Scotland Yard Dragnet (1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Can someone be hypnotised to murder?
howardmorley20 March 2010
I rated this film 6/10 as just above average.The other reviewer disclosed the murderer but anyone who watches this film could easily work it out.This because there are relatively few characters to choose from and apart from the obvious "red herring" it could only be one person.Audiences are so versed and educated in modern crime thrillers so they steer past the obvious, to wit: 1.Do not suspect the obvious hero whom the author points you towards.2.Ignore slightly sinister extras who have little or no dialogue - the audience cannot feel a rapprochement with them.3.When the motive appears in the screenplay suspect the character with the most to gain.

I vaguely remember Paul Carpenter (the lead actor) who was a Canadian actor from Montreal and who appeared quite regularly on British TV in the 50s and early 60s but his resume is strictly "B" rated and the British actors are similarly not of the first box office magnitude.The whole film reminds me of a typical "B" feature production value and budget film of the 50s in my youth (I am 64 now) when the cinema goer first had a cartoon, then Pathe News, then the "B" feature and finally "The Big Film", for the price of admission.

I always like to look at the cars, taxis, lack of parking restrictions in London shown in films during the 50s and of course the clothes fashions and manner of speaking.It's part of the fascination for me and why I like to buy dvds of this vintage.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hypnotic crime
robert-temple-124 March 2013
This is an interesting mystery film about a murder involving hypnotic suggestion by an unscrupulous hypnotist. The story is set in London. The hypnotist is played by the urbane Roland Culver, always impeccably dressed and equally impeccably mannered. In one scene, he stretches his arms forward in order to free his shirt cuffs, encumbered with cufflinks, from the confines of his jacket sleeves, a mannerism rarely seen these days, but once a commonplace amongst gentlemen of the old school. (It signified 'getting down to business', and resembles the pathetic attempts by Prime Minister David Cameron in our own time to show that he is 'getting down to business' by rolling up his sleeves after taking off his jacket. We are expected to believe that by doing that, Shirtsleeve Dave will save the economy from collapse. But pull the other shirtsleeve!) Culver plays a retired psychiatrist who has written numerous books on psychiatry and on 'hypnosis and the unconscious mind'. He is persuaded by his 'almost niece', played by pert Patricia Roc, to treat her fiancée, a test pilot who has survived a crash, and who has sudden and recurring fits inspired by an unknown subconscious fear. Eventually, the trouble is traced to the traumatic death of his mother when he was a child, and his repression of the horrific memories associated with the incident. But in the course of treatment by Culver, the fiancée, played by the rather boring Canadian actor Paul Carpenter (who died at the age of only 42 in 1964), proves so suggestible, that Culver decides to make use of him for a nefarious purpose. Culver's ex-wife lives upstairs in the same building, and he wants to kill her, so he hypnotizes Carpenter and instructs him to go upstairs and do it, but to remember nothing of it afterwards (what is known as post-hypnotic amnesia). The murder duly takes place, and a police investigation seems to be getting nowhere. Will Patricia Roc and Paul Carpenter be able to figure out the truth in time? And if so, how can they prove it? This film is important for containing a lengthy scene of Chris Barber and his Jazz Band playing in a London club, which all admirers of Chris Barber will want to see. (He played 'British Dixieland', and did it very well.) The film was released in 1957 but filmed in 1956. There is a lengthy portion of the film where we see Carpenter wandering around London in a daze, having fled a hypnosis session before being properly aroused from the hypnotic state. (Yes, this sort of thing can happen.) It is astonishing to see the streets of London practically devoid of traffic apart from a few old-fashioned taxis, and there is also a conspicuous lack of pedestrians. London, which today is so over-crowded and teeming that the crowds are spilling onto the streets everywhere and the underground cannot hold them so that at some hours of the day it can take 20 minutes even to squeeze into an underground station while one is left outside in the bad weather, was then practically a ghost town even ten years after the War. Anyone interested in the history of London will want to see these many scenes of London in 1956, with its conspicuous lack of foreigners and sleepy state of inactivity. This film is useful in portraying the criminal abuse of hypnosis, and though there is a feeble and unconvincing declaration at the end that it could not happen, the truth about the criminal abuses of hypnosis may be found in the book OPEN TO SUGGESTION, which gathers together 150 years of case histories of this sort of thing. The film was made under the title of THE HYPNOTIST but released as Scotland YARD DRAGNET, possibly to heighten its commercial appeal. It was directed by Montgomery Tully (1904-1988) and based upon a play by Falkland L. Cary (1987-1989). The film is interesting despite being somewhat mediocre. When Carpenter is wandering around in a trance state, he meets a young girl who takes him in, feeling sorry for him because he cannot remember his name or where he comes from, and doesn't know anyone but her. These scenes are poignant and Kay Callard with her big enquiring eyes is very effective as this 'Jazz Club Blond', as she is called in the cast list. She appeared in 36 films, but was never sufficiently recognised. She is one of the many British actresses to be unjustifiably forgotten, even though she lived to the age of 74, dying in 2008 in Peterborough. She appeared together with Paul Carpenter again in the B crime thriller ASSIGNMENT REDHEAD in 1958. Anyone interested in fifties fashions will be interested to see Patricia Roc's clothes in this film. One skirt has a multiple layered petticoat so thick that the skirt spreads out like a portable tent and gyrates when she turns. Her mannerisms are also perfect 'fifties woman' mannerisms, with a frozen arched brow and a permanently indulgent smile which eagerly awaits the next clever remark which any man cares to make to her. We have come some way since then, though whether men are any cleverer I doubt, especially as they no longer have submissive and indulgent smiles from expectant women encouraging them to say things.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hypnotising Dragnet.
morrison-dylan-fan10 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Learning of a sale on UK DVD company Network's page,I quickly looked for titles to pick up. Previously seeing him in the very good British Film Noir The Dark Man,I was pleased to spot another Noir co- starring William Hartnell, which led to me getting hypnotised.

The plot:

Hurt doing a test run, pilot Valentine Neal becomes haunted by past events in his life. Wanting to help her boyfriend, Mary Foster arranges for Neal to meet psychiatrist Doctor Francis Pelham. Hypnotising Neal,Pelham begins to explore his dark childhood memories. Finding Neal easy to hypnotise,Pelham decides to put Neal in a trance for his own use.

View on the film:

Bringing the title out of a trance,Network deliver an excellent transfer,with pristine sound and picture quality. Adapting Falkland L. Cary's play,the screenplay by writer/director Montgomery Tully partakes in an impressive level of psychological depth, as gripping exchanges between Pelham and Neal dig up the Noir horrors laying in Neal's sub-conscious. Giving Neal ambiguous shakes,Tully disappointing calms things down far too early,with the mysterious doubt between Neal and Pelham being explained 20 minutes before the end. Gliding round on the streets of late 1950's London,Tully sets his sights on glimpses on Film Noir stylisation,via shots spanning Neal's flat,and icy flashbacks unveiling the inner workings of Neal.

Playing a similar role to the one in The Dark Man, William Hartnell gives a good, gruff performance as Detective Inspector Ross,whilst the very pretty Patricia Roc gives a clever performance as Mary Foster,who raises questions to how helpful Pelham is being to Neal. Playing off each other, Roland Culver & Paul Carpenter give great performances,as Culver gives Pelham an unsettling,calculating calm,and Carpenter brings out the hypnotised fears of Neal.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The House of Dr Pelham
richardchatten13 January 2020
I figured out that one of the characters was up to something fairly early on in this psychological drama patterned after Hitchcock's 'Spellbound' but it was the 'why' that kept me guessing...

Ellen Pollock in fifties glasses as usual makes a vivid impression with little screen time as the scornful harpy living upstairs.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun programmer
Leofwine_draca21 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I quite liked this low budget programmer starring veteran character actor Roland Culver (who was still appearing in the 1980s!) as a dodgy psychiatrist visited by our working class hero, Canadian actor Paul Carpenter. It turns out that Culver's a bit of a criminal mastermind and decides to use Carpenter's mental health issues in a nifty little scheme involving seduction and murder. Made on the cheap by prolific director Montgomery Tully, THE HYPNOTIST is a bit better than expected. There's not a huge amount of plot, but the psychological insights are fun and the third act introduction of William Hartnell's sleuth lifts spirits a little.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
'When I count to ten, you will immediately forget this film ...'
johnshephard-8368217 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The first thing you might notice about this B movie melodrama is that the doctor treating our traumatised pilot hero Val (Paul Carpenter, suffering PTSD-type symptoms after a flying incident) must have missed that part of his training dealing with giving patient's loved ones bad news. 'He's a psychiatric case,' he blurts out to Val's fiancée Mary (Patricia Roc), without even suggesting that she sits down first, 'he might be a drug addict for the rest of his life,' he adds, in case he hasn't already depressed her enough. Mary, in true B movie fashion, stoically takes this news as if she's been informed that Val has a slight cold, and in any case she fortunately has a close family friend (Roland Culver) who is not only a top psychiatrist, but is also retired, and has room in his apartment for Val to come and stay while he receives hypnosis of the 'you will go to sleep' variety. From this implausible premise grows a plot that does at least have the merit of not taking the path you might expect: what appears to be a standard case study of 'sick man responding to unorthodox treatment' takes a darker turn when the unspeakably unpleasant woman upstairs is murdered, and Val is implicated. Along comes the dependable William Hartnell as the police inspector who, like many coppers of the genre, allows other characters to do the sleuthing for him - in this case Mary, who solves the whole thing by asking a key witness one question that the police have inexplicably forgotten to ask for themselves. Another merit of the film is that it allows you time to pop out to the pub for half an hour during a pointless scene in a night club, where Chris Barber, no less, is playing his hip music to the least hip collection of teenaged dancers you have ever seen, who grin and gyrate as if they are only just learning how to walk. Val is picked up by a girl half his age (Kay Callard), who, entirely unfazed by the fact that he doesn't know his own name, or anything else about himself, lets him stay the night at her flat, and then disappears from the film. Meanwhile, Mary continues to be confused by just about anything, responding to even the simplest of statements by saying 'what do you mean?: 'Val is very ill, Mary' - 'What do you mean? - 'Val is a murderer, Mary' - 'What do you mean? - 'It's raining outside, Mary' - 'What do you mean?' The end comes all too swiftly, when Mary presents her evidence to the real culprit, who readily confesses in order to prevent us from having the time to realise that the description of the events leading up to the murder don't really make any logical sense. Never mind, it's absolute rubbish, but fun.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"You're the nicest person I know. You're the only person I know!"
fillherupjacko23 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Aka Scotland Yard Dragnet (a slight oxymoron as it features neither a police dragnet nor, till the final part of the film, anyone from Scotland Yard.)

Val Neal (Paul Carpenter) is a pilot who ejects after a test-flight goes wrong. "He'll break his neck at that speed" exclaims some bod at ground control. We see, potentially, a dead man floating on a parachute, lord of the flies style. Carpenter isn't dead though (it's just his acting – bum tish!) although he suffers fits; blackouts which he's unaware of. These are hilarious to watch - all phoney hyperventilation and swooping orchestral soundtrack. This is all consistent with a general bemusement about mental illness. When his fiancé (Pat Roc) is informed that his illness is psychosomatic, she replies: "What does that mean?" Pat brings in her uncle (Roland Culver), a sort of psychiatrist/ hypnotist, to treat Carpenter; although his treatment appears to involve having Wang the houseboy serve up cigars and fortified wine in the smoke-filled library.

Pretty soon we realise that something's amiss – not so much with the patient but with sinister Dr Culver; his intimate questions reveal a less than wholesome interest in his niece. Thrown into the mix is annoying bitch Miss Barbara Barton – "she writes lurid love stories and sells them by the hundred thousand" – who Culver strangles before offering Carpenter up to the cops (she's the doc's ex wife).

In the meantime, Carpenter has wondered off round London, still hypnotised, and ended up in the Downbeat Club. It's all coke (no, not that kind) and coffees here but he still manages to get himself picked up – by a character billed only as Jazz Club Blond.

All in all, this film does for hypnotism what Reefer Madness did for marijuana.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A waste of time!
JohnHowardReid10 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
It's hard to decide which is worse – Montgomery Tully's inept, wait-for-the-B-grade-pause direction, or his incredibly rambling, disjointed screenplay (spun out from a stage play by Falkland Cary) with its compendium of dialogue clichés. The music scorer has tried vainly to give the film pace and atmosphere, but is largely defeated by the heavy hand of Mr Tully and his cast of largely flat-footed, second-rate players. In fact, it's a shame to find a fine actress like Kay Callard mixed up – if only briefly – in this woefully extended quota quickie. Patricia Roc and Roland Culver are usually featured in much better films too. Normally bottom-of-the-barrel "B" efforts like The Hypnotist don't waste more than an hour of a picturegoer's time, but this one is spun out to an incredible 92 minutes. (At some stage, the producer had mercy on cinema patrons and shortened the movie to 73 minutes, but I and my brother big-city critics were forced to sit through the full-length version). Production values are negligible.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dull and pointless, apart from...
lucyrfisher15 July 2021
...the compendium of clichés about psychiatry that emerge in the first ten minutes or so.

"Psychosomatic illness is caused by buried trauma." "Everything you have ever thought or experienced is recorded in your mind, but you've suppressed it. If we can just recover those repressed memories... "

I'm looking forward to London's empty streets and a nameless blonde.

Didn't they have carrier bags in 1956?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dull and disappointing
malcolmgsw13 January 2019
Amusing to note the American title of Scotland Yard Dragnet since there is no Dragnet.It really is a pretty atrocious ragbag of a film.You get the impression that Monte Tully got out a bundle of rejected scripts and took parts out of each,so disjointed is the story. The episode in the jazz club and the meeting with a pick up sees to have no connection with the rest ofthe film.Paul Carpenterwanders around the centre of 1956 London,and that is the most interesting part of the film Music is used in an unsuccessful attempt to beef up the drama.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dull, tedious and uninspiring.
geoffm602951 May 2020
This has B film written all over it. The dull and incredulous storyline, together with a lack lustre cast of one dimensional characters, made me lose interest fairly quickly. I suppose the film makers hoped that by weaving a story around an American test pilot, it would give the film an excitement and transatlantic appeal, but sadly the hero, played by Paul Carpenter is uninspiring, and merely plods his way through the film, failing to convince the audience that he's having some sort of mental breakdown. The scene where he wanders around London in a daze is tedious in the extreme! The only actor who stood out was the wonderfully urbane and cultured actor, Roland Culver, playing the dubious and unscrupulous psychiatrist. Below average film, strictly to be seen on a very rainy day!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed