"The Return of Sherlock Holmes" Wisteria Lodge (TV Episode 1988) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The odd mysteries of Wisteria Lodge
theowinthrop2 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
You will probably be able to answer these questions rather quickly.

In the Conan Doyle "Holmes Canon", what is the only story:

a) that is dated in the period when Holmes was supposedly dead in the Reichenbach Falls?

b) that has a police detective who is actually Holmes equal (for a change) in figuring out what is going on without Holmes saving his investigation?

c) that is actually written in two parts (for magazine publication purposes apparently)?

d) that has a villain based on fact as well as some details suggestive of fact?

Answer: THE ADVENTURE OF WISTERIA LODGE, which is in the collection HIS LAST BOW (1917). The story was written in 1908 or so.

SPOILER COMING UP:

It's not a bad story. Holmes and Watson are visited by a young man named Scott Eccles who needs their assistance. He was invited to the home of a reclusive neighbor named Garcia (which is an isolated estate called Wisteria Lodge), and sees a hideous faced man at the window looking in. His host is pleasant, but seemingly preoccupied. (in fact Mr. Eccles did not understand why he got the invite). But he is put up for the night. The next day he finds the house totally deserted except for the corpse of Garcia, who has been murdered. Holmes and Watson get into the case, but for a change they don't find Lestrade or Gregson involved. It is being handled by an Inspector Baynes, who actually is asking intelligent questions and making some astute observations (until the last Holmes story, THE ADVENTURE OF THE RETIRED COLOURMAN no other similarly intelligent detective shows up in any Holmes' tale).Gradually Holmes and Baynes go about their separate investigations, until they find themselves reaching the same conclusion. Scott Eccles is innocent. The villain is not the man at the window but a mysterious and secretive neighbor Henderson. He is Don Murillo, the "Tiger of San Pedro". This man is a blood-stained Latin-American tyrant, who just managed to flee his country before he could be assassinated or executed. However, the families of his victims have been tracking him, found him hiding out in the middle of England's countryside, and tried to kill him...but the person who planned the trap, a young woman in the household, excited the suspicions of the secretary of Murillo, and they planned their counter trap and escape. Subsequently Holmes and Watson learn of the murders of Murillo and his secretary in a hotel in Madrid.

The series ended the deaths of the two villains somewhat differently. To me the best part of the episode was Freddie Jones playing the wonderful Police Detective Inspector Baynes. This character, in the story, is following the methodical plodding associated with Lestrade, but he actually is smart. Why Conan Doyle never saw fit to make a story about Baynes alone is hard to fathom.

The use of the mirrors is an interesting aspect of the teleplay, as it leads up to a cackling Don Murillo enjoying his sense of power over the woman who betrayed him and the unfortunate man sent to kill him. As he's laughing the mirror he is looking at is shown to be warped.

However the actual story has one glaring error, which is that Watson sets it in March 1892. This is the period that Holmes is hiding after killing Professor Moriarty at the Reichebach Falls. Holmes can't be solving crimes at that time.

Actually, a bit of research I did over twenty years ago explains it all. Conan Doyle picked up bits and pieces from current sensational items in the news for his story. The original ends in a Madrid Hotel where Don Murillo and his secretary are killed. In 1889 (in a Madrid Hotel) the forger and perjurer Richard Pigott committed suicide when about to be returned to England for trial. And in a French hotel in 1891 the head of the Russian Secret Police was assassinated in a French Hotel by a political enemy. Doyle liked to blend events like that in his stories. The fall from power of Dom Pedro II of Brazil in 1889 may also be part of it.

But so also is the ironic coda of the career of Don Juan Rosas of Argentina, who ruled that country in the 1840s until he fled in 1852. Rosas had once been thought of as a reformer (he impressed a youthful Charles Darwin, who writes of him in THE VOYAGE OF THE "BEAGLE", but adds a postscript admitting he was subsequently disillusioned). Rosas ended up living on a small estate in England until he died peacefully in the 1870s.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Wisteria Lodge
Prismark1015 October 2019
I wonder if Arthur Conan Doyle's Wisteria Lodge was inspired by Arthur Morrison's The Affair of the Tortoise which was published earlier.

The latter was dramatised as an episode of The Rivals of Sherlock Holmes featuring the detective Martin Hewitt.

Both stories feature people with a murky past from the Americas who are now hiding out in Britain.

A cartographer Scott Eccles consults Sherlock Holmes. He was invited to a country estate as a guest of an amateur Spanish cartographer, Garcia. The next morning, Eccles wakes up and find the house deserted. The police later turn up wanting to question Eccles over the death of Mr Garcia.

Freddie Jones gives a fruity performance as Inspector Barnes. He comes across as pompous and pig headed at first, telling Holmes that he can follow his path while Barnes will tread his own. Holmes is convinced that Barnes has the wrong suspect.

Holmes and Watson investigate a neighbouring house. Dr Watson thinks he has spotted a lady in distress. It is an elaborate revenge tale featuring a fugitive dictator from Latin America. To Holme's surprise Barnes was never too far off the scent.

There is a lot of plot here, it just starts off in a very subdued manner. Jones actually livens things up a little and at the end it is a rather tragic tale of revenge.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very good, the brilliance of Freddie Jones succeeds.
Sleepin_Dragon11 May 2018
I'm quite a fan of Wysteria Lodge, it's one of the darkest, most grim, certainly most violent episodes, it has a harsh brutality, and an oddness that no other episode (perhaps The Mazarin Stone) can match.

Highlight of the episode for me has to be Freddie Jones, a fabulous actor, who's character is very much a match for Holmes, condescending, smug, but focused and intelligent, I really liked the character of Baynes. The opening is great, the business surrounding poor Mr Scott Eccles is full of intrigue. The murder that follows is quite brutal and explicit, particularly for the time. Strangest scene must be Watson's capture by the two little girls, very surreal.

Beautifully shot, great production values, and incredibly well acted, there is very little not to like about Wysteria Lodge. So much more going on then Silver Blaze, but not as good as the liked of Devil's Foot. Once again I'd say it benefits from being made during a purple patch for the series.

8/10
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Quite good in my opinion
TheLittleSongbird22 June 2011
I don't consider Wisteria Lodge up there with the best Granada Sherlock Holmes adaptations, but I can think of worse(ie. Eligible Bachelor), however it is in my opinion quite good. The story itself is wonderful, and quite unique for reasons that have been explained so well already.

The story here is intriguing and starts off grand, it's just that in the middle where the atmosphere get darker and gloomier and some of the pacing gets a little too languid for my liking, the storytelling does get perhaps too murky.

However, the adaptation once again is well made. I have always admired the authenticity and look of the costumes, sets and scenery, and Wisteria Lodge is no exception. The photography and editing is not among the best of these adaptations but they are good.

My quibble with the production values though is some of the lighting where some scenes are too dimly lit, so it is not always easy to see what's going on. In its defence though, Wisteria Lodge is not the first Sherlock Holmes to have this problem, of the many I've seen I think Mazarin Stone(one of those interesting but failed attempts) is especially guilty of this.

Back to the positives, I have always loved the music of this series, I find it so haunting and beautiful. Again Wisteria Lodge is no exception to the rule. The writing is as thoughtful and sophisticated as ever, some may find the mirror gimmick annoying I actually found it interesting and crucial to the mystery, and as superb as Jeremy Brett and Edward Hardwicke are in the leads, the real kudos when it comes to the acting is Freddie Jones. His Baynes is a very interesting character and very enjoyable to watch, and Jones, always a fine actor, nails the role.

In conclusion, it is a slight disappointment, but it is quite good all the same. 7/10 Bethany Cox
13 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Bit of a Hodgepodge
Hitchcoc11 February 2014
An episode that is divided into two parts in the literary form. It starts with a Mr. Eccles who has been invited to the signature lodge. He spends an evening with a group of nervous people who get even more nervous when they receive a message. When Eccles awakens, everyone has disappeared. The house is empty. Now a series of events ensues, involving a vicious murderer and his henchmen. In the mix, however, is revenge for the death of a loved one and a plot to exact that revenge. It leads to a daring effort to infiltrate the evil man's domain and Holmes and Watson getting in a bit deep. I like this episode because of the complexity of the network that develops from the actions of the villain. It is much more intense than many of the stories and moves us along with great pacing.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mirrored
tedg11 March 2006
By now you probably know that the Holmes series, like most of its ilk, has a production formula that changes everything each time excepting the main characters and few sets.

This is the worst effort of all the ones that feature Brett, and is oddly paired in the same DVD as the best.

Its not worth commenting on the story. The producers decided to not have any of these be mysteries in the writerly sense that you are given clues and weave wits with Holmes. Instead, they think you will be happy with a clever surprise at the end.

But still with those constraints, we can get a director and writer that tries to interpret the detection cinematically and succeed. Obviously the producers so specified because each episode tries a different trick. Some are apt, some not. Aptness aside, many fail.

The device here is mirrors. There must be a score of shots where the action is seen in a mirror, usually composed as a dynamic object in the frame. There are directors who know how to use this. Tarkovsky built an entire essay on it and the idea of inner rumination as reflected reality is in the first couple weeks of film school.

But this fails, alas. Its not used in any competent way, and we're not supposed to notice.

Ted's Evaluation -- 1 of 3: You can find something better to do with this part of your life.
12 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not great but interesting and entertaining enough
grantss13 December 2022
Sherlock Holmes is contacted by an exasperated and frightened Scott Eccles. He was a guest of a Spanish gentleman at Wisteria Lodge in rural Surrey but left when his host and his servant acted weird and then suddenly disappeared. Upon arrival at the lodge Mr Eccles, Holmes and Watson are shocked to discover that the Spaniard has been found dead, murdered.

One of the worst episodes in both the Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and Return of Sherlock Holmes series. It's not bad, just weak by the high standards of the series.

The plot is intriguing enough and some good twists and turns. However, it feels a bit clumsy and unpolished. This is made worse by some odd direction and camera work: extreme close-ups, amateurish camera angles, arty-but-empty still shots.

Rounding off the negatives is one of the most irritating performances and characters in the entire series: Freddie Jones as Inspector Baynes. Quite loathsome and cartoonish. He reminded me of the fascist, conservative Sherriff in a B-grade Hollywood movie where a bunch of teens wander into some hick town and the Sherriff takes a dislike to them and is determined to make their lives difficult. That cartoonish.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
enjoyably weird
mgl-9203728 March 2022
I agree that Freddie Jones was fantastic. He is the best policeman foil to Holmes that I have seen.

The story was quite odd and not believable in parts; nevertheless, I watched with rapt attention from start to finish.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Holmes & Watson on bicycles
vitoscotti29 October 2020
For me, watching "The Adventures", now "The Return" series I'm so glad I chose the Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes collection to view. There isn't an episode so far I didn't fully enjoy. Even with changing Watsons and Brett's declining health semi shocks. I jumped ship on Endeavour after maybe 5 episodes or so. These stories are crisp, no filler, great acting. Endeavour stories are good, but silly complex, and ultra dry up to the ending. Hopefully these are strong to the last one.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
One of the weakest in the series
ericksonsam6011 February 2012
This is in my mind this is one of my least favorite of Granada's adaptations of the Sherlock Holmes stories featuring Jeremy Brett. It starts out as a murder case but delves deep into Latin American politics. It's story is unremarkable with no special twists or turns. Even the atmosphere is murky with irritating direction and poorly lit photography. Not to mention that the pacing is slow. Only redeeming qualities include Jeremy Brett and Edward Hardwicke as the duo of Holmes and Watson (even though this is a given), Freddy Jones performance as the quirky Inspector Baynes, and the evocative music by Patrick Gowers. A poor entry in an otherwise excellent series.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
So-so
lanceware29 June 2008
The direction and plot line is rather muddy, perhaps intentionally to keep viewers in the dark. The repeated use of mirrors becomes an annoying gimmick rather than a stylistic feature. Brett's choices for the Holmes character are at times surprisingly odd relative to other episodes. The rest of the acting is uneven. A few of the motivations and reasons are not adequately explained in the end. Some of the shots seem poorly lit. This episode is one of the worst in the series. However, Freddie Jones stands out in a quirky role as Inspector Baynes, a detective trying to one-up Holmes and who turns out to be more intelligent than he at first seems.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not So Hot.
rmax30482316 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I kind of enjoyed the story in print. It begins promisingly. A mousy man, Scott Eccles, is invited by strangers to a rather crummy remote estate to have dinner and spend the night discussing cartography. His host has other friends over and there are servants and so forth. Eccles wakes up the next morning to find the house completely deserted except for a dead body.

After that, both in print and on film, the story gets a little murky and loses interest for me -- except for Freddy Jones as Inspector Baynes. My God, what a ham! We get repeated close ups of his rubescent features, those goggle eyes, that bulbous nose, that insinuatingly melodic voice.

His presence is the most gripping thing about the tale. The rest has some fugitive dictator from Latin America or someplace dodging assassins.

The atmosphere, as filmed, seems extraordinarily gloomy and dark. It's a somewhat depressing experience just to sit there and look at the screen. There are no new characters or colorful twists, nor does Holmes exercise the insights or deductive skills of a genius.

Pretty weak entry.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst of the Lot
Planar_Being2 May 2022
A very poor episode in one of my favorite TV shows. Dreadful direction, grotesque camera angles and up-nostril closeups, claustrophobic spaces with inadequate lighting.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Battle of Titans
aramis-112-8048803 January 2024
What is the mystery of Wisteria Lodge that has so frightened John Scott Eccles? And who murdered the map expert he went there to meet?

This is not one of my favorite Sherlock Holmes stories.

But it is one of my favorite dramatizations because of the performance of Freddie Jones as the local copper in charge of the case.

If the wonderful Jeremy Brett givesaus a complex, mannered Holmes, Jones, always one of my favorite actors, matches him note for note.

The case is a complex one and might prove confusing to the casual viewer. But Jones is always worth watching and his battle of wits with Brett's Holmes is one of the highlights of "The Return."

BTW, Jones was the Player in a radio version of "Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are Dead" with a Edward Hardwicke, who plays Watson here.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed