A Twist of Sand (1968) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Basically it was boring...
Britney-Keira20 April 2008
The basic problem with this film was it was simply boring. It did not leave you at all interested in the characters, and there development or to care what was going to happen to them.

The second problem was the superfluous nature of the character played by Honor Blackman, apart from falling over a lot, she did not seem to do anything.

The third problem was the lack of chemistry between the leads.

The fourth problem was the total predictability of the way it ended, there was nothing really to get excited about. The film was not that great, I would not choose to recommend this title to you, reader.
21 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
All for nothing...
j_paul_murdock31 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Unfortunately this film wasn't helped by the fact that the sound was out of synch for the second half. It didn't help either that it jumped about quite a bit.

We start with Richard Johnson and Roy Dotrice narrowly evading customs officials in Malta by throwing their contraband rifles and ammunition, meant for Cyprus, over board. All this during the opening credits.

Johnson feels reminded of his most dangerous mission during the war when he had to command a submarine through dangerous reefs and rocks in what is now Namibia to reach a secret newly designed German U-Boot, sink it without trace and ensure no one survived. He botches the mission by accidentally letting off a flare and we learn that he personally shoots anyone jumping overboard to escape and also, possibly, the native folk who have come out onto the shore to observe. (Quite how he did that with one pistol and in about 30 seconds is left to our imagination...) Roy Dotrice (who spends a lot of time with his shirt off) was a member of the crew.

All of a sudden (back in 1968) Jeremy Kemp, another ex-member of the crew, jumps on board the torpedo boat, along with his sidekick, a non-verbal German played by Peter Vaughan. Quite whether Kemp's accent is British or South African is left to the imagination. At least he can't be playing his usual German (can he?). It is also a mystery that, whilst everyone is sweating like mad in the Maltese heat with either their shirt off or with most of their buttons undone, Kemp turns up in a black high-necked sweater and a donkey jacket!

(The two scenes - the flashback to the war and Jeremy Kemp turning up should, in my opinion, have been the other way round.) For no apparent reason and to Johnson's annoyance, Honor Blackman turns up the next morning. Further to doing a good job later in the film of falling over and having evidently smuggled a whole trousseau on board, she does actually have something to do with the storyline. Kemp and her husband were involved in smuggling diamonds but Blackman is the only one to know exactly where the biggest stash of diamonds is hidden as her husband has died. She will only say that they are inland from the bay where Johnson sank the German U-Boot and, of course, if he steered through the reefs and rocks then, he can do it again.

No sooner has Johnson agreed than they are off the coast of South West Africa. There is a completely useless scene along the way at a port where they call to pick up supplies. A Diamond Security Police Inspector threatens to arrest them on the way back if they are smuggling diamonds (SDPOILER ALERT) but, of course, we never see the return trip! Johnson manages to steer the boat through the rocks but does so in such a violent way that a) he throws everyone about, b) loses the lifeboat and c) makes you wonder how the hell he managed to get a submarine through there during the War in the first place! (The boat is very obviously a model as the 'person' at the wheel a) never moves and has no facial features and b) is wearing a white shirt when Johnson at the helm is wearing a blue shirt!)

Lo and behold, they moor up right next to the rusting German U-Boot's tower and it is confirmed that Peter Vaughan's character was the only survivor of the attack. Honor Blackman now reveals that the diamonds are hidden in an old ship wreck 3 miles inland. So they all set off. With no visible bottles of water...!

When they reach the ship wreck it is now half buried in sand, the half where the diamonds are, and so our adventurous group decide to work their way along inside. Roy Dotrice actually finds the diamonds but Jeremy Kemp shows his true colours by snatching them off him and causing an old iron cannon to fall on him and kill him. He inadvertently also injures Peter Vaughan. The group returns the best way they can. Johnson, out of remorse, helps Vaughan and they all narrowly escape not only a sandstorm but also any accusations of plagiarism from the writers of Ice Cold in Alex!

Back at the bay we wonder how they got off the boat in the first place when they lost the wooden lifeboat getting there, only to see an inflatable rubber dinghy for the first time. When Kemp tries to shoot Johnson, Blackman throws the bag containing the diamonds at him but the bag ends up in the sea, lost forever. Vaughan is by now beside himself with guilt at being the only survivor of the sunken U-Boot but, in his attempt to calm him down, Kemp runs into Vaughan's flick knife and Vaughan collapses on the rocks. All of a sudden, Johnson and Blackman make their escape in the boat. The trip and, quite frankly, the film have all been for nothing...
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Unnecessary flashback slow down main story.
mark.waltz4 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
They could have had a quick prologue showing captain Richard Johnson's background and expanded the search for his smuggled goods to make more linear sense of what was going on as opposed to the recurring flashbacks of his World War II combat past which slows everything down. The problem is that Johnson and the bulk of the characters aren't really that interesting or likable enough to care about their past so why not just get on with it.

With an ensemble of salty voiced Honor Blackman, Peter Vaughan, Jeremy Kemp, Roy Dotrice and Guy Doleman, there's plenty of conflict, and the film is an attractive but somewhat messy adventure of some very amoral people dealing with the elements in trying to find some hidden diamonds. Plenty of beautiful photography representing Malta and the Skeleton Coast, and also lots of desolation in desert sequences.

I always enjoy Blackman with her very theatrical voice, and though she's quite the opportunist, she's probably the most idealistic of the group. They may help each other through scrapes, but when it comes down to it it's obvious that if they can get away with the diamonds on their own they'd do it no matter what happened to the others. I didn't find this hideous, but not particularly interesting even though what happens with the diamonds is suitably ironic.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dont Bother!
davyd-0223717 August 2021
Whilst Peter Vaughan does add something as a german who doesnt speak much, its clear from the outset that Jeremy Kemp shouldnt be trusted but oddly enough is, by his former Captain Richard Johnson. Ms Blackman knows where the diamonds are and what could have been a half decent film descends into a very quick and quite pathetic ending hence DONT Bother. We also had the benefit on freeview of LIP movements NOT matching the words coming out. Periodically, most of the time, this is the best freeview have to offer-hardly "great films"!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
for a box filled with diamonds
myriamlenys28 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This well-made adventure movie has a lot to offer : colourful travels, maritime and naval stunts, riveting war scenes, exotic scenery and a fine performance by a charismatic lead actor. Sadly enough the movie also suffers from over-predictability.

A question. What will happen if a handful of dangerous people who do not particularly like or trust each other become a team involved in an illegal enterprise ? And what if they're after a prize so great that it could tempt a Franciscan friar ? If your answer is : "I would not be surprised to see tension, in-fighting, treachery and homicide", then congratulations, you've just predicted 70 to 80% of the movie, including the ending. And no, it does not help that the movie indulges in so much foreshadowing.

Even the theatrical poster (or at least the theatrical poster shown here on imdb) contains some spoilers. It's rare to see a movie so devoted to burying its own surprise potential...

Still, it's an enjoyable way to spend a few hours, although I wouldn't recommend "A twist of sand" to people who suffer from a morbid fear of heights and/or a morbid fear of tiny enclosed spaces. If the scene with The Elevator From Hell doesn't scar them for life, then the scene with the centuries-old shipwreck will...
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Truly woeful
malcolmgsw10 October 2021
T his an absurd film. A labyrinthine plot which is very confusing due to the inter cutting of the World War 2 story. The model work is just about the worst I have ever seen. This film deserves to be buried in a deep hole and forgotten.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a good film lost
paulmanser14 July 2006
Warning: Spoilers
seen this film twice once as a kid when it first came out the second in my teens .cant remember the ins and outs .double crosses .richard Johnson as ex royal navy officer with a checkered past a wreck of a galleon with a lot of diamonds. peter vaughn as a mute ex German u boat sailor and a connection to Johnson .did enjoy it and would like to see it again .roy dotrice is rjs right hand man and ends up dead in one of the double crosses.honor blackman is the token totti with not a lot to do .and a bizarre ending involving a conning tower of a German sub.it seems a shame that so many British films made about this time have all but disappeared these are films that i grew up with such as hammerhead long days dying and a film with mark lester as a child who witnesses a murder on malta and is chased by two cops . little or no chance of seeing them on DVD a shame.
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ho hum
jefadlm-19 June 2022
I started viewing this about half way through ! I was also reading a book whilst easily keeping up with the narrative. Only 7 reviews plus me making 8 !!! WOW that about sums up this dull waste of time ! That said Peter Vaughan was interesting to watch , his facial expressions and body language told me more than any of the good cast , wasted on this bloomer ! Not recommended by me........
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Struggle for life and death and vanity in the qualms of Kalahari
clanciai7 January 2018
This film is like a moral sermon of vanity, but at the same time it's a thrilling adventure constantly getting screwed up. Perhaps the most interesting performance is by Peter Vaughan as the mentally unstable Johann who doesn't speak at all but only mumbles some German occasionally, and his acting is well worth observing carefully, as he is the key to the developing tragedy. Richard Johnson is reliable as usual, he repeats his feat as leader of a miscellanous party risking their lives, like in "The Haunting" five years earlier, but here they are facing all the atrocities of nature in the burning waste of the Kalahari with sand storms and other unexpected terrors of the sands, which brings out the worst in them. The most interesting and thrilling sequence though is the perilous cruise through the shallows of the Skeleton Coast. Honor Blackman is as tough a girl as ever, Roy Dotrice is the most sympathetic of the party and comes to unfairly suffer the most, while Jeremy Kemp is enigmatical and unpredictable as usual. All these five male actors appear to still be living today although they were all above 40 at the time of the film. It's not a bad story, it gives you plenty of reason for afterthought, it's a curiosity of an adventure film with an impressing struggle with destiny, which as always wins in the end over the weakness of human vanity, but.at least there are some survivors.
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed