8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
One Day (2011)
7/10
One Great Day
14 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
A wonderfully well-crafted film that spans a lifetime for its two main protagonists (the tagline isn't ''twenty years, two people'' for nothing; although, technically it is eighteen years. And, in reality, a few extra years are thrown in as the movie was released in 2011, the main story takes place between 1988 and 2006 but does reach 2011, too... Just saying...) - this ''One Day'' has been grossly undervalued by both film critics and moviegoers alike.

Anne Hathaway is splendid, as usual - her role here is central, as it should be, and the English accent she uses here is so close to genuine *this* is the role she should have won an Oscar for - not Les Misérables avec faux accent Français! (Even though a French accent is easier to fake than an English one - right, Anne? Which is doubly ironic here when you know that the original ''Anne Hathaway'' was actually Shakespeare's wife!) Granted, many were the critics that actually said that her Yorkshire accent in this one was inconsistent at best; but those are just technicalities, I say!

Her co-star is a genuine Brit: Jim Sturgess. He becomes increasingly credible in his role as the movie progresses: but that is due, alas, to the fact that he is a most unlikable character throughout three-quarters of this. Not his fault: it's the way he was written! David Nicholls adapted his own novel that spanned decades in the lives of its two central characters, two characters who love each other but aren't sure they do, most of that time... They do wind up married at one point - but there is no happy ending here. Enough said about that. Nicholls digs out many cultural hallmarks in the movie that he could barely use to full effect in the novel: one character handles a copy of the Watchmen trade paperback, specific songs play throughout the film, pinpointing to greater effect each new era evoked. The one thing perhaps deplorable in all this: the character's names seem to be evoking TV icons of two very different eras: two that don't belong together at all! Hathaway's Emma (Peel - of the Avengers: hey, she was Catwoman too, afterwards, so why not tackle that part as well, indeed?) and Sturgess' Dexter (he might have been less obnoxious here if he had been a serial killer too!) - they might be Nicholls' favorite TV memories, distant and recent, but why bring them together in this totally different setting? But I know, David: as an author, sometimes the most difficult thing is not ''finding the suitable ending'' but quite simply christening your main characters appropriately...! I sympathize!

Of note is the cameo here by one Matt Berry (The Third!) of either I.T. Crowd fame or London Dungeon renown - your pick! Matt is always amusing everywhere he appears and, here, as the bearer of bad news for Jim's character (again, I prefer Jim to Dexter) he transforms what would have been an uneventful scene into something much more than that... Great job, Matt; true to form.

One Day met with stiff reviews and so-so performances in box-offices worldwide: it was not a complete flop, but it was far from being the success it could, perhaps should have been. It is a touching tale of unrequited or, more precisely, uneven love: basically, she loves more than he does. Time passes. He realizes his (many) errors: and there is still time for them, however...

Watch it and make abstraction of all the annoyances (fake accents, odd choices for time capsules, obnoxious male lead) - and you will appreciate this overall effort, essentially due to the original tale, which comes from the novel's main plot. Schefig is a great director, too. Her director of photography here, Delhomme, made both London and Paris look better than they have looked, lately... And the music by Rachel Portman eclipses anything Hans Zimmer has ever done or will ever do - no, really!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zardoz (1974)
7/10
John Boorman's Best!
11 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
If one makes obvious abstraction of Excalibur, Hope And Glory and Journey Into Light (another ''totally different'' kind of production - and a documentary too) this is, for my money, Boorman's very best. Definitely his most experimental. And most certainly his most lyrical film ever.

Never mind the awkward explorations of human sexuality throughout the movie - and you can dismiss even the explanation of the mysterious name of ''Zardoz'' which has fascinated some but was only an amusing twist for me personally - it truly is the scope of all this that matters and it only becomes evident in the very end, as Sean Connery and Charlotte Rampling share the screen in one of the most poignant and spectacular time-spanning sequences ever shot: one that, quite effectively indeed, summarizes the lot of humankind since the dawn of time.

Far above merely experimental, this movie is one for the ages for it makes you reflect on everything we know about the human race. Simply look beyond the ''peace and love'' imagery and other anachronisms (which are, admittedly, plentiful in this one) and you will grasp what the true message, that lies beneath all that, truly is - and that will make you side with my view of things here and declare that this is, really, not only Boorman's best but one of the greatest movies of all time.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Avengers (2012)
6/10
We've All Seen This Film Before...
10 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Only in excess of 1,400 reviews of this so far - what could possibly be added at this point? It is obvious that the comic-book readers (and nostalgics, of which I could have still been, maybe ten years ago) were more than elated to see all of their favorite four-color heroes in live action together, all at once, sharing the big screen as if a Marvel comic came to life and had, very nearly, no budget restrictions whatsoever.

But seriously - Loki? In the 1960's Thor comics, maybe, he was still a villain one could love to loathe. But nowadays? Neither the character nor the actor portraying him (poor guy) were remotely interesting.

The army at his disposal was made up of some sort of third-rate alien race that, ironically enough, evoked some of rival DC's aliens from their INVASION crossover event back in the 90's (because they couldn't use the Skrulls - right? If those show up anywhere, it will be in a Fantastic Four movie! How amusing to see the Marvel universe split up that way - due to their overzealous ambition to expand their properties' share of the movie industry! It is truly priceless! And more so with the odd choice for replacements here...)

Much has been said about turning Nick Fury into Ebony Fury: personally, I think it improved the rather bland, James Bond wannabe type that the character was for several decades following his introduction in the comic-bookies... However, Samuel L. Jackson is not half the actor Lawrence Fishburne is: the latter could pull off Morpheus but the former is simply not convincing as Shaft, Mace Windu, Agent Augustus in the XxX movies (which naturally prepared him for this one here) and, truth be told, he must be taking this part about as seriously as his role in Snakes On A Plane...

And as for the Avengers themselves - aside from the extremely convincing Hulk (and customized too, in order to look more like human thespian counterpart Mark Ruffalo - I am sure Edward Norton and Eric Bana were so green with envy - not.) and the ever-solid Robert Downey Jr as Iron Man (he truly made this character his own) the rest is somewhat disappointing as Thor has still not grown on me, Captain America seems ill-served by Chris Evans' acting range and Hawkeye... Well, anyone could have played Hawkeye.

The single most disappointing character has to be Scarlett's Black Widow: I mean, wow, that line-delivery and lack of expressiveness is worthy of a Razzie or two - come on! Especially that line amidst the big battle in New York - ''I don't see how that can be a party'' was it? (I paraphrase!) Even Kristen Stewart could not have been this bad!

S.H.I.E.L.D. leaves me uninterested flat out, as well it should. It had ''future TV series spin-off'' written all over it; that must be why!

Now, it took me only a few seconds to figure out why all of this looked so damn familiar, as if I'd seen this movie before: and I sure did! The gathering of characters everyone knows, their peril aboard a ship and then the big battle with a common foe - the exact same plot was seen a few years ago in... LXG! That's right: the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, the movie Warner Bros. approved because it was cheaper to produce than a full-fledged (JUSTICE) LEAGUE movie! And these Avengers were still a long way from assembling, back then...!

So, why was the LXG so poorly received - and the Avengers praised? The LXG had a better, more iconic ship than the S.H.I.E.L.D.'s whatever it's called - it was the NAUTILUS! The LXG had a better action gal too in Peta Wilson! The LXG had one of the original action stars - Sean Connery himself! I'm sorry but, no matter how much I appreciate him, Robert Downey Jr. doesn't quite measure up to the original James Bond! And it only stands to reason too as the LXG gathered up classic literature characters rather than super-heroes who all have, collectively or individually, less than 100 years of history and yet the need to constantly revamp their mystique is already felt. Perhaps it is due to the fact that they lack originality? The Hulk is, after all, nothing but a rip-off of Mister Hyde. Thor was borrowed from Norse mythology - and modified. Hawkeye wants to be Robin Hood with an attitude. Need I go on?

The Avengers were only more anticipated and (considerably) more well- received because the target audience was primed and ready for it: they read these heroes' stories in their childhood and had wanted this for so long. That simply wasn't the case for the LXG; the kids who read those and viewed them in the same light are all dead of old age already.

For my money, the LXG had the better script - and more believable action. The Avengers' lone long action sequence is truly the only lasting impression one is left with with this over-hyped production - and I had seen it on YouTube before I got to see the film in its entirety! That doesn't say much for the rest of this Marvelfest - does it?

And, quite frankly, Thanos looks ridiculous too. But they have time to improve him a bit for Avengers 2 (Although with Batista as Drax The Destroyer, how hokey will the overall finished product get to be...?)
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aquaman (2006 TV Movie)
8/10
Probably the greatest unsung pilot ever
10 May 2013
This one could not have been better than it was: the rather short but costly to produce pilot episode for a proposed ''Mercy Reef'' series (quickly renamed Aquaman, when it went on sale on iTunes - the title it always should have had) was intriguing, well-done, full of interesting sub-plots involving a wide-array of solid supporting characters. This was truly considerably better than, say - the Smallville pilot? Or that most recent pilot they gave Mr. Moulton's creation, with Adrianne Palicki in the lead role... Yes, the same Adrianne who plays a Siren in this great pilot right here! Yes, folks, believe it: the Aquaman pilot undeniably was better than those two other pilots - one officially a failed one while the other begat a drawn-out series that probably ran for way too long as it was... (Just ask Tom Welling!)

Justin Hartley is Aquaman - much moreso than the cool guy who portrayed the role first and subsequently in various Smallville episodes. It is sad to see so many uninformed individuals nowadays claim that the Justin Hartley Aquaman footage they stumble upon on YouTube, for instance, is ''fake'' and that he only ever was Green Arrow on that other show - well, no, he was not! He was Aquaman first and this show was a GO until the merger that gave birth to the CW network made it impossible (although the real reason was budget concerns for each episode, if it was to continue forth. Yes, the haters will find it impossible to believe it, but this pilot here was indeed one of the most expensive to have ever been produced, ALL-TIME! If it had been as cheap to produce as The Big Bang Theory, Entourage or, indeed, the first five seasons of Smallville, AQUAMAN would have been ongoing - but under the more poetic title of ''Mercy Reef'' most certainly...)

It is ironic to note that Justin was replacing the first choice for the part here -I forget his name, sorry- and that, later on, he also got ditched for the part of Arrow when Smallville ended and Arrow spun-off into his own series - a cheap one to produce, you've guessed it, which is why it is still going as we post this here. Thus, now, neither role is officially ''his'' in many people's minds - as even Aquaman became that guy from American Idol's exclusive part, and it was him (Alan Ritchson - now I remember this one's name - alas) delivering the most profound lines written for the character of Aquaman but also for any super-hero on television - ever (veritable sermons about the significance of being a hero in today's world, what it means to the masses and well-being of the entire planet; Arthur Curry was effectively teaching the wet-behind-the-ears Clark Kent how to act... Super!) and it was all through Alan Ritchson's mouth, not Justin's.

People also marvel at the fact that Ving Rhames refused to be a part of another Mission Impossible fiasco - but accepted the part of Aquaman's mentor in this (at the time, sure-to-be ongoing) series. Why marvel at this when it is obvious that Ving had a better role in this one than he ever would have had playing second fiddle to Cruise? The dynamic between young AQ and McCaffery here was producing excellent dialogue and it would have been far greater than what we had seen going on between Jonathan ''Duke of Hazzard'' Kent and Clark: alas, we will never see the rest of it now.

Lou Diamond Philips' participation was also stunning quite a few - for no reason, too. After all, the Man From Atlantis himself was interested in the part of Aquaman's adoptive father: Patrick Duffy had been quoted saying that he very much loved the whole ''wink- wink'' aspect of the thing, in an interview given to TV Guide. They couldn't work it out contractually, that's all - so Lou stepped in and was immediately seen anchoring a solid supporting cast here that included many recognizable faces, most notably Daniela Wolters (now Deutscher) as Atlanna, Aquaman's mother, and Rick Peters as Agent Brigman - sort of a cross between Fox Mulder and some sort of precursor to... Agent Coulson? (See why I waited so long to review this - hindsight is always 20/20!)

The pilot's storyline itself is much more than the summary blurb says here, too: there is considerably more going on than just a young Florida Keys dude finding out he can breathe underwater! In fact, the story set up here would have made for several seasons of great adventure, as it incorporated elements of mystery, supernatural, mythology and more! Aquaman is, after all, not a mere super-hero but much more than that: through his links to the sea and Atlantis, he immediately becomes a larger-than-life force of nature, modern mythology personified at its best especially in these times of ecological concerns. Most so-called ''fans'' fail to see that - and that is just so sad. Thankfully, the pilot's writing team were not so blind and they cooked up a fascinating plot involving the Bermuda Triangle, Atlantis, a bit of an X-Files feel to it, mythological creatures waiting in tow (for sure - one shows up here and she was but the first emissary) and then we have a young Arthur Curry discovering his true nature and awesome heritage.

This would have been a great TV series - and we can easily call it the greatest genre TV series that never was, beyond ONE SINGLE EPISODE...

Buy it on iTunes! (I'm sure it's still there!)

And see you when this gets revived as... a major motion picture (but James Cameron needs not bother to volunteer to direct; nor should Marky Mark bother to audition for the part!)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A gem of animation - and storytelling
19 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Director Martin Rosen's second animated film, based upon the novel by Richard Adams, proves that he is a master of the genre. Like his preceding effort, *The Plague Dogs* belongs to that category of animation that is definitively the diametrical opposite of what studios such as Disney or Pixar dish out every time. For, just like *Watership Down* before it, *The Plague Dogs* is all about a grimy and sad reality - and everything that comes with that. It comes a step further than that, even. The two title characters, Rowf and Snitter, couldn't be further from the Lady, the Tramp and other feel-good cartoony loons of their ilk... For this is a tale that could very well have happened, up to a certain degree, unlike those recounted in 1001 other pieces of animations intended for children and a family audience - something that The Plague Dogs is definitely not, as you've already understood.

The story, in brief: these two dogs escape from a laboratory where they were destined to be guinea pigs - or already were. Their escape is not the solution to all aspects of their plight, however, as the world outside is most unwelcoming and of course -one would expect it but not two innocent dogs- they will soon be tracked down for recapture or elimination. Along the way they befriend a fox and all three soon meet their destiny - but not as we would expect it.

This is a film unlike any other, almost - for even *Watership Down* will appear to be an upbeat thingie in comparison (and it sure wasn't Bugs Bunny either!) The fact is that Rosen carries through with the original story and does not try to deter from it, nor to embellish things or, Heaven Forbid, tack on a happy ending à-la-Disney. The film suffered immensely from this in terms of marketability, of course - being neither a children's film nor something that appealed to a mature audience, it is indeed stuck in some limbo in-between these two poles. This film does have a happy ending though - the only one it could have had and, to me, it is the most beautiful and poetic thing ever on film. Not to appreciate it would either imply that your heart is made of stone or that you have no perception beyond the material state of things - and, in either case, it would make you a sadder story than *The Plague Dogs* were themselves.

Many parents introduce their children to the ''real world'' via intelligent pieces of fiction especially crafted for them: tales such as *Charlotte's Web* and *Watership Down* - I suggest to add *The Plague Dogs* to the list too; but only when they are mature enough to view it, and learn from its lessons. And only when you are ready and willing to learn along, too.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Prequel Before Prequels Were Really In
8 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
James Olson gives the performance of a lifetime in this underrated film that is, ultimately, about self-sacrifice as well as the ongoing battle between good and evil. When we term ''good and evil'' here it is, of course, the purest of goods (Christianity's vision of God) versus the foulest and darkest of evils - the devil. And Olson's character is the priest fighting the good fight; in a much more involved way than even those in The Exorcist. It is undeniable that this movie owes a lot to the latter, its predecessor in this genre that pretty much set the standards for this sort of thing. However, here, in great part due to Olson's performance, we get to truly feel for the character of the priest and we truly admire the sacrifice that he makes in the end (we warned you about spoilers - didn't you? However, you should have seen this one coming from a mile away...) Let us simply put it this way: after seeing this film, you will not think of priests as cowardly, frail dudes in frocks anymore!

Jack Magner (not to be confused with Jack Wagner nor with Michael O'Keefe, whom he resembles considerably more) is equally impressive in the role of the possessed boy that started the entire Amityville legend. His performance evokes that of Andrew Stevens in *The Fury* but is ten times more believable than that due to various factors that would take too much time to elaborate here. Suffice it to say, this is a frighteningly convincing case of possession, if you suspend your disbelief for a second and ignore the few technical flaws, here and there, throughout this film which is, overall, extremely adequate and effective.

Cast member Rutanya Alda (who was also in The Fury, incidentally) glows in the few minutes of screen time that she has. Most viewers will recognize only one other cast member though: Burt Young, famous for his supporting role in the Rocky movies.

There have been a number of films made about demonic possession in the last few years in Hollywood - none were as scary and well-done as this one is in its simplicity and straight-forwardness. This is much more than some scary fare to watch on Halloween night: don't be fooled by the programmers over at specialty channels such as Space The Imagination Station - they actually lack imagination there.

This film is *The French Connection* of horror films.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rest this case...
20 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
One had to expect only the most memorable results from an association between Taurus Films and Warner Bros. - and as much as I disagree with many elements of the end product, 1997's The Devil's Advocate certainly is that; memorable...

I lament the fact, though, that, just like quite a few other similar offerings out there, it offered only the most violent and repulsive resolution as possible means of triumph over evil. I guess that they catered to the most obvious common denominator in doing so, and since almost everyone out there would take the easy way out if they were faced with the Adversary himself, they thought that it was the way "to go" - literally... Almost everyone out there is self-loathing to the extreme, so double the reason right there to go this route, I suppose? Tinseltown thinks these things through, you know! And it certainly the way they are in that town - is it not?

Neiderman's novel, which served as the basis for this one, was itself inspired by various other opuses, it is evident, as the movie itself is reminiscent of previous fare in this very same genre as well... Disappointing, as is the choice of first name for the actual advocate here...! But that is another matter, a trifle less important as it is not universal...

The devil's DAUGHTER here, though, is a true and true temptress... No disappointment there! The character delivered on all fronts, as did the actress chosen for that, one must admit, key part.

Not one but TWO suicides mar "The Devil's Advocate" and its lesson about VANITY - first, the poor MaryAnn, portrayed magnificently by Charlize Theron (between this and being "The Astronaut's Wife", she really doesn't know how to pick'em! May have been why she turned into a Monster afterwards...?) And then the title character himself (it still feels awful to call any lead character "Kevin" - let's say Keanu instead! Darn - that sounds odd too... Not as much though! At least, this isn't a Bill & Ted feature... *Whew*!)

The real problem is entirely another, however: for it is not quite acceptable to wipe everything off at the end either, to still have the mandatory "happy ending" - complete with EVIL STILL LURKS AND IS MOST DEFINITELY NOT DEFEATED AT ALL after-taste. This, after TWO GRUESOME SUICIDE SCENES? At least, "Fallen" was not so hypocritical and stuck with its "very unhappy ending" - for pure logic's sake! Both films err in the same manner though - to pretend that the only way to elude an opponent such as the ultimate Adversary is through auto-destruction and nothing else is simply the WRONG MESSAGE TO SEND... Is there truly no other way to battle the devil in Tinseltown? In real life there are plenty: crucifixes, holy water, prayer! Alas, none of these are regular props in these flicks... not anymore! The days of The Exorcist and Hammer Films are long gone - crucifixes used to be worth something, back then!

Hollywood has to be more careful with this sort of thing, one figures, for they seem not to want to spread such things as "piousness" and "faith" nowadays...! We dare not offend nor alienate all the other beliefs, these days...! As it is already the case, only the sun will destroy vampires for instance - lest we make them vulnerable to ALL symbols of ALL religions, we make them invulnerable to all and do not even broach the subject anymore! Alas, the first bloodsucker, Dracula and everyone of the same ilk that has followed were NOT vulnerable to the sunlight but were vulnerable to other things... Guess what it was now! This is not the biggest problem here, again: the end solution is.

No heroes should simply escape the conflict by blowing themselves up... Prototypical action heroes do not do it - why should anyone who has to deal with the devil itself resort to this ultimate tactic?

I know that I lauded Al Pacino's performance in Carlito's Way and in many other films - but, here, I shall remain silent about his histrionics as "the devil"... He seemed to enjoy it; that is for sure.

It is amusing though to note that both "Fallen" and "The Devil's Advocate" (as also "Interview With A Vampire", of course) had a Rolling Stones song playing as they finally rolled the end credits... Sexagenarian, sex-obsessed rock'n'rollers who are STILL going strong; they must have indeed struck a deal with the devil (but they're not vampires - no) - hence the music fits on more than one level here! Again, the after-taste is just a tad bitter to swallow...
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mediterraneo (1991)
8/10
Wonderful cinematography & philosophy - highly recommended
20 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The message at the end of this film states that it is dedicated "to all of those who are running away" - as at least three of the main characters in the film ultimately do. As such, it could not be greater escapism for all of us watching; the only way would be to travel to Greece ourselves!

Mediterraneo is one of those films that can only make its audience think, laugh, reflect on deeper questions despite the fact that the actual storyline therein is quite simplistic indeed. A number of Italian soldiers, stranded on a Greek island, miss out on the end of World War II - such is the premise here and, just like that, this could have been quite the run-of-the-mill umpteenth boring war film, if done in a certain more marketable way... But it was done the European way: exploring the thoughts, aspirations, even a hint of the souls of these soldiers, rather than their militaristic exploits. And it was done in a lyrical way, even, I dare say! This movie delves into what every single soldier truly aspires to, even in the midst of war - and that is peace and love of course. And where better than a paradisaical Greek island to find such a thing, hmm?

Even if time does not allow for much exploration, the ensemble cast is well-defined and each soldier is given such endearing personality traits through the characters as they were written as much as through the fine performances by each and everyone in the cast. They are funny, witty and oh-so-Italiano, while the ladies they meet on the island are voluptuous and strong, and oh-so-Greek too...! Beyond boundaries and borders, we are all the same and this film underlines that in many ways.

There is another phrase that will stay with you after all this, if you are either nationality or belong to any other in the vicinity of the Mediterranean sea; and it is "one race, one face." Or the later, amusing version of it, as the second-in-command makes it up as he is indulging in all the good food that is so plentiful there: "one race, one stomach."

The scenery is stunning, the music is haunting - I cannot say enough (or more than has already been said) about the intrinsic qualities of this production. It is a feast for all the sense - and for the soul as well.

Above all, the entire exercise reminds us of this, too: life is so short. Enjoy it while you can. Find that place where you can finally stop running away.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed