"Law & Order" Renunciation (TV Episode 1991) Poster

(TV Series)

(1991)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Skirting responsibility
bkoganbing1 September 2017
On a nice spring night someone spots a man walking his dog, guns the engine and goes at him full throttle. Fortunately the dog survived the man was DOA.

There was nothing really that noble about James Ottavino the victim. He was one degenerate gambler, owed money to a lot of bookies who stopped taking his action. But his wife Ashley Crow was getting a different kind of action.

She was a high school teacher who manipulated a young, impressionable, and horny student into doing the deed. How culpable is she however as she comes up with a story that allows her to skirt.

Getting the blame properly apportioned out is the real issue in this Law And Order story for Michael Moriarty and Richard Brooks. You have to see how the truth is revealed.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Responsibility rejected
TheLittleSongbird12 March 2020
As some may have gathered already, 'Law and Order' is a show that has often been of very high quality to me and have always admired its exploring of heavy and sometimes controversial themes and complex moral dilemmas. Some may disagree but, and the same goes for 'Criminal Intent' and 'Special Victims Unit', the earlier seasons for me are better than the later ones, maybe not quite as taut or as refined but did prefer the writing and acting in the earlier years and nobody annoyed me.

Season 2 started off very well, if understandably a bit unsettled. It did very quickly get a lot better, with a few very powerful episodes and all the previous episodes before "Renunciation" (though some were better than others) are well worth watching. Season 2's ninth episode, of twenty one, "Renunciation" is the third solidly executed if slightly disappointing episode in a row. As indicated, definitely not a bad episode but not a great one like it could have been, with the second half being better than the first.

"Renunciation" has more good than it has bad, most 'Law and Order's' episodes were like that. It is slickly made as usual and the production values generally improved with each season. The music is not over-bearing or over-used. It is an intelligently and tightly written episode, more the second half than the first half though. Much of the story compels, where one does root for the case being solved and how the trial turns out. All the acting is fine, Michael Moriarty dominating the second half with such authority and shares great chemistry with Richard Brooks.

'Law and Order' was very strong when it came to exploring heavy themes and having complex moral dilemmas, which we do get here in "Renunciation" and explored further and with more tact than in the previous two episodes. The character interaction is handled very well, Carreta and Logan continue to gel and Stone is such a juicy character. The supporting characters are not particularly innovative and can be seen in most similar dramas but they still intrigue and are well written and played. One is glued to the screen and connected enough to care for what happens next and how the case is resolved and brought to trial.

The early portions though are a bit ordinary, the investigative/procedural elements not being as taut or as tense as everything with bringing the responsible to justice and a bit on the dull and bland side.

While enough of the story compels, it is something with tropes that one has seen frequently in similar shows or shows in the same genre and with not an awful lot of freshness or surprises.

In summary, good if not great. Pretty ordinary first half but the second half really redeems the episode. 7/10
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
My Tutor
safenoe3 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Eight years after the release of the movie My Tutor, we have Renunciation which has similar themes but way more deadly for sure. Anyway, Law and Order here deals with a maneater teacher who seduces one of her students in order to bump off her husband who has difficulty managing his gambling habit.

It's kind of a she said, he said, she said, he said type of episode and I must admit, it kind of got tiresome after a while with all of the she said, he said, she said, he said and so on. I was kind of relieved when the jury finally handed down its verdict.

Anyway, still I enjoy watching the early years of Law and Order.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed