The Perfect Woman (1949) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
His Living Doll
boblipton7 March 2019
Nigel Patrick is to begin a job in a few weeks. Until then, his aunt, Philippa Gill, won't let him have any money. He and his valet, Stanley Holloway answer an ad from Miles Malleson. Malleson has just built a robot he has modeled on his niece, Patricia Roc. For plot purposes, he wants Patrick to field-test the automaton in a hotel. Meanwhile, he is reminded that he has a lecture give that evening. Miss Roc -- the real one; the fake one is played by the appropriately named Pamela Devis -- has been housebound too long and decides to pose as the robot for a night on the town.

This is a set-up for a farce that the movies have been using at least since Lubitsch's DIE PUPPE.. Like many a post-war British sex farce, it seems a bit sniggering and brittle, but the cast is perfect. Not only was Malleson born to play woolly-brained old men, but there's Irene Handl as a maid-of-all-work called "Buttercup" and David Hurst as a Swiss prototype for Manuel in FAWLTEY TOWERS.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An imperfect film but still Enjoyable farcy
Harlekwin_UK4 July 2021
This is a movie very much of its time. That means some things have to be accepted in that context.

Movies based on plays often translate poorly to celluloid and perhaps that's the issue here.

The story and dialogue contain odd little holes and the humour sometimes seems places. Not quite forced but certainly not flowing from the story or situation directly.

The acting is good, especially from Patricia Roc and (the entirely silent) Pamela Devis.

The real credit I can give this movie is that I still really enjoyed it. If someone put the original play on, even AmDram, I'm pretty sure I'd be getting tickets!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too Old-Fashioned for Modern Tastes
JamesHitchcock27 June 2022
Roger Cavendish, an idle and rather useless upper-class young man, and his butler Ramshead discover that they are broke because Roger's main source of income, his rich aunt, has stopped his allowance until he gets a job. (They were probably based upon Wodehouse's Bertie Wooster and Jeeves). A search of the "situations vacant" column in "The Times" leads them to an eccentric, absent-minded professor who has created a robot woman which he calls "Olga". (The "Perfect Woman" of the title). The professor employs them to look after Olga for a week and take her into London to see if anyone can tell that she is not a real woman. Complications arise when the professor's beautiful niece, Penelope, decides to look for adventure and pretends to be Olga. (This is easier than it seems because her uncle has based the robot's appearance on Penelope's own looks). The film then explores the complications which ensue.

The film was a success when first released, but it is not well-known today, even though it occasionally turns up on television. I note that mine is only the twelfth review it has received. This is probably because it is an adaptation of a farce originally written for the stage. Farce was once a popular genre in the British theatre, but has lost ground in recent decades, and never really transferred well to the screen. For example, "No Sex Please, We're British" was a huge hit in the theatre during the seventies and eighties, but the film version was less successful even at the time, and is virtually unwatchable today, as is "Don't Just Lie There, Say Something!", another seventies film based upon a stage farce. Both those films are based upon the lazy assumption that sex is hilariously funny and that any mention of a sexual topic must therefore be good for a laugh. "The Perfect Woman" is not quite as bad as either of those awful examples, largely because in the forties both the Lord Chamberlain's Office, which governed censorship in the theatre, and its cinematic equivalent, the British Board of Film Censors, took a puritanical view of sexual humour, meaning that comic playwrights and screenwriters had to work harder for their laughs.

I can imagine that a film like this came across as quite funny in 1949. The lovely Patricia Roc makes Penelope a spirited heroine. I assumed that Roc was also playing Olga the Robot, but in fact that role went to an otherwise little-known actress named Pamela Devis, cast on the basis of her physical resemblance. (With modern computer trickery it would today be quite easy to have the same actress playing two different characters in the same scene, but perhaps this would not have been possible in the forties). Nigel Patrick and Stanley Holloway, however, seem to be trying too hard as Cavendish and Ramshead; Holloway in particular came across as too frenetic, which disappointed me as I have admired some of his other performances such as those he gave in "Passport to Pimlico" (also from 1949) and "My Fair Lady". The main problem with the film, however, is that its style of humour seems just too old-fashioned for the tastes of modern audiences. 5/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Similarities to Fawlty Towers
fotlock27 November 1999
I stumbled upon this movie one afternoon on TV. It's a pacey movie when compared to many British Movies of this era (Bernard Knowles experience as cinematographer on Hitch's 39 Steps may have benefitted him in this respect). The cast are splendid, if somewhat theatrical (English Farce), especially Miles Malleson as the dotty old inventor.

What fascinated me most was the similarities I began to notice with the acting of Leslie Banks as Cavendish with that of the exasperation of Basil Fawlty in "Fawlty Towers" a British TV show by ex-python John Cleese. The tortured expressions and heavily exaggerated body language were the first things to alert me to the "FT" connection. But there was more...

The pace increased exponentially along with the emerging complications of taking a beautiful female robot (impersonated by Malleson's neice) to a honeymoon suite in a posh hotel until the film ended in total chaos.

A foreign servant who spoke very little english and frequently misunderstood his manager's requests (Hmm, Manuel methinks!).
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Imperfect Comedy with Sci Fi Elements, Should Have Been Better
robert-temple-131 January 2008
What a pity. This film could have been a little gem. But it had an inferior director with no vision, Bernard Knowles, and was totally ruined by almost maniacally unrestrained over-acting by Nigel Patrick and Stanley Holloway, who are about as subtle as a pair of howling hyenas. The story had great promise. It concerns an absent-minded genius who has invented a robot which looks like a woman, and in fact is made to resemble his pretty young niece, charmingly played by Patricia Roc. The niece ends up impersonating the girl robot, to what should have been hilarious effect. However, none of it comes off. The genius is brilliantly played by Miles Malleson, with some terrific comic moments, and there is another superb supporting performance by the always-reliable Irene Handl. But they cannot save the film, alas. If only Nigel Patrick and Stanley Holloway had been replaced by robots, it might have worked.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Olga
richardchatten8 July 2021
"The creation of perfect women appears a self-defeating pursuit since", the late Philip Strick once wrote, "there are so many of them around already".

Although this truly bizarre farce seems on paper crying out for a disclaimer on Talking Pictures deploring it's attitude to women, it's actually the men who are portrayed as useless (no mean feat when played by the usually accomplished Nigel Patrick & Stanley Holloway) and the audience is laughing with Patricia Roc and Irene Handl rather than at them.

Plushly appointed but very silly, with Mickey Mousing music cues which which make it even more unfunny than it already would have been; it was dismissed by Denis Gifford as "heavy-going froth". And I'll go along with that.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not so perfect
zeppo-220 March 2007
As a British attempt to do some American 'screwball' comedy, it falls very short of the mark. Perhaps the same vehicle in the hands of someone like Cary Grant could have made it work but not the set of actors in this. As a traditional British farce it works better but not by much, and sadly points up the fact that light comedy was not really Nigel Patrick's forte.

In a short role as a effeminate dress sales clerk, Jerry Desmonde goes as far as you could without shouting out 'gay man,' in the days of fifties cinema. Pity his later roles were mainly playing stooge to the likes of Norman Wisdom.

This type of broad slapstick farce and comedy of errors was slowly dying out to be replaced by the more subtle Ealing comedies. And wouldn't really return till the more risqué Carry Ons of the swinging sixties.

All a bit dated in all and only vaguely amusing in the sense of 'they don't make them like that any more' type of way.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the funniest films ever made!
JohnHowardReid8 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Yes, undoubtedly one of the funniest films ever made, The Perfect Woman is that rare comedy than can be seen over and over again with no loss of humor or diminution in its appeal. The film's extraordinary ability to repeatedly entertain is due partly to its witty dialogue, risible situations and cleverly delineated characters; partly to the inspired comic portrayals contributed by almost the entire cast, particularly Patricia Roc (who never looked more charming), Nigel Patrick (delightfully in his element as a temporarily embarrassed young man of "good connections"), Stanley Holloway (the most versatile of gentleman's gentleman), Miles Malleson (impossible to surpass as irremediably absent-minded, eccentric yet lovable old duffers), David Hurst (a paragon of slow-witted incompetence) and Fred Berger (a short fuse splittingly compounded by his fractured English). Nor must we forget to commend Irene Handl, Jerry Desmonde and Anita Sharp-Bolster. As the robot, Pamela Devis is perhaps not quite as mechanical or automaton-like in some of her actions as would make for the greatest hilarity, but that small defect could probably be sheeted home to the make-up man and the director.

Otherwise, the direction is surprisingly fluid and professional. The comic timing is always spot on and the director, by means of rapid pacing and neat compositions has managed to completely disguise the script's stage origins. Supporting technical credits are likewise highly appealing.

OTHER VIEWS: At first sight, Patricia Roc, who gave such a convincing account of a chain-smoking neurotic in Love Story (1944), would hardly seem a prime contender for The Perfect Woman. Yet here, assisted by flattering costumes, make-up, hair styling and photography - plus her own innate charm, skills and talent - she seems a sure winner! - T.H.

So many funny lines and situations, so hilariously played, I was absolutely cracking up at our Hollywood Classics screening - despite the fact that I'd already seen the movie three or four times. - G.A.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Woeful Farce
splendidchap15 July 2021
A promising cast and premise are wasted in this woefully weak effort. The absence of a sharp script and tight direction is made worse by desperate over-acting. The participants were rewarded for the time they spent on the film. Unlike the viewers.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Woeful Farce
malcolmgsw23 April 2012
For some reason the director and actors seemed to be under the impression that if you acted in a maniacal fashion and speeded up your delivery everything would be hilarious.Instead it is an example of how not to film a farce.It makes even Brian Rix look restrained.Irene Handel and Miles Malleson are a joy as they are working at their own usual sedate pace.However what on earth were Patrick,Holloway and Roc playing at.Even as a robot Roc was wooden ,or should that be metallic.It is difficult to believe that Stanley Holloway gave a worse performance than this.I normally enjoy watching Nigel Patrick,but not in this.He literally chews the scenery.Little wonder that the British film industry was starring down at the precipice when this film was made.films of this type would help push it over the edge.
4 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Absent Minded Professor.
adamjohns-4257516 November 2022
The Perfect Woman (1949) -

It really was amazing how quickly two people could fall in love back in 1949 - That was the only note I took down whilst watching this film and sadly, because it was a bit forgettable, I can't really think what else to write about it in this review.

I know that it wasn't offensive and that there was a charm to it and an element of fun, but I don't think that I could really say much about the general construction of the film.

The only characters I can recall were the professor who invented the "Perfect Woman" and who was cute in his own way, but quite typical of inventors in film and also Stanley Holloway's butler, a man who knew his place, but didn't stay there.

I'm sure that they all gave perfectly adequate performances, because otherwise I would have made a note of it and I know that Irene Handl usually delivers a great character, but perhaps there have just been too many of this type of film that meant it didn't leave a specific mark.

The actual robot needing instructions to move or do anything, was a bit silly, like the daft scene in 'Mrs Doubtfire' (1993), where Robin Williams had to keep changing personas over dinner and that was a tired humour even in 1949 as far as I'm concerned.

So while it wasn't a bad film, it really didn't make any kind of impression on me and I wouldn't bother with it again.

380.61/1000.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A touch of Lubitsch
suchenwi21 July 2012
Warning: Spoilers
While this film sometimes has the subtlety of a Punch and Judy show, at other times it certainly brought me good laughs, and it milked many jokes out of the Mechanical Woman topic. Then there are foreigner stereotypes about the Italian hotel manager and the Swiss waiter, some being less painful than others. Then again, the catastrophic finale triggered by "love" very well wraps it up... The scenes in the Underground were quite well executed, where the smoking ears were a bit over the top.

I watched this shortly after "Die Puppe" (Ernst Lubitsch, 1919) which had a similar concept as center of the plot: an artisan builds a lifelike woman robot as the likeness of his daughter/niece, but for public appearance, the original must double up as the copy, the real woman acting as if she were the robot. A mouse/hairpin destroys the illusion.

In this juxtaposition, I found The Perfect Woman a very interesting watch - compare how Ossi Oswalda (in Die Puppe) and Patricia Roc in this play the most difficult role, both halfway plausible, and very charming.

I give it 9/10 - not for great cinematic art, but for the fun I had.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Adroit
keith-moyes-656-4814917 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The Perfect Woman is an amusing British farce from the late Forties that I have wanted to see for years and have finally managed to catch up with. Overall, I think it was worth the wait.

The central comic idea of a robot being impersonated by her look-alike is beautifully realised. As Penelope assiduously responds to all Olga's key words, while attempting to preserve her modesty without revealing her imposture, I soon found myself chuckling appreciatively at the precision of the staging and the pantomime. Patricia Roc is delightful and handles the physical comedy superbly well. I am slightly surprised that she did not become better known.

It was also good to see Irene Handl and Dora Bryan looking so young and sprightly.

However, I cannot claim that this picture is an overlooked minor classic and I have to acknowledge that it has a number of weaknesses.

The problems begin with the two male leads.

Stanley Holloway was probably the biggest star in the picture, but his character is undeveloped and only exists to give Roger Cavendish someone to talk to. Holloway's actual performance is quite restrained, with none of the frantic over-reaction that another reviewer has reported, but he has very little to work with and is unable to add much to the movie.

Nigel Patrick was an accomplished actor but here he is saddled with an impossible character. These pencil-moustached, down-on-their-luck, ageing playboys regularly turned up in English movies until well into the Sixties (Leslie Phillips built his whole career on them) but they are tough going today. In this movie, Roger Cavendish is meant to be dashing and debonair but today he just seems a bit shabby and creepy.

More importantly, the main comic premise may be a good basis for a series of sketches, but it is too slight to sustain a full-length feature film. The early scenes are over-written and overlong (probably reflecting its origins on the stage) but once the characters have been introduced, and the situation has been set up, the movie quickly builds up a good head of steam. There are then some very effective comic scenes in the middle of the picture, but eventually the possibilities of the robot impersonation are exhausted and there is nowhere else for the story to go. This is when we start to ask why Penelope is so determined to maintain her impersonation of Olga (it must be simple fun and devilment, because there is no plot reason for it).

At this point, the movie can only be stretched to the full 90 minutes by violating one of the basic rules of good farce: the situations may be contrived and far-fetched but the characters should always respond to them in plausible ways. In the final third of this movie, people continually act out of character in order to prolong the situation beyond its natural limits.

For example, the dinner scene is beautifully choreographed, but requires the hotel manager to be too pushy and insistent and Roger to be uncharacteristically feeble: instead of stuttering explanations, he should just have ushered this pest out of the room. Similarly, it was out of character for his Aunt to intrude on what she thought was his wedding night, or for him to allow it.

In a farce, it is fine for characters to exasperate each other, but it is fatal for them to exasperate the audience.

Despite these drawbacks, I am sure this droll little picture amused a lot of people in 1949 and much of it still amuses me today. It is certainly not the archaic museum piece that other reviewers have implied and I would strenuously reject any suggestion that it shows how much more sophisticated our taste in comedy has become over the years.

If you doubt me, I would just remind you that Mike Myers's wretched accents, crude mugging and off-target parody did not stop the Austin Powers movies from being one of the biggest grossing comedy series in history.

The Perfect Woman is no comedy classic, but it is a hell of a lot more adroit than those three clunkers.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed