Bring 'Em Back Alive (1932) User Reviews

Buck brings 'em back!

[JohnHowardReid · 7/10 · 1 November 2017]

Frank Buck (himself), Edward Anthony (himself).

Director. CLYDE E. ELLIOTT. Commentary written by Frank Buck and Edward Anthony, spoken by Frank Buck. Inspired by the book by Frank Buck and Edward Anthony. Photography: Carl Berger and Nick Cavaliere. Music: Gene Rodemich. Sound recording: Paul M. Robillard. Producer: Amadee J. Van Beuren.

Copyright 24 June 1932 by the Van Beuren Corporation. Released through RKO Radio Pictures. New York opening at the Mayfair: 17 June 1932. 7 reels. 65 minutes.

SYNOPSIS: "An authentic Motion Picture Record. Every foot of this documentary film was photographed in the Malayan Jungle."

NOTES: One of the top 15 films at the U.S./Canadian box-office for 1932.

COMMENT: This record of the RKO Van Beuren Expedition into the Malayan Jungle is directed with an astonishing degree of polish. Even jaded contemporary audiences will he enthralled. How Elliott was able to take these elaborate tracking shots and get such amazing close-ups of fighting lions, pythons and crocodiles is nothing short of wizardry - especially considering the unsophisticated equipment available.

True, hand-held silent cameras have been used. At an average speed of around twenty frames per second, movements do appear a trifle fast - and even the explorer's seem to walk in a somewhat ungainly fashion!

A well-integrated music score admirably complements the action. The movie's only real drawback is its rather insistent and incessant commentary, delivered in the manner of a garrulous racing broadcaster by Frank Buck himself.

Frank Buck 1884-1950

[bkoganbing · 6/10 · 8 October 2017]

Over 80 years after its first release Frank Buck's Bring 'Em Back Alive still is quite a work of film making. Even though the animals confrontations are clearly being staged the fact that the film was done at all is a source of some wonder. A couple of years before MGM had so many problems shooting Trader Horn on location not the least of which was tropical disease that no companies went on jungle location from America until The African Queen and King Solomon's Mines were done. I think we can assume that Mr. Buck in his work had become acclimatized years earlier.

Safaris were nothing new. The most famous one was that of former President Theodore Roosevelt in 1909 after he left office. Hunters were nothing new either. But trapping animals including some really dangerous species was a new idea back in the day and while Frank Buck wasn't the first he certainly popularized the notion. Bring them back for study and exhibit.

Time has overtaken Frank Buck. These same animals he trapped and others hunted are now in danger of extinction. The Good Book says God made man to rule over the rest of the species, but nowhere does it say exterminate them. We are their stewards, their caretakers and that is the idea that predominates now.

Still Buck and his exploits made him a popular hero. Buck was also his best publicist as this film shows.

It also shows some of his racial attitudes no doubt acquired in his childhood in Gainesville, Texas. I got a bit of a jolt when during his narration he meets up with some of the Malay natives who had worked on his safaris before. They were old and valued friends and he gave them what in his 1932 Texas mindset the highest possible compliment that they may be brown skinned, but they're all white on the inside.

You can interpret that in a lot of ways. For myself I believe it was the attitude of a man brought up a certain way, but having to work with and depend on people of a different race his attitudes were adjusting. In his mind he thought of it as praise. I guess we can leave it at that.

Racial attitudes notwithstanding Frank Buck was a man who was an adventurer who was in a dangerous business, bring 'em back alive.

Staged nature documentary is interesting time capsule

[a_chinn · 5/10 · 22 October 2017]

I was expecting more of an Indiana Jones/Alan Quartermain type of adventure, but this great white hunter jungle story is actually a nature documentary following Frank Buck capturing a baby elephant other various African wildlife. I was probably thinking of the 1980s Bruce Boxleitner TV series (very loosely based upon Buck), which was more "Raiders of the Lost Ark" than "Wild Kingdom." This documentary is interesting as a time capsule, even if most of the film is clearly staged.

Frank Buck and early sensitivity to nature and the environment

[briantaves · 13 October 2004]

Seventy years ago, big-game hunting was still considered a heroic and thoroughly admirable endeavor. The slogan "bring 'em back alive," adopted by Frank Buck, was an important turning point in this period, popularizing ideas which are far closer to today's notions of environmental protection. Buck was a businessman, who by the 1920s developed a thriving trade bringing animals back from Asia and selling them to the zoos of the United States and Europe. With the onset of the Great Depression, Buck, like many others, went bankrupt, but this opened up a new and far more important part of his career. Buck turned his real experience of capturing wild animals into a series of articles for magazines such as the Saturday Evening Post and Collier's. This led to a contract for a book with Simon and Schuster, entitled Bring 'em Back Alive, that became a runaway best seller. Bring 'em Back Alive remained steadily in print for more than two decades, and the phrase that would always henceforth be associated with Buck's name. With the success of the book, Buck moved on to his long-standing dream of making jungle pictures, inspired by a desire to improve on the films of Ernest Schoedsack and Merian C. Cooper. However, Buck had difficulty interesting a major studio in a movie version of Bring 'em Back Alive; he found it far easier, he recalled, to get an audience with the ruling maharajahs of India than the movie moguls, who saw no possibilities in animal films. Finally Van Beuren Pictures, a producer of shorts releasing through the new Hollywood studio, RKO, agreed to back Buck for an expedition to the Malayan jungles to produce thirteen short films. Shooting in Malaya, Sumatra, India and Ceylon, for nine months, Buck found that the animals themselves made up the story regardless of plans. Upon returning, Buck convinced Van Beuren that the footage could best form a feature-length movie, and in 1932 BRING 'EM BACK ALIVE became one of the most popular pictures of the year. Buck proved not only to be a raconteur on the printed page, but with his experience on the stage and as a showman from his youth capably played the starring role and proved the perfect narrator. He introduced the picture personally to audiences during its New York first run. Just as the success of the book prompted a follow-up, entitled Wild Cargo, by 1934 a second picture was produced under this title, shot in Ceylon, Sumatra, Malaya and northern India. This time, the emphasis on battles between animals was replaced with the ingenious methods used to capture them, and WILD CARGO was again profitable. Buck was very much a man of his time who embodied many of the attitudes of an era. There are occasional lapses from today's perspective, such as the references to his native assistants as his "boys"–a problematic designation he does explain in his books. Parts of his documentaries were indeed staged, but no more than was usual then, or now, to reconstruct actual events. Overall Buck promoted a sympathetic understanding of Asian wildlife–and people--at a time when both were still a novelty to Western eyes.

Buck's third book was entitled Fang and Claw, concentrating on the people of the far east that he had known, and in 1935 he directed a film of the same title that had little in common with the book. In contrast to the excitement of the first two movies, FANG AND CLAW was less spontaneous and planned to concentrate on the more prosaic aspects of Buck's business. Censors had clamped down on scenes revealing the violence in the animal kingdom. However, these same aspects caused FANG AND CLAW to be the first of Buck's films promoted to youth as learning tools by the National Education Association. It was the first of several Buck projects to reveal an increasing emphasis on the importance of children and fictional elements to Buck's audience, and he began to appear in films directed at this audience. By this time, Buck had secured a firm position as an American hero. The market offered Frank Buck medals, letter openers, pith helmets, giraffe pins, rings, neckerchiefs, brooch and jewelry, bracelet, knife, soap, pencil boxes, watches, and games. His endorsement was sought for such products as tires, guns, whiskey, food, automobiles, toys, clothing, and cigarettes. In addition, he told his stories over the radio, and was portrayed by actors on the air. He was also back in business importing animals for zoos. Buck could be seen in person at circus performances, and mounted important exhibits of his live animals, most notably at the 1939 World's Fair in New York. He went on the lecture circuit with his documentary footage. What makes his utilization of all these media all the more amazing is that he was a commodity, rather than a producer or distributor, such as a Walt Disney, in a time when different media outlets were all separate companies.

In 1948 RKO reissued BRING 'EM BACK ALIVE and Buck's career underwent a brief renaissance. That year, Buck returned to his hometown of Gainesville, Texas, to dedicate the Frank Buck Zoo, still the only existing memorial to the man and his work. By then, however, he was in failing health, and died in 1950 at age 66. Despite all the dangers Buck found himself in, his life ended not because of any wild animal, but from lung cancer caused by decades of cigarette smoking. Buck and his slogan of "bring 'em back alive" were an important part of introducing two generations to progressive ideas about the environment and the animal kingdom. His stories remain just as enjoyable as ever, and an anthology of the best of his writing was published in Buck's home state by Texas Tech University Press. Through his use of a multitude of media, including writing, films, radio, circus appearances, and exhibitions, Buck was an icon who epitomized an intelligent and conservation-minded interest in the wildlife of Asia.

Frank Buck's Tru-Life Adventures

[boblipton · 6/10 · 8 October 2017]

This purports to be the visual diary of one of Buck's expeditions to the Malay jungle to collect wild animals for zoos and circuses. Shot wild (without sound) and then narrated by Buck in a studio and with a score added by Frank Rodemich, it will strike the modern viewer as a black-and-white precursor of a Disney Tru-Life-Adventure movie, with enough random fights between top predators to keep people who like that happy. Add in enough eighty-year-old assumptions in the narration to annoy the modern viewer ("His skin was black, but he was white inside"), and you wind up with something of interest mostly for people with an antiquarian taste in movies. In 1932, it was an exciting documentary and there were several sequels.

A lot of the shots are faked; the ones in which Buck's "boys" are carrying a black leopard in a wooden cage seem to lack the leopard. However, I understand that Disney's cameramen staged a lot of their animal antics.

Biologically fascinating but culturally eye rolling.

[mark.waltz · 6/10 · 11 November 2023]

The narration written and spoken by Frank Buck is often unintentionally funny, rather pompous and self-congratulatory. Frank Buck has been comparing to Indiana Jones (only because they were similar adventurers), and certainly Indiana would have reacted strongly to the scene where a huge python wrestles with a black leopard then follows it up a tree. Buck's description of the black leopard as the jungle bully is one of those funny moments, especially when he describes its relationship with a spotted leopard mate.

The capture of baby honey bears, silvery gibbons, elephants, various monkeys and a huge grown lizard only document man's inhumanity to nature, although for the most part it's not threatening to the baby animals. Jones isn't seen much. Obviously he's behind the camera with director Clyde E. Elliott. The moral that wild animals are better off captured by man rather than eaten by predators is disturbing on all levels, but the views of the wild life is fascinating even if the film is horribly dated. Easy to see though why this was such a huge hit.

Wonderful and Horrifying at the same time

[oh madeline · 10/10 · 15 August 2000]

You will never find a better time capsule of 1933 than Bring 'Em Back Alive. This spectacular and horrifying documentary gets you inside the world and mind of one of the most celebrated hunters (and anthropologists!) of all time. This should be seen as one of the few surviving cinematic treatises on the state of wildlife in 1933 and also as a very telling piece of history.

Dated But Fun...

[bensonj · 30 November 2001]

As one might expect, this is a series of Ramar-walking-around-the-bushes shots of Buck, intercut with Malayan jungle photography and staged animal fights, plus some sequences of catching animals in old-fashioned drop-door cages and camouflaged-pit traps. The brevity (65 minutes), the music, and Buck's amateur, clipped, breathless narration ("All at once! A new menace! Appeared on the scene!") make the film watchable. Buck is usually seen with faithful best boy Ali: "His body was brown! But he was all white inside!" The staged fights, in which both contestants generally walk (or slither) away unhurt, include: black leopard vs. python, black leopard vs. tiger, python vs. crocodile, tiger vs. water buffalo, and python vs. tiger. The last is the finale, and it's fascinating to see how the python, its head being held by the tiger, swings the lower part of its body completely around and envelops the tiger. In this pre-Code film, are there shots of beautiful young bare-breasted native girls? What do YOU think?