IMDb रेटिंग
6.2/10
3.7 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंEnglishmen race to find the tomb of Genghis Khan before the sinister Fu Manchu does.Englishmen race to find the tomb of Genghis Khan before the sinister Fu Manchu does.Englishmen race to find the tomb of Genghis Khan before the sinister Fu Manchu does.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 नामांकन
Everett Brown
- Slave
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Steve Clemente
- Knife Thrower
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Willie Fung
- Ship's Steward
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Ferdinand Gottschalk
- British Museum Official
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Allen Jung
- Coolie
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Tetsu Komai
- Swordsman
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
James B. Leong
- Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Oswald Marshall
- Undetermined Role
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Chris-Pin Martin
- Potentate
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Lal Chand Mehra
- Indian Prince
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- निर्देशक
- Charles Brabin
- Charles Vidor(बिना क्रेडिट के)
- लेखक
- सभी कास्ट और क्रू
- IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAccording to the book "The Films of Myrna Loy" by Lawrence J. Quirk: "She recalls that she and Karloff decided between themselves that the only intelligent way that this movie could possibly be played was subtly tongue-in-cheek."
- गूफ़Genghis Khan's skeleton is clearly a medical school skeleton. The removable top of the skull is very noticeable.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनIn the 1970's, "Mask of Fu Manchu" was cut slightly (by about 2 minutes), removing references deemed particularly offensive to the Asian-American community (including several racial remarks and an extended version of the famous whipping scene). It is actually this cut version which MGM/UA released in the early 1990's on videotape, although the deleted segments were restored for the print of "Mask of Fu Manchu" used for the later laserdisc release "MGM Horror Classics," and the more recent DVD release.
- कनेक्शनEdited into Mondo Lugosi - A Vampire's Scrapbook (1987)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
Scientific Rape
Many, many times a movie can be worthwhile when it does no more than create and display a strange world. Almost always that's the case where the world is new and/or synthesized from previous abstract sources.
"Metropolis" of five years earlier is often celebrated as a film. Its only value is in the art design, but that's miraculous in a way. Unfortunately the story is as thuggishly stupid as the notions it criticizes. And that mars a movie for me.
This one is even more clever in the visual world it creates. And yes the story is dumb, and also racist. But it is not hypocritical: all the people involved are dishonorable, worthy of a Tod Browning script.
The visual notions are astonishingly varied. Nominally this is a mystical Chinese (Northern Chinese, more deeply mystical) environment added to a 30's German-influenced visual depiction of science. There are lots of "electrical" visuals, zaps and blinkers. Abstractions of reality dominate: staircases that stand alone: monumental pedestals and other features in internal spaces; statues and icons that become characters from props.
The styles aren't Chinese at all but borrowed from any place or era with an association with the mystical.
Deep, deep shadows. Many ceremonial movements in everyday tasks (as well as ceremonies). Vast ambitions, though this was commonplace by then. Direct precode references to sex and the implication that somehow rape on a national scale had something to do with mystical/ scientific power.
(Remember, this is BEFORE Hitler's ascendancy.)
The story and most characters are irrelevant and that underscores the effect of the tone.
Watch Indiana Jones if you must, if you need movement. Watch this if you want to be saturated with cinematic color.
Ted's Evaluation -- 4 of 3: Every cineliterate person should experience this.
"Metropolis" of five years earlier is often celebrated as a film. Its only value is in the art design, but that's miraculous in a way. Unfortunately the story is as thuggishly stupid as the notions it criticizes. And that mars a movie for me.
This one is even more clever in the visual world it creates. And yes the story is dumb, and also racist. But it is not hypocritical: all the people involved are dishonorable, worthy of a Tod Browning script.
The visual notions are astonishingly varied. Nominally this is a mystical Chinese (Northern Chinese, more deeply mystical) environment added to a 30's German-influenced visual depiction of science. There are lots of "electrical" visuals, zaps and blinkers. Abstractions of reality dominate: staircases that stand alone: monumental pedestals and other features in internal spaces; statues and icons that become characters from props.
The styles aren't Chinese at all but borrowed from any place or era with an association with the mystical.
Deep, deep shadows. Many ceremonial movements in everyday tasks (as well as ceremonies). Vast ambitions, though this was commonplace by then. Direct precode references to sex and the implication that somehow rape on a national scale had something to do with mystical/ scientific power.
(Remember, this is BEFORE Hitler's ascendancy.)
The story and most characters are irrelevant and that underscores the effect of the tone.
Watch Indiana Jones if you must, if you need movement. Watch this if you want to be saturated with cinematic color.
Ted's Evaluation -- 4 of 3: Every cineliterate person should experience this.
उपयोगी•2021
- tedg
- 13 जून 2005
टॉप पसंद
वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए रेट करें और वॉचलिस्ट में साइन इन करें
- How long is The Mask of Fu Manchu?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Gospodar Azije
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $3,27,627(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 8 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें