Ultra Red (2023) Poster

(2023)

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
B-Flick at Best
chiefrobinbrooks-5452821 March 2024
Good Premises Red neck, bad real bad and way off base. Engineers smarter than you show. Smuggled alcohol wouldn't be out in the open. I've seen 18 year olds that are better at smuggling onto a Naval ship Single person going out, NEVER, NASA uses military protocols. That means unknown threat 2 person team. We are talking tear in suit DEAD.

Tech working on gear, would have another person.

What it shows is a movie that could be good failing do to ignorance, bad research and biases without the curtesy to find out the basic procedures/protocols I can see the attempts at humor but they don't work. Your trying to force the humor and that never works You have to maintain your foundation.

NASA doesn't accept just anyone, your grease monkeys don't represent current Naval Engineering much less aviation. Cleanliness in MANDATORY For your information I have 24 years military service, worked on conventional, gas turbine, and nuclear power shipped. Have meant and known astronauts. Have lived in the Houston area and talked with those that work for NASA, since High School. I have friend that worked on the Hubble Telescope. Specialized in Computers and Communication equipment, Aviation and Warfare qualified, served on 5 US ships.

Sad when the potential for a good movie is ruined bad enough that I am making my first review.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What have you done to my crew
nogodnomasters31 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
A rover on Mars sees somthing for a moment and stops working. Rather than send another rover a manned mission to Mars is suddenly urgently needed to repair the over. The guy who can best do is Jonathan Walker (Carlos Flores Jr.) who is in prison because he steals. NASA gets him out of prison for the trip The spaceship has regular gravity and it does not fly itself. It needs constant control and the engine room is stream propulsion. It was pipes and valves of unknown use. Who made this? The characters were in constant conflict as the guys working in the Engine room were also prison labor. Totally unbelievable. We wait much of the film until they get to Mars, which was a solid letdown.

The writing was bad and the production low budget. The film [PLOT SPOILER} attempted to do some kind of Alien-Andromeda Strain type of thing and it failed.

Guide: F-word. Nudity (Keely Dervin)
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
DIRE
mjhallowell28 April 2024
Absolutely dire.

The dialogue is cringeworthy, and made even worse by such poor delivery. Almost every word uttered sounds forced, contrived.

The plot is okay in general terms, but collapses once you get down to the detail. The main character continually overemphasises his sleaziness and rebel-without-a-cause temperament and ends up in a heavy-weapons fight with two crew-members all over a bottle of whiskey. In real life, such a misfit would never have been allowed anywhere near a NASA facility, let on board a mission to Mars.

Casting: Terrible - at least as far as the main characters are concerned. The minor players - such as the two pilots - should have been put in the major roles as they are clearly more competent and deserve better than this lousy movie. To be fair, though, most of the cast have been compromised by the awful script.

The directing isn't too bad, but as the old saying goes, "you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear."

One of the worst aspects of this film is the CGI. At times you'd think they'd used the stop-motion techniques employed in the "Jason and the Argonauts" movies of the 1960s.

Give this one a miss.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Dialog is terrible, laughable.
thejonsanderson27 April 2024
I realise this is a low budget movie but some things are just inexcusable. If the budget is small then at least get the zero cost stuff right. The acting seems so wooden it's like a high school production, but this seems to mainly due to the script which appears to have written by someone who isn't quite up to the job. Maybe a proof reader with at least grade 8 English could have fixed it. It does not greatly add to the budget to give your actors lines that don't make them sound like idiots and making an actor sound like an idiot destroys the character's credibility.

You might have thought that when an actor is presented with a line like "We'd still need to necessitate cooperation with Jack Walker" (4:53) they might say, whoa, stop, this needs some fixing. But no, they just plough on and it just keeps getting worse. I gave up long before the end so maybe the second half gets better.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wowww
amymay-699165 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
So nasa just hires anybody with a pulse,huh? Because someone "vouched for them." That's not how nasa works. The key to great movies is a suspension of disbelief- the ability to fall into the movie and feel the emotions as if you are there. Well,nasa hiring insubordinate, PRISONER, redneck grease monkey aboard a filthy,rusting bucket of bolts instantly made me side eye this monstrosity of a "movie". Pair that with a "genius" who steals jewelry and a milquetoast "captain",a two hour "training course" on how to be an astronaut, and you have all the ingredients of a crap sandwich. Why is everyone so dirty?? Like literal,need-a-bath grimy.. apparently there was no room in the budget for a brush,because nasa lady's hair.looked like crap in every scene. Everyone was a dishelved mess. I thought they were supposed to be in cryogenics,like the "nasa director" said they were supposed to be. So they writers didn't even stick to their own plot. The ship set was TERRIBLE. I've seen better setups at high school plays. And how does.one write EVERY SINGLE CHARACTER to be unlikeable and irritating? The nasa lady's entire family pi$$ed me off within three minutes of the movie starting,and every single one of the space crew is annoying AF. They didn't even do a thorough search for the rover before just heading back. I just wanted whatever entity existed on Mars to kill them all. Not one;but TWO in-spaceship gunfights. Stuff just happened.and then everything continued without consequences. No police, debriefing, higher ups asking questions,nothing! Nasa just let some petty crook keep the truth serum alien box he found on Mars. Nasa lady had one unpolished nail,which was weird.. this whole movie was one giant "this could never happen" to the point where it was infuriating and unwatchable. Like a idiot I suffered so you don't have to. It's too late for me I can't unsee this but you have a chance. Save yourself.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Travesty
thales-6304524 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
What a travesty. This had the beginnings of a good plot but the acting and script had me gnashing my teeth. From watching the NASA employee at the very beginning talking to her children you knew the acting was going to be bad. And so it came to pass. Filmmakers love the idea of a brilliant scientist/engineer being a bit of a lad. And so it came to pass. The dynamics between the characters is awful. And the storyline of the crew being NASA employees is an insult to NASA employees everywhere. Nobody would employ these plonkers. Two of the engine room staff don't get any lines and makes you wonder why they were there. The story has more holes than a Swiss cheese. The return to earth was laughable. How do we explain that asks the scriptwriters? Easy. Just ignore it. I guess we will never find out what the or who the alien was.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Ultra Fred
Pycal21 January 2024
Indie filmmaker Michael Fredianelli takes off from his usual comfort zone of earth bound tough guy cinema to explore the final frontier with a sci-fi movie set mostly in space. This microbudget production is an impressive one and many of the visual effects utilized are jaw dropping especially when it comes to the indie arena. Of particular standout is the segment of the film depicting the Mars surface-- Sci-fi geeks will only recognize the familiar Agua Dulce terrain when they're done marveling at how skillful (if obviously exaggerated for effect) a recreation of the red planet the film achieves. It makes Mars seem truly frightening in all its desolate rocky and dusty landscape. Similarly, the movie makes the cold vacuum of space seem equally as vast and scary and borrows much from the look and feel from the Hollywood sci-fi classic Alien.

Well there is no denying the technical achievements on display with Ultra Red, its biggest problem is its script. It utilizes a plot that very much resembles Star Trek's The "Naked Time" and its Next Generation follow up "The Naked Now" and deals with an extraterrestrial substance that effects the brain similarly to alcohol. However the way the substance is discovered and delivered comes off clear as day as a rather clunky MacGuffin. Furthermore, there are other problems with believability. The crew of the spaceship (NASA no less) in the movie is comically unprofessional and it wasn't enough for the lead character to be a genius rover vehicle designer, but also a master thief with a rap sheet a mile long as well. Other times, the film's technobabble just comes off poorly developed like when we're told that a futuristic weapon operates on the same principle as said rover which itself is more clearly modeled after present day technology. Now, I'm no scientist, but elements like that read more as pure kayfabe to me and took me out of the movie a bit.

While it's highly ambitious and impressive in many facets as well as highly entertaining for much of its running time, Ultra Red stumbles in too many places to be a clear win and instead comes off as a rather mixed bag.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad, it hurts.
stubmandrel7 May 2024
OK, full disclosure, I baled before the movie was ten minutes in.

The CGI is cringeworthy. The rover rolls its wheels straight through boulders. The gaseous alien is pixellated. The characters are straight out of a (bad) school drama assignment. The set dressing is as thin as tissue. The dialogue is painful.

The plot is wafer thin. The rover is broken. Only one man can repair it. He's in jail. He's a genius with the mental capacity of a cardboard box. He can learn to be an astronaut in 12 hours, from a guy who you wouldn't trust to punch the code into a carwash.

Seriously, if the rest of the movie is as bad as what I saw, it has stolen the crown from Plan 9 From Outer Space.

I need a lie down.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Adventures of Space Jerk and the Learn-on-the-Job Crew
Aylmer5 February 2024
Cool futuristic spaceship sets, effects, cinematography, and engaging mystery plot around a strange alien entity on Mars become heavily undermined by how aggressively smug and unlikeable the main hero comes off right from the start of the film. Even more unfortunately, things don't get any better for him as he insults his way through the rest of the film, making lewd comments to his superiors even while on his multi-billion dollar Mars walk. This would be more forgivable if he demonstrates some kind of clever ingenuity to display why everyone else must tolerate his behavior, but he seldom really exhibits any competence whatsoever. His saving grace lies in the fact that he is surrounded by a similarly dismal group of self-centered numbskulls who don't even seem to care that much about the mission, their own lives, or the lives of their coworkers once they start getting bumped off. At least things never get predictable.

I did find the over-the-top lack of professionalism among the crew of an experimental United States Government funded spaceship to be an amusing commentary though on the current state of our top agencies. It may or may not have been the agenda that this film was going for, but it's the satirical bend of this movie that makes it the most worthwhile. I'm going to go ahead and give it a higher rating keeping this in mind, plus how impressive the movie looks when taking its tiny indie budget into consideration. It could easily have devolved into a silly Asylum type "sharks in space" sort of movie but never stoops to that level.

Keep an eye out for some eye-popping visuals and a couple cute aliens who pop by to liven things up. The overall story reminds me a lot of the two "Naked" Star Trek episodes (once the alien object starts to infect the crew in a way that causes them to lose inhibition and... you guessed it... behave even less-professionally), but even more so of the Doctor Who episode "Planet of Evil" in that the object seems to bring an evil corrupting alien presence with it which proceeds to pare the crew down to such a degree that one wonders how the ship remains space-worthy. I was a bit disappointed that it doesn't quite come together as handily as the Doctor Who episode or even delve too deeply into alien intelligence, life, or past civilizations, only to focus on the petty internal squabbling.

Also watch out for some random nudity late in the film that comes absolutely out of nowhere. Also keep in mind that there's a few over-the-top gory moments sprinkled in which may preclude younger viewers from jumping right in, unless their parents are into this sort of thing.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed