Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueBritish officers battle bandits and guerrillas in India.British officers battle bandits and guerrillas in India.British officers battle bandits and guerrillas in India.
Harry Evans
- Cafe Patron
- (non crédité)
Joe Garcio
- Servant
- (non crédité)
Stuart Hall
- Officer
- (non crédité)
Sam Harris
- Cafe Patron
- (non crédité)
Al Haskell
- Arab Shooting Explosive
- (non crédité)
Carol Henry
- Lancer
- (non crédité)
Robin Hughes
- Tall Major in Lounge
- (non crédité)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe Eleventh Lancers is most likely a reference to 11th (Prince of Wales's Own) Bengal Lancers, a regiment initially formed in 1876. It was an Indian Army regiment, not a British Army one.
- GaffesThere are many scenes in which General Melville and Colonel Rivington are the only officers wearing medal ribbons on their uniforms. All officers should be wearing their medal ribbons when in uniform.
Commentaire à la une
B Movie Propaganda Theme Dull
While making a movie that has the Soviets as the bad guys, this time subbing in Imperial Russians since it was set in the 1800s, is not bad in itself. The Communists were as awful as their worst critics said they were. But propaganda themed flicks tend to suck in general, even if the foe was a worthy one.
Robert Egan really irritated me. His permanent sneer was a real turn off. He played the typical brash American masquerading as the brash Canadian colonial officer in the stuffy British army. His foolish behavior was supposed to be endearing but it was so poorly done that it reminded me of the archetype 50s rebellious teenager more than an army officer.
The action scenes were simply cowboy and Indians subbed in with lancers and Afghan guerrillas exchanging lever action for bolt action rifles. The outdoor sets looked like the same ones they used in many westerns. It was a tired flick that lacked any charisma or hook. I saw it on Netflix and it took four sessions to get it all in.
It wasn't all terrible. It had a part where he got "disgraced" in order to go "rebel" and deceive the native officer he thought was a friend, Raymond Burr as an Indian Muslim and infiltrate their underground. The conclusion could be figured out from a scene in the middle where a "new" weapon was shown to the Brit officers.
It wasn't horrid but don't go out of your way to watch it
Robert Egan really irritated me. His permanent sneer was a real turn off. He played the typical brash American masquerading as the brash Canadian colonial officer in the stuffy British army. His foolish behavior was supposed to be endearing but it was so poorly done that it reminded me of the archetype 50s rebellious teenager more than an army officer.
The action scenes were simply cowboy and Indians subbed in with lancers and Afghan guerrillas exchanging lever action for bolt action rifles. The outdoor sets looked like the same ones they used in many westerns. It was a tired flick that lacked any charisma or hook. I saw it on Netflix and it took four sessions to get it all in.
It wasn't all terrible. It had a part where he got "disgraced" in order to go "rebel" and deceive the native officer he thought was a friend, Raymond Burr as an Indian Muslim and infiltrate their underground. The conclusion could be figured out from a scene in the middle where a "new" weapon was shown to the Brit officers.
It wasn't horrid but don't go out of your way to watch it
utile•57
- Jakealope
- 23 sept. 2014
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et regarder afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Durée1 heure 11 minutes
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le Défilé de la trahison (1954) officially released in India in English?
Répondre