Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Kippur (2000)
7/10
"Every minute of silence is a great treasure to me..."
20 February 2005
Kippur (2000) Directed by Amos Gitai Starring: Liron Levo, Tomer Russo, Uri Klausner, Yoram Hattab, and Guy Amir ***1/2 out of 5 stars

Forgive me if I see the good in everything, but I believe that this Israel film, which features excruciatingly long takes and little dialogue, DOES have some deep significance. However, the long takes ARE draining, yet when you realize the purpose, it all seems to make sense.

Based on Israeli filmmaker Amos Gitai's personal experiences in the Yom Kippur war in 1973, in which Egyptian and Syrian forces attacked Israel on their holy day of Yom Kippur, "Kippur" follows a search and rescue team of four people as they travel by helicopter to different war-torn areas to find as many people alive as possible and bring them to some sort of safety and medical treatment. The film begins with two characters, Ruso (Yes, Russo) and Weinraub (Levo), who find themselves abruptly trying to get into a war. One of the characters (Ruso, I believe) is eager to get to the battlefront, proclaiming that a war has finally reached their generation and that "it is ours!". You must understand that Israel has been going through a war at least once, if not twice a decade. So, war, to the naive, inexperience individual, seems like a rite of passage.

Ruso and Weinraub, after awkwardly entering the front lines and being told to go back as shells are heard closeby, stop on the side and meet up with Gadassi (Amir), a medical officer trying to find a ride to the mission briefing. When they finally get to the battlefield to start the search and rescue, you soon find out that the film is about the death, detachment, and irrationality of war. What began as a rite of passage for the characters ended up being a strange, tortured nightmare. They go from area to area finding amputees and dead soldiers, usually unable to help all and having to leave much of the bodies on the battlefield. One torturous take follows the four characters as they try to help a soldier, who is hurt and obviously alive, out of a big field of mud. As they fall and slip, the soldier's body is thrown around, unintentionally carelessly. The frustration takes over one of the soldiers helping him as he breaks down in the middle of the mud and the doctor is going back and forth trying to calm the panicking soldier and help the injured one. When they finally make it to some other officers waiting for them to take the soldier away, he is already dead and the helplessness on the soldier's muddy faces says it all.

This film can be and will be very draining for most viewers. The long takes and the often far away framing distances ourselves from the action and you should soon learn to explore and examine what Gitai is trying to convey through the characters' stories. The film DOES build up to a briefly explosive climax, which poetically brings everything full circle for the soldiers. "Kippur" is a difficult film appropriate for its difficult subject. It is also daring, unwavering in its message, and, most importantly, truthful to the nonsense that war really is.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The 47th Annual Grammy Awards (2005 TV Special)
7/10
A Surprisingly Energetic Night
17 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The opening number definitely set the tone as the Black Eyed Peas, Gwen Stefani and Eve, Los Lonely Boys, Maroon 5 and Franz Ferdinand all performed. It culminated with all 4 (Gwen and Eve were not to be seen) performing their songs all at the same time.

Queen Latifah hosted, but she was just a transitionary tool as much was to be desired with her scripted material. So what owned the night was the performances, the production numbers and the few surprises along the way. Here are a few high notes and some other observations:

+ The 1st Ray Charles Tribute: Jamie Foxx, Alicia Keys, and Quincy Jones put on an emotional and powerful performance, which seemed to mix the classic "Georgia" with another song I am not familiar with. Favorite part: "Oh...Alicia!" Only minus: it was only 2 minutes or so long. +Prince beating Usher. Serves him right. Heck I like Usher's songs, but he has gotten way too arrogant. +Usher's performance...yes, he's arrogant and he doesn't have the best voice, but those dance moves with James Brown kept the energy up. Favorite part: the Trampoline. +Kanye West's performance...ambitious and well-conceived. +John Mayer's wins...2 for 2 and Song of the Year! Wow... -J LO and Marc Anthony...supposedly there was hype behind this performance, but I couldn't tell. -The Southern Rock tribute which followed...I don't know, but a friend of mine was disgusted by the fact that neither Freebird nor Sweet Home Alabama featured the solos which they are famous for. -----(yes 5 minuses) the Tsunami Relief performance...all for a good cause, but it was a huge disaster. None of them came out on the good end of the singing stick.

Despite the nice surprises, the Grammys ended up playing conservative in the end. It would have been nice to see Kanye West or the other nominees for Record and Album of the year to win, but when a musical legend like Ray Charles dies, it's hard to ignore the temptation to honor his departing gift to the industry.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Phantom fails miserably
20 January 2005
THE PHANTOM OF THE OPERA Starring: Gerard Butler, Emmy Rossum, Patrick Wilson, Miranda Richarson and Minnie Driver Directed by Joel Schumacher Rating: ACTUALLY.... 1/2 star out of 5

By the looks of things, this film has it all. But, as the movie progresses, we find that everything is a mask and nothing is revealed. Nothing. What looks like a promising journey into the recesses of a tortured soul's mind becomes a dull, overwrought version of the famed Broadway Musical.

Any fans of the musical will probably be disappointed, but as a person who has not had the pleasure of seeing the Phantom on stage, I have to say that Joel Schumacher's rendition fails on its own merits. The film fails to make anyone care about any of the characters and totally relies, too much so, on the famous moments, iconography and 2 songs (about a good majority of the singing plays off the melodies of "Music of the Night" and the song that goes "The Phannnnnnntom of the opera is there...inside your mind"). By the time the other song sequence comes, you really don't care.

It's a shame because I can see so much potential in a film adaptation of The Phantom of the Opera. Yet, Joel Schumacher's upends any potential with a strong emphasis on Art Direction, which is quite some beautiful eye candy. However, the emotions are lacking in every aspect because we do not believe any of the character's actions. The Phantom (Butler) is made to be such an ass and not much more (hell, why is he hidden away with such a beautiful half face??? the other half wasn't that scarred and he could wear that mask and still live, right?), Christine (Rossum, who glows a bit) is made to be torn between two different loves when there really is no reason to, and Raoul (Wilson, who is as unbelievable as his hair) is made to be a hero when he is also an ass and a very dumb one at that. There are no true motivations within any of the characters' actions or the story's contrivances. One especially non-sensical moment comes at the end when a character brings an old music box as a gesture to another character. This action presents two problems 1)How does this guy know about the music box? Forget if there's an explanation in the musical or book, there is none in the movie. 2)Why would he think it would be such a great gesture to the other character? Again, nothing in the movie makes us believe this character would think this was at all a grand idea.

The only positives are the colorful and crisp art direction and cinematography and Minnie Driver, whose character, though she does not appear in many scenes, is welcomed as hilarious moments of enjoyment in between a big pile of fluff. Some people might enjoy the fact they recognized references to both the musical and the book, but Schumacher does a very poor job of creating a cohesive, significant, and emotionally satisfying work. What remains is beauty without meaning, craft without art, a film without resonance.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed