La Parisienne (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Light & Lovely Bardot!
shepardjessica-120 February 2005
Brigitte Bardot sparkles in this lighthearted romp with Charles Boyer and looks great as always. Although I prefer her dramas and melodramas her romantic comedies are a filling dessert. She seems comfortable, relaxed, and appears to be having a fine old time. Boyer is always charming and an undervalued actor for many years.

A 6 out of 10. Best performance = BB. The music is annoying, especially the opening, but the color is great. All Bardot fans should seek this out (just for fun). I think Bardot is under-rated because few of her films are GREAT ART, but she holds her own with anybody and was always a treat for the eyes as well.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
UNE PARISIENNE (Michel Boisrond, 1957) **
Bunuel197629 January 2010
Even more frivolous, thus less rewarding, than COME DANCE WITH ME (1959; see my review elsewhere), this is really nothing more than a Hollywood-type sex comedy (with the heroine – once more, Brigitte Bardot – forsaking true love temporarily for a fling with a suave but aging prince played by Charles Boyer, no less!) spiced up with the new-fangled French naughtiness. Actually, the movie's two halves barely jell together as we first see the central couple (the man, by the way, is COME DANCE WITH ME's Henri Vidal and, throughout this lengthy initial sequence, we also get to see Noel Roquevert from that same film) being forced into marriage after she is surprised in the hero's bed during a week-end hunting party by her father, the current Prime Minister. Eventually, the two have a row and she vows to throw herself at the first man she meets: of course, since all of this occurs at the visiting Boyer's welcome festivities, it is he who becomes her 'target'; needless to say, he is happy to oblige…while spouse Nadia Gray who, naturally, is aware of his foibles covers up for him during engagements of state (especially when he flies off with Bardot to London)! This interlude, in fact, occupies the film's latter stages and even includes Boyer being mistaken for a gangster (perhaps a nod to his celebrated turn as Pepe' Le Moko in ALGIERS [1938]) in a pub – from which he and Bardot have to fight their way out! As I said at the start, UNE PARISIENNE is basically fluff which, though good-looking per se, does not have enough substance for it to be elevated beyond that.

Hollywood REMEMBERS: BRIGITTE BARDOT (TV) (N/A, 1990) **

Included on the R2 DVD of UNE PARISIENNE (1957) released by C'Est La Vie was this 25-minute pseudo-documentary about the French sex kitten. Exclusively featuring narration over scenes from a handful of her (thankfully)rarer films, these include a few that I happen to have in my collection, namely: Anatole Litvak's ACT OF LOVE (1953; a Hollywood-French co-production starring Kirk Douglas), Marc Allegret's MADEMOISELLE STRIPTEASE (1956), THE NIGHT HEAVEN FELL (1957; directed by her "Svengali" husband Roger Vadim and co-starring Stephen Boyd and Alida Valli), Serge Bourguignon's TWO WEEKS IN September (1967; with Laurent Terzieff and James Robertson Justice), Edward Dmytryk's SHALAKO (1968; an exotic Western that boasted an impressive cast: Sean Connery, Stephen Boyd, Jack Hawkins, Peter Van Eyck, Alexander Knox, Woody Strode and Honor Blackman) and her penultimate film, Vadim's DON JUAN OR IF DON JUAN WERE A WOMAN (1973; with Robert Hossein, Maurice Ronet, Robert Walker Jr. and Jane Birkin). Needless to say, Bardot's most famous films are also included - ...AND GOD CREATED WOMAN (1956), CONTEMPT (1963), VIVA MARIA! (1965) and SPIRITS OF THE DEAD (1968) - but the ones I most welcomed, personally, were those of films that are now virtually untraceable: BABETTE GOES TO WAR (1959) and PLEASE, NOT NOW! (1961)...which promises to be especially naughty and, in hindsight, might just fall into my lap one of these days! Title notwithstanding, Bardot had very little to do with Hollywood and this inadequate featurette only serves to highlight the fact that, most of the time, her star vehicles had little except her beauty and charm to commend them.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Italian holiday
dbdumonteil5 August 2012
A generic title ,which could fit countless other movies whose heroine is a Parisian;a screenplay the standards of which are simply what the French call:"Théatre De Boulevard ":run of the mill stories of wives,husbands ,lovers ,cuckolds ,with a dash of "Roman Holiday" in reverse for good measure.

Brigitte Bardot acted naturally ,with a drawling voice and a roguish look ,and this "Petit Je Ne Sais Quoi " which made her THE greatest French sex symbol of all time;she did know she was hot and very attractive but she did never take it too seriously;she already showed her love for animals in the scene when she pampered the dog;Charles Boyer was aging at the time and was too old for a prince charming.

As for her hubby in the film,Henri Vidal,this is one of the saddest stories in the history of the French cinema:addicted to heroin since he was 17,although he tried detox ,he had only two years left to live ;he was to meet again BB in "Voulez-Vous Danser Avec Moi"with the same director (Boisrond), his final role (1959).
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
About as romantic as a case of herpes.
planktonrules30 September 2013
Rule #1 for any romantic comedy is that you have to like the characters. And, in this way, "La Parisienne" is certainly no great rom-com. It's characters are, to put it bluntly, annoying. Michel (Henri Vadal) is a pig who has just married the most beautiful woman on the planet--yet keeps mistresses. Brigitte (Brigitte Bardot) is a stalker who KNOWS Michel is a pig but tricks him into marrying her--and then spends the rest of the film after marrying him treating him like dirt. This is supposed to be funny and romantic? So what do you have apart from two annoying characters? Well, a nice cameo by Charles Boyer, Bardot is GORGEOUS and there are lots of nice bits of scenery in the south of France. But together, these still aren't enough of a reason to watch this film.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A light, charming, cheeky comedy with a lot of sass.
ssprecher14 November 2000
Bridgette Bardot, looking as sexy as ever, plays a spoiled but innocent daughter of a French Ambassador. She cons one of her father's top aides (womanizer MICHEL) into marrying her and it turns out to be the best thing for both of them. Michel is soon flirting with his old girlfriends and in order to teach him a lesson, Bridgette flirts heavily with a married PRINCE CHARLES. Michel is surprised by his jealousy. A cat-and-mouse game ensues between Brigdette and Michel ("I'll have an affair"..."No you won't"...) And finally Michel realizes she just might and vows to give up all the other ladies in his life. Bridgette and Michel settle comfortably into their happily-ever-after while Prince Charles jets home to England.

It's an admittedly light piece but it's incredibly charming. While some may fault it as a product of it's time, I found that completely enjoyable. Worthy of a rental.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lame comedy saved by Bardot
rockymark-3097423 April 2022
This is a totally lame comedy that goes flat right at the beginning. Without any attempt to create characters we are to believe that the sultry Bardot is irresistibly obsessed with a womanizing character named Michel, who isn't even cast properly. One wonders why any young woman would be attracted to this person.

But where's the motivation? There is none. The film begins on the absurd premise that for some reason the sultry Bardot, who could probably have seduced any male between puberty and senescence, must have this guy.

The other characters are similarly miscast, most of them, presumably lovers, looking more past their prime than in their prime.

Yet a film such as this requires credibility. One could imagine a Bardot fixated on, say, Louis Jourdan.

The rest of the film is similarly sloppily plotted. For no apparent reason (at least no credible reason) the father insists that Bardot marry Michel. Also for no apparent reason Bardot, who at the beginning was obsessed with Michel, now doesn't want to consummate the relationship on the absurd premise that the father forced Michel to marry her!

With the same "astute" plotting, Bardot suddenly decides to commit adultery with the first person who enters the room, who turns out to be the French prince played by Charles Boyer.

Quite simply, Bardot saves the film. It's amazing what a perfect erotic presence she was in her prime. I refer here not even to her body which is rarely and only briefly exposed. It's her pouty face that steals the show. For good reason she is the last face we see at the end of the film, winking at the audience. I can't imagine why else someone would wish to see this film.

But it does make one admire Hollywood scriptwriters more. They would never allow a film to begin unmotivated in the way this film does, even when the motivation, as in a musical, is far more cursorily motivated, as when Fred Astaire is instantly mesmerized by Ginger Rogers in one musical and attempts to track her down.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Ultimately Perfectly Delicious Confection
pmullinsj27 April 2005
I have to agree with all the previous commenter's--this is simply the best of all frothy comedies, with Bardot as sexy as Marilyn Monroe ever was, and definitely with a prettier face (maybe there's less mystique, but look how Marilyn paid for that.) I don't think I've ever seen such a succulent-looking female on screen, so perfect that even a gay man like me got excited by it--and not just for purely aesthetic reasons (if the idiot evangelicals really want to do their 'convert-a-queer' number, they are really going to need to up their standards, as no church mice need apply here...)Her breasts, the rest of her figure, her adorable voice, the hilarious way she shakes as she walks across a room...only to arrive in front of a man, breasts literally pointed as if in exquisite confrontation...

I think Boyer is one of the greatest leading men in all of film history. No one played opposite more great female stars than did he: Garbo, Dietrich, K. Hepburn, Colbert, and here Bardot, among many others. And he was also in 'Fanny' with Leslie Caron, and had small parts in 'How to Steal a Million' with A. Hepburn, as well as being in the Deneuve movie 'The April Fools' (although not opposite her.) The only thing I could disagree with in remarks is that even the loud, obnoxious music over the opening credits is appropriate--I mean, Bardot is not meant to be subtle on top of everything else, and her essential loudness (I don't mean her voice) is part of her irresistible and, one might even say, exemplary charm.

Vidal is thoroughly handsome, even if pouty Brigitte says toward the beginning 'I don't know why I am in love with you, you're not even handsome.'

Dear, dear Bardot! Truly one of the wonders of the 20th century, not to mention the joy that she is still with us, when so many of the truly characterful are passing away so fast, in all her eccentric glory.
20 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Brigitte Bardot Shows Why She Was the Hottest Thing to Hit the Screen
writerasfilmcritic13 September 2005
Most of the Brigitte Bardot movies I've seen have failed to take full advantage of her captivating screen presence. Unfortunately, she was given few really good roles in movies of undeniable quality, which was a real oversight. She deserved them and was able to demonstrate her full cinematic power when they came her way. As Genevieve in "Love on a Pillow" we had a clear exception to the trend of light, fluffy vehicles, for it was an interesting, artistic film by any reasonable measure, and in it, a 28-year-old BB was at her most alluring. "Une Parisienne" is another, featuring an extremely captivating Brigitte in an interesting, well-crafted comedy that explores how an ambitious lady's man can be convinced to remain faithful to an incredibly beautiful young wife. There are several good performances here. Her playboy husband, Michel, is one, "the prince," played by Charles Boyer, is another, with entertaining efforts by a good supporting cast. As for Brigitte Bardot, the way she looks in this movie is the way I remember her as a kid in the fifties. She was 23 in 1957 and way ahead of her time, more beautiful than any other actress of the period, including Marilyn Monroe. Her curvy, coquettish sexuality, amply displayed in several bosom-baring, skintight dresses, simply jumps off the screen. She was more hip and cute than the women of America are today, nearly fifty years later. Obsessed with their careers and still desperately clinging to feminist politics, they come off like a bunch of clueless lesbians. In stark contrast, the sex kitten was sexually liberated, intelligent, and clearly independent long before it was fashionable, yet while fully understanding the power of her exceptional femininity, she used it for a higher purpose than mere self-interest -- she believed in love. A still photo simply could not do her justice. You had to watch her slender yet voluptuous form (with its 20-inch waist) lightly cross a room. You had to see that wild blonde mane, gaze into her big, brown, seductive eyes, and listen as her full, pouting lips spoke French. In a closeup at the end of this movie she winks and flirts with the camera, her beautiful orbs twinkling. What a babe! For fans of Brigitte Bardot, "Une Parisienne" is not to be missed.
20 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bardot, a dynamic fun-loving woman and Boyer, an old-style romantic without the grand manner...
Nazi_Fighter_David24 July 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Vadim changed Brigitte's image and way of life from that of the young society beauty he had married to that of a rebellious and challenging teenager of the 1950s…

"Une Parisienne" succeeded in launching her ravishing figure as the teenage goddess, the casual sexuality, the provocative gaiety in confrontation with men…

Charles Boyer — as Prince Charles — was the perfect, ideal choice of those magically romantic moments… His deep and vibrant voice spoke a promise of new adventures in love… His deep, wondering eyes bespoke a worldly knowledge untarnished by cynicism… He had the boudoir grace of Valentino without the hysteria or the sometime effeminacy of the great lover… Under Michel Boisrond's direction, Boyer was an old-style romantic without the grand manner
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sparkling slapstick !
wrvisser-leusden-nl23 September 2003
In her memoirs Brigitte Bardot mentions she is proud of this movie. I can imagine so, because here she fully utilizes her talent for light comedy. 'Une Parisienne' certainly ranks among Bardot's best.

What makes this movie, is its slapstick - from beginning to end. 'Parisienne's' story only serves to get these effects right. Your special attention for its ending, when Brigitte irresistably invites her viewers to keep her secret a secret.

When you settle on your sofa in the weekend, weary and tired after a week's hard work, 'Une Parisienne' is the right movie to make you feel better.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Delightful Fench 50's movie
JanMnstr24 January 2009
A sparkling movie. BB is a marvel. She's sultry. She is a feminist. She is still very much in love.

The movie features Paris in the 50's. It is wonderful to look at the sites, the cars (DS!) and Orly.

A simple but very enjoyable romantic comedy. The music is horrendous. It almost dissonates. On the other hand it is hilarious. But it is probably the only thing amiss, at least looking at it with 21st century eyes.

The movie comments on the French manner of treating infidelity. It is that sense modern. A movie like un elephant se trompe enormenent did it in an 80's way. But the basic premise stays the the same.

Thanks to makers for providing BB with this opportunity.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Ooh la la
gbill-7487722 March 2018
Male fantasy is turned up to 11 in this one. It's a sex farce that I confess to enjoying, despite the silliness and objectification, because dear god it's 1957, Brigitte Bardot is 23, and the film has such a fun French playfulness to it.

As you might guess, the film revolves around Bardot, and she is in so many scenes designed to titillate that it's comical. Let's see, there's the buxom, lusty secretary wearing a tight sweater, the girl sneaking up to a hotel to start an affair with no strings attached, the bride taking off her gown and walking around in lingerie, and the disinterested woman who can be aroused to passion with kisses on the back of the neck. She's also in a low cut red evening dress, trying to seduce another man into an affair by getting down on her hands and knees, later takes a bath, lifting her legs skyward out of the tub, runs around in a towel, and presents breakfast in bed in a shirt and apron. The object of her affections is played by Henri Vidal, and the man she pursues to make him jealous is 58-year-old Charles Boyer. He jets her off to Nice for a swim, so we see her emerging from the sea in a bikini, then dancing seductively with him in a small café.

Bardot is gorgeous and immortalized in this movie, even if it is over-the-top. I might have liked it even more for going all the way in its over-the-top-ness, if that makes any sense. There are countless shots which are just fantastic, including one in front of a set of mirrors, reminiscent of Marilyn Monroe in 'How to Marry a Millionaire". I did like the open acknowledgment of affairs, which is so very French, but how the film points out they have to be conducted in the right way, with sensitivity and decorum, and the jealousy that even then may arise. It's not high art, and it's definitely not politically correct, but ooh la la, this one is a guilty pleasure.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
much more than showing off BB's sex-appeal
wvisser-leusden18 July 2009
Of all the 48 films of Brigitte Bardot, "Une Parisienne" is widely regarded as (one of) her best. What we see is special: for once the plot has a value of its own, does much more than only providing a cheap vehicle for BB's sex-charged appearance.

This film is your true & well worked-out light comedy, with a good and coherent story. Set in France's government circles in the late 1950's, it entertains from beginning to end. Providing many amusing twists & turns and some slapstick -- all acted out by at least three starring leads, including Bardot.

"Une Parisienne" (= French for "female inhabitant of Paris") focuses on telling a story, not on showing Brigitte Bardot. Brigitte serves the plot very well by using her talent for acting in light comedies.

When you settle on your couch on a Friday-night, tired and weary from a week's slaving away, just turn on "Une Parisienne". This film will make you feel better.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
France's answer to Marilyn Monroe
JamesHitchcock26 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The "woman of Paris" of the title is Brigitte Laurier, the gorgeous blonde twenty-something daughter of the French President, played by her namesake La Bardot. (Contrary to what the synopsis on my DVD cover might say, Monsieur Laurier is not an "Ambassador"). Now you might think that just about every heterosexual male in the France of the 1950s would have been passionately in love with the fair Brigitte, but in this film she is suffering from a severe case of unrequited love. The man in question is Michel Legrand – not the famous musician of that name, but a handsome aide to her father. The reason for Michel's lack of ardour is not that he is gay, blind or mad, but simply that he is far more interested in his various mistresses, even though they are generally married and both older and less attractive than Brigitte.

Despite Michel's lack of interest, Brigitte is nothing if not persistent, and in one particularly farcical scene she is able to trick him into marriage. He is placed in a dilemma whereby he has to choose between admitting (falsely) to being Brigitte's lover, in which case her father will insist on their marrying in order to preserve the good name of the family, or admitting (truthfully) to being the lover of a married woman, which as the deceived husband is one of his colleagues will probably lead to a scandal and the end of his career.

Marriage, however, does not seem to calm Michel down, and he soon falls back into his old ways, making assignments with his old flame Monique Wilson. To teach him a lesson, therefore, Brigitte tries to arouse his jealousy by pretending to flirt with Prince Charles, the husband of Queen Greta, a European monarch currently on a State Visit to France. As Brigitte's father is their host, it is easy for her to gain access to the Royal couple.

Again, my DVD cover gets it wrong here. It says that "Charles and Greta fly back to England", but they are not- officially at least- British. They supposedly represent a fictitious European, possibly Scandinavian, country. It did, however, occur to me that the characters might have been inspired by the way in which the British Royal Family was viewed in the late fifties. Just as Elizabeth II was in 1957, Greta is a beautiful young woman in her early thirties, but comes across as rather staid and conservative, obsessed with her official duties to the exclusion of all else, and not a lot of fun. Charles, like Prince Philip, is older than his wife and often seen dressed in naval uniform. Although there is no evidence that Philip was ever unfaithful, there was a lot of speculation around this period that he had a roving eye- as Charles certainly does. The use of the name "Charles" might have been a coded hint that the screenwriter had the British monarchy in mind, even though the real Prince Charles would only have been a young boy at the time. (Dalton Trumbo had done something similar in "Roman Holiday" four years earlier when he called his royal heroine, clearly based upon Queen Elizabeth, "Princess Anne").

Bardot was often described as a "sex kitten", a term which did not necessarily refer to her youth as the description continued to be applied to her even in her thirties. The implication of the phrase was that, at least in her comic roles, she combined sexual attractiveness with a certain innocence and playfulness; in this her screen persona was somewhat similar to that of Marilyn Monroe. (Indeed, Brigitte was sometimes regarded as France's answer to Marilyn).

This film is a good example of what I mean, The Anglo-Saxon peoples have often regarded the French- sometimes enviously, sometimes censoriously- as being more progressive and permissive in sexual matters than their own countries, but in fact during the 1950s France was probably as conservative in such matters as anywhere else in the Western world and operated its own system of film censorship. At this period a fully-fledged French sex comedy would probably have been unthinkable as a British or American one, but "Une Parisienne" has a lot in common with "sophisticated" Hollywood comedies of the time such as the Monroe vehicle "The Seven Year Itch". It is a film where there is a lot of talk about adultery, but no nudity and no sex scenes; when two characters end up in the same bed they both remain fully clothed. We are never sure whether all that talk is ever anything more than just talk; Brigitte and Charles never actually cheat on their respective spouses, although he certainly has the intention of doing so, and a discreet veil is left drawn over the question of whether Michel and Monique actually sleep together after his marriage.

The story is an ingenious one and is handled with a good deal of wit and style. Bardot (a much better actress in her native language than she ever was in English) is absolutely adorable. Hollywood did not have a monopoly on sophisticated comedy in the fifties. 8/10
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed