(2005– )

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Entertaining Junk Food For The Poker Mind
Agrenish10 July 2006
Whenever you have the top names of poker in a room together, you'll more often than not, enjoy watching it.

However, this is not poker in any traditional sense. The blinds are so high throughout this program that it has turned Texas Holdem mostly into a preflop game. In the dramatic sense, all-in preflops on television are cute to watch but in reality have turned the game into more of a game of black jack than a game of poker with very little emphasis into the psychological battles the players have with each other.

This contains little, if any, real poker knowledge. It's more of a made-for-television series to rake in some additional money from crazed poker fans than anything, but to their credit, it's still somewhat entertaining and I cannot deny the fact that I still want to know who wins at the end of each episode. Just don't think you'll learn much by watching someone go all-in under the gun with an A-T with five players to follow.

The structure of the tournament also alters the way each player handles each game. While each player wants to win, sometimes their goal becomes instead to just make fourth place and as such, much of the tension is lost once a player reaches his goal and relaxes, knowing that they no longer *must* compete to win. While not a bad thing necessarily, if you're watching to learn, ask yourself how often you'll be in a position where fourth place out of sixth would be good enough.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Great Poker Show!
andreric27 April 2006
I have been watching this show religiously and I think it is great. 24 of the best poker players in the world playing each other in 6 person games every week. The tournament structure is quite different from tournaments like the WSOP but it is still good in many ways.

If this tournament was as badly constructed as the previous poster suggests why would some of the all-time greats such as Doyle Brunson, David Sklansky, Mike Caro, Antonio Esfandiari, Scotty Nguyen, Kathy Liebert and Johnny Chan even bother with a $40,000 buy-in and their valuable time. I have yet to hear one of these players express issues with the event in the post-match interviews.

With some of the televised poker out there like the Celebrity Poker Showdown I find it hard to dispute the quality of play in this show.

My opinion - if you like quality no-limit Texas hold 'em poker this show is hard to beat!

8/10 (It is still no Sopranos or Lost)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poor quality of poker
alexandrajade21 February 2006
Whoever structured this tournament was REALLY catering to the lowest common denominator; with the starting stacks, blind levels, and lengths of blind levels, each game became a crapshoot after about 10 minutes of aired time. It was a really simple formula: chip count, all-in, commercial. Chip count, all-in, commercial. Chip count, all-in, commercial. There also seemed to be a disproportionate amount of commercials. I'm quite frankly surprised so many top players agreed to play in such a poorly structured tournament.

Not for true poker fans! Only moronic "all-in" junkies will enjoy this crap (although I will say the heads-up matches at the end were good). I will not even give "Poker Superstars III" a chance.

2/10
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed