Les chutes (1897) Poster

(1897)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Getting it right....
jack-26028 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The Plot Summary says, "...looks west from the U.S. side, with the river running right to left...". Reviewer J Hailey also mentions the swift current and the small island (see below).

Trivia says, "First film shot in Canada".

Reviewer Snow Leopard mentions, "2 parts of the falls with water rushing past in the foreground and farther toward the background a stretch of the falls themselves". Reviewer Alice Liddel notes the same arrangement.

Snow Leopard also mentions "an observation point in the middle of the falls". Reviewer James Haugh writes of that same small island and goes on to say that the shot was from Goat Island back toward the American falls.

I lived in the area some 50 years ago. Niagara Falls consists of two cataracts, the 'American' and the 'Horseshoe'. They are separated by Goat Island (U.S. soil, not Canadian). The Niagara River flows straight out of the 'Horseshoe' falls and downstream left to right below the 'American' falls.

The quoted part of the Plot Summary is flat wrong. Looking west from anywhere along the face of the 'American' falls, from the right (or east) bank out to Goat Island, would be a view across the gorge below the falls toward the left (or west) bank. The 'American' falls range basically north-south. Looking south along the lip toward Goat Island, the river runs left to right. Ditto for a shot "west" (south, really) from Goat Island...and there was no islet or observation point between there and the Canadian side.

The Trivia entry *could* be right. I saw the film about 10 years ago and don't recall it precisely, but it *feels* right with the description of the water rushing past in the foreground (running right to left). The view would be from Canada, back upstream a bit from their end of the 'Horseshoe' (to capture the river's rush). The stretch of the falls in the background would be the 'American' falls in their entirety. That observation point would be Goat Island.

But the shot could as easily have been *from* Goat Island. I recall that before I came to the area, there used to be an islet between Goat Island and the U.S. side and there may have been an observation point on it, but it has since fallen over the lip. The view, however, would have to be "east" (north, really, along the face of the 'American' falls...but with right to left flow) toward the U.S. bank. That side of the river is relatively shallow with lots of rocks breaking up the surface. The water doesn't rush past so much as it splashes past, unlike the deeper 'Horseshoe' falls.

Lumiere would have taken the most interesting shot possible, right? To my mind's eye, that would be from the Canadian side as described above, but he would have had to deal with the mist that is constantly rising from the pool at the foot of the 'Horseshoe'. Second best would be from the U.S. side out past Goat Island and centered on the 'Horseshoe', as little or no mist rises from the rubble at the foot of the 'American'.

I'm looking for a copy of The Movies Begin so I can re-view this clip.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Well framed shot that achieves its aims as a result
bob the moo2 March 2008
I watched this film on a DVD that was rammed with short films from the period. I didn't watch all of them as the main problem with these type of things that their value is more in their historical novelty value rather than entertainment. So to watch them you do need to be put in the correct context so that you can keep this in mind and not watch it with modern eyes. With the Primitives & Pioneers DVD collection though you get nothing to help you out, literally the films are played one after the other (the main menu option is "play all") for several hours. With this it is hard to understand their relevance and as an educational tool it falls down as it leaves the viewer to fend for themselves, which I'm sure is fine for some viewers but certainly not the majority. What it means is that the DVD saves you searching the web for the films individually by putting them all in one place – but that's about it.

Last year I went to Argentina for holidays (which is the next big place people – get yourselves there before everyone else is there waiting for you). Anyway, while on this trip we went up to the border with Brazil to see the amazing sights of Igagzu Falls (sure I've spelt that wrong). We tried to capture the sheer force and amount of water there but it is impossible to convey this idea of endless water crashing down and how it feels to be so small within this huge natural formation of waterfalls. Anyway I mention this because here we have another film from the Lumiere company that tries to capture this as well.

While it is difficult to convey the film does well by framing the static shot to greatest impact. So in the foreground we have one part of Niagara Falls, with the water flowing quickly right in front of the viewer. In the background we have a clear view of a larger part of it while in the middle ground we have a handful of people who look tiny by comparison. It is not a brilliant experience these days but it does not take away from the fact that it is a cleverly set up shot that achieves its aims as a result.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Only good if you're there
Horst_In_Translation13 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Of course there's not many more mesmerizing places of nature out there than the Niagare Falls, but it's just not a beautiful sight at all in this short film. We don't have colors or, more importantly, the noisy sound of the water splashing which could have added lots of quality to this film. Of course you can't blame the makers of this film for it. Nonetheless the whole perspective with the people in the background is rather unspectacular and Lumière could have found a better spot to depict the action. The view is kinda okay, but I was almost more interested in the black strange mass (which proved to be several people) in the background than the water as the film progressed. It almost dragged a bit, even at only 40 seconds.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
We live amidst the power of nature
jhaugh28 May 2003
The Lumiere cameraman ventured out to Goat Island and trained his camera back toward the American falls; capturing some people, at an observation point, on a small island. They view the falls from what appears to be a precarious vantage point. The puniness of the people, next to the power of the falls, is emphasized.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nature in motion...
JoeytheBrit28 May 2009
One of Lumiere's roving cameramen once again captures the urgency of motion in one of their films, but this time it isn't a man-made example but a creation of nature that it is immeasurably more impressive. The spuming waters crash past small figures watching from a fragile looking observation point between two waterfalls, and the falls make the human tourists look frail and insignificant. The fencing behind which these tourists observes one of the world's great natural wonders doesn't look too sturdy either. It wouldn't be long before waterfalls became a staple ingredient of the action adventure film, and one can't help feeling that maybe Lumiere's cameraman sensed the potential of this natural phenomenon.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
It's America all right.
the red duchess11 October 2000
This must have looked great, and a little frightening in 1897, and it is still mightily impressive. Previous Lumiere films had caught the sense of natural movement in the context of a static frame, such as the rippling sea in 'Barque sortant au port'. This being an American subject, it obviously has a much more overpowering impact, the gentle ripples of 'Barque' become the raging, renting, explosive ejaculations of the Niagara Falls, here breaching the frame from two positions, a fall in the background, and a river in the foreground, so huge and majestic its waves seem like giant ice-floes. To further emphasise the awesome presence of nature, the audience is represented by a couple of tiny tourists who meekly observe from a sheltered vantage point. There is movement in this human world too, but it is stiff and insignificant compared to the inexorable grace of the water. This human/nature dialectic is a prominent Lumiere theme, very interesting at the beginning of a technology that would seek to do away with both.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Beautiful Cinematography
Snow Leopard10 March 2005
The beautiful cinematography of "Niagara" combines footage of the falls, from an excellent vantage point, with other scenery that complements the main view very nicely. The film has held up well physically, and it is still quite effective in making the viewer feel part of the scene.

The camera field is well-chosen so as to catch portions of two parts of the falls. In the foreground, water rushes past as it heads towards the falls, and farther back is a view of a stretch of the falls themselves. The footage convincingly displays the power and beauty of nature.

Although at first the rushing waters grab all of the attention, the camera field also includes a group of persons on an observation point in the middle of the falls. It's very interesting to watch them as well, looking very small and vulnerable in the midst of such natural grandeur.

As simple as the idea for this feature is, it works very well, and it makes a very attractive picture that also brings out some interesting themes.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Les chutes
Michael_Elliott26 December 2016
Les chutes (1896)

Apparently this here was the first film shot in Canada. Niagara Falls is the location and the camera is placed on a platform where we get a terrific view of the water going over the falls. Obviously there wasn't anything ground-breaking about this picture but at the same time other American studios began filming the falls so once again the Lumiere Brothers were way ahead of them. Thankfully the cinematography was exceptionally good and especially for this era so we get a crystal clear shot of the falls, which makes the film all the more entertaining.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A different view than I expected
Tornado_Sam23 October 2017
Okay, so when I saw "Niagara Falls" first I must admit the view shown here was much different than what I'd expected. What had first come to mind was a long view of one of the falls, with the water crashing down. Instead of that we've got a view that shows the water rushing over one of the falls in the foreground, with another fall on the left side of the screen, and in the midst of it all is a bit of land, an observation spot where we see some people there watching.

Since the falls are in Canada the Bros had to send one of their cameramen, Alexandre Promio, down to film this shot. The result of his cinematography looks pretty good, even if it wasn't what I'd expected at all (and I suppose he couldn't have done any better). It does drag a bit because all you see if the water going over the falls, although you do see some sightseers on the bit of land. Thankfully, as with all the Lumiere features (or most of them) it has been beautifully preserved to be viewed on YouTube for anyone who wants to see it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed