Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Smokers (2000)
Yikes!
18 February 2002
Warning: Spoilers
**contains spoilers**

This movie COULD have been something... it could have been one of those teen-angsty guilty pleasure movies that are totally bad, but fun to watch (like "Crime and Punishment in Suburbia", "Ginger Snaps", or "Girl", which also stars Dominique Swain...perhaps she's fast becoming the queen of bad teen B-movies?). Anyway, the premise is allright: it's shocking, sure, but it's supposed to be. Three private school stoner-girls decide that they are tired of feeling vulnerable and "hunted" by men; in order to put men in the same position, they decide to meet one prize specimin on the sly and have sex with him at gunpoint. Their plan doesn't really work, for obvious reasons (the guy's too "scared" to perform), but when word gets out that he was almost raped, his jerk-o guy friends are (naturally!) not worried, but turned on. Now, three girls trying to "rape" men and falsely empower themselves (in order to rid themselves of the vulnerablity all women feel) might have been interesting to watch...but after the initial group hold-up the movie divovles into about a dozen different story lines, none of which make sense whatsoever. One girl mopes around after her distant boyfriend. Another girl--the loose cannon--starts to obsess about the gun. The main girl flirts back and forth between a gay musician (the scene in the bar, where the lipsyncing by the musician is SO obvious, is truly priceless) and her child-hood best friend, the class dork who got suddenly studly during senior year. This goes on for awhile...things gets boring and convoluted. What happened to the girls Revolution? The big gang activity I was promised? It never really enters into the picture again as I was faced with some of the worst acting and writing I've seen in a loooong time. "Jeremy" the good-boy friend of Jefferson, the main character, is one of the worst actors I've ever seen! In his eyes you can see the moments where he is quietly begging the director to hold his hand. Plus, the girls always seem to wear some kind of weird Joker-like makeup. WHY? Is this supposed to make them look wild? But none of this badness can top the ending....which is one of the most poorly edited, confusing scenes ever filmed. It goes like this: Jefferson goes into the dorm bathroom to set off the smoke alarm with her lighter. Oops! She suddenly falls and we see a curtain catch on fire! A curtain in a bathroom?? It could have been a shower curtain..but even so, what else is there to burn. All I saw was tile. It doesn't matter, because the next thing we see is the bathroom in flames! Jefferson is screaming, and rips off her dress (was it burning? huh?). Karen, the bad girl with the gun, is lying on the floor surrounded by flames, crying--wait a minute, how'd she get there? "GIVE ME YOUR HAND", Jefferson shouts (seriously!). "I'll be fine, go save yourself," Karen yells. Jefferson runs out of the bathroom in her underwear, wailing and screaming at the firemen to save Karen.

All I could think as I saw this scene was WHY? WHY? WHY? I was so busy being stunned by the badness of it that I more or less missed the ending, so I will spare you that. I will sum up by saying that if you rent "Ghost World" and see the trailer for "The Smokers" (as I did), and see that Thora Birch is in both movies...do NOT assume the movies are at all on an equal parr. "Ghost World", however, is definitly worth your time. Rent that instead.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Much Hollywood-ized version of a True Story
13 September 2000
For the last year or so, I've had my freshman writing classes read the Tobias Wolff memoir, "This Boys Life". A lot of them always think they can get away with watching the movie on cable instead, but of course (as with most movies based on books), much is missed in the screen version of this true story. The film would have you believe that young Toby is a loveable brat who fancies trouble, but the book tells of a more complex and disturbed child--one who has a rich imagination, and is essentially kind (especially to his mother), but who lies consistently and refuses to accept his own faults. Dwight is portrayed well in the film as a mean and immature man, but the movie fails to show how Toby himself paralells Dwight: they are both liars, for one; and Dwight's insistence on "molding" Toby make one wonder...Throughout the book, Toby's greatest danger at the hands of his step-father is the possibility that Dwight will succeed in turning Toby into him.

There are other things that the movie tries to work in, but does so awkwardly: Toby's friendship with Arthur, the gay boyscout, is one. As is Toby's desire to "get away" from the abusive Dwight (in the book, Toby doesn't so much want to get away from Dwight as he does want to run away and go on great swashbuckling adventures). The worst injustice on the movie's part is the ending, of course. It is completely hollywood.

The movie is enjoyable for its performances (especially DeNiros'), but viewers should realize that the "True Story" behind this movie has been given the hollywood golden touch.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed