Perils of the Jungle (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
"Those drums speak the dance of war."
classicsoncall13 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Even with Clyde Beatty in the movie, Commodore Films used footage to place a lion and tiger in the same place, something I never understood about jungle films of the Fifties. Obviously the tiger realized there was a geographical problem, and beat a hasty retreat, not to be seen again after the opening scene.

"Perils of the Jungle" is actually two stories. In the first half set in the Belgian Congo, Beatty and partner Grant Cunningham (Stanley Farrar) come to the aid of Jo Carter (Phyllis Coates), a wild animal trapper who stands to lose her camp after an accidental fire releases her prize black maned Nubian lions. The only hope to raise enough money to save the operation might be the capture of a live gorilla, a rare feat that would bring in a few thousand dollars from an American zoo. Character actor John Doucette is the bad guy of the piece portraying Jo's competitor Gorman, who has designs of buying out her interest.

I found a bit of unintentional humor in the fire scene as Beatty attempts to rescue a trapped man from burning. As one of the lions escapes, Beatty just happens to find a chair to do the lion tamer act, while a native boy puts out the fire with a single bucket of water. Ah, the wonder of 'B' movies!

Just a note about Phyllis Coates. She appears here shortly after her role as Lois Lane in the first season run of episodes on "The Adventures of Superman". Her portrayal as Lane seemed almost one dimensionally uniform no matter what the predicament, but here she seems much more natural and engaging. I liked her much better in the jungle format.

If you close your eyes and concentrate on the voice of Beatty's tracker Korjah (Roy Glenn), you might mistake him for James Earl Jones.

The movie's second half moves to Southern Rhodesia, with Beatty and Cunningham still on the trail of black maned lions. Before embarking, they're warned about the dangers of the tse-tse fly and the warring tribes of the Matabele. Sure enough, both factors come into play as Cunningham is infected with the sleeping sickness. Attempting to reach a hospital by cutting through Wambasi territory, they have a dangerous encounter with a white man named Grubbs (Leonard Mudie) who's been stealing gold from his native benefactors and framing native girls for the thefts. The story line is pretty ludicrous, but it makes for a convincing death mask ceremony under the watchful eye of the Wambasi king, who turns out to be a teenage boy. Unfortunately, a lot of the scenes in this portion of the flick are very dark, but Beatty's party gets away safely after first kidnapping the boy king, and then releasing him once they're safely away.

I imagine these filmed adventures of Clyde Beatty were meant to fuel viewers' imaginations of his real life jungle exploits, but the contrived situations more often brought a chuckle. Still, when surrounded by jungle cats, you couldn't have a better man in your corner than Beatty. To get a look at him in his prime, you might want to catch his adventures in "The Lost Jungle" from 1934, either the Mascot serialized version or the resulting condensed feature at just over an hour. It attempts to explain the coexistence of lions and tigers together on the lost island city of Kamor in the South Pacific.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Cheap and forgettable.
planktonrules9 March 2012
This is a surprisingly bad film. Now this is NOT because there were a lot of watchable jungle movies made from the 1930s-1950s. No--most of them were terrible. But, because this one starred the very famous African explorer, circus owner and lion tamer, Clyde Beatty, I expected a bit more--such as realism. But, once again, like all the second-rate Tarzan ripoffs of the era, the animals were occasionally from different continents (Africa and Asia) and the gorilla was yet another guy dressed up in a cheap gorilla costume. I just thought I'd see better than this.

As for the story, it's a bit odd. Instead of a normal narrative, it is told as a flashback--and a rather sketchy and episodic one at that. It seemed like they cut scenes from several different movies to make up this one--and perhaps they did. The first story is about a female big-game dealer (Phyllis Coates--of "Superman" fame). The second, in a carryover from the first, is about an evil big-game dealer. And, the third segment is about an evil white guy who controls a tribe of savages. None of the stories are very good and it's all set in the dense jungles of Africa--which, for the most part, are only in the movies as lions and the like do NOT live in such environments but in the savannas. Once again, this is a mythical representation of Africa and despite Beatty's presence, it seems little like the real thing. Which makes you wonder if either Beatty didn't care or perhaps he wasn't quite the awesome explorer he portrayed himself as being during his interesting life. Overall, pretty dull and forgettable.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I never expected to find a zoo in the middle of Africa.
mark.waltz21 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
You noticed that while there are often movies with men in gorilla or ape suits, outside of Bert Lahr, there has never been a movie with a man in a lion costume. One of the ape costumes here is absolutely ridiculous, like the suit got a permanent before the actor put it on. It's not just a plight of the animals in this Clyde Beatty film, but the whole structure that makes it weak.

The film has two stories, the first half dealing with Phyllis Coates' deals with a zoo buyer searching for lions and gorillas (with the lions promised to him escaping during a fire that shows Beatty using his taming tools to prevent the humans from being attacked as they escape) and the second half on the hunt for black maned lions. While the fire sequence is exciting as far as the action is concerned, it seems rather close to the enclosure they are in. This ends up being like two episodes of a TV show smashed together for the big screen, and the episodes are completely different in tone which makes it rather jarring.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jungle adventures for kids
searchanddestroy-112 January 2023
Only if you have nothing else to do. Not even at a Tarzan movie level. Most of the film is made by predictable, already seen schemes, material, using a studio jungle, Republic Studios. But it is an agreeable time waster, if you seek some childhood memories. Not really boring. The director George Blair, a totally uninspired and without the least ambition film maker, does the union minimum to get his payroll. Blair was the exact equivalent of Philip Ford, another "home" Republic Pictures director, whose career for the studio was exactly the copy of Blair's one. Same kind of movies, grade Z or I would say under Z, before running away from it to TV industry, realizing that they could not survive because no one, in the big screen industry, would even think to use them anymore. Which company could have needed such lousy technicians?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed