy or Greenpeace commune becomes the central character and SURVIVORS becomes a sort of BBC post apocalypse rival of EMMERDALE FARM with the only episodes worth watching being " Lights of London " , " Mad dog " and the absolutely outstanding " Last laugh "

All in all a fairly good mature intelligent drama series but it should have been an unforgettable masterpiece from the golden age of British television. And if only Terry Nation had been given more control I`m certain it would have been . So if you`re going to watch SURVIVORS make sure you watch the whole of the first season and the episodes I mentioned above . Ignore the rest
35 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Nostalgic, but well done, BBC TV SF
stevelomas-6940119 July 2020
Aside from the occasional inexplicably stupid decision, flares, dubious supporting cast, flares, horrendous interior decoration and flares this is very good BBC SF. The story, if slow, is certainly plausible and is much better than the atrocity of the remake.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Patchy but good overall
michael-leacy25 February 2010
Having just viewed all three series for the first time, I'm surprised that every reviewer seems to love Season 1 and hates Seasons 2 and 3. To be honest, I can't see much of a shift in quality between the three. I would probably agree that the first series is the best - but only just. I think that Season 3 is almost as good. Season 2 - apart from the excellent "Light of London" is largely a disaster, settling into an almost comfortable 'everyday' life-style which just feels too safe. Season 3 pulls the rug out from all that by being continuously threatening with the heroes moving from place to place with no sense of any roots. A third season with them happily working the land would have just sent the show down the tubes. Much of the second half of Season 1 also suffers from this "happy" community syndrome as well (excepting the harrowing "Law and Order" episode). Season 3 has some duff episodes as well, but then all 3 seasons do, but a number of very hard-hitting ones such as "Mad Dog" and the haunting "Last Laugh" - as adult as the series ever got. Yes, Jenny has become very annoying and shockingly willing to leave her son behind, while the character of Ruth (one of the best) is written out without explanation. Overall - good and entertaining to watch (perhaps just once though) - but patchy throughout.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Living through it now
kris-gray22 December 2020
Man made virus in China spreads around the world and kills 98% of the population? Sound familiar? I saw this back in the day and also have it on DVD box set. It was Sci-Fi at its finest at the time and hasn't really been bettered. The recent remake, which left us in the air when it was cancelled after only 2 seasons, was nowhere near as good, despite the bigger budget. I urge you all to watch it to get some tips, when the current virus wipes out most of us, if you are a survivor you will need them.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It All Started Off So well .....
euronick6128 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Series one was excellent .. a very good premise with good storylines and a good cast of interesting characters ... series 2 came along .. Abby had gone and several characters were killed off in a fire .. but new characters came into the series and soon established themselves in the farmstead .. then series 3 came along .. oh dear what happened .. good characters like Ruth, who was acting as the doctor, The Italian lady and the woman with a baby who had a crush on Doctor Who on the barge all had disappeared along with the younger characters, who came in towards the end of the previous series, with no explanation ... good characters like Pet and Jack only appeared in 3 episodes along with Greg who only appeared in 2. Series 3 seemed to consist of Charles, Jenny and Hubert traipsing around the country looking for Greg with Jenny whinging on about him and Agnes completely forgetting she had left Pet looking after her baby. The ending made no sense it was just as if the characters couldn't be bothered anymore and just wandered off. I don't know if there was a 4th series planned and then abandoned .... very unsatisfactory end.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Post-Apocalyptic Survival Drama, with a typically downbeat British outlook
medwards-852633 October 2022
As a science fiction fan, I must say this is truly one of the best TV productions ever made. There are issues with it, some ropey acting/production in places, a heavy middle class bias to protagonist characters and it has aged, a younger audience would probably struggle with it, however, if you can stick with it you will be richly rewarded.

This is Sci-Fi made as realistic as possible, and, given the CoVid19 pandemic we are still in the midst of (believe me folks it is not over yet) amazingly prophetic. Yes thankfully CoVid19 has not been anywhere as deadly as the virus in this show, but it's sketchy origins, it's rapid spread and the utterly ineffective response to it are all here, writ large way back in the mid 70s.

This is also a call for a return to a simpler way of life, living close and harmoniously with nature, living in small intimately connected communities; things that resonate even more in our modern environ, with mobile phones and social media. The backdrop is always though, that human cruelty and selfishness will often ruin the best laid plans.

The two central pillars that hold up this series are the two excellent characters of Greg Preston (a blunt and forcefully practical engineer type, played with wonderful gusto by Ian McCulloch) and Abby Grant (played with a deep intelligence, resilience and resolve by Caroyln Seymour) the supposed third pillar, Jenny (overacted by Lucy Flemming) is meant to be the true heart and emotional centre of the show, however, compared to the other two her part is underwritten and the actor playing her struggles to convey the same depth as the other two protagonists.

Unfortunately the quality of the show decreases as they made the bizarre decisions to get rid of the Abby character from the second series, and it gets a little bogged down in the domestic drama of running an effective farming community. However, it is worth watching all the way to its conclusion as there are always very good episodes that elevate the series far above normal.

This show poses and answers with great effect the age old mythical and sci-fi question, what would happen if we had to start society again, right from scratch?

Personally, of all post-apocalyptic shows, for me, it provides the deepest and most satisfying exploration of this idea, perhaps because this scenario is so much more realistic than zombies, aliens or slowly walking plants...

I would, and do, recommend this series to anyone, but especially anyone with more than a passing interest in science fiction, philosophy or human nature.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Has not dated well and has lazy plot contrivances
rightangleterre6 September 2023
The idea is a good one, especially in light of the events of recent years. However, it has some problems - some of which are due to it being written in the 1970s and others due to lazy plot contrivances.

The worst example of the latter is how the characters of the children are written. These kids are allowed to know confidential things to be kept hidden from visitors to the commune, yet mix freely with said visitors and tell the visitors exactly what the adults are keeping from them. Children have free range to play with guns too, despite the adults always having a problem with this.

The kids are gullible enough to believe a female character is an evil witch when encouraged by the cliche that is the character of Hubert; worse, two of the adults are swayed over. Fine if this was set in the 1370s but in the 1970s?

The death of a male character is par for the course, while the death of a female character is seen as a tragic event. Women here are generally not fully-fledged adults; they are there to support the men. I guess that is perhaps a reflection of 1970s attitudes though.

Also has a very, very slow plot progression.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Crap-tastic.
screenman30 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I'm afraid I'm out of step with popular opinion on this one.

My recollections of the series are largely critical. It featured a capable rather than first-rate cast, who were condemned to struggle with those banes of British television: an inadequate budget and a melodramatic script. Both of which are far more debilitating than any virus.

The melodrama is there simply to make up for the shortcomings in the finance department. So, we are treated to needlessly verbose confrontations, and hysterical shouting-matches.

Given its budgetary constraints; there was about enough mileage in the idea to run for a 6-part serial. After that it might have perished with honours. Unfortunately, it was allowed to outlast its value and quickly descended into a soap opera. Perhaps I should say soap-less opera, considering how scruffy and squalid everyone and every thing seemed to be. There were tiresome digressions with people going away on obscure adventures, whilst lovelorn individuals would eventually go off in pursuit of them. These crusades and searches became the mainstays of the series in its later incarnations. Even its creator, Terry Nation, walked quietly away from its death-bed before the plug was finally pulled.

Nope; I have no fond memories of this turkey. But anybody with a penchant for disease-induced end-of-civilisation-as-we-know-it-situations that bore your socks off, could do no better than to get their hands on 'Virus - The Director's Cut'. That's actually made in Japan, and comes with a standard Nipponese 3-year warranty to 'do your 'ead in', as the Cockneys say. Sometimes it's marketed under the more apt title of 'Fukkatsu No Hi'. I couldn't have put it better myself.
5 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disturbing, frightening and powerful.
stephen-alford119 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
What an incredible impact this series had on me as a nine year old in 1975. To me it was absolutely terrifying the way it depicted the total collapse of civilisation. The airliners taking off from Heathrow during the credits really illustrated perfectly how a killer virus would be spread right round the planet. The Oriental scientist at the start carried the plague overseas - was this a deliberate ploy by his government because they knew their own country was doomed? Or was the plague slow acting at the start and he didn't know he was infected? Jenny's doctor friend said that the disease was a mutant virus. That suggests to me it changed very quickly and started killing much quicker as it spread worldwide. You seen people dead behind the wheel of their vehicles meaning it killed very quickly at times. I would expect the towns and cities to look just like early morning - cars lined neatly outsides houses and in driveways and shops and factories locked up, because people would simply be dead in their homes. Wouldn't cities be gloomy and terrifying without street lighting and illumination from homes and shops? Obviously the rats and other vermin would be widespread. Pets would become feral again no doubt. Do you think towns and cities would ever be accessible again? How long would it take for nature to reclaim the built up areas? Just think, all round the world would be virtually silent with vast cities with only a handful of stunned, terrified people in them.

Another thing, in Survivors you seen Greg, Abby and Jenny using petrol pumps to fill up cars they acquired. Think about it, nowadays that would be impossible because you need to get activation from an attendant's computerised screen/till and obviously the power would be gone. How could you get fuel? Computers and advancing technology if anything has made us MORE vulnerable. If society collapsed we'd be completely at a loss in many ways, much more so than when Survivors was on.

With all the corpses lying dead, wouldn't other diseases be on the rise? That would be disastrous for new born babies because they wouldn't be innoculated in a post plague world.

So, so many questions. Survivors is probably the best post plague apocalyptic series I've ever seen.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Genius ... or Tedious?
chuffnobbler19 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
An amazing, sprawling epic, touching on some of the most powerful issues that mankind can ever face ... or ... lots of people standing around talking about crop rotation.

Survivors is the most variable TV show I have ever seen. It is either gripping, or tiresome. Its three seasons seem to have little in common with each other, and the series gradually runs out of steam (ironic, as it ends with the re-invention of the steam engine!).

The first series is the best. Beginning with the shock of The Death, and society falling apart, it moves on to deal with scavenging, trading, disease, and how to cope without electricity or medicine. Some brilliant images of deserted streets. Memorable characters, such as Emma Cohen and Tom Price, will not be bettered as the series moves on. Some stand-out episodes, including the capital punishment story everyone always remembers, make up for some of the more ordinary tales which seem to involve two groups of people waving guns at each other for 45 minutes.

With series two, Abby Grant has moved on, and nearly all the likable characters are killed off in a fire. Now in a new, less tight-knit community, the stories are more varied in quality and some quite unsympathetic.

Mina is very likable, but is thought to be a witch. It's this kind of story that reminds us how easy it is to become primitive all over again. The community gains a doctor, and the London-based two parter breaks the series' mould effectively.

It all falls apart at the end of series two when leader Greg heads off to Norway in a hot air balloon. This is the first nail in the coffin of the series.

Series three is very hard going. Having spent so long building up the new community in series two, this is barely seen and all but forgotten. The doctor is never even mentioned again. Jenny moans a lot about missing either (a) home, (b) kids, or (c) Greg. In some scenes, she moans about all three, becoming an unlikeable whining machine. Charlie rants on about forming communities and rebuilding society to anyone who will listen, almost prompting me to reach for the mute button. Hubert gets drunk and falls over (he occasionally proves himself useful by shooting people).

Charlie, Jenny and Hubert trot from one place to the next, avoiding wild dogs, trying to find Greg. It all seems a bit aimless. There's a brilliant and terrifying episode about rabies, but the third series is mostly very yawn-making. Greg seems to be setting up some kind of military rule towards the end of the series, though Heaven only knows how Norweigian Anna is involved.

The final episodes, aiming to switch on hydro-electric power-stations, makes interesting viewing, if only because they're talking about valves instead of crops, for a change. Moving from one location to the next, occasionally picking up and dropping off new faces, gives the third series far less emotional involvement than that in earlier episodes. It's a real effort to sit through some of it.

At its worst, Survivors bored me and frustrated me as characters behaved illogically and provoked arguments for no reason. At its best, it's shocking, thought-provoking and terrifying. In the first two years, the best far outweighs the worst. Towards the end, I was losing patience and sympathy. Worth a watch for the scale of its ideas if nothing else.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's happened and thankfully not as bad
puppyrevenge16 April 2020
Wow. The first episode has really happened. Not quite as bad and most of the world hasn't been wiped out but March 2020 is as close to this as i'd like thankyou. Thought I'd watch it to cheer myself up, all i can say is at least it's not as bad as this......so far.....
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
strangely prescient of the coronavirus
howboutthisone_huh15 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I say prescient because of the opening credits, not the series in general. The video header to every episode shows a chinese scientist accidentally dropping a flask or something and then you see him traveling to other countries. That is, the premise is that the pandemic started by accident in a chinese lab and spread to the rest of the world. Sound familiar? I'd love to know how they thought of that but sadly the creator of the show died over 20 years ago. I don't about britain but I don't recall in the states that biological doomsday was given much consideration. Nuclear sure, political collapse sure, but biological, no.

Normally I wouldn't watch something like this let alone write a review but given the current times, I highly recommend giving it a try if you can find it. Note, it's not about a virus; not exactly. The virus sets up the story but very little of the storyline is about the technical details of the virus, and very little is about the 'death' as they refer to it when most of the population of the world suddenly dies.

So for everybody that got a D in hs biology, no, a virus can't kill off this many people in such a short amount of time. I can't explain without running afoul of the censors but it just can't happen. Anyway, even though the premise of the show is pretty ludicrous, it's very smart that they don't concentrate on it. Instead, the story lines are more around what would happen if everything about modern civilization was turned off, literally, and it's as much relevant today as it was 45 years ago. How would we survive? How well would you survive?

The stories are very original and very well thought out. You won't learn much about how to survive doomsday but every episode covers subject matter which isn't just theoretical. Sure the technical details can be far fetched at times and the drama is ruined by a pretty low brow production quality but the stories are well thought out. For instance there's a scene in season 2 when they talk about slaughtering a pig and everyone is concerned because there is no salt. In the US I think a lot of people would be confused by that and just skip over that part but it's an important point. Salt has been used for thousands of years as a preservative. Before refrigeration, our forebears all depended on things like salting meat to preseve it otherwise, the meat spoils, you get sick and die. If you don't preserve the meat then you have to eat it all at once and then it becomes a game of economy. You have X number of mouths to feed each day and some days will be feast and others will be famine. It's pretty difficult to survive when the worls is so unpredictable. That's why, until humans learned to domesticate plants and animals, the population remained pretty small for thousands of years. But anyway, it's interesting that the writers did't try to explain this point at all. The characters mention this a couple of times but they don't dumb down the story by trying to explain. But to not mention this, and to skip over this issue as if everyone were still buying meat at the supermarket would be pretty dumb too.

The series also covers more serious issues like childbirth, abortion, women's rights, political organs, and individual freedoms versus the collective. I have to admit though that season 3 went a bit too far and it was a bit too repetitive for me. Missed a couple of the latter episodes couch surfing. Still, hollywood would never make something like this. It's too smart and besides the topies in the show would be too sensitive to political correctness. The controversy wouldn't be worth the political correctness.

Again, the drama often gets lost in the poor production value but it's still worth watching. My guess is that they shot this on a small budget in the quickest amount of time they could. It's funny to watch too because in quite a few scenes, especially in season 1, the actors step over each other's lines and carry on anyway somehow. But it's not amateurish. There's still some brilliant characters and dialog and acting mixed in with the rest of the mud.

Unfortunately, they decided to remake this series in 2008. The remake copies from the original but it's not worth one second of attention. It's basically a cartoon soap opera focused on shadow conspiracies and cliche character driven plots.

It's still a cheap production, and I'd wager that for 2008, even cheaper than the original series because it's a much smaller cast (primary and extra), fewer production sets, a noticeable lack of animals, and they copied storylines from the original and everything else from all the other cartoon shows streaming out of hollywood.

Yeah, I said, a lack of animals. The remake is just a silly soap opera. The characters are living in a mansion and they're main hardship is just getting along with everyone else. There's no sense that they actually work or anything and there are hardly any animals in any of the scenes, while the original series had horses, sheep, cows, dogs, rats, and so on; lots of them. In the remake there's even this silly subplot about finding a vaccine but what good is a vaccine if everyone starves to death. You say, but there's supermarkets and warehouses full of stuff to last survivors for years. Um, no. Just like if this doomsday happened in 1975, it doesn't matter. If you want to survive doomsday you'll need to learn about subsistence survival which involves finding new energy sources, raising crops, and lots of animals. Again, I won't explain further because of the censors but everything we take for granted will disappear in a relatively short time span. Even gasoline (petrol) doesn't last but a few months before it breaks down chemically and is useless. The producers of the original series understood that but somehow in a generation and a half, this basic understanding of science and economy is either been lost or deemed less important to viewers who would prefer to watch melodrama and cartoons than think for themselves.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Fiction made (possibly) fact
Essex_Rider4 June 2021
I remember this when it first aired, fiction? Yeah, right!. It now looks increasingly like this fiction made it all the way to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The world is in the grip of a pandemic and although the death rate isn't as bad as the fictional series, the economic cost is horrendous.

They should definitely show this again, or maybe the woke warriors would complain too loudly.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
interesting evolution
Aylmer24 January 2023
Seeing as "Doctor Who" and "Blake's 7" were two of my earliest childhood TV obsessions, I can claim to be somewhat of a Terry Nation completist now having just finished this show as well. I notice a lot of similarities between how this show changed over time with "Blake's 7", which started up not long after this show wrapped. For one, both shows lose their central characters but continue on after a supporting character is given a chance to carry the show. Both shows open on a serious note and routinely go back to a central plot carrying things forward, but often have side episodes that seem to have little to do with the greater story.

Compared to "Blake's", this show feels much cheaper and messier, though I really appreciate it being a pioneer TV show of how human beings will handle a post-apocalyptic scenario long before "Jericho" or "The Walking Dead". A pandemic (originating in China) destroying human society feels eerily realistic these days, and this show nicely deals with a litany of issues from how food production and energy would have to be managed, along with security, communication, religion, and family all having been irreparably altered by events. It's a limitless well of potential that this show could have delved into even deeper.

This show evolves significantly even mid-season, with Season 1 beginning as travel-focused in search for family but settles into a story about managing a small compound. Season 2 loses much of the cast and shifts things over to a small village, preferring to double-down on the domestic issues. Season 3 shakes things up and goes back to wandering around after losing almost all of its central cast. It goes in some interesting directions but unfortunately drops many interesting subplots and never truly feels like things come together. Instead it's almost like their writing staff were continually having to "wing it" after losing a location or an actor and being presented with shooting location opportunities at the last minute. It's missing an overall plan, but generally the writing and acting are of a professional enough level that they help elevate things.

One of my favorite episodes would be the 2-parter called "Lights of London" as it placed an enormous importance on getting society going again and how this particular group may be one of human kind's last hopes. There's a subplot presented about a big move to an island that they need to gear up for, which would have been a very interesting story to return to later on, but no such luck.

I do give credit to the series though for making me sad at every character death, knowing that each human left is so critical to the continuance of mankind as a species. All throughout though, especially in season 3, we get presented with antagonistic characters (brigands and aspiring tyrants) who the world certainly could do without. The show rarely presents the moral quandary of what must be done with characters who drag everyone down but at the same time remain necessary in some way.

There's two characters sort of like this with Tom Price and Hubert who both come off as irredeemably antisocial and annoying but both get a chance to prove themselves somewhat. I particularly enjoyed Price's final episode, as up to that point I was confused why anyone was putting up with him. Come to think of it, malingerers, criminals, and generally lazy people will not just go away after society falls apart, so their shortcomings would be something that he more heroic individuals would realistically need to manage.

I wish I had seen this show earlier as I spent a bit of time back in 2009 with Ian McCulloch, who seemed much fonder of his writing contributions for the show than his acting. His character seems more "the brain" of this show than any other and the glue that holds it together, so with him missing in most of Season 3 it felt like the show loses a lot of cohesion and destined to fall apart. It's sad that all these years later we don't have another, better quality and more thought-out version of this concept using the best of this show as a road map. As it stands, "Survivors" is some quality sci fi from one of TV's greatest minds, exemplifying the limitless potential and serious disappointing shortcomings that would typify most of what Nation produced.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Impressive Series!!!!
sandreacci2 October 2015
Probably one of the best "end of the world as we know it" series. It is sad that it took as long as it did for Survivors to come to DVD in the US. They obviously didn't have a large budget but they really didn't need it.

One of the things that stands out and actually makes it even better is they did not use any music to set the mood/tone of the show. The actors had to carry each episode along with the script. All too often music is used for dramatic effect and if it was removed, the scene would fail. Not with this series. There is a theme at the start and it comes back in at the end. So no incidental music is used and it actually makes this even better. In fact, I wish this would happen more often.

As with any series, some episodes are not as good as others. The plot sometimes jumps around but for the most part the series holds up on its own and leaves you wanting to know what will happen next. The remake of the show in 2008 does not come close to this original.

