I usually trust critics to have a better idea of a movies quality than random viewers, but they are wrong about this movie.
It makes me wonder how many of these negative critics are personally offended by the depiction of certain elites within this movie. Silicon Valley tech bros are a primary antagonist in this movie, and I wouldn't doubt if many of these privileged critics fit firmly within those circles; whether as tech reviewers or delusional futurists. Or maybe they didn't like the depiction of media figures in this movie, who tried to both-sides their way out of controversy.
It has been claimed that this movie is yet another liberal bashing of the common man, claiming they are too stupid to get serious about the impending disaster... but that doesn't happen in this movie.
The movie focuses primarily on Washington, Media, and Silicon Valley elites. The common man is fed misinformation, both sides drivel, bogus tech solutions, and broken promises from "patriotic" politicians. Just like in real life, the common man is distracted and divided by the elite class.
This movie likely would have gotten better critic reviews if it was smug; if it spent an undeserving amount of time on idiotic Qanon types who have no agency in the first place, or if the only antagonist was the Trump-esque president and her Fail-son.
Ask any Climate Scientist how familiar this movie feels and they'll tell you it's the most accurate depiction of their struggles to date. Not only having to deal with inept, self serving politicians, but having to bite their teeth while Big Tech Grifters capitalize off the disaster with band-aid fixes and the media tries to get "both sides" of the story.
I don't know what compelled reviewers to project their own smugness onto this movie, and I don't think the movie is perfect either, but it deserves better than this.
4 out of 6 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends