Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Unusual and sensitive
27 February 2013
Contrary to the opinions expressed by some reviewers, this documentary, though with some odd moments and sequences, is much more sensitive and personal than their reviews would imply.

Ms Solberg presents a clear theme. Carmen Mianda was misunderstood by her own people. That she was actually portuguesa, makes little difference to the story, though it is important to know. The important point is that she was Brazilian to her core. Even her dear sister Aurora makes that point clear.

The main theme in the story is a subtle apology to the world for the way the upper class Brazilians treated Carmen. Yes, she was a popular singer who had the ear of Getulio Vargas at the right time, but she was never a part of the Brazilian highly detested "elite," those who vilified her at her gala performance on her first return from the USA, the elite who own the news media and were able to manipulate public opinion in Brazil among people who "mattered." Ms Solberg's mother appears to be among those to whom the film refers, since "nice people" never went out where the masses gathered. Ms Solberg also makes the point that these Brazilians did not form their world opinions in Brazil, but in Europe, where they also bought their clothes. Interesting juxtaposition of preferences.

Thus it is wrong to believe that because of her fame and favor with the president at the time, Carmen was socially well-connected. Ms Solberg tells us about those who "always" loved her. These were the people whom the world thinks of as "real" Brazilians, the samba singers, the bahianos, the black people of the northeast, whose culture permeates everything Brazilian. This is why America became obsessed with Carmen at the time that the Brazilin upper crust felt sold out by her.

Thus, the theme is clearly one of a clash of cultures, not so much between North and Soutn America, but rather among Brazilians themselves. And Ms Solberg comes down squarely, as does Carmen, on the side of the majority, those who love the rhythm of Brazil and who adore Carmen Miranda. This documentary was for them, not so much for us norte americanos.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Film Noir Musical
15 November 2007
Warning: Spoilers
What an interesting idea: a film noir musical. While some of the acting was a bit over the top by today's standards, this film is a masterpiece of classic noir with great music, as well. The story line is formulaic, but weren't most of the in those days? I loved the song Bacall sang in THE BIG SLEEP, but BLUES IN THE NIGHT makes brings the music to the forefront, giving the viewer/listener a fuller experience.

What a femme fatale Kay is, and she leaves us with no doubt about it: out for herself, jealous, envious, self pitying, willing to sacrifice anything for what she wants, but once she gets it, goes about making it as miserable as possible. Even her death at the hands of a man she scorns as unworthy in every way is poetic justice.

I'm glad TCM is running BLUES IN THE NIGHT a bit more. I'm ready to see it again tight away!
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The most genuine loves story to be produced in many years
27 December 2005
Wow! This love story blew me away. It is a story for everyone. What it tells us us that you cannot help whom you love. Sometimes obstacles are placed Romeo and Juliet style by family, by society, or by our own fears and inhibitions. But here we learn that love is well worth fighting for, no matter what form it takes. All too often we wait until it is too late to act. We plan to travel when we retire. We plan to get married when we are older. We plan and plan and plan. But we don't LIVE. We don't ACT. As Shakespeare has a character tell us in Julius Caesar, "There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at th4e flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in misery.We must take the current wen it serves or lose our ventures."

This warning shows anyone who would see that anything worth having is worth risking all at the right moment. Love is all too often the victim of our hesitation.

NOTE: I am so disappointed at all the comments from gay men who think the film breaks no ground because it does not show more open affection/sex/whatever or because it does not support their gay agenda. A big part of he success of this effort will be in what it does not say or do.

There are too many in-your-face gay films that have already done more harm than good in chipping away at homophobia. Some people don't want to be confronted so directly with alternative lifestyles. And to apply today's sophistication to a situation that begins and ends 20 to 40 years ago, when attitudes and fears were much more difficultly to confront is a great mistake. Ang Lee is already being accused by the "Christian" reviewers of promoting "Hollywood's gay agenda." To the contrary, he is doing just the right thing to show how universal love and loss are.

Far from promoting such an agenda, his effort shows clearly that whether or not one approves of "love" between two people, one must concede that love and loss take their toll on anyone who feels one and suffers the other. This message is far more likely to evoke sympathy from unlikely audience members than a few minutes of explicit hay rolling and intimate kisses. For that, perhaps viewers should stick to the Logo Channel.
26 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed