Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire: Season 1, Episode 6

The Fall of Rome (26 Oct. 2006)

TV Episode  -   -  Drama | History
7.1
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.1/10 from 55 users  
Reviews: 2 user | 1 critic

How the greatest empire gained a useless emperor, how the barbarians destroyed the foundations of city... How Rome fell, because of one fatal mistake.

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

Editors' Spotlight

Leonard Nimoy: 1931-2015

Best known for his work on "Star Trek," actor and director Leonard Nimoy died on Friday in Los Angeles. Read our full story on his varied career, and view our memorial photo gallery.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 388 titles
created 26 Jan 2012
 
a list of 10000 titles
created 07 Nov 2012
 
a list of 213 titles
created 10 months ago
 
a list of 48 titles
created 6 months ago
 

Related Items

Search for "The Fall of Rome" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: The Fall of Rome (26 Oct 2006)

The Fall of Rome (26 Oct 2006) on IMDb 7.1/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Ancient Rome: The Rise and Fall of an Empire.
« Previous Episode | 6 of 6 Episodes
Edit

Cast

Episode credited cast:
...
Olympius
...
Mark Lockyer ...
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
...
Honorius
Natasha Barrero ...
Colin Heber-Percy ...
Stiticho
...
Jovius (as Phillip Jackson)
Karl Jenkinson ...
Sarus
Simon Kunz ...
Ian Lindsay ...
Paul Mooney ...
Emissary
Sabina Netherclift ...
Goth woman
Lyall B. Watson ...
Andrew Westfield ...
Berig
Edit

Storyline

Under emperor Honorius Rome was still the nominal, eponymous capital, but his seat of government was the palace in Ravenna, an Adriatic port closer to the borders under constant threat as irresistible attacks from the east by nomadic peoples like the Huns caused a chain-reaction of westward migrations, forcing people like the Goths (who lived by the Black Sea) to invade the Roman imperial territory. Stilicho had allowed them to live there, but after his disgrace and execution on the instigation of Olympius, the new imperial chief councilor, all 'barbarians' were slaughtered or fled to such remote regions as the mountainous central European province of Noricum, where the Goths await the final assignation of land they were promised; when king Alaric realizes that is no longer Honorius' intent, he decides not to attack his naturally sheltered residence in Ravenna, but to lay siege to Rome itself, no longer properly defended as the imperial army is overstretched by rebellion in Gaul and ... Written by KGF Vissers

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Drama | History

Edit

Details

Language:

Release Date:

26 October 2006 (UK)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Noble Barbarians vs. Arrogant Romans. Never Seen that Before...
5 April 2011 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

This episode is literally about the fall of Rome. Not the fall of the empire mind you. That continued on for another 60 years in the west and thousand in the east. This is the sack of Rome by the Goth Alaric. A major event in Roman history which I'm quite sure has never been filmed before. This is really what the series should be doing, exploring the bits of Roman history that no one else covers. The best episodes are the ones that aren't retreading the tired old emperors and generals.

I'm not sure why, but after three episodes they bring the freeze-frame introductions again. Maybe the same crew was involved. They make Alaric out to be far too nice. Somehow having nice-guy Romans is politically incorrect, but nice-guy barbarians are just fine. The situation has been simplified almost beyond recognition. The real Alaric was an amoral general who was out for himself. The men surrounding him were all soldiers. He was not king of all the Goths, he was king of one group of Goths. A very successful king, but king of a sub-group nonetheless. They weren't simple farmers and families out looking for land. Certainly he wanted land to live on, but they were warriors and they were expected to fight in exchange for it. And Alaric and Stilicho weren't all chummy like they're shown here. Stilicho led several campaigns against Alaric in an effort to drive him off Roman lands. When he did offer him land it wasn't a benign gesture. It was an exchange for military service. Alaric would serve Stilicho and Stilicho would pay them by settling them on land. Also, the uprising against the barbarians wasn't just some mindless, bigoted gesture against foreigners (although it was stupid), it was a reaction about the number of barbarians being used in the army. Currently about 1/3 of the Western army was barbarian, a dangerous situation when Rome needed to use its army to defend itself against those very people. At any rate, they capture his reluctance to sack Rome and his failed negotiations with Honorius just right. Basically, all the facts are right, they've just got the context wrong.

It's still a fairly entertaining episode. And it is always nice to see the barbarian invasions on screen. The only other time I've seen that is in Attila. It just seems like it could have done more.


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Chronological order? Ryuujin2
DVD release? darkrosetiger
And the 4th episode! Owinterwlf
I can't believe so many are dissing this show rock_bustin
Ancient Rome V Rome (HBO Series) - Which is better? rickyboy101
3rd Episode Owinterwlf
Discuss The Fall of Rome (2006) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?