I highly recommend it!!!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bring this series to the USA PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!
da_ly_s13 November 2007
I am a huge fan of this show. I first saw it on PBS about 10 years ago and I have been looking to purchase it ever since. To be honest the obsession has almost driven me mad.

It was an awesome Sci-Fi show that I recommend to any fans of post-pandemic movies/series. The "Survivors" go through different trials as they attempt to remain civil and alive. The series does not start by just dropping you off, it shows you the virus and the people before everyone dies, which gives the show a stable base. I never saw the end of the series.

And if you all could spread the word that we would like a USA Zone 1 version that would be great! Thank you!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Far inferior to the remake....
jdwaite5919 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I'd seen the re-make recently and enjoyed it, but was frustrated by the abrupt ending midway through season 2. I figured, I know the original is going to be a cheesy 70's production, but I like the basic storyline and I'll at least get 3 full seasons out of it. What a mistake. Aside from the horrid filming (unavoidable for 70's era TV) the acting is atrocious. And both of these pale in comparison to the worst writing I think I've ever seen. I don't just mean the script but the entire storyline. The characters make mistakes no sensible person in that situation would make and never learn from them. Nevertheless, I was determined to stick with it until episode 9, "Law & Order", which is inexplicably the favorite of other reviewers I've seen. First, the idea that any group of people would allow an obvious degenerate like Tom Price to join them after he's held 2 of the women hostage at gunpoint and tried to force them to trade sex for food is laughable. They know he's a drunk and a lecher, yet he's welcomed into their society without as much as a discussion. Then, after he's raped and killed one of their members, no one even thinks to mention his name as a suspect, even though he'd been visibly drunk, obnoxious and bothering one of the other women at the "party" the night of the murder. No, instead they "convict" a mildly retarded and good-hearted man, then decide execution is the only way to settle the issue. When the tragic error is discovered (too late), the idiot leader who railroaded the whole scenario along decides they can't tell the truth about the matter or they'll undo all the "good" they've accomplished so far. Got news for you, Greg, if you've just wrongly executed an innocent retarded man based on nothing but your flimsy, meandering logic, while the real and obvious killer is sitting right there, you haven't "built" anything worthwhile and you shouldn't be in charge of anything other than tinkering with fuel pumps and such. And then, they allow the murderer to stay with the group! No worries about the children now, no talk of banishment, why? Because they need him to help them farm! This is absurd on so many levels, my head hurts. Needless to say, out came the disc, and into the mail with it before any more damage could be done. I don't usually take the time to shred bad movies, but in this case I've made an exception to, hopefully, save other viewers of the new series the pain of what I just went through with the original.
6 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The best adult S.F. drama series the B.B.C. has ever made.
spook-1522 January 2000
This series was first shown on peak-time on Sundays on B.B.C. 1 (the prime channel) and regularly attracted audiences in millions including a precocious ten year old (me!) and his siblings. The reason was simple: it was the best adult oriented S.F. drama series the B.B.C. had ever made. They have never made anything better since. And it was very powerful, very realistic, completely believable, terrifyingly accurate and very scary on a psychological "what if?" level. Characters behaved in the way that people behave in real crises (such as civil wars) when the veneer of civilisation falls away: some try to grab power, some become natural leaders, some want to be led, others give up in despair and kill themselves. The series didn't flinch from showing all that or sugar coat the pill - and was much the better for it. The B.B.C. had the pick of the best T.V. and stage character actors around to cast it, plots never plumbed the depths of cliche, stories and themes were rarely if ever neatly resolved. It made a huge impact on the British national consciousness: episodes were being talked about in offices, factories and school playgrounds for days afterwards. If you consider that it was broadcast before anyone had ever heard of A.I.D.S., H.I.V., B.S.E., C.J.D. or G.M.O.s then I think it fair to say it was way ahead of it's time. And, sadly, like a lot of the finest T.V. produce of the B.B.C. and independent T.V. in Britain of the 1970s and 1980s - nowhere is it available on video.
17 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Iconic & horrifying.
robin10196228 July 2022
I was 13yo when this first aired & I was glued to it from the start. The title sequence still haunts me to this day - a premonition of the last few years? I would love this to be repeated - UK drama at its best.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed