PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,9/10
1,6 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaAn ordinary man suddenly finds that anything he says comes true. Or at least, almost anything.An ordinary man suddenly finds that anything he says comes true. Or at least, almost anything.An ordinary man suddenly finds that anything he says comes true. Or at least, almost anything.
- Premios
- 1 nominación
Wallace Lupino
- Constable Winch
- (as Wally Lupino)
Gertrude Musgrove
- Effie (replaced by Joan Hickson)
- (escenas eliminadas)
- Dirección
- Lothar Mendes
- Alexander Korda(sin acreditar)
- Guión
- H.G. Wells(sin acreditar)
- Lajos Biró(sin acreditar)
- Todo el reparto y equipo
- Producción, taquilla y más en IMDbPro
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesTorin Thatcher, George Sanders, and Ivan Brandt are Celestial Bodies who appear at the beginning and end of this movie.
- PifiasThe sequence in which the constable is transported to San Francisco was obviously filmed in Los Angeles.
- Citas
George McWhirter Fotheringay: You just stand there looking lovely, until I notice you!
- Créditos adicionalesOpening credits are shown over a background of outer space.
- ConexionesFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 20 Movies Where the World Actually Ends (2021)
Reseña destacada
H.G. Wells' Fantasy of Anarchy
What would a world without want be like? The answer has been the subject of countless stories, not a few movies, & every sensitive soul's nighttime sighing for ages. H. G. Wells poses the question by having godlike beings give a department store clerk, George McWhirter Fotheringay, that ability, & watching it evolve, as he bounces from adviser to adviser, from the sexy girl he desires to a retired British Army man.
The film is a treat, especially for those of us accustomed to (& maybe a little bored by) the Star Trek treatment of absolute power conferred on lowly mortals. I don't know much about the history of science fiction in the movies, but Wells goes about everything (he wrote the script, based on his novel) with the fabulous in mind, while adding purely sci-fi touches, which I won't give away.
Fotheringay is no bleeding-heart aching to turn the world into a painless utopia, nor is he a selfish, power-hungry perve, but a nondescript man who takes his time to figure out just what has happened to him before bringing everything to a head. In the meantime, we're given what amounts to a funny English comedy of manners, as well as a peek into a time (& place) where science fiction took a different direction. (For example: if you found out you had miraculous powers, would you tell anyone? I don't think I would. & if you told anyone, wouldn't you imagine the authorities pouncing on you at the first opportunity? Not so in 1930's Essex!)
The ending seems Gene Roddenberry-esque, & perhaps the Star Trek creator admired & shared Wells' humanism; but the film shines with neat-o special effects (some cool stuff, for the time) & a wonderful performance by Roland Young. A must-see for those who like their sci-fi earthbound & thought-provoking.
(My subject line, by the way, refers to anarchy as a form of government in which there are no governments, just self-government; I don't mean it in the common usage of disorder or chaos. The movie touches on the idea that, without their lives being controlled by those in power, who have a vested interest in people needing money & goods, people might find other ways to spend their time - like, for example, in creation.)
The film is a treat, especially for those of us accustomed to (& maybe a little bored by) the Star Trek treatment of absolute power conferred on lowly mortals. I don't know much about the history of science fiction in the movies, but Wells goes about everything (he wrote the script, based on his novel) with the fabulous in mind, while adding purely sci-fi touches, which I won't give away.
Fotheringay is no bleeding-heart aching to turn the world into a painless utopia, nor is he a selfish, power-hungry perve, but a nondescript man who takes his time to figure out just what has happened to him before bringing everything to a head. In the meantime, we're given what amounts to a funny English comedy of manners, as well as a peek into a time (& place) where science fiction took a different direction. (For example: if you found out you had miraculous powers, would you tell anyone? I don't think I would. & if you told anyone, wouldn't you imagine the authorities pouncing on you at the first opportunity? Not so in 1930's Essex!)
The ending seems Gene Roddenberry-esque, & perhaps the Star Trek creator admired & shared Wells' humanism; but the film shines with neat-o special effects (some cool stuff, for the time) & a wonderful performance by Roland Young. A must-see for those who like their sci-fi earthbound & thought-provoking.
(My subject line, by the way, refers to anarchy as a form of government in which there are no governments, just self-government; I don't mean it in the common usage of disorder or chaos. The movie touches on the idea that, without their lives being controlled by those in power, who have a vested interest in people needing money & goods, people might find other ways to spend their time - like, for example, in creation.)
útil•172
- selfhelpradio
- 28 ago 1999
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is The Man Who Could Work Miracles?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- L'home que podia fer miracles
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Denham Studios, Denham, Buckinghamshire, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Exterior, studio uncredited)
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 22 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was El hombre que fabricaba milagros (1936) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde