The Triangle (TV Mini Series 2005) Poster

(2005)

User Reviews

Review this title
77 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
From time to time Sci-Fi gets it good
siderite3 June 2006
Sci-fi channel is known for incredibly bad movies with occasional successes. This one is a keeper. A miniseries about the Bermuda Triangle that is done as a true story should be done: character development, cause and effect, a proper conclusion. I understand from other people here that seeing the series as a ... well... series, can taint the viewing pleasure. I took the liberty of watching it as a film, from start to end, and I was pleasantly surprised. The entire thing is about 3 parts of almost 90 minutes.

Actors. Lou Diamond Philips outdid himself, I think. Even in a secondary role, he had a difficult role, with a vast range of emotions. He played it well. Catherine Bell is cute as a whistle :) while Eric Stoltz does well as the lead.

All in all it is a film worth seeing, keeps you on your toes and, while some of the ideas are absurd and not everything is within the realm of logic, it is only a movie and should be taken as such. The effects are decent, without being too flashy, the music and atmosphere are also appropriate.
45 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
intriguing mysterious start but ...
SnoopyStyle18 December 2015
Strange phenomena has been occurring in the Sargasso Sea or the Bermuda Triangle since early seafaring. Columbus in 1492 encounters a modern ship and loses 2 men in a strange event. In the present, ship magnate Eric Benerall (Sam Neill) finds those two men and his own men dead on one of his ships. He recruits certain experts to solve the mystery for $5 million each. Howard Thomas (Eric Stoltz) is a reporter investigating Triangle cases. Emily Patterson (Catherine Bell) is a skilled engineer. Stan Lathem (Bruce Davison) is a psychic. Bruce Geller (Michael E. Rodgers) is an extreme adventurer. Meeno Paloma (Lou Diamond Phillips) leads a Greenpeace expedition against whalers when giant bubbles take down the whaling ship and the Greenpeace boat. Meeno is the sole survivor but he returns to find the world oddly different.

This is a 3 part Sci-Fi mini-series. I really like part one as the mystery gets laid out. The production is pretty good for a TV show. It's set up for something interesting. The second part starts to show some cracks. I don't like some of the turns with the mystery. I don't care about Lou Diamond Phillips' part of the story. I also don't like the team being split up. Part three does a competent job wrapping the story up. This TV series starts out strong but loses some of its steam.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"A great mini-series from the creators of Independence Day, X-Men and Farscape!"
simon-trek4 April 2006
I've been interested in this mini-series ever since I first learned about it back in October of last year. It wasn't just the plot that caught my attention, but also the fact that this mini-series was written and produced by two great film makers and one great TV producer combined! They include Dean Devlin the producer and co-writer of Independence Day, Bryan Singer the director of the X-Men films and Rockne S. O'Bannon the creator of the science fiction/fantasy series Frascape.

So ever since I learned about this mini-series I really wanted to now when it would premiere here in Australia. For months I've been seeing commercials on television about the The Triangle which only say "Comming Soon" with no clue of an exact start date, which really annoyed me. But at last this great mini-series has finally premiered here on Australian television!

If you like science fiction/mystery stories than this is just the mini-series for you. It has a very suspenseful and complicated plot about a psyche, a journalist, a meteorologist and an underwater scientist who are hired by a shipping billionaire (played by Sam Neill) to solve one of the world's greatest mysteries: the Bermuda Triangle. This shipping billionaire also has a problem. A number of his ships have recently disappeared in the Bermuda Triangle and he is desperate for answers. So these four characters all of whom have only just met head out on a very dangerous investigation to solve a phenomena unlike anything the world has ever known!

As for the cast of this mini-series there are only three main cast members that I am familiar with. They include Sam Neill an actor who is very well known here in Australia. Bruce Davidson, an actor best known to X-Men fans for his role as Senator Robert Kelly in the first X-Men film. And Catherine Bell who is best known for her role in the TV series JAG.

So all together this is a brilliant miniseries and I loved it! So if you like stories about the Bermuda Triangle and you love science fiction mysteries than this is just the mini-series for you!
26 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Intriguing and Entertaining, But with a Disappointing Resolution
claudio_carvalho9 September 2007
While chasing a whaler, the Greenpeace boat sinks with the vessel, pulled by a mysterious force underwater and only Meeno Paloma (Lou Diamond Phillip) survives. Meanwhile, after the disappearance of six ships in the Bermuda Triangle in one year, the millionaire owner of the Mineral Shipping Lines Eric Benerall (Sam Neill) hires the skeptical journalist of The Observer Howard Thomas (Eric Stoltz); the scientist Bruce Geller (Michael Rodgers); the offshore engineer Emily Patterson (Catherine Bell) and the psychic Stan Lathem (Bruce Davison) to investigate the reasons for the phenomenon in the area. If the team succeeds in their quest for the truth, each one would receive five million dollars. They find a high-tech underwater facility from the Navy, and each one of them has glimpses of alternative reality after their discovery. They conclude that the experiment conducted by the Navy is affecting the electromagnetic balance of the ocean, while trying to find a way to close the dimensional tear opened by the Philadelphia Experiment. But they believe that the procedure actually will open the Pandora Box and destroy the world.

"The Triangle" is an intriguing an entertaining story that recalls "Sliders" in some moments. The characters are well developed but unfortunately the resolution of the plot is disappointing and confused. When the group reaches the base, in the climax of the story, it is very disappointing what happens next. The DVD released in Brazil has only 160 minutes running time, therefore 80 minutes vanished in the edition, and this might be the cause of my frustration with the messy end of the story. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "O Mistério do Triângulo das Bermudas" ("The Mystery of the Bermuda Triangle")
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What Was With the Ending?
YorkvilleGirl7 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I thought the cast was terrific...but I kept getting the impression that the story was being padded for time. Like they weren't sure when and how to finally end it.

Characters were introduced, then discarded without explanation.

The most unnecessarily confusing bit involved the group visiting billionaire Benirall's offices at the end of the movie. Instead of seeing Eric Benerall, they are dismissed rudely by his brother Winston...as Eric Benirall's assistant looks on, enigmatically.

It is never explained why Eric (Sam Neill) who has spent the series as a crucial main character and tortured personality, is not to be disturbed. (Um, maybe I missed something) And it would have, at least, made a satisfying resolution.

What made it so confusing is, after all that, the characters are given their $5 mill paychecks, anyway. Big deal. What was the point of the scene then? Just to throw in another silly, distracting plot twist?
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange, a bit lengthy
Verona13 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I am not so mad at all the sci-ency-government conspiracy gibberish as I was the ending- it ended, for me, with a huge "WHAT?". I did enjoy Katharine Bell, a sassy but sensual heroine who had amazing chemistry with Bruce (Michael Rodgers). But COME ON! What the hell?

I think Bruce said it all:

"My reality is having a family, responsibilities and a bum leg."

So, we never get to see Bruce and Emily get together and they have odd "lives" now. It was very strange, I kept expecting them to say "to be continued" or something.

I think TT's biggest problem was the fact that, like all mini-series, it was too long. It was like Devlin and Singer had to keep coming up with plot twists. I agree with the other reviewers that the whole point of having Lou Diamond Phillips in this film was to have Lou Diamond Phillips in this film.

I don't know, very mixed feelings.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Heart of the Matter
Mark-1298 December 2005
After viewing the complete mini series I came away with the impression that although very entertaining, something was missing.

To much padding in the last two parts was off putting and not enough emphasis on the various Triangle theories was a disappointment.

Although the final explanation was effective, I was hoping for something more akin to uncontrollable nature.

Performances were uniformly good. Many times the actors were clumped together, but Eric Stolz, Bruce Davison and Lou Diamond Phillips really shined.

Effects ran the gamut from great to unconvincing.
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
old premise
wolfhors12 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Did any Star Trek watch this? Time/space rip gets bigger and bigger, secret govt agency tries to stop it but is really the cause of the whole thing because a time warp thing works backwards. Already done by the next generation trek thing. Nice dress up of a Star Trek episode. Pretty good acting tho' and enough confusion with the visions thing to keep us from seeing it right off. Come on Sci-Fi channel get original. I wish the Sci-Fi Channel would come up with some real new story lines. They either do a real hokey job with their movies or they get good acting with stale story lines, Why don't they try fresh story lines AND good acting???? They should have put their money into something like resurrecting Firefly. Original story line ( OK but but with a campy twist) and good characters and acting. It's like politics the good guys can't get elected.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Absolutely entertaining
jessemaddox@charter.net7 December 2005
"The Triangle" was a six hour joy ride. I do not profess to be a fan of all of the SciFi Channel's programming (I recognize some great shows- Stargate SG-1 and Galactica) but the majority of "movies" shown on SciFi are predictable bounty hunting, government conspiracy, prehistoric super-animal chomp-fest. Very formulaic. Don't get me wrong, every other Saturday or so, SciFi shows a marathon of classic big screen films, and I'm generally in attendance. "The Triangle" uses a blend of clever writing, great acting, and manages to prey upon the mass interest of a phenomenon. The first two hours sets a tone that builds a surprisingly high level of suspense. The next two hours begins to mingle all that science stuff I'll never care to understand- but the acting carries it through (esp. Lou Diamond Phillips and Eric Stoltz). The finale seemed to mix that perfect amount of intellectual head scratching and great writing. I just hope folks give this mini-series a chance- it's well worth the time.
96 out of 115 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable, intriguing and yet....
skoyles17 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"The Triangle" is audacious if nothing else. Good cast with well known names, famous producers, good credentials all around. The interplay of character study with the Bermuda Triangle makes for good viewing. The first third was an accomplished polished presentation worthy of any cinema. The second was perhaps not as strong but with the heart-wrenching situation so well portrayed by Lou Diamond Philips and the teasers at the end it stands up. The third section, excoriated by several critics on this site, was more challenging: here was the solution to the Triangle. Unfortunately the writers chose play to the intellect with the solution, a solution into which I will not venture lest I spoil things completely for anyone, but I will say that it might help to have some notions of non-Aristotelan causality to really enjoy it. I found "The Triangle" different from what I expected, somewhat uneven, but I am glad to have seen it and glad I recorded it for future viewing.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It was okay...barely
gee-1528 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When viewing films of this type, the viewer automatically must accept a certain amount of "mumbo-jumbo". Given that this program is entitled "The Triangle", the normally skeptical viewer must be willing to suspend a great deal of disbelief. Not a problem. But the great weakness of this film is asking the viewer to basically take their disbelief and not only suspend it but throw if off the top of the highest peak in the Rocky Mountain Range.

A few examples of "reasonable" suspensions of said beliefs:

1. The Bermuda Triangle is really a place where ships and planes disappear.(Not true but I'm okay assuming this for the sake of an interesting film)

2. The reason for the triangle has something to do with wormholes and "exotic material". (A hokey but acceptable science fiction premise)

3. The disruptions in the triangle result in shifts in universe that are unexpected. (One of the more interesting aspects of the film. Okay with me!)

Then we have some of the less reasonable suspensions:

1. A multi-millionaire selects a team of four individuals (a journalist, a psychic, a meteorologist and an oceanographer) to solve the mystery of the Triangle. Oh, and they can't use any outside people. Oh, and they'll each get $5 million dollars if they're successful. AND they have to start right away. (My suspensometer is now starting to go "sproing!")

2. Each individual has some tragic or sad backstory that manifests itself. (Does anyone have a normal life in these movies?)

3. The meteorologist is a gung-ho professor who lives in an academic world where he can chuck all of his research and classes for an undetermined amount of time by having graduate students and undergraduates students "cover" for him. (You have got to be kidding!)

4. The psychic and journalist frequently engage in tepid debates about empirical vs.supernatural evidence. (Will these films EVER bother to actually have an interesting debate about this issue? It's worth discussing but, geez, do we have to trot out the old "there are things that science just can't understand because it's too close-minded to." Sorry it just burns me up that that is the level of sophistication that screenwriters can muster.)

That's not to say that there aren't some scenes that are fairly interesting and even poignant. Catherine Bell's interaction with her birth mother in the alternate universe is quite affecting as is Lou Diamond Phillips' reactions to constant shifts in his family makeup. And yes, I must confess to finding a tear in my jaded eye when, at the end, Phillips turns over in his bed to see his youngest son lying next to him asleep. (However, what was the deal with Phillips' shower? What? In some alternate universe, the plumbing goes bad?)

Then the big eye roller, they find out that the reason for the problem is related to "The Philadelphia Experiment" (Brother!) and a secret government project run by the Navy (What? The CIA too busy?) for forty years. (Which is, of course, why we've had a federal deficit!)

Bottom line: A few good thing don't really add up to a terrific film. But it's an okay time waster.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An excellent made for TV show. Way above the norm.
stormruston30 July 2006
This was a great little series. All the acting was top notch, not a single weak link.The special effects were adequate for a TV movie, ranging from pretty good to just short of great.

The story was fantastic, very original and sometimes down right creepy, especially Lou Diamond Phillips character. All the story lines tied nicely into a pretty exciting climax and a satisfying conclusion.

If TV was this good all the time i would subscribe to cable, sadly this is more of a exception then a rule, so I now own it on DVD.The DVD has a "making of" featurette that was enjoyable too.

Definitely worth watching if you are a SIFI fan.
53 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The acting helps
ctomvelu-115 April 2009
THE TRIANGLE is a 3-part miniseries, and reveals the tropical pitfalls of many miniseries: too much talk, too much padding, too little action, bad music, etc. What saves it from complete oblivion is the cast, which includes topflight names like Bruce Davison, Lou Phillips, Eric Stoltz (who practically steals this movie) and Sam Neill. A team of diverse experts is sent to the Berumda Triangle to investigate the disappearance of several ships, only to run afoul of the Navy's notorious Philadelphia Experiment. They then find themselves lost in a series of time and dimensional shifts. If anyone had half a brain, they;'d take this overly long drama and edit it into a 90-minute feature, the way the makers of the original SALEM'S LOT did. I love most of the actors here, but the thing goes on way too long and my interest eventually petered out -- well, except whenever Catherine Bell was on-screen. She can be fully clothed, with her hair tied back and wearing little or no makeup and still be skiers than most actresses dolled up and stark naked -- well, except for Virginia Madsen, but she's not in this movie.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Great potential, poor payoff
vhsiv21 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
After being wowed by the first night, I had hoped for something just a *little* better.

In their promotional material they seemed as though they were as jaded with much of the Triangle conspiracy material as they, the producers, were. However, after 2 nights of wonderful build-up, O'Bannon, Devlin and Singer took their eyes off the target and shifted their focus from the Bermuda Triangle to the myth of the Philadelphia Experiment.

Meh! And then they wasted Lou Diamond Philips in a side-story, that felt like padding. If they wanted to put forward a notion of alternate-reality and subtle changes, they ought to have done that with one of the other principals, and not just isolated LDP in his own little microcosm.

What many viewers, and I'm sure most people who came to Rockne through 'Farscape' were probably hoping for was something as inventive and experimental as that show had been, even if this episode echoed Farscape's 'A Human Raction'. Many of us Farscape fans were just plain disappointed.

The plot would have been much tighter if they had remained with the economy of the principals and placed greater emphasis on the mystery of the Triangle, rather than try to throw in the kitchen sink of wormholes and other gobblety-gook. Time-travel and alternate-reality stories are all about as threadbare as the last 'Star Trek:TNG' episode that used them.

None of the actors can really be blamed here, as their efforts were all solid. They only suffered from a weak script. O'Bannon - or the SciFi Channel – ought to have passed the script under the noses of O'Bannon's old workmates David Kemper and Richard Manning. They could have helped steer this production into a rock-solid effort, worth more than just the forgettable effort that appeared here.
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent show with massive blunder.
taijdevon17 March 2021
Overall, mostly an ok drama. But what drove me nuts was the OCEANOGRAPHER claiming Lithuania is land locked. I have stood in the port city of Klaipeda and watched the Baltic sea. Even if you have not, look at a map. That a purported expert on oceans could make a junior high geography error about oceans and state the falsehood authoritatively is absolutely crazy making. I don't blame Catherine Bell, but the writers should be shot.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Disappointing
whpratt18 December 2007
Thought this film was going to be interesting and quickly found out it was nothing that I have not heard before about missing planes, ships and people being lost completely in the Bermuda Triangle. The actors held this picture together with great acting by Sam Neil, Eric Stoltz and Bruce Davison. The TV Series of this story bomb out after a few showings and this film goes around and around in circles and you quickly lose track of just what the film is really about. The ending will leave you high and dry and you will feel like the story just came to a complete ending before it should have. Don't waste your time on this film, it was a big disappointment to me.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great series, one weak point for me.
jwinps-561-92420613 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
First, it's one of the better Bermuda Triangle films. The cast and acting are perfect. It has a new spin on what's behind the triangle, made clear in the third episode. The part where they are about ready to set all things back to normal is well paced with a will they or won't they succeed edge of your seat feel. I found the scene where all lost ships/planes momentarily come back and then quickly disappear to be a bit off the mark. The air and sea crowded with all flying next to each other is simply not too believable. Plus, the special effects in this scene are SOOOO obviously CGI and not that well done. Had this part if the film been more believable I would have given it an 8. The film resolves with lives of the key characters cing to a somewhat unexpected resolution for all.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dean Devlin's best work
ebiros229 June 2012
Producer Dean Devlin says he makes pop corn movies. Something to kick back and be entertained. If this is his style, he went a notch higher with this one.

The acting is great, and the plot is original. Special effects are not stellar, but for the budget it borders on amazing. In terms of production, this is one of the best I've seen. Dean Devlin nailed this one. I would dare to say that it surpasses the Independence Day by far.

Good that it was a made for TV mini series. There's not a minute wasted in all its 4 hour content, and it would not have made a good 2 hour movie.

It's worth setting aside 4 hours of your time to see this - pop corns or not.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Get Lost In 'The Triangle'
marcus_stokes20009 September 2006
Warning: Spoilers
*The Bermuda SPOILERS* After having lost yet another ship in the infamous Bermuda Triangle, shipowner Eric Benirall (Sam Neill) decides to enlist the help of a quartet of specialists; journalist Howard Thomas (Eric Stolz), meteorologist Bruce Geller (Michael E. Rodger), marine biologist Emily Patterson (Catherine Bell) and psychic Stan Lathern (Bruce Davison), to discover the secret behind the mysterious disappearances in the Triangle; if they will, they'll get $5 million each.

Soon they find out that the US Navy is somehow involved, and that probably the famous 'Philadelphia Experiment' done in 1943 on the USS Aldrich may have been the start of it...

I hadn't big expectations, when I sat down and watched 'The Triangle', and I was very pleasantly surprised to see that the great names (Stoltz, Bell, Davison, Neill, and Lou Diamond Philips in the pivotal part of a man who returned alone from the Triangle and helps our foursome solve the enigma) weren't there just for show; there was also a very good script, that kept me guessing, and waiting with baited breath for the next twist, and also caring for the main characters.

A great miniseries, in the vein of '4400', which I regret not having, in DVD or otherwise.

The Triangle: 9/10.
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Turbulent Triangle
megan_chatterton1 May 2022
Four people are hired by a billionaire to investigate missing ships and discover a military project that has ripped a hole in space-time. This was pretty good for a 2000s SciFi Channel production. As far as length, I'm not sure it needed to be a miniseries. Pacing is probably its weakness.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
formulaic and a wasted opportunity
jamie_shares28 September 2006
Potentially quite good, but thoroughly ruined by lack of attention to storyline and development of characters. Clearly trying to capitalise on the success of Sci-Fi driven drama such as Lost/Invasion, but unfortunately forgetting to get the basics right. Eric Stolz and Sam Neill are both good actors. However, the dialogue they had to spout was glib nonsense and they knew it. Really disappointed with the cliché, disjointed storytelling and embarrassing script. Lost the will to live after 3 episodes...CGI special effects not particularly convincing and attention to detail very poor. The climax was confusing and the pseudo-science behind it very vague. Was it a weapon? Who was developing it? Who cares?
16 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
creepy fun, saved by the actors
Juliette20055 December 2005
I'm not usually a 'sci-fi' kind of fan, I came to this quite frankly because there was nothing else on, and I was taken with it. It's haunted and very funny, I think in an intentional way (one line, describing a billionaire- 'he's the anti-Trump, no publicist, no parties, no public profile').

The actors rise considerably far above the material. Particularly Sam Neill, Eric Stoltz, and Bruce Davison, who all infuse their potentially one-dimensional roles with plenty of good stuff. My main gripe was with the plot, which is pretty convoluted, and didn't really become much more focused over the course of the next two episodes.

It was wonderful to see such fine Independent film actors tear up a script. They added depth and feeling to parts that normally would have none, and it became more noticeable as the mini-series went on and other actors came in and did not add that depth.

The director had a sure hand, and did a wonderful job not only with the actors but in creating a world that looks familiar, but can't possibly exist.

The music wasn't to my taste, but the photography was expertly done, there was clearly a great deal of thought and production value put into this film.

I'm hoping they'll make another one, perhaps turn this into a series, I think it may work even better as a one hour weekly adventure story.

All in all, worth a watch.
72 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good idea, but...
scotthofland26 February 2022
Intriguing story, but told poorly. This show provides an explanation for disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle. Gotta hand it to 'em, it's pretty clever at times. Acting varies from good to mediocre, and the editing leaves a lot to be desired, but the story does eventually progress. Special effects are kinda B-movie grade. This show is on a par with A Sound Of Thunder. Worth a watch for Sci-fi fans.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Builds to a climax; then crashes and burns
markbarnette8 December 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The mini-series begins promisingly enough, sets the initial plot well and the acting was excellent. I would disagree with others, though, that the director did a wonderful job. If this man knows the sci-fi genre he sure hid it well. The further we get into the story, the most lost he becomes; superfluous characters, pointless dialog, and increasingly inconsistent story lines.

The writers also don't seem to understand even the most basic concept of continuity. For those who watched the show, I have one question: why did these six characters in the show -- and seemingly only those six characters -- have any awareness of the different realities? For that matter, why should they? The writers and director make no effort to explain why these characters should be so privileged.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good late-night B-movie
Josef_Schweik10 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Sort of like The Langoliers, or the Final Countdown, or Matrix. Multiple timelines interlace with each other, mixing up events and people's destinies. In the end the "good timeline" prevails :)
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed