In my view, the cother reviewer's (jmfrazer) perspective on the film is shortsighted and misses the deeper context and narrative the movie provides. While he slams the film's structure and content, I believe he overlooks the documentary's aim to immerse viewers in the unique subculture of drone enthusiasts.
First, I think the film's use of well chosen short clips and snippets from various flights is a deliberate choice, reflecting the diverse experiences of drone pilots and builders. This approach highlights the collective spirit and collaboration within the drone community.
I also believe dismissing the political segments on regulations as "odd" misses a crucial point. These segments provide essential context about the challenges the drone community faces, particularly with legal and regulatory hurdles. This context is vital for appreciating the community's struggles and contributions, balancing innovation with safety and regulation.
His claim that the film is only for those already engrossed in the culture seems fundamentally mistaken to me. While the film resonates with insiders, I believe it also serves as an introductory window for outsiders, showcasing the excitement, technical skill, and camaraderie of the drone community. He I am new to this scene, and found the community's back story as show quite a relevation.
In short, I think his narrow focus on the film's format and content overlooks its successful portrayal of the drone community's challenges, innovations, and spirit. The documentary celebrates the achievements while educating and inspiring a broader audience about the intersection of art, engineering and science. In my view, he misses the film's potential to engage both enthusiasts and newcomers alike.
P. S: I usually don't comment on movies, but found the other reviewer's critique pretty unfair and felt some points needed to be addressed.
First, I think the film's use of well chosen short clips and snippets from various flights is a deliberate choice, reflecting the diverse experiences of drone pilots and builders. This approach highlights the collective spirit and collaboration within the drone community.
I also believe dismissing the political segments on regulations as "odd" misses a crucial point. These segments provide essential context about the challenges the drone community faces, particularly with legal and regulatory hurdles. This context is vital for appreciating the community's struggles and contributions, balancing innovation with safety and regulation.
His claim that the film is only for those already engrossed in the culture seems fundamentally mistaken to me. While the film resonates with insiders, I believe it also serves as an introductory window for outsiders, showcasing the excitement, technical skill, and camaraderie of the drone community. He I am new to this scene, and found the community's back story as show quite a relevation.
In short, I think his narrow focus on the film's format and content overlooks its successful portrayal of the drone community's challenges, innovations, and spirit. The documentary celebrates the achievements while educating and inspiring a broader audience about the intersection of art, engineering and science. In my view, he misses the film's potential to engage both enthusiasts and newcomers alike.
P. S: I usually don't comment on movies, but found the other reviewer's critique pretty unfair and felt some points needed to be addressed.
