Agatha Christie: Poirot: Season 10, Episode 1 The Mystery of the Blue Train
(11 Dec. 2005)
|
|
| 0Share... |
Agatha Christie: Poirot: Season 10, Episode 1 The Mystery of the Blue Train
(11 Dec. 2005)
|
|
| 0Share... |
| Episode cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| David Suchet | ... | ||
| James D'Arcy | ... |
Derek Kettering
|
|
| Alice Eve | ... |
Lenox
|
|
| Nicholas Farrell | ... |
Knighton
|
|
| Bronagh Gallagher | ... |
Ada Mason
|
|
|
|
Tom Harper | ... |
Corky
|
|
|
Jane How | ... |
Lady at Ball
|
|
|
Samuel James | ... |
Steward
|
| Helen Lindsay | ... |
Sister Rosalia
|
|
| Oliver Milburn | ... |
La Roche
|
|
| Jaime Murray | ... |
Ruth Kettering
|
|
| Roger Lloyd-Pack | ... |
Inspector Caux
(as Roger Lloyd Pack)
|
|
|
|
Etela Pardo | ... |
Dolores
|
| Georgina Rylance | ... |
Katherine
|
|
|
|
Josette Simon | ... |
Mirelle Milesi
|
After traveling on the Blue Train from Calais to Nice, Hercule Poirot is pressed into service to help solve the murder of heiress Ruth Kettering who is found savagely beaten in her compartment. She was the daughter of wealthy industrialist Rufus Van Alden and very much wanted a divorce. Both her husband and her lover were on the train but she had changed rooms with another passenger, Katherine Grey, so the question naturally arises as to whether she was the intended victim. Grey may also have had enemies as she had recently inherited a very large sum of money and greedy relatives had suddenly taken a interest in her. When an attempt is subsequently made on Grey's life, this appears to the case but Poirot methodically sifts through all of the clues to determine the motive and identify the killer. Written by garykmcd
I am not a terribly big fan of Agatha Christie, but "Mystery of the Blue Train" is one of her novels that I did in fact like and was therefore thrilled to hear that they've made this TV adaptation as part of the "Poirot" series with David Suchet.
Unfortunately, it was not to be... it started on the wrong foot immediately with the way it was directed--was there no one around to rein the director in? Everything seems shot in darkness, through smoke, half-obscured, half-reflected in mirrors, etc. It's often difficult to even see the faces of actors because of this.
Of course, that would probably be bearable if the screenplay adaptation wasn't so bad. It takes amazing liberties with the novel (some of which have been already mentioned in other comments) that I couldn't believe. The storyline doesn't seem to make any sense any more, and the dynamic between some of the characters has been completely changed.
In conclusion, do not go anywhere near this movie if you've liked the novel at all.