Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire (TV Mini Series) The Fall of Rome (2006) User Reviews

the role of the barbarians

[georgioskarpouzas · 7/10 · 6 May 2007]

There is a dispute among the historians of the late empire whether the barbarians invigorated or destroyed the empire.This episode paints a positive picture of the Goths, mainly their leader Alaric who appears as a keen politician and an honourable man betrayed by the the weakling Onorious, Roman Emperor, prey himself to scheming courtiers and vindictive former Goths who have been romanized. This depiction applies specifically to the Goths who appear as manipulated refugees seeking a homeland that has been promised to them.Other barbarians do not receive such good press but neither appear in this episode.Recent books do not accept such a mild consideration of barbarian intrusion in Roman soil. But it is still a plausible interpretation well dramatized.

Noble Barbarians vs. Arrogant Romans. Never Seen that Before...

[ArchStanton1862 · 8/10 · 5 April 2011]

This episode is literally about the fall of Rome. Not the fall of the empire mind you. That continued on for another 60 years in the west and thousand in the east. This is the sack of Rome by the Goth Alaric. A major event in Roman history which I'm quite sure has never been filmed before. This is really what the series should be doing, exploring the bits of Roman history that no one else covers. The best episodes are the ones that aren't retreading the tired old emperors and generals.

I'm not sure why, but after three episodes they bring the freeze-frame introductions again. Maybe the same crew was involved. They make Alaric out to be far too nice. Somehow having nice-guy Romans is politically incorrect, but nice-guy barbarians are just fine. The situation has been simplified almost beyond recognition. The real Alaric was an amoral general who was out for himself. The men surrounding him were all soldiers. He was not king of all the Goths, he was king of one group of Goths. A very successful king, but king of a sub-group nonetheless. They weren't simple farmers and families out looking for land. Certainly he wanted land to live on, but they were warriors and they were expected to fight in exchange for it. And Alaric and Stilicho weren't all chummy like they're shown here. Stilicho led several campaigns against Alaric in an effort to drive him off Roman lands. When he did offer him land it wasn't a benign gesture. It was an exchange for military service. Alaric would serve Stilicho and Stilicho would pay them by settling them on land. Also, the uprising against the barbarians wasn't just some mindless, bigoted gesture against foreigners (although it was stupid), it was a reaction about the number of barbarians being used in the army. Currently about 1/3 of the Western army was barbarian, a dangerous situation when Rome needed to use its army to defend itself against those very people. At any rate, they capture his reluctance to sack Rome and his failed negotiations with Honorius just right. Basically, all the facts are right, they've just got the context wrong.

It's still a fairly entertaining episode. And it is always nice to see the barbarian invasions on screen. The only other time I've seen that is in Attila. It just seems like it could have done more.

a challenge

[Kirpianuscus · 9 August 2020]

A chain of mistakes, good intentions and absence of the imperial autorithy. Beautiful portrait of Alaric and inspired sketch of the fall of Roman empire. An episode about people not events, well crafted for create a good conclusion of the viewer. A challenge and the premises of fundamental change of a world.