Anaconda 3: Offspring (2008 TV Movie)
1/10
Sci- Fi does it again
13 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Seriously, anyone that thinks this hunk of garbage is even a decent movie has the lowest standards on the planet! The first Anaconda was the only good one. It had everything, decent cast, great acting(Mostly Jon Voight, perfect setting, awesome animatronics, and the snake actually looked like a real Green Anaconda! Plus it has suspense which The Hunt For Blood Orchid and this butt leakage sorely lacks.

If you're going to call a movie "Anaconda" and it's supposed to be about a giant ANACONDA eating people, doesn't it make sense to have the snake look like an ANACONDA?! Even with CGI, they still can't make a decent snake! The ones in the second film looked almost like really big elapids(cobras, mambas, etc), and the ones in this movie look like damn vipers! I swear I saw one scene in which the snake actually had fangs! And not only that, but this film is a rip-off of the Python movies, which are rip-offs of the first Anaconda! The snake is genetically modified instead of being a natural animal, the snake is oddly intelligent, it stares down its prey like it recognizes them, and it impales people with its tail more often than it constricts them. ALL of these are staples of the Python movies.

The only decent actor in this entire film was Hasselhoff, and that statement itself should tell you how bad it is.

Characters suck, effects suck, CGI sucks, snakes suck, weapons suck, cast sucks, acting sucks, and the plot sucks. Add all this up and you get another Sci-fi channel original suckfest that's not original at all. Really, how sad is it when a movie has to rip-off movies that are already rip-offs? Well, it gets a lot sadder when the rip-off of the rip-offs is the next installment of the series that started the whole damn thing! Anaconda III: more proof that Sci-Fi channel makes the worst horror flicks.
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed