Change Your Image
fastforward666
Reviews
Primer (2004)
Gimmick movie and a desperate hype-seeker
"The story is confusing indeed, so you should watch this movie again to understand it, because Primer is great and..." NO, THANKS!
I think that people who defend this garbage in such way should really stop embarrassing themselves and check some common sense first. Excuse me, but when a movie requires to be seen twice or more just for the sake of understanding the plot or concept... well, then there is something terribly wrong about it and a clear sign of a very bad movie.
Watching Primer was nothing but a horrible mistake and a waste of time for me. If you have to pay to watch this, please don't do so, as it will probably not only waste your time but your money as well. Go ahead and watch it if you are curious (still not recommended), but don't pay for cinema ticket, don't rent or buy the DVD. You had been warned.
I love time-travel movies in many different shapes. From high-tech apocalyptic time-travel (see Terminator) to mellow and ordinary (see About Time), from tense and intriguing (see Time Lapse and Predestination) to funny and relaxed (see Groundhog Day) to anything in between. Time-travel movies could be cheesy sometimes, but are entertaining. Primer is the first such movie that I encountered yet to be completely tiresome, uninspired and boring.
This is neither unconventional, artistic nor some kind of atmospheric, extraordinary movie where story plays just a secondary role. No, it's pretty mundane thriller with just slight sci-fi touch and actually is very story-oriented. The story itself is flawed, very difficult to follow while story-telling ability of the movie is almost nonexistent. Acting doesn't help as being very flat and characters and connections between them are left underdeveloped and unexplained. Camera work is generic, so neither it helps the movie to shape some edges of the story.
No, I didn't understood what really happened in the movie, but however, the plot isn't complex. Obviously, there were many ways and solutions for better editing that could make Primer more comprehensible and flowing. However, it was edited and constructed exactly for purpose to be incomprehensible, but why? There is couple of good reasons.
First off, Primer is a gimmick. Pay attention to the fact that this was director's debut work. The usual problem with debuts is that so many of these, no matter how exceptionally good they are, stay under the radar and are left unnoticed, due to lack of hype. Shane Carruth appears so concerned with this. He realizes the simple fact, that if the audience discuss the movie after watching it, the more it discuss, the more the hype gets successful. So he chooses to completely confuses the story, so that audience could discuss it as long as possible after the movie had been seen, only to figure out what actually happened in the movie. It creates a buzz, and while it appeals to various sci-fi geeks, lots of theories will follow soon, so the movie will not only got it's attention and recognition, but eventual praises as well.
Then, the movie is made by very small budget, as little as 7000$ goes. I like underground low-budget cinema where enthusiasm and artistic passion is all that matters and win over financial obstacles, but that's not the case here. Everything about Primer was consciously subordinated towards making of a hype. It's artistically hollow and dishonest movie and I suspect that 7000$ budget was rather a clever minimum-risk investment than anything else. Note that among myriad of irrelevant nonsense the two main guys babble in the movie, they often talk about their investments in the stock market for their invented device. Coincidence? I feel it's not.
So, try to figure out what happened in the movie you just saw, discuss it further and recommend others to "watch it again to understand"... and there you go. You support a movie that is not only without artistic value but even without the content. Geeks who payed the cinema tickets twice or more only to figure out what happened in the story should be thanked by the staff, as they helped Primer to achieve the commercial success. Most normal people however lost interest in the story at the half of the movie, as it's extremely dull, unacceptably attention demanding and in the end it hardly makes any sense. After all, I just don't care what really happened in Primer, as there's so many great films around to be seen, so I don't bother. Shane Carruth might be clever as a businessman, but is just horrible as an artist and a filmmaker.
OXV: The Manual (2013)
Weak and naive, but pretentious as hell
Recommended to me as interesting, intelligent movie. I watched it twice. At first, I wasn't impressed, but it looked OK. As I fell asleep for 10-15 minutes somewhere in the middle, I decided to give it another try. Especially after reading praising reviews here which made me think I probably lost track with the story during these missing 10-15 minutes, or something crucial to understand the concept. Unfortunately, after a second chance, it was even bigger disappointment. Movie starts promising, in pretty ordinary, casual setting. A young girl and a boy got introduced after some unknown important test where both scored extreme yet opposite results. Then, strong reactions happen upon their contacts, followed by weird events, so they cannot stay close to each other more than 1 minute. Fairly interesting indeed. Also, camera work is really good and quite artistic. Unfortunately, that's all about it. Slowly, movie takes confused and dull rather than interesting route.
Frequencies suffers from style-over-substance and trying-so-hard syndromes. There is just too much of everything. When it tries as romance movie, it fails because of general mechanic flow and "scientific" coldness. "The higher the frequency, the lower the empathy" - as main female character was described could explain that, but however, it's no excuse. Flat, emotionless movies are not good no matter the genre and lack of any sentimentality in drama and especially romance is just a failure.
Then, it tries at social commentary, with very poor results. Standard concepts of social control and mental manipulation, perhaps the social effect of modern technologies are perpetuated... but in so superficial and obnoxious manner. Basically, a social commentary just for the sake of it. Also, since government agents or whatever got introduced in the story, the movie really drags in unneeded nonsense and becomes difficult to follow.
Self-help and (anti) psychiatry themes are covered. For instance, the negative frequency of main guy "not in sync with nature" and main girl's way too high one which prevents her to "feel" can also imply mental disabilities like autism. The problem however is lack of transparency in these subjects, as it never goes beyond simple implications. Seems that atmosphere was clearly set at inoffensive and "positive", to prevent cool and "smart" tone of the movie. Possible mental disabilities got masked, characters typically presented as "genius". Minor scenes which imply autism by displaying repetitive behavior still stay neutral, in a way of some "cool" screen shots. A scene where the couple was prescribed with "dose of Mozart and Brahms" is just so damn namby-pamby and downright stupid. Even most characters were named by gifted scientists or composers (Newton, Tesla, Strauss etc.) for totally unclear and bizarre reason. Red flag for pretentiousness risen!
Oh, and that notorious aspect, the flirt with (cough!) existential philosophy. Without doubt, this is where Frequencies is at the most pretentious and where it failed to lowest. Philosophical phrases are extensively used throughout entire movie, in most laconic way imaginable. Such desperate desire to appear so intellectual is just annoying. So, philosophical catch-phrases are constantly thrown everywhere, but in fact, the initial idea of the whole movie hardly have some(if any)depth. The premise goes literally like this: there are people who emotionally cannot get together(because of their extremely opposite "frequencies"), they are not "destined" to be (add there many boring contemplations about fate, shown in the movie), some words can change that (certain tones may change "frequencies"), but these words can be also used as a tool to manipulate and control others, while certain music (like Mozart, doh!)is antidote (it brings all humans at the the same "frequency") and can unify whole mankind on subconscious level (add there that inane social commentary part)
It's perhaps interesting, but no need for some extra intelligence to realize how naïve and flawed this "theory" is. However, this "theory" is not the issue, but lack of content around that idea in the movie.
At this point, Frequencies enters New-Ageisms (Scientology?) and perhaps cyber occultism? Like a magic formulas, some meaningless words are used to manipulate people and get them instantly act. There are digital devices who generate these "magic" words. Meh, come on! The way these ideas got executed in the plot is absolutely lazy, random and stupid. Good science fiction IS based on science, but this is just childish "futuristic" fiction. There is even some device with video transmission of future events, another idea thrown in the plot for no actual reason? Oh, my
On top of all, the most horrid side are tendencies at artistic and even avant-garde. There's numerous flaws in plot, atmosphere and even acting, yet whole package fools out with faux "unconventionality". Frequencies pretends to be intelligent, but ends as mumbo jumbo. It tries as artistic movie, but ends as arty-farty one. It's often suggested as atmospheric, "visual" movie. Well, camera is classy, but it's still far from good atmospheric movie. Lynch's Eraserhead or Tarkovsky's Stalker are examples of atmospheric masterpieces - where actual story was secondary, moving at very slow pace, while visual side was primary. That sometimes seems to be the case with Frequencies. It's visually strong but only in technical terms, because unlike these two movies it cannot express anything emotional or captivating. While it's story is not that buried, it also moves in much faster pace. But, clocking at 100 minutes, Frequencies looks long-winded, like there is about 30 minutes more than needed.
So finally, the movie just died under all that mess. Near the end, I simply started to ask - what's the damn point of all this? Seems that directors were also aware that it got lost along the way. Even the closing scene with two main characters clearly ends in that fashion. Frequencies is nothing but superficial effort to be extraordinary, original, smart, artistic. Result is pretentious and faceless movie. It's blueprint of all wrong in modern art - made out of boredom, with desire to impress but nothing to express.